user/sven/linux.git, branch v3.10.30

Linux 3.10.30

2014-02-13T21:48:15Z

intel_pstate: Correct calculation of min pstate value

2014-02-13T21:48:04Z

commit 7244cb62d96e735847dc9d08f870550df896898c upstream. The minimum pstate is supposed to be a percentage of the maximum P state available. Calculate min using max pstate and not the current max which may have been limited by the user Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

intel_pstate: Improve accuracy by not truncating until final result

2014-02-13T21:48:04Z

commit d253d2a52676cfa3d89b8f0737a08ce7db665207 upstream. This patch addresses Bug 60727 (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60727) which was due to the truncation of intermediate values in the calculations, which causes the code to consistently underestimate the current cpu frequency, specifically 100% cpu utilization was truncated down to the setpoint of 97%. This patch fixes the problem by keeping the results of all intermediate calculations as fixed point numbers rather scaling them back and forth between integers and fixed point. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60727 Signed-off-by: Brennan Shacklett Acked-by: Dirk Brandewie Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

intel_pstate: fix no_turbo

2014-02-13T21:48:04Z

commit 1ccf7a1cdafadd02e33e8f3d74370685a0600ec6 upstream. When sysfs for no_turbo is set, then also some p states in turbo regions are observed. This patch will set IDA Engage bit when no_turbo is set to explicitly disengage turbo. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada Acked-by: Dirk Brandewie Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

intel_pstate: Add Haswell CPU models

2014-02-13T21:48:04Z

commit 6cdcdb793791f776ea9408581b1242b636d43b37 upstream. Enable the intel_pstate driver for Haswell CPUs. One missing Ivy Bridge model (0x3E) is also included. Models referenced from tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.c:has_nehalem_turbo_ratio_limit Signed-off-by: Nell Hardcastle Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Acked-by: Dirk Brandewie Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

timekeeping: Avoid possible deadlock from clock_was_set_delayed

2014-02-13T21:48:04Z

commit 6fdda9a9c5db367130cf32df5d6618d08b89f46a upstream. As part of normal operaions, the hrtimer subsystem frequently calls into the timekeeping code, creating a locking order of hrtimer locks -> timekeeping locks clock_was_set_delayed() was suppoed to allow us to avoid deadlocks between the timekeeping the hrtimer subsystem, so that we could notify the hrtimer subsytem the time had changed while holding the timekeeping locks. This was done by scheduling delayed work that would run later once we were out of the timekeeing code. But unfortunately the lock chains are complex enoguh that in scheduling delayed work, we end up eventually trying to grab an hrtimer lock. Sasha Levin noticed this in testing when the new seqlock lockdep enablement triggered the following (somewhat abrieviated) message: [ 251.100221] ====================================================== [ 251.100221] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 251.100221] 3.13.0-rc2-next-20131206-sasha-00005-g8be2375-dirty #4053 Not tainted [ 251.101967] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 251.101967] kworker/10:1/4506 is trying to acquire lock: [ 251.101967] (timekeeper_seq){----..}, at: [] retrigger_next_event+0x56/0x70 [ 251.101967] [ 251.101967] but task is already holding lock: [ 251.101967] (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}, at: [] retrigger_next_event+0x3c/0x70 [ 251.101967] [ 251.101967] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 251.101967] [ 251.101967] [ 251.101967] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 251.101967] -> #5 (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}: [snipped] -> #4 (&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock){-.-...}: [snipped] -> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}: [snipped] -> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}: [snipped] -> #1 (&(&pool->lock)->rlock){-.-...}: [ 251.101967] [] validate_chain+0x6c3/0x7b0 [ 251.101967] [] __lock_acquire+0x4ad/0x580 [ 251.101967] [] lock_acquire+0x182/0x1d0 [ 251.101967] [] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80 [ 251.101967] [] __queue_work+0x1a9/0x3f0 [ 251.101967] [] queue_work_on+0x98/0x120 [ 251.101967] [] clock_was_set_delayed+0x21/0x30 [ 251.101967] [] do_adjtimex+0x111/0x160 [ 251.101967] [] compat_sys_adjtimex+0x41/0x70 [ 251.101967] [] ia32_sysret+0x0/0x5 [ 251.101967] -> #0 (timekeeper_seq){----..}: [snipped] [ 251.101967] other info that might help us debug this: [ 251.101967] [ 251.101967] Chain exists of: timekeeper_seq --> &rt_b->rt_runtime_lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock#11 [ 251.101967] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 251.101967] [ 251.101967] CPU0 CPU1 [ 251.101967] ---- ---- [ 251.101967] lock(hrtimer_bases.lock#11); [ 251.101967] lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock); [ 251.101967] lock(hrtimer_bases.lock#11); [ 251.101967] lock(timekeeper_seq); [ 251.101967] [ 251.101967] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 251.101967] [ 251.101967] 3 locks held by kworker/10:1/4506: [ 251.101967] #0: (events){.+.+.+}, at: [] process_one_work+0x200/0x530 [ 251.101967] #1: (hrtimer_work){+.+...}, at: [] process_one_work+0x200/0x530 [ 251.101967] #2: (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}, at: [] retrigger_next_event+0x3c/0x70 [ 251.101967] [ 251.101967] stack backtrace: [ 251.101967] CPU: 10 PID: 4506 Comm: kworker/10:1 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc2-next-20131206-sasha-00005-g8be2375-dirty #4053 [ 251.101967] Workqueue: events clock_was_set_work So the best solution is to avoid calling clock_was_set_delayed() while holding the timekeeping lock, and instead using a flag variable to decide if we should call clock_was_set() once we've released the locks. This works for the case here, where the do_adjtimex() was the deadlock trigger point. Unfortuantely, in update_wall_time() we still hold the jiffies lock, which would deadlock with the ipi triggered by clock_was_set(), preventing us from calling it even after we drop the timekeeping lock. So instead call clock_was_set_delayed() at that point. Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Prarit Bhargava Cc: Richard Cochran Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Sasha Levin Reported-by: Sasha Levin Tested-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rtc-cmos: Add an alarm disable quirk

2014-02-13T21:48:03Z

commit d5a1c7e3fc38d9c7d629e1e47f32f863acbdec3d upstream. 41c7f7424259f ("rtc: Disable the alarm in the hardware (v2)") added the functionality to disable the RTC wake alarm when shutting down the box. However, there are at least two b0rked BIOSes we know about: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812592 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805740 where, when wakeup alarm is enabled in the BIOS, the machine reboots automatically right after shutdown, regardless of what wakeup time is programmed. Bisecting the issue lead to this patch so disable its functionality with a DMI quirk only for those boxes. Cc: Brecht Machiels Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: John Stultz Cc: Rabin Vincent Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov [jstultz: Changed variable name for clarity, added extra dmi entry] Tested-by: Brecht Machiels Tested-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

timekeeping: Fix missing timekeeping_update in suspend path

2014-02-13T21:48:03Z

commit 330a1617b0a6268d427aa5922c94d082b1d3e96d upstream. Since 48cdc135d4840 (Implement a shadow timekeeper), we have to call timekeeping_update() after any adjustment to the timekeeping structure in order to make sure that any adjustments to the structure persist. In the timekeeping suspend path, we udpate the timekeeper structure, so we should be sure to update the shadow-timekeeper before releasing the timekeeping locks. Currently this isn't done. In most cases, the next time related code to run would be timekeeping_resume, which does update the shadow-timekeeper, but in an abundence of caution, this patch adds the call to timekeeping_update() in the suspend path. Cc: Sasha Levin Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Prarit Bhargava Cc: Richard Cochran Cc: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

timekeeping: Fix CLOCK_TAI timer/nanosleep delays

2014-02-13T21:48:03Z

commit 04005f6011e3b504cd4d791d9769f7cb9a3b2eae upstream. A think-o in the calculation of the monotonic -> tai time offset results in CLOCK_TAI timers and nanosleeps to expire late (the latency is ~2x the tai offset). Fix this by adding the tai offset from the realtime offset instead of subtracting. Cc: Sasha Levin Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Prarit Bhargava Cc: Richard Cochran Cc: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

timekeeping: Fix lost updates to tai adjustment

2014-02-13T21:48:03Z

commit f55c07607a38f84b5c7e6066ee1cfe433fa5643c upstream. Since 48cdc135d4840 (Implement a shadow timekeeper), we have to call timekeeping_update() after any adjustment to the timekeeping structure in order to make sure that any adjustments to the structure persist. Unfortunately, the updates to the tai offset via adjtimex do not trigger this update, causing adjustments to the tai offset to be made and then over-written by the previous value at the next update_wall_time() call. This patch resovles the issue by calling timekeeping_update() right after setting the tai offset. Cc: Sasha Levin Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Prarit Bhargava Cc: Richard Cochran Cc: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman