user/sven/linux.git, branch v4.14.57

Linux 4.14.57

2018-07-22T12:28:52Z

string: drop __must_check from strscpy() and restore strscpy() usages in cgroup

2018-07-22T12:28:52Z

commit 08a77676f9c5fc69a681ccd2cd8140e65dcb26c7 upstream. e7fd37ba1217 ("cgroup: avoid copying strings longer than the buffers") converted possibly unsafe strncpy() usages in cgroup to strscpy(). However, although the callsites are completely fine with truncated copied, because strscpy() is marked __must_check, it led to the following warnings. kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c: In function ‘cgroup_file_name’: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:1400:10: warning: ignoring return value of ‘strscpy’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result] strscpy(buf, cft->name, CGROUP_FILE_NAME_MAX); ^ To avoid the warnings, 50034ed49645 ("cgroup: use strlcpy() instead of strscpy() to avoid spurious warning") switched them to strlcpy(). strlcpy() is worse than strlcpy() because it unconditionally runs strlen() on the source string, and the only reason we switched to strlcpy() here was because it was lacking __must_check, which doesn't reflect any material differences between the two function. It's just that someone added __must_check to strscpy() and not to strlcpy(). These basic string copy operations are used in variety of ways, and one of not-so-uncommon use cases is safely handling truncated copies, where the caller naturally doesn't care about the return value. The __must_check doesn't match the actual use cases and forces users to opt for inferior variants which lack __must_check by happenstance or spread ugly (void) casts. Remove __must_check from strscpy() and restore strscpy() usages in cgroup. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ma Shimiao Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Chris Metcalf [backport only the string.h portion to remove build warnings starting to show up - gregkh] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: KVM: Add ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 discovery through ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID

2018-07-22T12:28:52Z

commit 5d81f7dc9bca4f4963092433e27b508cbe524a32 upstream. Now that all our infrastructure is in place, let's expose the availability of ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 to guests. We take this opportunity to tidy up a couple of SMCCC constants. Acked-by: Christoffer Dall Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: KVM: Handle guest's ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 requests

2018-07-22T12:28:51Z

commit b4f18c063a13dfb33e3a63fe1844823e19c2265e upstream. In order to forward the guest's ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 calls to EL3, add a small(-ish) sequence to handle it at EL2. Special care must be taken to track the state of the guest itself by updating the workaround flags. We also rely on patching to enable calls into the firmware. Note that since we need to execute branches, this always executes after the Spectre-v2 mitigation has been applied. Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: KVM: Add ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 support for guests

2018-07-22T12:28:51Z

commit 55e3748e8902ff641e334226bdcb432f9a5d78d3 upstream. In order to offer ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 support to guests, we need a bit of infrastructure. Let's add a flag indicating whether or not the guest uses SSBD mitigation. Depending on the state of this flag, allow KVM to disable ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 before entering the guest, and enable it when exiting it. Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: KVM: Add HYP per-cpu accessors

2018-07-22T12:28:51Z

commit 85478bab409171de501b719971fd25a3d5d639f9 upstream. As we're going to require to access per-cpu variables at EL2, let's craft the minimum set of accessors required to implement reading a per-cpu variable, relying on tpidr_el2 to contain the per-cpu offset. Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: ssbd: Add prctl interface for per-thread mitigation

2018-07-22T12:28:51Z

commit 9cdc0108baa8ef87c76ed834619886a46bd70cbe upstream. If running on a system that performs dynamic SSBD mitigation, allow userspace to request the mitigation for itself. This is implemented as a prctl call, allowing the mitigation to be enabled or disabled at will for this particular thread. Acked-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: ssbd: Introduce thread flag to control userspace mitigation

2018-07-22T12:28:51Z

commit 9dd9614f5476687abbff8d4b12cd08ae70d7c2ad upstream. In order to allow userspace to be mitigated on demand, let's introduce a new thread flag that prevents the mitigation from being turned off when exiting to userspace, and doesn't turn it on on entry into the kernel (with the assumption that the mitigation is always enabled in the kernel itself). This will be used by a prctl interface introduced in a later patch. Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Acked-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: ssbd: Restore mitigation status on CPU resume

2018-07-22T12:28:51Z

commit 647d0519b53f440a55df163de21c52a8205431cc upstream. On a system where firmware can dynamically change the state of the mitigation, the CPU will always come up with the mitigation enabled, including when coming back from suspend. If the user has requested "no mitigation" via a command line option, let's enforce it by calling into the firmware again to disable it. Similarily, for a resume from hibernate, the mitigation could have been disabled by the boot kernel. Let's ensure that it is set back on in that case. Acked-by: Will Deacon Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: ssbd: Skip apply_ssbd if not using dynamic mitigation

2018-07-22T12:28:51Z

commit 986372c4367f46b34a3c0f6918d7fb95cbdf39d6 upstream. In order to avoid checking arm64_ssbd_callback_required on each kernel entry/exit even if no mitigation is required, let's add yet another alternative that by default jumps over the mitigation, and that gets nop'ed out if we're doing dynamic mitigation. Think of it as a poor man's static key... Reviewed-by: Julien Grall Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Acked-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman