user/sven/linux.git, branch v4.17.9

Linux 4.17.9

2018-07-22T13:16:09Z

bpf: undo prog rejection on read-only lock failure

2018-07-22T13:16:09Z

commit 85782e037f8aba8922dadb24a1523ca0b82ab8bc upstream. Partially undo commit 9facc336876f ("bpf: reject any prog that failed read-only lock") since it caused a regression, that is, syzkaller was able to manage to cause a panic via fault injection deep in set_memory_ro() path by letting an allocation fail: In x86's __change_page_attr_set_clr() it was able to change the attributes of the primary mapping but not in the alias mapping via cpa_process_alias(), so the second, inner call to the __change_page_attr() via __change_page_attr_set_clr() had to split a larger page and failed in the alloc_pages() with the artifically triggered allocation error which is then propagated down to the call site. Thus, for set_memory_ro() this means that it returned with an error, but from debugging a probe_kernel_write() revealed EFAULT on that memory since the primary mapping succeeded to get changed. Therefore the subsequent hdr->locked = 0 reset triggered the panic as it was performed on read-only memory, so call-site assumptions were infact wrong to assume that it would either succeed /or/ not succeed at all since there's no such rollback in set_memory_*() calls from partial change of mappings, in other words, we're left in a state that is "half done". A later undo via set_memory_rw() is succeeding though due to matching permissions on that part (aka due to the try_preserve_large_page() succeeding). While reproducing locally with explicitly triggering this error, the initial splitting only happens on rare occasions and in real world it would additionally need oom conditions, but that said, it could partially fail. Therefore, it is definitely wrong to bail out on set_memory_ro() error and reject the program with the set_memory_*() semantics we have today. Shouldn't have gone the extra mile since no other user in tree today infact checks for any set_memory_*() errors, e.g. neither module_enable_ro() / module_disable_ro() for module RO/NX handling which is mostly default these days nor kprobes core with alloc_insn_page() / free_insn_page() as examples that could be invoked long after bootup and original 314beb9bcabf ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks") did neither when it got first introduced to BPF so "improving" with bailing out was clearly not right when set_memory_*() cannot handle it today. Kees suggested that if set_memory_*() can fail, we should annotate it with __must_check, and all callers need to deal with it gracefully given those set_memory_*() markings aren't "advisory", but they're expected to actually do what they say. This might be an option worth to move forward in future but would at the same time require that set_memory_*() calls from supporting archs are guaranteed to be "atomic" in that they provide rollback if part of the range fails, once that happened, the transition from RW -> RO could be made more robust that way, while subsequent RO -> RW transition /must/ continue guaranteeing to always succeed the undo part. Reported-by: syzbot+a4eb8c7766952a1ca872@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+d866d1925855328eac3b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 9facc336876f ("bpf: reject any prog that failed read-only lock") Cc: Laura Abbott Cc: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf, arm32: fix to use bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro api

2018-07-22T13:16:08Z

commit 18d405af30bf6506bf2fc49056de7691c949812e upstream. Any eBPF JIT that where its underlying arch supports ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY would need to use bpf_jit_binary_{un,}lock_ro() pair instead of the set_memory_{ro,rw}() pair directly as otherwise changes to the former might break. arm32's eBPF conversion missed to change it, so fix this up here. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: enforce correct alignment for instructions

2018-07-22T13:16:08Z

commit 9262478220eac908ae6e168c3df2c453c87e2da3 upstream. After commit 9facc336876f ("bpf: reject any prog that failed read-only lock") offsetof(struct bpf_binary_header, image) became 3 instead of 4, breaking powerpc BPF badly, since instructions need to be word aligned. Fixes: 9facc336876f ("bpf: reject any prog that failed read-only lock") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Martin KaFai Lau Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: KVM: Add ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 discovery through ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID

2018-07-22T13:16:08Z

commit 5d81f7dc9bca4f4963092433e27b508cbe524a32 upstream. Now that all our infrastructure is in place, let's expose the availability of ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 to guests. We take this opportunity to tidy up a couple of SMCCC constants. Acked-by: Christoffer Dall Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: KVM: Handle guest's ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 requests

2018-07-22T13:16:08Z

commit b4f18c063a13dfb33e3a63fe1844823e19c2265e upstream. In order to forward the guest's ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 calls to EL3, add a small(-ish) sequence to handle it at EL2. Special care must be taken to track the state of the guest itself by updating the workaround flags. We also rely on patching to enable calls into the firmware. Note that since we need to execute branches, this always executes after the Spectre-v2 mitigation has been applied. Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: KVM: Add ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 support for guests

2018-07-22T13:16:08Z

commit 55e3748e8902ff641e334226bdcb432f9a5d78d3 upstream. In order to offer ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 support to guests, we need a bit of infrastructure. Let's add a flag indicating whether or not the guest uses SSBD mitigation. Depending on the state of this flag, allow KVM to disable ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 before entering the guest, and enable it when exiting it. Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: KVM: Add HYP per-cpu accessors

2018-07-22T13:16:08Z

commit 85478bab409171de501b719971fd25a3d5d639f9 upstream. As we're going to require to access per-cpu variables at EL2, let's craft the minimum set of accessors required to implement reading a per-cpu variable, relying on tpidr_el2 to contain the per-cpu offset. Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: ssbd: Add prctl interface for per-thread mitigation

2018-07-22T13:16:08Z

commit 9cdc0108baa8ef87c76ed834619886a46bd70cbe upstream. If running on a system that performs dynamic SSBD mitigation, allow userspace to request the mitigation for itself. This is implemented as a prctl call, allowing the mitigation to be enabled or disabled at will for this particular thread. Acked-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: ssbd: Introduce thread flag to control userspace mitigation

2018-07-22T13:16:08Z

commit 9dd9614f5476687abbff8d4b12cd08ae70d7c2ad upstream. In order to allow userspace to be mitigated on demand, let's introduce a new thread flag that prevents the mitigation from being turned off when exiting to userspace, and doesn't turn it on on entry into the kernel (with the assumption that the mitigation is always enabled in the kernel itself). This will be used by a prctl interface introduced in a later patch. Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Acked-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman