user/sven/linux.git, branch v4.19.200

Linux 4.19.200

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210729135137.260993951@linuxfoundation.org Tested-by: Jon Hunter Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Tested-by: Shuah Khan Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ARM: dts: versatile: Fix up interrupt controller node names

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit 82a1c67554dff610d6be4e1982c425717b3c6a23 ] Once the new schema interrupt-controller/arm,vic.yaml is added, we get the below warnings: arch/arm/boot/dts/versatile-ab.dt.yaml: intc@10140000: $nodename:0: 'intc@10140000' does not match '^interrupt-controller(@[0-9a-f,]+)*$' arch/arm/boot/dts/versatile-ab.dt.yaml: intc@10140000: 'clear-mask' does not match any of the regexes Fix the node names for the interrupt controller to conform to the standard node name interrupt-controller@.. Also drop invalid clear-mask property. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla Acked-by: Linus Walleij Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210701132118.759454-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com' Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cifs: fix the out of range assignment to bit fields in parse_server_interfaces

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit c9c9c6815f9004ee1ec87401ed0796853bd70f1b ] Because the out of range assignment to bit fields are compiler-dependant, the fields could have wrong value. Signed-off-by: Hyunchul Lee Signed-off-by: Steve French Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

firmware: arm_scmi: Fix range check for the maximum number of pending messages

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit bdb8742dc6f7c599c3d61959234fe4c23638727b ] SCMI message headers carry a sequence number and such field is sized to allow for MSG_TOKEN_MAX distinct numbers; moreover zero is not really an acceptable maximum number of pending in-flight messages. Fix accordingly the checks performed on the value exported by transports in scmi_desc.max_msg Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210712141833.6628-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reported-by: Vincent Guittot Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi [sudeep.holla: updated the patch title and error message] Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

firmware: arm_scmi: Fix possible scmi_linux_errmap buffer overflow

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit 7a691f16ccad05d770f813d9c4b4337a30c6d63f ] The scmi_linux_errmap buffer access index is supposed to depend on the array size to prevent element out of bounds access. It uses SCMI_ERR_MAX to check bounds but that can mismatch with the array size. It also changes the success into -EIO though scmi_linux_errmap is never used in case of success, it is expected to work for success case too. It is slightly confusing code as the negative of the error code is used as index to the buffer. Fix it by negating it at the start and make it more readable. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210707135028.1869642-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

hfs: add lock nesting notation to hfs_find_init

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit b3b2177a2d795e35dc11597b2609eb1e7e57e570 ] Syzbot reports a possible recursive lock in [1]. This happens due to missing lock nesting information. From the logs, we see that a call to hfs_fill_super is made to mount the hfs filesystem. While searching for the root inode, the lock on the catalog btree is grabbed. Then, when the parent of the root isn't found, a call to __hfs_bnode_create is made to create the parent of the root. This eventually leads to a call to hfs_ext_read_extent which grabs a lock on the extents btree. Since the order of locking is catalog btree -> extents btree, this lock hierarchy does not lead to a deadlock. To tell lockdep that this locking is safe, we add nesting notation to distinguish between catalog btrees, extents btrees, and attributes btrees (for HFS+). This has already been done in hfsplus. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f007ef1d7a31a469e3be7aeb0fde0769b18585db [1] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701030756.58760-4-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi Reported-by: syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: Al Viro Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva Cc: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

hfs: fix high memory mapping in hfs_bnode_read

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit 54a5ead6f5e2b47131a7385d0c0af18e7b89cb02 ] Pages that we read in hfs_bnode_read need to be kmapped into kernel address space. However, currently only the 0th page is kmapped. If the given offset + length exceeds this 0th page, then we have an invalid memory access. To fix this, we kmap relevant pages one by one and copy their relevant portions of data. An example of invalid memory access occurring without this fix can be seen in the following crash report: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in memcpy include/linux/fortify-string.h:191 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in hfs_bnode_read+0xc4/0xe0 fs/hfs/bnode.c:26 Read of size 2 at addr ffff888125fdcffe by task syz-executor5/4634 CPU: 0 PID: 4634 Comm: syz-executor5 Not tainted 5.13.0-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline] dump_stack+0x195/0x1f8 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1d/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:233 __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:419 [inline] kasan_report.cold+0x7b/0xd4 mm/kasan/report.c:436 check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:180 [inline] kasan_check_range+0x154/0x1b0 mm/kasan/generic.c:186 memcpy+0x24/0x60 mm/kasan/shadow.c:65 memcpy include/linux/fortify-string.h:191 [inline] hfs_bnode_read+0xc4/0xe0 fs/hfs/bnode.c:26 hfs_bnode_read_u16 fs/hfs/bnode.c:34 [inline] hfs_bnode_find+0x880/0xcc0 fs/hfs/bnode.c:365 hfs_brec_find+0x2d8/0x540 fs/hfs/bfind.c:126 hfs_brec_read+0x27/0x120 fs/hfs/bfind.c:165 hfs_cat_find_brec+0x19a/0x3b0 fs/hfs/catalog.c:194 hfs_fill_super+0xc13/0x1460 fs/hfs/super.c:419 mount_bdev+0x331/0x3f0 fs/super.c:1368 hfs_mount+0x35/0x40 fs/hfs/super.c:457 legacy_get_tree+0x10c/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:592 vfs_get_tree+0x93/0x300 fs/super.c:1498 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2905 [inline] path_mount+0x13f5/0x20e0 fs/namespace.c:3235 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3248 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3456 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3433 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x2b8/0x340 fs/namespace.c:3433 do_syscall_64+0x37/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:47 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x45e63a Code: 48 c7 c2 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb d2 e8 88 04 00 00 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f9404d410d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000020000248 RCX: 000000000045e63a RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000020000100 RDI: 00007f9404d41120 RBP: 00007f9404d41120 R08: 00000000200002c0 R09: 0000000020000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00000000004ad5d8 R15: 0000000000000000 The buggy address belongs to the page: page:00000000dadbcf3e refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x1 pfn:0x125fdc flags: 0x2fffc0000000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x3fff) raw: 02fffc0000000000 ffffea000497f748 ffffea000497f6c8 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff888125fdce80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ffff888125fdcf00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >ffff888125fdcf80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ ffff888125fdd000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ffff888125fdd080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ================================================================== Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701030756.58760-3-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: Al Viro Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva Cc: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

hfs: add missing clean-up in hfs_fill_super

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit 16ee572eaf0d09daa4c8a755fdb71e40dbf8562d ] Patch series "hfs: fix various errors", v2. This series ultimately aims to address a lockdep warning in hfs_find_init reported by Syzbot [1]. The work done for this led to the discovery of another bug, and the Syzkaller repro test also reveals an invalid memory access error after clearing the lockdep warning. Hence, this series is broken up into three patches: 1. Add a missing call to hfs_find_exit for an error path in hfs_fill_super 2. Fix memory mapping in hfs_bnode_read by fixing calls to kmap 3. Add lock nesting notation to tell lockdep that the observed locking hierarchy is safe This patch (of 3): Before exiting hfs_fill_super, the struct hfs_find_data used in hfs_find_init should be passed to hfs_find_exit to be cleaned up, and to release the lock held on the btree. The call to hfs_find_exit is missing from an error path. We add it back in by consolidating calls to hfs_find_exit for error paths. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f007ef1d7a31a469e3be7aeb0fde0769b18585db [1] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701030756.58760-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701030756.58760-2-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva Cc: Al Viro Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sctp: move 198 addresses from unusable to private scope

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit 1d11fa231cabeae09a95cb3e4cf1d9dd34e00f08 ] The doc draft-stewart-tsvwg-sctp-ipv4-00 that restricts 198 addresses was never published. These addresses as private addresses should be allowed to use in SCTP. As Michael Tuexen suggested, this patch is to move 198 addresses from unusable to private scope. Reported-by: Sérgio Signed-off-by: Xin Long Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net: annotate data race around sk_ll_usec

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit 0dbffbb5335a1e3aa6855e4ee317e25e669dd302 ] sk_ll_usec is read locklessly from sk_can_busy_loop() while another thread can change its value in sock_setsockopt() This is correct but needs annotations. BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __skb_try_recv_datagram / sock_setsockopt write to 0xffff88814eb5f904 of 4 bytes by task 14011 on cpu 0: sock_setsockopt+0x1287/0x2090 net/core/sock.c:1175 __sys_setsockopt+0x14f/0x200 net/socket.c:2100 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2115 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2112 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x62/0x70 net/socket.c:2112 do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:47 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae read to 0xffff88814eb5f904 of 4 bytes by task 14001 on cpu 1: sk_can_busy_loop include/net/busy_poll.h:41 [inline] __skb_try_recv_datagram+0x14f/0x320 net/core/datagram.c:273 unix_dgram_recvmsg+0x14c/0x870 net/unix/af_unix.c:2101 unix_seqpacket_recvmsg+0x5a/0x70 net/unix/af_unix.c:2067 ____sys_recvmsg+0x15d/0x310 include/linux/uio.h:244 ___sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2598 [inline] do_recvmmsg+0x35c/0x9f0 net/socket.c:2692 __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2771 [inline] __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2794 [inline] __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2787 [inline] __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0xcf/0x150 net/socket.c:2787 do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:47 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae value changed: 0x00000000 -> 0x00000101 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 1 PID: 14001 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.13.0-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin