user/sven/linux.git, branch v5.4.143

Linux 5.4.143

2021-08-26T12:55:22Z

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee Tested-by: Hulk Robot Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Tested-by: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

netfilter: nft_exthdr: fix endianness of tcp option cast

2021-08-26T12:36:22Z

[ Upstream commit 2e34328b396a69b73661ba38d47d92b7cf21c2c4 ] I got a problem on MIPS with Big-Endian is turned on: every time when NF trying to change TCP MSS it returns because of new.v16 was greater than old.v16. But real MSS was 1460 and my rule was like this: add rule table chain tcp option maxseg size set 1400 And 1400 is lesser that 1460, not greater. Later I founded that main causer is cast from u32 to __be16. Debugging: In example MSS = 1400(HEX: 0x578). Here is representation of each byte like it is in memory by addresses from left to right(e.g. [0x0 0x1 0x2 0x3]). LE — Little-Endian system, BE — Big-Endian, left column is type. LE BE u32: [78 05 00 00] [00 00 05 78] As you can see, u32 representation will be casted to u16 from different half of 4-byte address range. But actually nf_tables uses registers and store data of various size. Actually TCP MSS stored in 2 bytes. But registers are still u32 in definition: struct nft_regs { union { u32 data[20]; struct nft_verdict verdict; }; }; So, access like regs->data[priv->sreg] exactly u32. So, according to table presents above, per-byte representation of stored TCP MSS in register will be: LE BE (u32)regs->data[]: [78 05 00 00] [05 78 00 00] ^^ ^^ We see that register uses just half of u32 and other 2 bytes may be used for some another data. But in nft_exthdr_tcp_set_eval() it casted just like u32 -> __be16: new.v16 = src But u32 overfill __be16, so it get 2 low bytes. For clarity draw one more table( means that bytes will be used for cast). LE BE u32: [<78 05> 00 00] [00 00 <05 78>] (u32)regs->data[]: [<78 05> 00 00] [05 78 <00 00>] As you can see, for Little-Endian nothing changes, but for Big-endian we take the wrong half. In my case there is some other data instead of zeros, so new MSS was wrongly greater. For shooting this bug I used solution for ports ranges. Applying of this patch does not affect Little-Endian systems. Signed-off-by: Sergey Marinkevich Acked-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fs: warn about impending deprecation of mandatory locks

2021-08-26T12:36:22Z

[ Upstream commit fdd92b64d15bc4aec973caa25899afd782402e68 ] We've had CONFIG_MANDATORY_FILE_LOCKING since 2015 and a lot of distros have disabled it. Warn the stragglers that still use "-o mand" that we'll be dropping support for that mount option. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

mm: memcontrol: fix occasional OOMs due to proportional memory.low reclaim

2021-08-26T12:36:22Z

[ Upstream commit f56ce412a59d7d938b81de8878faef128812482c ] We've noticed occasional OOM killing when memory.low settings are in effect for cgroups. This is unexpected and undesirable as memory.low is supposed to express non-OOMing memory priorities between cgroups. The reason for this is proportional memory.low reclaim. When cgroups are below their memory.low threshold, reclaim passes them over in the first round, and then retries if it couldn't find pages anywhere else. But when cgroups are slightly above their memory.low setting, page scan force is scaled down and diminished in proportion to the overage, to the point where it can cause reclaim to fail as well - only in that case we currently don't retry, and instead trigger OOM. To fix this, hook proportional reclaim into the same retry logic we have in place for when cgroups are skipped entirely. This way if reclaim fails and some cgroups were scanned with diminished pressure, we'll try another full-force cycle before giving up and OOMing. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210817180506.220056-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org Fixes: 9783aa9917f8 ("mm, memcg: proportional memory.{low,min} reclaim") Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner Reported-by: Leon Yang Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt Acked-by: Roman Gushchin Acked-by: Chris Down Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: [5.4+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

mm, memcg: avoid stale protection values when cgroup is above protection

2021-08-26T12:36:22Z

[ Upstream commit 22f7496f0b901249f23c5251eb8a10aae126b909 ] Patch series "mm, memcg: memory.{low,min} reclaim fix & cleanup", v4. This series contains a fix for a edge case in my earlier protection calculation patches, and a patch to make the area overall a little more robust to hopefully help avoid this in future. This patch (of 2): A cgroup can have both memory protection and a memory limit to isolate it from its siblings in both directions - for example, to prevent it from being shrunk below 2G under high pressure from outside, but also from growing beyond 4G under low pressure. Commit 9783aa9917f8 ("mm, memcg: proportional memory.{low,min} reclaim") implemented proportional scan pressure so that multiple siblings in excess of their protection settings don't get reclaimed equally but instead in accordance to their unprotected portion. During limit reclaim, this proportionality shouldn't apply of course: there is no competition, all pressure is from within the cgroup and should be applied as such. Reclaim should operate at full efficiency. However, mem_cgroup_protected() never expected anybody to look at the effective protection values when it indicated that the cgroup is above its protection. As a result, a query during limit reclaim may return stale protection values that were calculated by a previous reclaim cycle in which the cgroup did have siblings. When this happens, reclaim is unnecessarily hesitant and potentially slow to meet the desired limit. In theory this could lead to premature OOM kills, although it's not obvious this has occurred in practice. Workaround the problem by special casing reclaim roots in mem_cgroup_protection. These memcgs are never participating in the reclaim protection because the reclaim is internal. We have to ignore effective protection values for reclaim roots because mem_cgroup_protected might be called from racing reclaim contexts with different roots. Calculation is relying on root -> leaf tree traversal therefore top-down reclaim protection invariants should hold. The only exception is the reclaim root which should have effective protection set to 0 but that would be problematic for the following setup: Let's have global and A's reclaim in parallel: | A (low=2G, usage = 3G, max = 3G, children_low_usage = 1.5G) |\ | C (low = 1G, usage = 2.5G) B (low = 1G, usage = 0.5G) for A reclaim we have B.elow = B.low C.elow = C.low For the global reclaim A.elow = A.low B.elow = min(B.usage, B.low) because children_low_usage <= A.elow C.elow = min(C.usage, C.low) With the effective values resetting we have A reclaim A.elow = 0 B.elow = B.low C.elow = C.low and global reclaim could see the above and then B.elow = C.elow = 0 because children_low_usage > A.elow Which means that protected memcgs would get reclaimed. In future we would like to make mem_cgroup_protected more robust against racing reclaim contexts but that is likely more complex solution than this simple workaround. [hannes@cmpxchg.org - large part of the changelog] [mhocko@suse.com - workaround explanation] [chris@chrisdown.name - retitle] Fixes: 9783aa9917f8 ("mm, memcg: proportional memory.{low,min} reclaim") Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao Signed-off-by: Chris Down Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Acked-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Chris Down Acked-by: Roman Gushchin Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1594638158.git.chris@chrisdown.name Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/044fb8ecffd001c7905d27c0c2ad998069fdc396.1594638158.git.chris@chrisdown.name Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ASoC: intel: atom: Fix breakage for PCM buffer address setup

2021-08-26T12:36:21Z

[ Upstream commit 65ca89c2b12cca0d473f3dd54267568ad3af55cc ] The commit 2e6b836312a4 ("ASoC: intel: atom: Fix reference to PCM buffer address") changed the reference of PCM buffer address to substream->runtime->dma_addr as the buffer address may change dynamically. However, I forgot that the dma_addr field is still not set up for the CONTINUOUS buffer type (that this driver uses) yet in 5.14 and earlier kernels, and it resulted in garbage I/O. The problem will be fixed in 5.15, but we need to address it quickly for now. The fix is to deduce the address again from the DMA pointer with virt_to_phys(), but from the right one, substream->runtime->dma_area. Fixes: 2e6b836312a4 ("ASoC: intel: atom: Fix reference to PCM buffer address") Reported-and-tested-by: Hans de Goede Cc: Acked-by: Mark Brown Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2048c6aa-2187-46bd-6772-36a4fb3c5aeb@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819152945.8510-1-tiwai@suse.de Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

PCI: Increase D3 delay for AMD Renoir/Cezanne XHCI

2021-08-26T12:36:21Z

[ Upstream commit e0bff43220925b7e527f9d3bc9f5c624177c959e ] The Renoir XHCI controller apparently doesn't resume reliably with the standard D3hot-to-D0 delay. Increase it to 20ms. [Alex: I talked to the AMD USB hardware team and the AMD Windows team and they are not aware of any HW errata or specific issues. The HW works fine in Windows. I was told Windows uses a rather generous default delay of 100ms for PCI state transitions.] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210722025858.220064-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Marcin Bachry Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mario Limonciello Cc: Prike Liang Cc: Shyam Sundar S K Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: prevent rename2 from exchanging a subvol with a directory from different parents

2021-08-26T12:36:21Z

[ Upstream commit 3f79f6f6247c83f448c8026c3ee16d4636ef8d4f ] Cross-rename lacks a check when that would prevent exchanging a directory and subvolume from different parent subvolume. This causes data inconsistencies and is caught before commit by tree-checker, turning the filesystem to read-only. Calling the renameat2 with RENAME_EXCHANGE flags like renameat2(AT_FDCWD, namesrc, AT_FDCWD, namedest, (1 << 1)) on two paths: namesrc = dir1/subvol1/dir2 namedest = subvol2/subvol3 will cause key order problem with following write time tree-checker report: [1194842.307890] BTRFS critical (device loop1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=27574272 slot=10 ino=258, invalid previous key objectid, have 257 expect 258 [1194842.322221] BTRFS info (device loop1): leaf 27574272 gen 8 total ptrs 11 free space 15444 owner 5 [1194842.331562] BTRFS info (device loop1): refs 2 lock_owner 0 current 26561 [1194842.338772] item 0 key (256 1 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 [1194842.338793] inode generation 3 size 16 mode 40755 [1194842.338801] item 1 key (256 12 256) itemoff 16111 itemsize 12 [1194842.338809] item 2 key (256 84 2248503653) itemoff 16077 itemsize 34 [1194842.338817] dir oid 258 type 2 [1194842.338823] item 3 key (256 84 2363071922) itemoff 16043 itemsize 34 [1194842.338830] dir oid 257 type 2 [1194842.338836] item 4 key (256 96 2) itemoff 16009 itemsize 34 [1194842.338843] item 5 key (256 96 3) itemoff 15975 itemsize 34 [1194842.338852] item 6 key (257 1 0) itemoff 15815 itemsize 160 [1194842.338863] inode generation 6 size 8 mode 40755 [1194842.338869] item 7 key (257 12 256) itemoff 15801 itemsize 14 [1194842.338876] item 8 key (257 84 2505409169) itemoff 15767 itemsize 34 [1194842.338883] dir oid 256 type 2 [1194842.338888] item 9 key (257 96 2) itemoff 15733 itemsize 34 [1194842.338895] item 10 key (258 12 256) itemoff 15719 itemsize 14 [1194842.339163] BTRFS error (device loop1): block=27574272 write time tree block corruption detected [1194842.339245] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1194842.443422] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 26561 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:449 csum_one_extent_buffer+0xed/0x100 [btrfs] [1194842.511863] CPU: 6 PID: 26561 Comm: kworker/u17:2 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc3-git+ #793 [1194842.511870] Hardware name: empty empty/S3993, BIOS PAQEX0-3 02/24/2008 [1194842.511876] Workqueue: btrfs-worker-high btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [1194842.511976] RIP: 0010:csum_one_extent_buffer+0xed/0x100 [btrfs] [1194842.512068] RSP: 0018:ffffa2c284d77da0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [1194842.512074] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: ffff928867bd9978 [1194842.512078] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff928867bd9970 [1194842.512081] RBP: ffff92876b958000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00000000000c0003 [1194842.512085] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 [1194842.512088] R13: ffff92875f989f98 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [1194842.512092] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff928867a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1194842.512095] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1194842.512099] CR2: 000055f5384da1f0 CR3: 0000000102fe4000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [1194842.512103] Call Trace: [1194842.512128] ? run_one_async_free+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] [1194842.631729] btree_csum_one_bio+0x1ac/0x1d0 [btrfs] [1194842.631837] run_one_async_start+0x18/0x30 [btrfs] [1194842.631938] btrfs_work_helper+0xd5/0x1d0 [btrfs] [1194842.647482] process_one_work+0x262/0x5e0 [1194842.647520] worker_thread+0x4c/0x320 [1194842.655935] ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [1194842.655946] kthread+0x135/0x160 [1194842.655953] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [1194842.655965] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [1194842.672465] irq event stamp: 1729 [1194842.672469] hardirqs last enabled at (1735): [] console_trylock_spinning+0x185/0x1a0 [1194842.672477] hardirqs last disabled at (1740): [] console_trylock_spinning+0x15c/0x1a0 [1194842.672482] softirqs last enabled at (1666): [] __do_softirq+0x2e1/0x50a [1194842.672491] softirqs last disabled at (1651): [] __irq_exit_rcu+0xa7/0xd0 The corrupted data will not be written, and filesystem can be unmounted and mounted again (all changes since the last commit will be lost). Add the missing check for new_ino so that all non-subvolumes must reside under the same parent subvolume. There's an exception allowing to exchange two subvolumes from any parents as the directory representing a subvolume is only a logical link and does not have any other structures related to the parent subvolume, unlike files, directories etc, that are always in the inode namespace of the parent subvolume. Fixes: cdd1fedf8261 ("btrfs: add support for RENAME_EXCHANGE and RENAME_WHITEOUT") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ipack: tpci200: fix memory leak in the tpci200_register

2021-08-26T12:36:21Z

[ Upstream commit 50f05bd114a46a74726e432bf81079d3f13a55b7 ] The error handling code in tpci200_register does not free interface_regs allocated by ioremap and the current version of error handling code is problematic. Fix this by refactoring the error handling code and free interface_regs when necessary. Fixes: 43986798fd50 ("ipack: add error handling for ioremap_nocache") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Dongliang Mu Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210810100323.3938492-2-mudongliangabcd@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ipack: tpci200: fix many double free issues in tpci200_pci_probe

2021-08-26T12:36:21Z

[ Upstream commit 57a1681095f912239c7fb4d66683ab0425973838 ] The function tpci200_register called by tpci200_install and tpci200_unregister called by tpci200_uninstall are in pair. However, tpci200_unregister has some cleanup operations not in the tpci200_register. So the error handling code of tpci200_pci_probe has many different double free issues. Fix this problem by moving those cleanup operations out of tpci200_unregister, into tpci200_pci_remove and reverting the previous commit 9272e5d0028d ("ipack/carriers/tpci200: Fix a double free in tpci200_pci_probe"). Fixes: 9272e5d0028d ("ipack/carriers/tpci200: Fix a double free in tpci200_pci_probe") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Dongliang Mu Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210810100323.3938492-1-mudongliangabcd@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin