user/sven/linux.git, branch v6.12.38

Linux 6.12.38

2025-07-14T14:02:59Z

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/CPU/AMD: Properly check the TSA microcode

2025-07-14T14:02:59Z

In order to simplify backports, I resorted to an older version of the microcode revision checking which didn't pull in the whole struct x86_cpu_id matching machinery. My simpler method, however, forgot to add the extended CPU model to the patch revision, which lead to mismatches when determining whether TSA mitigation support is present. So add that forgotten extended model. This is a stable-only fix and the preference is to do it this way because it is a lot simpler. Also, the Fixes: tag below points to the respective stable patch. Fixes: 7a0395f6607a ("x86/bugs: Add a Transient Scheduler Attacks mitigation") Reported-by: Thomas Voegtle Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) Tested-by: Thomas Voegtle Message-ID: <04ea0a8e-edb0-c59e-ce21-5f3d5d167af3@lio96.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Linux 6.12.37

2025-07-10T14:05:15Z

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250708162241.426806072@linuxfoundation.org Tested-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso Tested-by: Mark Brown Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli Tested-by: Ron Economos Tested-by: Jon Hunter Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Tested-by: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/process: Move the buffer clearing before MONITOR

2025-07-10T14:05:14Z

Commit 8e786a85c0a3c0fffae6244733fb576eeabd9dec upstream. Move the VERW clearing before the MONITOR so that VERW doesn't disarm it and the machine never enters C1. Original idea by Kim Phillips . Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/microcode/AMD: Add TSA microcode SHAs

2025-07-10T14:05:14Z

Commit 2329f250e04d3b8e78b36a68b9880ca7750a07ef upstream. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

KVM: SVM: Advertise TSA CPUID bits to guests

2025-07-10T14:05:14Z

Commit 31272abd5974b38ba312e9cf2ec2f09f9dd7dcba upstream. Synthesize the TSA CPUID feature bits for guests. Set TSA_{SQ,L1}_NO on unaffected machines. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/bugs: Add a Transient Scheduler Attacks mitigation

2025-07-10T14:05:14Z

Commit d8010d4ba43e9f790925375a7de100604a5e2dba upstream. Add the required features detection glue to bugs.c et all in order to support the TSA mitigation. Co-developed-by: Kim Phillips Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) Reviewed-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/bugs: Rename MDS machinery to something more generic

2025-07-10T14:05:14Z

Commit f9af88a3d384c8b55beb5dc5483e5da0135fadbd upstream. It will be used by other x86 mitigations. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) Reviewed-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: userfaultfd: fix race of userfaultfd_move and swap cache

2025-07-10T14:05:14Z

commit 0ea148a799198518d8ebab63ddd0bb6114a103bc upstream. This commit fixes two kinds of races, they may have different results: Barry reported a BUG_ON in commit c50f8e6053b0, we may see the same BUG_ON if the filemap lookup returned NULL and folio is added to swap cache after that. If another kind of race is triggered (folio changed after lookup) we may see RSS counter is corrupted: [ 406.893936] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff0000c5a9ddc0 type:MM_ANONPAGES val:-1 [ 406.894071] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff0000c5a9ddc0 type:MM_SHMEMPAGES val:1 Because the folio is being accounted to the wrong VMA. I'm not sure if there will be any data corruption though, seems no. The issues above are critical already. On seeing a swap entry PTE, userfaultfd_move does a lockless swap cache lookup, and tries to move the found folio to the faulting vma. Currently, it relies on checking the PTE value to ensure that the moved folio still belongs to the src swap entry and that no new folio has been added to the swap cache, which turns out to be unreliable. While working and reviewing the swap table series with Barry, following existing races are observed and reproduced [1]: In the example below, move_pages_pte is moving src_pte to dst_pte, where src_pte is a swap entry PTE holding swap entry S1, and S1 is not in the swap cache: CPU1 CPU2 userfaultfd_move move_pages_pte() entry = pte_to_swp_entry(orig_src_pte); // Here it got entry = S1 ... < interrupted> ... // folio A is a new allocated folio // and get installed into src_pte // src_pte now points to folio A, S1 // has swap count == 0, it can be freed // by folio_swap_swap or swap // allocator's reclaim. // folio B is a folio in another VMA. // S1 is freed, folio B can use it // for swap out with no problem. ... folio = filemap_get_folio(S1) // Got folio B here !!! ... < interrupted again> ... // Now S1 is free to be used again. // Now src_pte is a swap entry PTE // holding S1 again. folio_trylock(folio) move_swap_pte double_pt_lock is_pte_pages_stable // Check passed because src_pte == S1 folio_move_anon_rmap(...) // Moved invalid folio B here !!! The race window is very short and requires multiple collisions of multiple rare events, so it's very unlikely to happen, but with a deliberately constructed reproducer and increased time window, it can be reproduced easily. This can be fixed by checking if the folio returned by filemap is the valid swap cache folio after acquiring the folio lock. Another similar race is possible: filemap_get_folio may return NULL, but folio (A) could be swapped in and then swapped out again using the same swap entry after the lookup. In such a case, folio (A) may remain in the swap cache, so it must be moved too: CPU1 CPU2 userfaultfd_move move_pages_pte() entry = pte_to_swp_entry(orig_src_pte); // Here it got entry = S1, and S1 is not in swap cache folio = filemap_get_folio(S1) // Got NULL ... < interrupted again> ... move_swap_pte double_pt_lock is_pte_pages_stable // Check passed because src_pte == S1 folio_move_anon_rmap(...) // folio A is ignored !!! Fix this by checking the swap cache again after acquiring the src_pte lock. And to avoid the filemap overhead, we check swap_map directly [2]. The SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO path does make the problem more complex, but so far we don't need to worry about that, since folios can only be exposed to the swap cache in the swap out path, and this is covered in this patch by checking the swap cache again after acquiring the src_pte lock. Testing with a simple C program that allocates and moves several GB of memory did not show any observable performance change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250604151038.21968-1-ryncsn@gmail.com Fixes: adef440691ba ("userfaultfd: UFFDIO_MOVE uABI") Signed-off-by: Kairui Song Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAMgjq7B1K=6OOrK2OUZ0-tqCzi+EJt+2_K97TPGoSt=9+JwP7Q@mail.gmail.com/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAGsJ_4yJhJBo16XhiC-nUzSheyX-V3-nFE+tAi=8Y560K8eT=A@mail.gmail.com/ [2] Reviewed-by: Lokesh Gidra Acked-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan Reviewed-by: Barry Song Reviewed-by: Chris Li Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Kairui Song Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton (cherry picked from commit 0ea148a799198518d8ebab63ddd0bb6114a103bc) [ lokeshgidra: resolved merged conflict caused by the difference in move_swap_pte() arguments ] Signed-off-by: Lokesh Gidra Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/vmalloc: fix data race in show_numa_info()

2025-07-10T14:05:13Z

commit 5c5f0468d172ddec2e333d738d2a1f85402cf0bc upstream. The following data-race was found in show_numa_info(): ================================================================== BUG: KCSAN: data-race in vmalloc_info_show / vmalloc_info_show read to 0xffff88800971fe30 of 4 bytes by task 8289 on cpu 0: show_numa_info mm/vmalloc.c:4936 [inline] vmalloc_info_show+0x5a8/0x7e0 mm/vmalloc.c:5016 seq_read_iter+0x373/0xb40 fs/seq_file.c:230 proc_reg_read_iter+0x11e/0x170 fs/proc/inode.c:299 .... write to 0xffff88800971fe30 of 4 bytes by task 8287 on cpu 1: show_numa_info mm/vmalloc.c:4934 [inline] vmalloc_info_show+0x38f/0x7e0 mm/vmalloc.c:5016 seq_read_iter+0x373/0xb40 fs/seq_file.c:230 proc_reg_read_iter+0x11e/0x170 fs/proc/inode.c:299 .... value changed: 0x0000008f -> 0x00000000 ================================================================== According to this report,there is a read/write data-race because m->private is accessible to multiple CPUs. To fix this, instead of allocating the heap in proc_vmalloc_init() and passing the heap address to m->private, vmalloc_info_show() should allocate the heap. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250508165620.15321-1-aha310510@gmail.com Fixes: 8e1d743f2c26 ("mm: vmalloc: support multiple nodes in vmallocinfo") Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet Suggested-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman