user/sven/linux.git, branch v6.12.43

Linux 6.12.43

2025-08-20T16:30:58Z

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250818124448.879659024@linuxfoundation.org Tested-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield Tested-by: Florian Fainelli Tested-by: Shuah Khan Tested-by: Hardik Garg Tested-by: Peter Schneider Tested-by: Ron Economos Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250819122820.553053307@linuxfoundation.org Tested-by: Peter Schneider Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli Tested-by: Florian Fainelli Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Tested-by: Hardik Garg Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield Tested-by: Brett Mastbergen Tested-by: Jon Hunter Tested-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: Return -ENODEV from acpi_parse_spcr() when SPCR support is disabled

2025-08-20T16:30:58Z

commit b9f58d3572a8e1ef707b941eae58ec4014b9269d upstream. If CONFIG_ACPI_SPCR_TABLE is disabled, acpi_parse_spcr() currently returns 0, which may incorrectly suggest that SPCR parsing was successful. This patch changes the behavior to return -ENODEV to clearly indicate that SPCR support is not available. This prepares the codebase for future changes that depend on acpi_parse_spcr() failure detection, such as suppressing misleading console messages. Signed-off-by: Li Chen Acked-by: Hanjun Guo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250620131309.126555-2-me@linux.beauty Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

PCI: Honor Max Link Speed when determining supported speeds

2025-08-20T16:30:58Z

commit 3202ca221578850f34e0fea39dc6cfa745ed7aac upstream. The Supported Link Speeds Vector in the Link Capabilities 2 Register indicates the *supported* link speeds. The Max Link Speed field in the Link Capabilities Register indicates the *maximum* of those speeds. pcie_get_supported_speeds() neglects to honor the Max Link Speed field and will thus incorrectly deem higher speeds as supported. Fix it. One user-visible issue addressed here is an incorrect value in the sysfs attribute "max_link_speed". But the main motivation is a boot hang reported by Niklas: Intel JHL7540 "Titan Ridge 2018" Thunderbolt controllers supports 2.5-8 GT/s speeds, but indicate 2.5 GT/s as maximum. Ilpo recalls seeing this on more devices. It can be explained by the controller's Downstream Ports supporting 8 GT/s if an Endpoint is attached, but limiting to 2.5 GT/s if the port interfaces to a PCIe Adapter, in accordance with USB4 v2 sec 11.2.1: "This section defines the functionality of an Internal PCIe Port that interfaces to a PCIe Adapter. [...] The Logical sub-block shall update the PCIe configuration registers with the following characteristics: [...] Max Link Speed field in the Link Capabilities Register set to 0001b (data rate of 2.5 GT/s only). Note: These settings do not represent actual throughput. Throughput is implementation specific and based on the USB4 Fabric performance." The present commit is not sufficient on its own to fix Niklas' boot hang, but it is a prerequisite: A subsequent commit will fix the boot hang by enabling bandwidth control only if more than one speed is supported. The GENMASK() macro used herein specifies 0 as lowest bit, even though the Supported Link Speeds Vector ends at bit 1. This is done on purpose to avoid a GENMASK(0, 1) macro if Max Link Speed is zero. That macro would be invalid as the lowest bit is greater than the highest bit. Ilpo has witnessed a zero Max Link Speed on Root Complex Integrated Endpoints in particular, so it does occur in practice. (The Link Capabilities Register is optional on RCiEPs per PCIe r6.2 sec 7.5.3.) Fixes: d2bd39c0456b ("PCI: Store all PCIe Supported Link Speeds") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/70829798889c6d779ca0f6cd3260a765780d1369.camel@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fe03941e3e1cc42fb9bf4395e302bff53ee2198b.1734428762.git.lukas@wunner.de Reported-by: Niklas Schnelle Tested-by: Niklas Schnelle Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

dm: split write BIOs on zone boundaries when zone append is not emulated

2025-08-20T16:30:58Z

commit 675f940576351bb049f5677615140b9d0a7712d0 upstream. Commit 2df7168717b7 ("dm: Always split write BIOs to zoned device limits") updates the device-mapper driver to perform splits for the write BIOs. However, it did not address the cases where DM targets do not emulate zone append, such as in the cases of dm-linear or dm-flakey. For these targets, when the write BIOs span across zone boundaries, they trigger WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_straddles_zones(bio)) in blk_zone_wplug_handle_write(). This results in I/O errors. The errors are reproduced by running blktests test case zbd/004 using zoned dm-linear or dm-flakey devices. To avoid the I/O errors, handle the write BIOs regardless whether DM targets emulate zone append or not, so that all write BIOs are split at zone boundaries. For that purpose, drop the check for zone append emulation in dm_zone_bio_needs_split(). Its argument 'md' is no longer used then drop it also. Fixes: 2df7168717b7 ("dm: Always split write BIOs to zoned device limits") Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Reviewed-by: Mikulas Patocka Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250717103539.37279-1-shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rcu: Fix racy re-initialization of irq_work causing hangs

2025-08-20T16:30:58Z

commit 61399e0c5410567ef60cb1cda34cca42903842e3 upstream. RCU re-initializes the deferred QS irq work everytime before attempting to queue it. However there are situations where the irq work is attempted to be queued even though it is already queued. In that case re-initializing messes-up with the irq work queue that is about to be handled. The chances for that to happen are higher when the architecture doesn't support self-IPIs and irq work are then all lazy, such as with the following sequence: 1) rcu_read_unlock() is called when IRQs are disabled and there is a grace period involving blocked tasks on the node. The irq work is then initialized and queued. 2) The related tasks are unblocked and the CPU quiescent state is reported. rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending is reset to DEFER_QS_IDLE, allowing the irq work to be requeued in the future (note the previous one hasn't fired yet). 3) A new grace period starts and the node has blocked tasks. 4) rcu_read_unlock() is called when IRQs are disabled again. The irq work is re-initialized (but it's queued! and its node is cleared) and requeued. Which means it's requeued to itself. 5) The irq work finally fires with the tick. But since it was requeued to itself, it loops and hangs. Fix this with initializing the irq work only once before the CPU boots. Fixes: b41642c87716 ("rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work") Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202508071303.c1134cce-lkp@intel.com Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/amd/display: Allow DCN301 to clear update flags

2025-08-20T16:30:58Z

commit 2d418e4fd9f1eca7dfce80de86dd702d36a06a25 upstream. [Why & How] Not letting DCN301 to clear after surface/stream update results in artifacts when switching between active overlay planes. The issue is known and has been solved initially. See below: (https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3441) Fixes: f354556e29f4 ("drm/amd/display: limit clear_update_flags t dcn32 and above") Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello Signed-off-by: Ivan Lipski Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

firmware: arm_scmi: Convert to SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS

2025-08-20T16:30:58Z

commit 62d6b81e8bd207ad44eff39d1a0fe17f0df510a5 upstream. The old SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() macro leads to a warning about an unused function: | drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_power_control.c:363:12: error: | 'scmi_system_power_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] | static int scmi_system_power_resume(struct device *dev) The proper way to do this these days is to use SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() and pm_sleep_ptr(). Fixes: 9a0658d3991e ("firmware: arm_scmi: power_control: Ensure SCMI_SYSPOWER_IDLE is set early during resume") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Peng Fan Message-Id: <20250709070107.1388512-1-arnd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

io_uring/rw: cast rw->flags assignment to rwf_t

2025-08-20T16:30:58Z

commit 825aea662b492571877b32aeeae13689fd9fbee4 upstream. kernel test robot reports that a recent change of the sqe->rw_flags field throws a sparse warning on 32-bit archs: >> io_uring/rw.c:291:19: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected restricted __kernel_rwf_t [usertype] flags @@ got unsigned int @@ io_uring/rw.c:291:19: sparse: expected restricted __kernel_rwf_t [usertype] flags io_uring/rw.c:291:19: sparse: got unsigned int Force cast it to rwf_t to silence that new sparse warning. Fixes: cf73d9970ea4 ("io_uring: don't use int for ABI") Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507032211.PwSNPNSP-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-sata: Add link_power_management_supported sysfs attribute

2025-08-20T16:30:57Z

commit 0060beec0bfa647c4b510df188b1c4673a197839 upstream. A port link power management (LPM) policy can be controlled using the link_power_management_policy sysfs host attribute. However, this attribute exists also for hosts that do not support LPM and in such case, attempting to change the LPM policy for the host (port) will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Introduce the new sysfs link_power_management_supported host attribute to indicate to the user if a the port and the devices connected to the port for the host support LPM, which implies that the link_power_management_policy attribute can be used. Since checking that a port and its devices support LPM is common between the new ata_scsi_lpm_supported_show() function and the existing ata_scsi_lpm_store() function, the new helper ata_scsi_lpm_supported() is introduced. Fixes: 413e800cadbf ("ata: libata-sata: Disallow changing LPM state if not supported") Reported-by: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202507251014.a5becc3b-lkp@intel.com Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rust: workaround `rustdoc` target modifiers bug

2025-08-20T16:30:57Z

commit abbf9a44944171ca99c150adad9361a2f517d3b6 upstream. Starting with Rust 1.88.0 (released 2025-06-26), `rustdoc` complains about a target modifier mismatch in configurations where `-Zfixed-x18` is passed: error: mixing `-Zfixed-x18` will cause an ABI mismatch in crate `rust_out` | = help: the `-Zfixed-x18` flag modifies the ABI so Rust crates compiled with different values of this flag cannot be used together safely = note: unset `-Zfixed-x18` in this crate is incompatible with `-Zfixed-x18=` in dependency `core` = help: set `-Zfixed-x18=` in this crate or unset `-Zfixed-x18` in `core` = help: if you are sure this will not cause problems, you may use `-Cunsafe-allow-abi-mismatch=fixed-x18` to silence this error The reason is that `rustdoc` was not passing the target modifiers when configuring the session options, and thus it would report a mismatch that did not exist as soon as a target modifier is used in a dependency. We did not notice it in the kernel until now because `-Zfixed-x18` has been a target modifier only since 1.88.0 (and it is the only one we use so far). The issue has been reported upstream [1] and a fix has been submitted [2], including a test similar to the kernel case. [ This is now fixed upstream (thanks Guillaume for the quick review), so it will be fixed in Rust 1.90.0 (expected 2025-09-18). - Miguel ] Meanwhile, conditionally pass `-Cunsafe-allow-abi-mismatch=fixed-x18` to workaround the issue on our side. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # Needed in 6.12.y and later (Rust is pinned in older LTSs). Reported-by: Konrad Dybcio Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/36cdc798-524f-4910-8b77-d7b9fac08d77@oss.qualcomm.com/ Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/144521 [1] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144523 [2] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250727092317.2930617-1-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman