<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>user/sven/linux.git/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst, branch v6.4.3</title>
<subtitle>Linux Kernel
</subtitle>
<id>https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/atom?h=v6.4.3</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/atom?h=v6.4.3'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2023-05-24T04:11:54Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: document the existence of the mail bot</title>
<updated>2023-05-24T04:11:54Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-05-22T23:09:03Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=7e7b3b097a9d95cd76fb462f83dc740b71bd73c0'/>
<id>urn:sha1:7e7b3b097a9d95cd76fb462f83dc740b71bd73c0</id>
<content type='text'>
We had a good run, but after 4 weeks of use we heard someone
asking about pw-bot commands. Let's explain its existence
in the docs. It's not a complete documentation but hopefully
it's enough for the casual contributor. The project and scope
are in flux so the details would likely become out of date,
if we were to document more in depth.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230522140057.GB18381@nucnuc.mle/
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn &lt;andrew@lunn.ch&gt;
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman &lt;simon.horman@corigine.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230522230903.1853151-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: clarify the need to sending reverts as patches</title>
<updated>2023-03-29T06:51:05Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-27T17:26:46Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=e70f94c6c75c2e3274df474b4c0bf6153e0533c3'/>
<id>urn:sha1:e70f94c6c75c2e3274df474b4c0bf6153e0533c3</id>
<content type='text'>
We don't state explicitly that reverts need to be submitted
as a patch. It occasionally comes up.

Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller &lt;jacob.e.keller@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli &lt;f.fainelli@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327172646.2622943-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: add note about Changes Requested and revising commit messages</title>
<updated>2023-03-24T04:50:22Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-22T23:12:02Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=e110ba65927151bf56d8012ddf39ce10f91cbdf9'/>
<id>urn:sha1:e110ba65927151bf56d8012ddf39ce10f91cbdf9</id>
<content type='text'>
One of the most commonly asked questions is "I answered all questions
and don't need to make any code changes, why was the patch not applied".
Document our time honored tradition of asking people to repost with
improved commit messages, to record the answers to reviewer questions.

Take this opportunity to also recommend a change log format.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322231202.265835-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: convert to a non-FAQ document</title>
<updated>2022-12-28T10:06:06Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-12-22T19:22:48Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=ff249be5cca9f982e58936847ba6c30104abbcad'/>
<id>urn:sha1:ff249be5cca9f982e58936847ba6c30104abbcad</id>
<content type='text'>
The netdev-FAQ document has grown over the years to the point
where finding information in it is somewhat challenging.
The length of the questions prevents readers from locating
content that's relevant at a glance.

Convert to a more standard documentation format with sections
and sub-sections rather than questions and answers.

The content edits are limited to what's necessary to change
the format, and very minor clarifications.

Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap &lt;rdunlap@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn &lt;andrew@lunn.ch&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: reshuffle sections in prep for de-FAQization</title>
<updated>2022-12-28T10:06:06Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-12-22T19:22:47Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=f4ef681115f822daf7f36f8b1892d9f1e1a26fbf'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f4ef681115f822daf7f36f8b1892d9f1e1a26fbf</id>
<content type='text'>
Subsequent changes will reformat the doc away from FAQ.
To make that more readable perform the pure section moves now.

Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap &lt;rdunlap@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn &lt;andrew@lunn.ch&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: offer performance feedback to contributors</title>
<updated>2022-10-24T10:03:44Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-10-20T18:30:31Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=c5884ef477b405aadf49419a417d62dc8137e7f3'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c5884ef477b405aadf49419a417d62dc8137e7f3</id>
<content type='text'>
Some of us gotten used to producing large quantities of peer feedback
at work, every 3 or 6 months. Extending the same courtesy to community
members seems like a logical step. It may be hard for some folks to
get validation of how important their work is internally, especially
at smaller companies which don't employ many kernel experts.

The concept of "peer feedback" may be a hyperscaler / silicon valley
thing so YMMV. Hopefully we can build more context as we go.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: add a cheat sheet for the rules</title>
<updated>2022-07-04T09:06:50Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-07-02T03:12:09Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=5d407ca7389261c002c49068e4a11ed3bff0fc8e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5d407ca7389261c002c49068e4a11ed3bff0fc8e</id>
<content type='text'>
Summarize the rules we see broken most often and which may
be less familiar to kernel devs who are used to working outside
of netdev.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn &lt;andrew@lunn.ch&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: document reverse xmas tree</title>
<updated>2022-07-04T09:06:50Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-07-02T03:12:08Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=a24875641143fce726529e6d550b313c53eb5821'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a24875641143fce726529e6d550b313c53eb5821</id>
<content type='text'>
Similarly to the 15 patch rule the reverse xmas tree is not
documented.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn &lt;andrew@lunn.ch&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: document that patch series length limit</title>
<updated>2022-07-04T09:06:50Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-07-02T03:12:07Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=02514a067fad6df27c4b21c316c1af93066af06e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:02514a067fad6df27c4b21c316c1af93066af06e</id>
<content type='text'>
We had been asking people to avoid massive patch series but it does
not appear in the FAQ.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn &lt;andrew@lunn.ch&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: move the netdev-FAQ to the process pages</title>
<updated>2022-03-31T08:49:39Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-30T04:25:05Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=8df0136376dc9227a45fd6a1420016f58792b5d0'/>
<id>urn:sha1:8df0136376dc9227a45fd6a1420016f58792b5d0</id>
<content type='text'>
The documentation for the tip tree is really in quite a similar
spirit to the netdev-FAQ. Move the netdev-FAQ to the process docs
as well.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli &lt;f.fainelli@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni &lt;pabeni@redhat.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
