user/sven/linux.git/arch, branch v4.19.266

x86/speculation: Add RSB VM Exit protections

2022-11-23T06:53:47Z

commit 2b1299322016731d56807aa49254a5ea3080b6b3 upstream. tl;dr: The Enhanced IBRS mitigation for Spectre v2 does not work as documented for RET instructions after VM exits. Mitigate it with a new one-entry RSB stuffing mechanism and a new LFENCE. == Background == Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation (IBRS) was designed to help mitigate Branch Target Injection and Speculative Store Bypass, i.e. Spectre, attacks. IBRS prevents software run in less privileged modes from affecting branch prediction in more privileged modes. IBRS requires the MSR to be written on every privilege level change. To overcome some of the performance issues of IBRS, Enhanced IBRS was introduced. eIBRS is an "always on" IBRS, in other words, just turn it on once instead of writing the MSR on every privilege level change. When eIBRS is enabled, more privileged modes should be protected from less privileged modes, including protecting VMMs from guests. == Problem == Here's a simplification of how guests are run on Linux' KVM: void run_kvm_guest(void) { // Prepare to run guest VMRESUME(); // Clean up after guest runs } The execution flow for that would look something like this to the processor: 1. Host-side: call run_kvm_guest() 2. Host-side: VMRESUME 3. Guest runs, does "CALL guest_function" 4. VM exit, host runs again 5. Host might make some "cleanup" function calls 6. Host-side: RET from run_kvm_guest() Now, when back on the host, there are a couple of possible scenarios of post-guest activity the host needs to do before executing host code: * on pre-eIBRS hardware (legacy IBRS, or nothing at all), the RSB is not touched and Linux has to do a 32-entry stuffing. * on eIBRS hardware, VM exit with IBRS enabled, or restoring the host IBRS=1 shortly after VM exit, has a documented side effect of flushing the RSB except in this PBRSB situation where the software needs to stuff the last RSB entry "by hand". IOW, with eIBRS supported, host RET instructions should no longer be influenced by guest behavior after the host retires a single CALL instruction. However, if the RET instructions are "unbalanced" with CALLs after a VM exit as is the RET in #6, it might speculatively use the address for the instruction after the CALL in #3 as an RSB prediction. This is a problem since the (untrusted) guest controls this address. Balanced CALL/RET instruction pairs such as in step #5 are not affected. == Solution == The PBRSB issue affects a wide variety of Intel processors which support eIBRS. But not all of them need mitigation. Today, X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT triggers an RSB filling sequence that mitigates PBRSB. Systems setting RSB_VMEXIT need no further mitigation - i.e., eIBRS systems which enable legacy IBRS explicitly. However, such systems (X86_FEATURE_IBRS_ENHANCED) do not set RSB_VMEXIT and most of them need a new mitigation. Therefore, introduce a new feature flag X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE which triggers a lighter-weight PBRSB mitigation versus RSB_VMEXIT. The lighter-weight mitigation performs a CALL instruction which is immediately followed by a speculative execution barrier (INT3). This steers speculative execution to the barrier -- just like a retpoline -- which ensures that speculation can never reach an unbalanced RET. Then, ensure this CALL is retired before continuing execution with an LFENCE. In other words, the window of exposure is opened at VM exit where RET behavior is troublesome. While the window is open, force RSB predictions sampling for RET targets to a dead end at the INT3. Close the window with the LFENCE. There is a subset of eIBRS systems which are not vulnerable to PBRSB. Add these systems to the cpu_vuln_whitelist[] as NO_EIBRS_PBRSB. Future systems that aren't vulnerable will set ARCH_CAP_PBRSB_NO. [ bp: Massage, incorporate review comments from Andy Cooper. ] Signed-off-by: Daniel Sneddon Co-developed-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov [ bp: Adjust patch to account for kvm entry being in c ] Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/bugs: Warn when "ibrs" mitigation is selected on Enhanced IBRS parts

2022-11-23T06:53:47Z

commit eb23b5ef9131e6d65011de349a4d25ef1b3d4314 upstream. IBRS mitigation for spectre_v2 forces write to MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL at every kernel entry/exit. On Enhanced IBRS parts setting MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL[IBRS] only once at boot is sufficient. MSR writes at every kernel entry/exit incur unnecessary performance loss. When Enhanced IBRS feature is present, print a warning about this unnecessary performance loss. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2a5eaf54583c2bfe0edc4fea64006656256cca17.1657814857.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/speculation: Use DECLARE_PER_CPU for x86_spec_ctrl_current

2022-11-23T06:53:47Z

commit db886979683a8360ced9b24ab1125ad0c4d2cf76 upstream. Clang warns: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c:58:21: error: section attribute is specified on redeclared variable [-Werror,-Wsection] DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, x86_spec_ctrl_current); ^ arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h:283:12: note: previous declaration is here extern u64 x86_spec_ctrl_current; ^ 1 error generated. The declaration should be using DECLARE_PER_CPU instead so all attributes stay in sync. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: fc02735b14ff ("KVM: VMX: Prevent guest RSB poisoning attacks with eIBRS") Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/speculation: Disable RRSBA behavior

2022-11-23T06:53:47Z

commit 4ad3278df6fe2b0852b00d5757fc2ccd8e92c26e upstream. Some Intel processors may use alternate predictors for RETs on RSB-underflow. This condition may be vulnerable to Branch History Injection (BHI) and intramode-BTI. Kernel earlier added spectre_v2 mitigation modes (eIBRS+Retpolines, eIBRS+LFENCE, Retpolines) which protect indirect CALLs and JMPs against such attacks. However, on RSB-underflow, RET target prediction may fallback to alternate predictors. As a result, RET's predicted target may get influenced by branch history. A new MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL bit (RRSBA_DIS_S) controls this fallback behavior when in kernel mode. When set, RETs will not take predictions from alternate predictors, hence mitigating RETs as well. Support for this is enumerated by CPUID.7.2.EDX[RRSBA_CTRL] (bit2). For spectre v2 mitigation, when a user selects a mitigation that protects indirect CALLs and JMPs against BHI and intramode-BTI, set RRSBA_DIS_S also to protect RETs for RSB-underflow case. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov [bwh: Backported to 5.15: adjust context in scattered.c] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings [sam: Fixed for missing X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB context] Signed-off-by: Samuel Mendoza-Jonas Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/bugs: Add Cannon lake to RETBleed affected CPU list

2022-11-23T06:53:47Z

commit f54d45372c6ac9c993451de5e51312485f7d10bc upstream. Cannon lake is also affected by RETBleed, add it to the list. Fixes: 6ad0ad2bf8a6 ("x86/bugs: Report Intel retbleed vulnerability") Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo [ bp: Adjust cpu model name CANNONLAKE_L -> CANNONLAKE_MOBILE ] Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/cpu/amd: Enumerate BTC_NO

2022-11-23T06:53:47Z

commit 26aae8ccbc1972233afd08fb3f368947c0314265 upstream. BTC_NO indicates that hardware is not susceptible to Branch Type Confusion. Zen3 CPUs don't suffer BTC. Hypervisors are expected to synthesise BTC_NO when it is appropriate given the migration pool, to prevent kernels using heuristics. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo [ bp: Adjust context ] Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/common: Stamp out the stepping madness

2022-11-23T06:53:46Z

commit 7a05bc95ed1c5a59e47aaade9fb4083c27de9e62 upstream. The whole MMIO/RETBLEED enumeration went overboard on steppings. Get rid of all that and simply use ANY. If a future stepping of these models would not be affected, it had better set the relevant ARCH_CAP_$FOO_NO bit in IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Acked-by: Dave Hansen Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/speculation: Fill RSB on vmexit for IBRS

2022-11-23T06:53:46Z

commit 9756bba28470722dacb79ffce554336dd1f6a6cd upstream. Prevent RSB underflow/poisoning attacks with RSB. While at it, add a bunch of comments to attempt to document the current state of tribal knowledge about RSB attacks and what exactly is being mitigated. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo [ bp: Adjust for the fact that vmexit is in inline assembly ] Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

KVM: VMX: Fix IBRS handling after vmexit

2022-11-23T06:53:46Z

commit bea7e31a5caccb6fe8ed989c065072354f0ecb52 upstream. For legacy IBRS to work, the IBRS bit needs to be always re-written after vmexit, even if it's already on. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

KVM: VMX: Prevent guest RSB poisoning attacks with eIBRS

2022-11-23T06:53:46Z

commit fc02735b14fff8c6678b521d324ade27b1a3d4cf upstream. On eIBRS systems, the returns in the vmexit return path from __vmx_vcpu_run() to vmx_vcpu_run() are exposed to RSB poisoning attacks. Fix that by moving the post-vmexit spec_ctrl handling to immediately after the vmexit. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo [ bp: Adjust for the fact that vmexit is in inline assembly ] Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman