user/sven/linux.git/arch, branch v5.4.111

bpf, x86: Validate computation of branch displacements for x86-32

2021-04-10T11:34:31Z

commit 26f55a59dc65ff77cd1c4b37991e26497fc68049 upstream. The branch displacement logic in the BPF JIT compilers for x86 assumes that, for any generated branch instruction, the distance cannot increase between optimization passes. But this assumption can be violated due to how the distances are computed. Specifically, whenever a backward branch is processed in do_jit(), the distance is computed by subtracting the positions in the machine code from different optimization passes. This is because part of addrs[] is already updated for the current optimization pass, before the branch instruction is visited. And so the optimizer can expand blocks of machine code in some cases. This can confuse the optimizer logic, where it assumes that a fixed point has been reached for all machine code blocks once the total program size stops changing. And then the JIT compiler can output abnormal machine code containing incorrect branch displacements. To mitigate this issue, we assert that a fixed point is reached while populating the output image. This rejects any problematic programs. The issue affects both x86-32 and x86-64. We mitigate separately to ease backporting. Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk Reviewed-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf, x86: Validate computation of branch displacements for x86-64

2021-04-10T11:34:31Z

commit e4d4d456436bfb2fe412ee2cd489f7658449b098 upstream. The branch displacement logic in the BPF JIT compilers for x86 assumes that, for any generated branch instruction, the distance cannot increase between optimization passes. But this assumption can be violated due to how the distances are computed. Specifically, whenever a backward branch is processed in do_jit(), the distance is computed by subtracting the positions in the machine code from different optimization passes. This is because part of addrs[] is already updated for the current optimization pass, before the branch instruction is visited. And so the optimizer can expand blocks of machine code in some cases. This can confuse the optimizer logic, where it assumes that a fixed point has been reached for all machine code blocks once the total program size stops changing. And then the JIT compiler can output abnormal machine code containing incorrect branch displacements. To mitigate this issue, we assert that a fixed point is reached while populating the output image. This rejects any problematic programs. The issue affects both x86-32 and x86-64. We mitigate separately to ease backporting. Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk Reviewed-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ia64: fix format strings for err_inject

2021-04-10T11:34:31Z

[ Upstream commit 95d44a470a6814207d52dd6312203b0f4ef12710 ] Fix warning with %lx / u64 mismatch: arch/ia64/kernel/err_inject.c: In function 'show_resources': arch/ia64/kernel/err_inject.c:62:22: warning: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'u64' {aka 'long long unsigned int'} 62 | return sprintf(buf, "%lx", name[cpu]); \ | ^~~~~~~ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210313104312.1548232-1-slyfox@gentoo.org Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ia64: mca: allocate early mca with GFP_ATOMIC

2021-04-10T11:34:31Z

[ Upstream commit f2a419cf495f95cac49ea289318b833477e1a0e2 ] The sleep warning happens at early boot right at secondary CPU activation bootup: smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ... BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/page_alloc.c:4942 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/1 CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc2-00007-g79e228d0b611-dirty #99 .. Call Trace: show_stack+0x90/0xc0 dump_stack+0x150/0x1c0 ___might_sleep+0x1c0/0x2a0 __might_sleep+0xa0/0x160 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1a0/0x600 alloc_page_interleave+0x30/0x1c0 alloc_pages_current+0x2c0/0x340 __get_free_pages+0x30/0xa0 ia64_mca_cpu_init+0x2d0/0x3a0 cpu_init+0x8b0/0x1440 start_secondary+0x60/0x700 start_ap+0x750/0x780 Fixed BSP b0 value from CPU 1 As I understand interrupts are not enabled yet and system has a lot of memory. There is little chance to sleep and switch to GFP_ATOMIC should be a no-op. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210315085045.204414-1-slyfox@gentoo.org Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/build: Turn off -fcf-protection for realmode targets

2021-04-10T11:34:31Z

[ Upstream commit 9fcb51c14da2953de585c5c6e50697b8a6e91a7b ] The new Ubuntu GCC packages turn on -fcf-protection globally, which causes a build failure in the x86 realmode code: cc1: error: ‘-fcf-protection’ is not compatible with this target Turn it off explicitly on compilers that understand this option. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210323124846.1584944-1-arnd@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf, x86: Use kvmalloc_array instead kmalloc_array in bpf_jit_comp

2021-04-10T11:34:30Z

[ Upstream commit de920fc64cbaa031f947e9be964bda05fd090380 ] x86 bpf_jit_comp.c used kmalloc_array to store jited addresses for each bpf insn. With a large bpf program, we have see the following allocation failures in our production server: page allocation failure: order:5, mode:0x40cc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0" Call Trace: dump_stack+0x50/0x70 warn_alloc.cold.120+0x72/0xd2 ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x157/0x160 __alloc_pages_slowpath+0xcdb/0xd00 ? get_page_from_freelist+0xe44/0x1600 ? vunmap_page_range+0x1ba/0x340 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2c9/0x320 kmalloc_order+0x18/0x80 kmalloc_order_trace+0x1d/0xa0 bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1e2/0x484 ? kmalloc_order_trace+0x1d/0xa0 bpf_prog_select_runtime+0xc3/0x150 bpf_prog_load+0x480/0x720 ? __mod_memcg_lruvec_state+0x21/0x100 __do_sys_bpf+0xc31/0x2040 ? close_pdeo+0x86/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f2f300f7fa9 Code: Bad RIP value. Dumped assembly: ffffffff810b6d70 : ; { ffffffff810b6d70: e8 eb a5 b4 00 callq 0xffffffff81c01360 <__fentry__> ffffffff810b6d75: 41 57 pushq %r15 ... ffffffff810b6f39: e9 72 fe ff ff jmp 0xffffffff810b6db0 ; addrs = kmalloc_array(prog->len + 1, sizeof(*addrs), GFP_KERNEL); ffffffff810b6f3e: 8b 45 0c movl 12(%rbp), %eax ; return __kmalloc(bytes, flags); ffffffff810b6f41: be c0 0c 00 00 movl $3264, %esi ; addrs = kmalloc_array(prog->len + 1, sizeof(*addrs), GFP_KERNEL); ffffffff810b6f46: 8d 78 01 leal 1(%rax), %edi ; if (unlikely(check_mul_overflow(n, size, &bytes))) ffffffff810b6f49: 48 c1 e7 02 shlq $2, %rdi ; return __kmalloc(bytes, flags); ffffffff810b6f4d: e8 8e 0c 1d 00 callq 0xffffffff81287be0 <__kmalloc> ; if (!addrs) { ffffffff810b6f52: 48 85 c0 testq %rax, %rax Change kmalloc_array() to kvmalloc_array() to avoid potential allocation error for big bpf programs. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210309015647.3657852-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ARM: dts: am33xx: add aliases for mmc interfaces

2021-04-10T11:34:30Z

[ Upstream commit 9bbce32a20d6a72c767a7f85fd6127babd1410ac ] Without DT aliases, the numbering of mmc interfaces is unpredictable. Adding them makes it possible to refer to devices consistently. The popular suggestion to use UUIDs obviously doesn't work with a blank device fresh from the factory. See commit fa2d0aa96941 ("mmc: core: Allow setting slot index via device tree alias") for more discussion. Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

xtensa: move coprocessor_flush to the .text section

2021-04-07T12:47:42Z

commit ab5eb336411f18fd449a1fb37d36a55ec422603f upstream. coprocessor_flush is not a part of fast exception handlers, but it uses parts of fast coprocessor handling code that's why it's in the same source file. It uses call0 opcode to invoke those parts so there are no limitations on their relative location, but the rest of the code calls coprocessor_flush with call8 and that doesn't work when vectors are placed in a different gigabyte-aligned area than the rest of the kernel. Move coprocessor_flush from the .exception.text section to the .text so that it's reachable from the rest of the kernel with call8. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Max Filippov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

powerpc: Force inlining of cpu_has_feature() to avoid build failure

2021-04-07T12:47:39Z

[ Upstream commit eed5fae00593ab9d261a0c1ffc1bdb786a87a55a ] The code relies on constant folding of cpu_has_feature() based on possible and always true values as defined per CPU_FTRS_ALWAYS and CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE. Build failure is encountered with for instance book3e_all_defconfig on kisskb in the AMDGPU driver which uses cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP) to decide whether calling kernel_enable_vsx() or not. The failure is due to cpu_has_feature() not being inlined with that configuration with gcc 4.9. In the same way as commit acdad8fb4a15 ("powerpc: Force inlining of mmu_has_feature to fix build failure"), for inlining of cpu_has_feature(). Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b231dfa040ce4cc37f702f5c3a595fdeabfe0462.1615378209.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/mem_encrypt: Correct physical address calculation in __set_clr_pte_enc()

2021-03-30T12:35:29Z

commit 8249d17d3194eac064a8ca5bc5ca0abc86feecde upstream. The pfn variable contains the page frame number as returned by the pXX_pfn() functions, shifted to the right by PAGE_SHIFT to remove the page bits. After page protection computations are done to it, it gets shifted back to the physical address using page_level_shift(). That is wrong, of course, because that function determines the shift length based on the level of the page in the page table but in all the cases, it was shifted by PAGE_SHIFT before. Therefore, shift it back using PAGE_SHIFT to get the correct physical address. [ bp: Rewrite commit message. ] Fixes: dfaaec9033b8 ("x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot") Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky Cc: Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/81abbae1657053eccc535c16151f63cd049dcb97.1616098294.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman