user/sven/linux.git/crypto, branch v5.1.14

crypto: hash - fix incorrect HASH_MAX_DESCSIZE

2019-05-31T13:43:09Z

commit e1354400b25da645c4764ed6844d12f1582c3b66 upstream. The "hmac(sha3-224-generic)" algorithm has a descsize of 368 bytes, which is greater than HASH_MAX_DESCSIZE (360) which is only enough for sha3-224-generic. The check in shash_prepare_alg() doesn't catch this because the HMAC template doesn't set descsize on the algorithms, but rather sets it on each individual HMAC transform. This causes a stack buffer overflow when SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK() is used with hmac(sha3-224-generic). Fix it by increasing HASH_MAX_DESCSIZE to the real maximum. Also add a sanity check to hmac_init(). This was detected by the improved crypto self-tests in v5.2, by loading the tcrypt module with CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER_EXTRA_TESTS=y enabled. I didn't notice this bug when I ran the self-tests by requesting the algorithms via AF_ALG (i.e., not using tcrypt), probably because the stack layout differs in the two cases and that made a difference here. KASAN report: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in memcpy include/linux/string.h:359 [inline] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in shash_default_import+0x52/0x80 crypto/shash.c:223 Write of size 360 at addr ffff8880651defc8 by task insmod/3689 CPU: 2 PID: 3689 Comm: insmod Tainted: G E 5.1.0-10741-g35c99ffa20edd #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x86/0xc5 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_address_description+0x7f/0x260 mm/kasan/report.c:188 __kasan_report+0x144/0x187 mm/kasan/report.c:317 kasan_report+0x12/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:614 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 mm/kasan/generic.c:191 memcpy+0x37/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:125 memcpy include/linux/string.h:359 [inline] shash_default_import+0x52/0x80 crypto/shash.c:223 crypto_shash_import include/crypto/hash.h:880 [inline] hmac_import+0x184/0x240 crypto/hmac.c:102 hmac_init+0x96/0xc0 crypto/hmac.c:107 crypto_shash_init include/crypto/hash.h:902 [inline] shash_digest_unaligned+0x9f/0xf0 crypto/shash.c:194 crypto_shash_digest+0xe9/0x1b0 crypto/shash.c:211 generate_random_hash_testvec.constprop.11+0x1ec/0x5b0 crypto/testmgr.c:1331 test_hash_vs_generic_impl+0x3f7/0x5c0 crypto/testmgr.c:1420 __alg_test_hash+0x26d/0x340 crypto/testmgr.c:1502 alg_test_hash+0x22e/0x330 crypto/testmgr.c:1552 alg_test.part.7+0x132/0x610 crypto/testmgr.c:4931 alg_test+0x1f/0x40 crypto/testmgr.c:4952 Fixes: b68a7ec1e9a3 ("crypto: hash - Remove VLA usage") Reported-by: Corentin Labbe Cc: # v4.20+ Cc: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Tested-by: Corentin Labbe Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

crypto: gcm - fix incompatibility between "gcm" and "gcm_base"

2019-05-22T05:39:44Z

commit f699594d436960160f6d5ba84ed4a222f20d11cd upstream. GCM instances can be created by either the "gcm" template, which only allows choosing the block cipher, e.g. "gcm(aes)"; or by "gcm_base", which allows choosing the ctr and ghash implementations, e.g. "gcm_base(ctr(aes-generic),ghash-generic)". However, a "gcm_base" instance prevents a "gcm" instance from being registered using the same implementations. Nor will the instance be found by lookups of "gcm". This can be used as a denial of service. Moreover, "gcm_base" instances are never tested by the crypto self-tests, even if there are compatible "gcm" tests. The root cause of these problems is that instances of the two templates use different cra_names. Therefore, fix these problems by making "gcm_base" instances set the same cra_name as "gcm" instances, e.g. "gcm(aes)" instead of "gcm_base(ctr(aes-generic),ghash-generic)". This requires extracting the block cipher name from the name of the ctr algorithm. It also requires starting to verify that the algorithms are really ctr and ghash, not something else entirely. But it would be bizarre if anyone were actually using non-gcm-compatible algorithms with gcm_base, so this shouldn't break anyone in practice. Fixes: d00aa19b507b ("[CRYPTO] gcm: Allow block cipher parameter") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

crypto: crct10dif-generic - fix use via crypto_shash_digest()

2019-05-22T05:39:43Z

commit 307508d1072979f4435416f87936f87eaeb82054 upstream. The ->digest() method of crct10dif-generic reads the current CRC value from the shash_desc context. But this value is uninitialized, causing crypto_shash_digest() to compute the wrong result. Fix it. Probably this wasn't noticed before because lib/crc-t10dif.c only uses crypto_shash_update(), not crypto_shash_digest(). Likewise, crypto_shash_digest() is not yet tested by the crypto self-tests because those only test the ahash API which only uses shash init/update/final. This bug was detected by my patches that improve testmgr to fuzz algorithms against their generic implementation. Fixes: 2d31e518a428 ("crypto: crct10dif - Wrap crc_t10dif function all to use crypto transform framework") Cc: # v3.11+ Cc: Tim Chen Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

crypto: skcipher - don't WARN on unprocessed data after slow walk step

2019-05-22T05:39:43Z

commit dcaca01a42cc2c425154a13412b4124293a6e11e upstream. skcipher_walk_done() assumes it's a bug if, after the "slow" path is executed where the next chunk of data is processed via a bounce buffer, the algorithm says it didn't process all bytes. Thus it WARNs on this. However, this can happen legitimately when the message needs to be evenly divisible into "blocks" but isn't, and the algorithm has a 'walksize' greater than the block size. For example, ecb-aes-neonbs sets 'walksize' to 128 bytes and only supports messages evenly divisible into 16-byte blocks. If, say, 17 message bytes remain but they straddle scatterlist elements, the skcipher_walk code will take the "slow" path and pass the algorithm all 17 bytes in the bounce buffer. But the algorithm will only be able to process 16 bytes, triggering the WARN. Fix this by just removing the WARN_ON(). Returning -EINVAL, as the code already does, is the right behavior. This bug was detected by my patches that improve testmgr to fuzz algorithms against their generic implementation. Fixes: b286d8b1a690 ("crypto: skcipher - Add skcipher walk interface") Cc: # v4.10+ Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

crypto: ccm - fix incompatibility between "ccm" and "ccm_base"

2019-05-22T05:39:42Z

commit 6a1faa4a43f5fabf9cbeaa742d916e7b5e73120f upstream. CCM instances can be created by either the "ccm" template, which only allows choosing the block cipher, e.g. "ccm(aes)"; or by "ccm_base", which allows choosing the ctr and cbcmac implementations, e.g. "ccm_base(ctr(aes-generic),cbcmac(aes-generic))". However, a "ccm_base" instance prevents a "ccm" instance from being registered using the same implementations. Nor will the instance be found by lookups of "ccm". This can be used as a denial of service. Moreover, "ccm_base" instances are never tested by the crypto self-tests, even if there are compatible "ccm" tests. The root cause of these problems is that instances of the two templates use different cra_names. Therefore, fix these problems by making "ccm_base" instances set the same cra_name as "ccm" instances, e.g. "ccm(aes)" instead of "ccm_base(ctr(aes-generic),cbcmac(aes-generic))". This requires extracting the block cipher name from the name of the ctr and cbcmac algorithms. It also requires starting to verify that the algorithms are really ctr and cbcmac using the same block cipher, not something else entirely. But it would be bizarre if anyone were actually using non-ccm-compatible algorithms with ccm_base, so this shouldn't break anyone in practice. Fixes: 4a49b499dfa0 ("[CRYPTO] ccm: Added CCM mode") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

crypto: chacha20poly1305 - set cra_name correctly

2019-05-22T05:39:42Z

commit 5e27f38f1f3f45a0c938299c3a34a2d2db77165a upstream. If the rfc7539 template is instantiated with specific implementations, e.g. "rfc7539(chacha20-generic,poly1305-generic)" rather than "rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", then the implementation names end up included in the instance's cra_name. This is incorrect because it then prevents all users from allocating "rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", if the highest priority implementations of chacha20 and poly1305 were selected. Also, the self-tests aren't run on an instance allocated in this way. Fix it by setting the instance's cra_name from the underlying algorithms' actual cra_names, rather than from the requested names. This matches what other templates do. Fixes: 71ebc4d1b27d ("crypto: chacha20poly1305 - Add a ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD construction, RFC7539") Cc: # v4.2+ Cc: Martin Willi Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Martin Willi Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

crypto: chacha-generic - fix use as arm64 no-NEON fallback

2019-05-22T05:39:42Z

commit 7aceaaef04eaaf6019ca159bc354d800559bba1d upstream. The arm64 implementations of ChaCha and XChaCha are failing the extra crypto self-tests following my patches to test the !may_use_simd() code paths, which previously were untested. The problem is as follows: When !may_use_simd(), the arm64 NEON implementations fall back to the generic implementation, which uses the skcipher_walk API to iterate through the src/dst scatterlists. Due to how the skcipher_walk API works, walk.stride is set from the skcipher_alg actually being used, which in this case is the arm64 NEON algorithm. Thus walk.stride is 5*CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE, not CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE. This unnecessarily large stride shouldn't cause an actual problem. However, the generic implementation computes round_down(nbytes, walk.stride). round_down() assumes the round amount is a power of 2, which 5*CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE is not, so it gives the wrong result. This causes the following case in skcipher_walk_done() to be hit, causing a WARN() and failing the encryption operation: if (WARN_ON(err)) { /* unexpected case; didn't process all bytes */ err = -EINVAL; goto finish; } Fix it by rounding down to CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE instead of walk.stride. (Or we could replace round_down() with rounddown(), but that would add a slow division operation every time, which I think we should avoid.) Fixes: 2fe55987b262 ("crypto: arm64/chacha - use combined SIMD/ALU routine for more speed") Cc: # v5.0+ Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

crypto: lrw - don't access already-freed walk.iv

2019-05-22T05:39:41Z

commit aec286cd36eacfd797e3d5dab8d5d23c15d1bb5e upstream. If the user-provided IV needs to be aligned to the algorithm's alignmask, then skcipher_walk_virt() copies the IV into a new aligned buffer walk.iv. But skcipher_walk_virt() can fail afterwards, and then if the caller unconditionally accesses walk.iv, it's a use-after-free. Fix this in the LRW template by checking the return value of skcipher_walk_virt(). This bug was detected by my patches that improve testmgr to fuzz algorithms against their generic implementation. When the extra self-tests were run on a KASAN-enabled kernel, a KASAN use-after-free splat occured during lrw(aes) testing. Fixes: c778f96bf347 ("crypto: lrw - Optimize tweak computation") Cc: # v4.20+ Cc: Ondrej Mosnacek Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

crypto: salsa20 - don't access already-freed walk.iv

2019-05-22T05:39:41Z

commit edaf28e996af69222b2cb40455dbb5459c2b875a upstream. If the user-provided IV needs to be aligned to the algorithm's alignmask, then skcipher_walk_virt() copies the IV into a new aligned buffer walk.iv. But skcipher_walk_virt() can fail afterwards, and then if the caller unconditionally accesses walk.iv, it's a use-after-free. salsa20-generic doesn't set an alignmask, so currently it isn't affected by this despite unconditionally accessing walk.iv. However this is more subtle than desired, and it was actually broken prior to the alignmask being removed by commit b62b3db76f73 ("crypto: salsa20-generic - cleanup and convert to skcipher API"). Since salsa20-generic does not update the IV and does not need any IV alignment, update it to use req->iv instead of walk.iv. Fixes: 2407d60872dd ("[CRYPTO] salsa20: Salsa20 stream cipher") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

crypto: lrw - Fix atomic sleep when walking skcipher

2019-04-18T14:13:46Z

When we perform a walk in the completion function, we need to ensure that it is atomic. Fixes: ac3c8f36c31d ("crypto: lrw - Do not use auxiliary buffer") Cc: Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Acked-by: Ondrej Mosnacek Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu