user/sven/linux.git/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c, branch v4.14.235

ACPI: processor_perflib: Do not send _PPC change notification if not ready

2018-04-26T09:02:16Z

[ Upstream commit ba1edb9a5125a617d612f98eead14b9b84e75c3a ] The following warning was triggered after resumed from S3 - if all the nonboot CPUs were put offline before suspend: [ 1840.329515] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x771 at rIP: 0xffffffff86061e3a (native_read_msr+0xa/0x30) [ 1840.329516] Call Trace: [ 1840.329521] __rdmsr_on_cpu+0x33/0x50 [ 1840.329525] generic_exec_single+0x81/0xb0 [ 1840.329527] smp_call_function_single+0xd2/0x100 [ 1840.329530] ? acpi_ds_result_pop+0xdd/0xf2 [ 1840.329532] ? acpi_ds_create_operand+0x215/0x23c [ 1840.329534] rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80 [ 1840.329536] ? cpumask_next+0x1b/0x20 [ 1840.329538] ? rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80 [ 1840.329541] intel_pstate_update_perf_limits+0xf3/0x220 [ 1840.329544] ? notifier_call_chain+0x4a/0x70 [ 1840.329546] intel_pstate_set_policy+0x4e/0x150 [ 1840.329548] cpufreq_set_policy+0xcd/0x2f0 [ 1840.329550] cpufreq_update_policy+0xb2/0x130 [ 1840.329552] ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x130/0x130 [ 1840.329556] acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed+0x65/0x80 [ 1840.329558] acpi_processor_notify+0x80/0x100 [ 1840.329561] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x44/0x5c [ 1840.329563] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x14/0x20 [ 1840.329565] process_one_work+0x193/0x3c0 [ 1840.329567] worker_thread+0x35/0x3b0 [ 1840.329569] kthread+0x125/0x140 [ 1840.329571] ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1840.329572] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60 [ 1840.329575] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x180 [ 1840.329577] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30 [ 1840.329585] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x774 (tried to write 0x0000000000000000) at rIP: 0xffffffff86061f78 (native_write_msr+0x8/0x30) [ 1840.329586] Call Trace: [ 1840.329587] __wrmsr_on_cpu+0x37/0x40 [ 1840.329589] generic_exec_single+0x81/0xb0 [ 1840.329592] smp_call_function_single+0xd2/0x100 [ 1840.329594] ? acpi_ds_create_operand+0x215/0x23c [ 1840.329595] ? cpumask_next+0x1b/0x20 [ 1840.329597] wrmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x70 [ 1840.329598] ? rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80 [ 1840.329599] ? wrmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x70 [ 1840.329602] intel_pstate_hwp_set+0xd3/0x150 [ 1840.329604] intel_pstate_set_policy+0x119/0x150 [ 1840.329606] cpufreq_set_policy+0xcd/0x2f0 [ 1840.329607] cpufreq_update_policy+0xb2/0x130 [ 1840.329610] ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x130/0x130 [ 1840.329613] acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed+0x65/0x80 [ 1840.329615] acpi_processor_notify+0x80/0x100 [ 1840.329617] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x44/0x5c [ 1840.329619] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x14/0x20 [ 1840.329620] process_one_work+0x193/0x3c0 [ 1840.329622] worker_thread+0x35/0x3b0 [ 1840.329624] kthread+0x125/0x140 [ 1840.329625] ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1840.329626] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60 [ 1840.329628] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x180 [ 1840.329631] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30 This is because if there's only one online CPU, the MSR_PM_ENABLE (package wide)can not be enabled after resumed, due to intel_pstate_hwp_enable() will only be invoked on AP's online process after resumed - if there's no AP online, the HWP remains disabled after resumed (BIOS has disabled it in S3). Then if there comes a _PPC change notification which touches HWP register during this stage, the warning is triggered. Since we don't call acpi_processor_register_performance() when HWP is enabled, the pr->performance will be NULL. When this is NULL we don't need to do _PPC change notification. Reported-by: Doug Smythies Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada Signed-off-by: Yu Chen Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: processor_perflib: Simplify code and stop using CPUFREQ_START

2017-02-03T23:05:29Z

acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() can live without using CPUFREQ_START (which is gonna be removed soon), as it is only used while setting ignore_ppc to 0. This can be done with the help of "ignore_ppc < 0" check alone. The notifier function anyway ignores all events except CPUFREQ_ADJUST and dropping CPUFREQ_START wouldn't harm at all. Once CPUFREQ_START event is removed from the cpufreq core, acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() will get called only for CPUFREQ_NOTIFY or CPUFREQ_ADJUST event. Drop the return statement from the first if block to make sure we don't ignore any such events. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI / processor: Make acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed() void

2016-11-21T13:35:42Z

The return value of acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed() is never used, so make it void. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Viresh Kumar

cpufreq: intel_pstate: Request P-states control from SMM if needed

2016-11-17T21:47:47Z

Currently, intel_pstate is unable to control P-states on my IvyBridge-based Acer Aspire S5, because they are controlled by SMM on that machine by default and it is necessary to request OS control of P-states from it via the SMI Command register exposed in the ACPI FADT. intel_pstate doesn't do that now, but acpi-cpufreq and other cpufreq drivers for x86 platforms do. Address this problem by making intel_pstate use the ACPI-defined mechanism as well. However, intel_pstate is not modular and it doesn't need the module refcount tricks played by acpi_processor_notify_smm(), so export the core of this function to it as acpi_processor_pstate_control() and make it call that. [The changes in processor_perflib.c related to this should not make any functional difference for the acpi_processor_notify_smm() users]. To be safe, only call acpi_processor_notify_smm() from intel_pstate if ACPI _PPC support is enabled in it. Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada

Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq'

2015-09-01T13:52:35Z

* pm-cpufreq: (53 commits) cpufreq: speedstep-lib: Use monotonic clock cpufreq: powernv: Increase the verbosity of OCC console messages cpufreq: sfi: use kmemdup rather than duplicating its implementation cpufreq: drop !cpufreq_driver check from cpufreq_parse_governor() cpufreq: rename cpufreq_real_policy as cpufreq_user_policy cpufreq: remove redundant 'policy' field from user_policy cpufreq: remove redundant 'governor' field from user_policy cpufreq: update user_policy.* on success cpufreq: use memcpy() to copy policy cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event cpufreq: mediatek: Add MT8173 cpufreq driver dt-bindings: mediatek: Add MT8173 CPU DVFS clock bindings intel_pstate: append more Oracle OEM table id to vendor bypass list intel_pstate: Add SKY-S support intel_pstate: Fix possible overflow complained by Coverity cpufreq: Correct a freq check in cpufreq_set_policy() cpufreq: Lock CPU online/offline in cpufreq_register_driver() cpufreq: Replace recover_policy with new_policy in cpufreq_online() cpufreq: Separate CPU device registration from CPU online cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling ...

cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2015-09-01T13:50:38Z

What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier. Kill CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE and fix its usage sites. This also updates the numbering of notifier events to remove holes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI / processor: Drop an unused argument of a cleanup routine

2015-07-22T20:11:16Z

acpi_processor_unregister_performance() actually doesn't use its first argument, so drop it and update the callers accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Viresh Kumar

ACPI: Remove FSF mailing addresses

2015-07-08T00:27:32Z

There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI / processor: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version

2014-02-20T23:27:47Z

Use public function acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version of evaluating ACPI _OST method. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI: Clean up inclusions of ACPI header files

2013-12-07T00:03:14Z

Replace direct inclusions of , and , which are incorrect, with inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, , and should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that be included prior to so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Matthew Garrett Cc: Tony Luck Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki