user/sven/linux.git/drivers/base/component.c, branch v4.9.296

component: Silence bind error on -EPROBE_DEFER

2020-05-27T14:41:46Z

[ Upstream commit 7706b0a76a9697021e2bf395f3f065c18f51043d ] If a component fails to bind due to -EPROBE_DEFER we should not log an error as this is not a real failure. Fixes messages like: vc4-drm soc:gpu: failed to bind 3f902000.hdmi (ops vc4_hdmi_ops): -517 vc4-drm soc:gpu: master bind failed: -517 Signed-off-by: James Hilliard Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200411190241.89404-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

component: fix loop condition to call unbind() if bind() fails

2019-11-25T08:52:23Z

[ Upstream commit bdae566d5d9733b6e32b378668b84eadf28a94d4 ] During component_bind_all(), if bind() fails for any particular component associated with a master, unbind() should be called for all previous components in that master's match array, whose bind() might have completed successfully. As per the current logic, if bind() fails for the component at position 'n' in the master's match array, it would start calling unbind() from component in 'n'th position itself and work backwards, and will always skip calling unbind() for component in 0th position in the master's match array. Fix this by updating the loop condition, and the logic to refer to the components in master's match array, so that unbind() is called for all components starting from 'n-1'st position in the array, until (and including) component in 0th position. Signed-off-by: Banajit Goswami Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Merge 4.5-rc4 into driver-core-next

2016-02-14T22:29:55Z

We want the fixes in here as well. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

component: remove device from master match list on failed add

2016-02-11T09:42:09Z

Calling component_add() may result in the completion of a set of devices, which will try to bring up a master. In bringing the master up, we populate its match array with the current set of children. If binding any of the devices fails, component_add() itself will fail, free the struct component entry, and return to the caller. The now-freed entry is never removed from the master's match array, and will later be used in a futile attempt to bind to freed memory. Bring component_add's behaviour on failure to bring up a master into line with component_del by removing the (to-be-freed) component from the master's match array. The specific case which broke was: - rockchip_drm_drv adds a component master - dwhdmi_rockchip adds a child component in probe (master incomplete) - rockchip_drm_vop adds two children in probe, which completes the set - inside component_add, we try to bring up the master, having populated the master's match array, and fail with EPROBE_DEFER from dwhdmi_rockchip; we delete the putative component - rockchip_drm_vop's probe fails and returns EPROBE_DEFER - we later re-probe rockchip_drm_vop and add the component; the master is complete, so we attempt to bring it up again - walking the match array, we find the previous child, whose master pointer doesn't match (as it has been freed in the meantime) - rockchip_drm_vop probe fails, and will never be attempted again Fixes: ffc30b74fd6d01588bd3fdebc3b1acc0857e6fc8 Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone Cc: Russell King Cc: Thierry Reding Cc: Laurent Pinchart Signed-off-by: Russell King

component: remove impossible condition

2016-02-10T01:39:33Z

We will be evaluating this condition only if match->num == match->alloc and that means we have already dereferenced match which implies match can not be NULL at this point. Moreover we have done a NULL check on match just before this. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

component: Detach components when deleting master struct

2016-01-27T19:07:51Z

component_master_add_with_match calls find_components which, if any components already exist, it attaches to the master struct. However, if we later encounter an error the master struct is deleted, leaving components with a dangling pointer to it. If the error was a temporary one, e.g. for probe deferral, then when the master device is re-probed, it will fail to find the required components as they appear to already be attached to a master. Fix this by nulling components pointers to the master struct when it is deleted. This code is factored out into a separate function so it can be shared with component_master_del. Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst Signed-off-by: Russell King

component: fix crash on x86_64 with hda audio drivers

2016-01-26T18:13:33Z

Maarten reports that the addition of releasing match data to the component helper results in a general protection fault on x86_64. This is caused by the devm resources being freed in reverse order to their allocation, which caused a use-after-free of the match array. Switch the match array to be a more conventional kmalloc/kfree() affair, explicitly freeing it along with the parent match data structure. Reported-by: Maarten Lankhorst Fixes: ce657b1cddf1 ("component: add support for releasing match data") Signed-off-by: Russell King

component: add support for releasing match data

2015-12-07T00:02:05Z

The component helper treats the void match data pointer as an opaque object which needs no further management. When device nodes being passed, this is not true: the caller should pass its refcount to the component helper, and there should be a way to drop the refcount when the matching information is destroyed. This patch provides a per-match release method in addition to the match method to solve this issue. Rather than using component_match_add(), users should use component_match_add_release() which takes an additional function pointer for releasing this reference. Signed-off-by: Russell King

component: track components via array rather than list

2015-12-07T00:02:05Z

Since we now have an array which defines each component, maintain the components to be bound in the array rather than a separate list. We also need duplicate tracking so we can eliminate multiple bind calls for the same component: we preserve the list-based component order in that the first match which adds the component determines its position. Signed-off-by: Russell King

component: move check for unbound master into try_to_bring_up_masters()

2015-12-07T00:02:04Z

Clean up the code a little; we don't need to check that the master is unbound for every invocation of try_to_bring_up_master(), so let's move it to where it's really needed - try_to_bring_up_masters(), where we may encounter already bound masters. Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Russell King