user/sven/linux.git/drivers/md, branch v4.9.181

bcache: avoid clang -Wunintialized warning

2019-05-31T13:48:16Z

[ Upstream commit 78d4eb8ad9e1d413449d1b7a060f50b6efa81ebd ] clang has identified a code path in which it thinks a variable may be unused: drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:333:4: error: variable 'bucket' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized] fifo_pop(&ca->free_inc, bucket); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/md/bcache/util.h:219:27: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop' #define fifo_pop(fifo, i) fifo_pop_front(fifo, (i)) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/md/bcache/util.h:189:6: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop_front' if (_r) { \ ^~ drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:343:46: note: uninitialized use occurs here allocator_wait(ca, bch_allocator_push(ca, bucket)); ^~~~~~ drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:287:7: note: expanded from macro 'allocator_wait' if (cond) \ ^~~~ drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:333:4: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true fifo_pop(&ca->free_inc, bucket); ^ drivers/md/bcache/util.h:219:27: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop' #define fifo_pop(fifo, i) fifo_pop_front(fifo, (i)) ^ drivers/md/bcache/util.h:189:2: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop_front' if (_r) { \ ^ drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:331:15: note: initialize the variable 'bucket' to silence this warning long bucket; ^ This cannot happen in practice because we only enter the loop if there is at least one element in the list. Slightly rearranging the code makes this clearer to both the reader and the compiler, which avoids the warning. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: add failure check to run_cache_set() for journal replay

2019-05-31T13:48:16Z

[ Upstream commit ce3e4cfb59cb382f8e5ce359238aa580d4ae7778 ] Currently run_cache_set() has no return value, if there is failure in bch_journal_replay(), the caller of run_cache_set() has no idea about such failure and just continue to execute following code after run_cache_set(). The internal failure is triggered inside bch_journal_replay() and being handled in async way. This behavior is inefficient, while failure handling inside bch_journal_replay(), cache register code is still running to start the cache set. Registering and unregistering code running as same time may introduce some rare race condition, and make the code to be more hard to be understood. This patch adds return value to run_cache_set(), and returns -EIO if bch_journal_rreplay() fails. Then caller of run_cache_set() may detect such failure and stop registering code flow immedidately inside register_cache_set(). If journal replay fails, run_cache_set() can report error immediately to register_cache_set(). This patch makes the failure handling for bch_journal_replay() be in synchronized way, easier to understand and debug, and avoid poetential race condition for register-and-unregister in same time. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: fix failure in journal relplay

2019-05-31T13:48:16Z

[ Upstream commit 631207314d88e9091be02fbdd1fdadb1ae2ed79a ] journal replay failed with messages: Sep 10 19:10:43 ceph kernel: bcache: error on bb379a64-e44e-4812-b91d-a5599871a3b1: bcache: journal entries 2057493-2057567 missing! (replaying 2057493-2076601), disabling caching The reason is in journal_reclaim(), when discard is enabled, we send discard command and reclaim those journal buckets whose seq is old than the last_seq_now, but before we write a journal with last_seq_now, the machine is restarted, so the journal with the last_seq_now is not written to the journal bucket, and the last_seq_wrote in the newest journal is old than last_seq_now which we expect to be, so when we doing replay, journals from last_seq_wrote to last_seq_now are missing. It's hard to write a journal immediately after journal_reclaim(), and it harmless if those missed journal are caused by discarding since those journals are already wrote to btree node. So, if miss seqs are started from the beginning journal, we treat it as normal, and only print a message to show the miss journal, and point out it maybe caused by discarding. Patch v2 add a judgement condition to ignore the missed journal only when discard enabled as Coly suggested. (Coly Li: rebase the patch with other changes in bch_journal_replay()) Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui Tested-by: Dennis Schridde Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: return error immediately in bch_journal_replay()

2019-05-31T13:48:16Z

[ Upstream commit 68d10e6979a3b59e3cd2e90bfcafed79c4cf180a ] When failure happens inside bch_journal_replay(), calling cache_set_err_on() and handling the failure in async way is not a good idea. Because after bch_journal_replay() returns, registering code will continue to execute following steps, and unregistering code triggered by cache_set_err_on() is running in same time. First it is unnecessary to handle failure and unregister cache set in an async way, second there might be potential race condition to run register and unregister code for same cache set. So in this patch, if failure happens in bch_journal_replay(), we don't call cache_set_err_on(), and just print out the same error message to kernel message buffer, then return -EIO immediately caller. Then caller can detect such failure and handle it in synchrnozied way. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

md/raid: raid5 preserve the writeback action after the parity check

2019-05-25T16:26:57Z

commit b2176a1dfb518d870ee073445d27055fea64dfb8 upstream. The problem is that any 'uptodate' vs 'disks' check is not precise in this path. Put a "WARN_ON(!test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags)" on the device that might try to kick off writes and then skip the action. Better to prevent the raid driver from taking unexpected action *and* keep the system alive vs killing the machine with BUG_ON. Note: fixed warning reported by kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Nigel Croxon Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Revert "Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state"

2019-05-25T16:26:57Z

commit a25d8c327bb41742dbd59f8c545f59f3b9c39983 upstream. This reverts commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef. Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Nigel Croxon Cc: Xiao Ni Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

dm delay: fix a crash when invalid device is specified

2019-05-25T16:26:54Z

commit 81bc6d150ace6250503b825d9d0c10f7bbd24095 upstream. When the target line contains an invalid device, delay_ctr() will call delay_dtr() with NULL workqueue. Attempting to destroy the NULL workqueue causes a crash. Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference

2019-05-25T16:26:46Z

commit ee37e62191a59d253fc916b9fc763deb777211e2 upstream. When doing re-add, we need to ensure rdev->mddev->pers is not NULL, which can avoid potential NULL pointer derefence in fallowing add_bound_rdev(). Fixes: a6da4ef85cef ("md: re-add a failed disk") Cc: Xiao Ni Cc: NeilBrown Cc: # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: never set KEY_PTRS of journal key to 0 in journal_reclaim()

2019-05-21T16:48:59Z

commit 1bee2addc0c8470c8aaa65ef0599eeae96dd88bc upstream. In journal_reclaim() ja->cur_idx of each cache will be update to reclaim available journal buckets. Variable 'int n' is used to count how many cache is successfully reclaimed, then n is set to c->journal.key by SET_KEY_PTRS(). Later in journal_write_unlocked(), a for_each_cache() loop will write the jset data onto each cache. The problem is, if all jouranl buckets on each cache is full, the following code in journal_reclaim(), 529 for_each_cache(ca, c, iter) { 530 struct journal_device *ja = &ca->journal; 531 unsigned int next = (ja->cur_idx + 1) % ca->sb.njournal_buckets; 532 533 /* No space available on this device */ 534 if (next == ja->discard_idx) 535 continue; 536 537 ja->cur_idx = next; 538 k->ptr[n++] = MAKE_PTR(0, 539 bucket_to_sector(c, ca->sb.d[ja->cur_idx]), 540 ca->sb.nr_this_dev); 541 } 542 543 bkey_init(k); 544 SET_KEY_PTRS(k, n); If there is no available bucket to reclaim, the if() condition at line 534 will always true, and n remains 0. Then at line 544, SET_KEY_PTRS() will set KEY_PTRS field of c->journal.key to 0. Setting KEY_PTRS field of c->journal.key to 0 is wrong. Because in journal_write_unlocked() the journal data is written in following loop, 649 for (i = 0; i < KEY_PTRS(k); i++) { 650-671 submit journal data to cache device 672 } If KEY_PTRS field is set to 0 in jouranl_reclaim(), the journal data won't be written to cache device here. If system crahed or rebooted before bkeys of the lost journal entries written into btree nodes, data corruption will be reported during bcache reload after rebooting the system. Indeed there is only one cache in a cache set, there is no need to set KEY_PTRS field in journal_reclaim() at all. But in order to keep the for_each_cache() logic consistent for now, this patch fixes the above problem by not setting 0 KEY_PTRS of journal key, if there is no bucket available to reclaim. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: fix a race between cache register and cacheset unregister

2019-05-21T16:48:59Z

commit a4b732a248d12cbdb46999daf0bf288c011335eb upstream. There is a race between cache device register and cache set unregister. For an already registered cache device, register_bcache will call bch_is_open to iterate through all cachesets and check every cache there. The race occurs if cache_set_free executes at the same time and clears the caches right before ca is dereferenced in bch_is_open_cache. To close the race, let's make sure the clean up work is protected by the bch_register_lock as well. This issue can be reproduced as follows, while true; do echo /dev/XXX> /sys/fs/bcache/register ; done& while true; do echo 1> /sys/block/XXX/bcache/set/unregister ; done & and results in the following oops, [ +0.000053] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000998 [ +0.000457] #PF error: [normal kernel read fault] [ +0.000464] PGD 800000003ca9d067 P4D 800000003ca9d067 PUD 3ca9c067 PMD 0 [ +0.000388] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ +0.000269] CPU: 1 PID: 3266 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.0.0+ #6 [ +0.000346] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.fc28 04/01/2014 [ +0.000472] RIP: 0010:register_bcache+0x1829/0x1990 [bcache] [ +0.000344] Code: b0 48 83 e8 50 48 81 fa e0 e1 10 c0 0f 84 a9 00 00 00 48 89 c6 48 89 ca 0f b7 ba 54 04 00 00 4c 8b 82 60 0c 00 00 85 ff 74 2f <49> 3b a8 98 09 00 00 74 4e 44 8d 47 ff 31 ff 49 c1 e0 03 eb 0d [ +0.000839] RSP: 0018:ffff92ee804cbd88 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ +0.000328] RAX: ffffffffc010e190 RBX: ffff918b5c6b5000 RCX: ffff918b7d8e0000 [ +0.000399] RDX: ffff918b7d8e0000 RSI: ffffffffc010e190 RDI: 0000000000000001 [ +0.000398] RBP: ffff918b7d318340 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffffb9bd2d7a [ +0.000385] R10: ffff918b7eb253c0 R11: ffffb95980f51200 R12: ffffffffc010e1a0 [ +0.000411] R13: fffffffffffffff2 R14: 000000000000000b R15: ffff918b7e232620 [ +0.000384] FS: 00007f955bec2740(0000) GS:ffff918b7eb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ +0.000420] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ +0.000801] CR2: 0000000000000998 CR3: 000000003cad6000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 [ +0.000837] Call Trace: [ +0.000682] ? _cond_resched+0x10/0x20 [ +0.000691] ? __kmalloc+0x131/0x1b0 [ +0.000710] kernfs_fop_write+0xfa/0x170 [ +0.000733] __vfs_write+0x2e/0x190 [ +0.000688] ? inode_security+0x10/0x30 [ +0.000698] ? selinux_file_permission+0xd2/0x120 [ +0.000752] ? security_file_permission+0x2b/0x100 [ +0.000753] vfs_write+0xa8/0x1a0 [ +0.000676] ksys_write+0x4d/0xb0 [ +0.000699] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0xf0 [ +0.000692] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Liang Chen Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman