user/sven/linux.git/drivers/rtc, branch v5.15.57

rtc: ftrtc010: Fix error handling in ftrtc010_rtc_probe

2022-06-14T16:36:07Z

[ Upstream commit b520cbe5be37b1b9b401c0b6ecbdae32575273db ] In the error handling path, the clk_prepare_enable() function call should be balanced by a corresponding 'clk_disable_unprepare()' call , as already done in the remove function. clk_disable_unprepare calls clk_disable() and clk_unprepare(). They will use IS_ERR_OR_NULL to check the argument. Fixes: ac05fba39cc5 ("rtc: gemini: Add optional clock handling") Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220403054912.31739-1-linmq006@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rtc: ftrtc010: Use platform_get_irq() to get the interrupt

2022-06-14T16:36:07Z

[ Upstream commit 05020a733b02cf7a474305e620fb306cd3abfe84 ] platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property in the node as this bypasses the hierarchical setup and messes up the irq chaining. In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core code use platform_get_irq(). Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211220011524.17206-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rtc: mt6397: check return value after calling platform_get_resource()

2022-06-14T16:36:07Z

[ Upstream commit d3b43eb505bffb8e4cdf6800c15660c001553fe6 ] It will cause null-ptr-deref if platform_get_resource() returns NULL, we need check the return value. Fixes: fc2979118f3f ("rtc: mediatek: Add MT6397 RTC driver") Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220505125043.1594771-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rtc: mc146818-lib: Fix the AltCentury for AMD platforms

2022-05-25T07:57:26Z

[ Upstream commit 3ae8fd41573af4fb3a490c9ed947fc936ba87190 ] Setting the century forward has been failing on AMD platforms. There was a previous attempt at fixing this for family 0x17 as part of commit 7ad295d5196a ("rtc: Fix the AltCentury value on AMD/Hygon platform") but this was later reverted due to some problems reported that appeared to stem from an FW bug on a family 0x17 desktop system. The same comments mentioned in the previous commit continue to apply to the newer platforms as well. ``` MC146818 driver use function mc146818_set_time() to set register RTC_FREQ_SELECT(RTC_REG_A)'s bit4-bit6 field which means divider stage reset value on Intel platform to 0x7. While AMD/Hygon RTC_REG_A(0Ah)'s bit4 is defined as DV0 [Reference]: DV0 = 0 selects Bank 0, DV0 = 1 selects Bank 1. Bit5-bit6 is defined as reserved. DV0 is set to 1, it will select Bank 1, which will disable AltCentury register(0x32) access. As UEFI pass acpi_gbl_FADT.century 0x32 (AltCentury), the CMOS write will be failed on code: CMOS_WRITE(century, acpi_gbl_FADT.century). Correct RTC_REG_A bank select bit(DV0) to 0 on AMD/Hygon CPUs, it will enable AltCentury(0x32) register writing and finally setup century as expected. ``` However in closer examination the change previously submitted was also modifying bits 5 & 6 which are declared reserved in the AMD documentation. So instead modify just the DV0 bank selection bit. Being cognizant that there was a failure reported before, split the code change out to a static function that can also be used for exclusions if any regressions such as Mikhail's pop up again. Cc: Jinke Fan Cc: Mikhail Gavrilov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CABXGCsMLob0DC25JS8wwAYydnDoHBSoMh2_YLPfqm3TTvDE-Zw@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/51192_Bolton_FCH_RRG.pdf Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220111225750.1699-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rtc: sun6i: Fix time overflow handling

2022-05-25T07:57:24Z

[ Upstream commit 9f6cd82eca7e91a0d0311242a87c6aa3c2737968 ] Using "unsigned long" for UNIX timestamps is never a good idea, and comparing the value of such a variable against U32_MAX does not do anything useful on 32-bit systems. Use the proper time64_t type when dealing with timestamps, and avoid cutting down the time range unnecessarily. This also fixes the flawed check for the alarm time being too far into the future. The check for this condition is actually somewhat theoretical, as the RTC counts till 2033 only anyways, and 2^32 seconds from now is not before the year 2157 - at which point I hope nobody will be using this hardware anymore. Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220211122643.1343315-4-andre.przywara@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rtc: pcf2127: fix bug when reading alarm registers

2022-05-25T07:57:23Z

[ Upstream commit 73ce05302007eece23a6acb7dc124c92a2209087 ] The first bug is that reading the 5 alarm registers results in a read operation of 20 bytes. The reason is because the destination buffer is defined as an array of "unsigned int", and we use the sizeof() operator on this array to define the bulk read count. The second bug is that the read value is invalid, because we are indexing the destination buffer as integers (4 bytes), instead of indexing it as u8. Changing the destination buffer type to u8 fixes both problems. Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220208162908.3182581-1-hugo@hugovil.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rtc: fix use-after-free on device removal

2022-05-25T07:57:23Z

[ Upstream commit c8fa17d9f08a448184f03d352145099b5beb618e ] If the irqwork is still scheduled or running while the RTC device is removed, a use-after-free occurs in rtc_timer_do_work(). Cleanup the timerqueue and ensure the work is stopped to fix this. BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in mutex_lock+0x94/0x110 Write of size 8 at addr ffffff801d846338 by task kworker/3:1/41 Workqueue: events rtc_timer_do_work Call trace: mutex_lock+0x94/0x110 rtc_timer_do_work+0xec/0x630 process_one_work+0x5fc/0x1344 ... Allocated by task 551: kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x384/0x6e0 devm_rtc_allocate_device+0xf0/0x574 devm_rtc_device_register+0x2c/0x12c ... Freed by task 572: kfree+0x114/0x4d0 rtc_device_release+0x64/0x80 device_release+0x8c/0x1f4 kobject_put+0x1c4/0x4b0 put_device+0x20/0x30 devm_rtc_release_device+0x1c/0x30 devm_action_release+0x54/0x90 release_nodes+0x124/0x310 devres_release_group+0x170/0x240 i2c_device_remove+0xd8/0x314 ... Last potentially related work creation: insert_work+0x5c/0x330 queue_work_on+0xcc/0x154 rtc_set_time+0x188/0x5bc rtc_dev_ioctl+0x2ac/0xbd0 ... Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210160951.7718-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rtc: mc146818-lib: fix signedness bug in mc146818_get_time()

2022-04-13T18:59:26Z

commit 7372971c1be5b7d4fdd8ad237798bdc1d1d54162 upstream. The mc146818_get_time() function returns zero on success or negative a error code on failure. It needs to be type int. Fixes: d35786b3a28d ("rtc: mc146818-lib: change return values of mc146818_get_time()") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Reviewed-by: Mateusz Jończyk Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220111071922.GE11243@kili Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rtc: mc146818-lib: fix RTC presence check

2022-04-13T18:59:14Z

[ Upstream commit ea6fa4961aab8f90a8aa03575a98b4bda368d4b6 ] To prevent an infinite loop in mc146818_get_time(), commit 211e5db19d15 ("rtc: mc146818: Detect and handle broken RTCs") added a check for RTC availability. Together with a later fix, it checked if bit 6 in register 0x0d is cleared. This, however, caused a false negative on a motherboard with an AMD SB710 southbridge; according to the specification [1], bit 6 of register 0x0d of this chipset is a scratchbit. This caused a regression in Linux 5.11 - the RTC was determined broken by the kernel and not used by rtc-cmos.c [3]. This problem was also reported in Fedora [4]. As a better alternative, check whether the UIP ("Update-in-progress") bit is set for longer then 10ms. If that is the case, then apparently the RTC is either absent (and all register reads return 0xff) or broken. Also limit the number of loop iterations in mc146818_get_time() to 10 to prevent an infinite loop there. The functions mc146818_get_time() and mc146818_does_rtc_work() will be refactored later in this patch series, in order to fix a separate problem with reading / setting the RTC alarm time. This is done so to avoid a confusion about what is being fixed when. In a previous approach to this problem, I implemented a check whether the RTC_HOURS register contains a value <= 24. This, however, sometimes did not work correctly on my Intel Kaby Lake laptop. According to Intel's documentation [2], "the time and date RAM locations (0-9) are disconnected from the external bus" during the update cycle so reading this register without checking the UIP bit is incorrect. [1] AMD SB700/710/750 Register Reference Guide, page 308, https://developer.amd.com/wordpress/media/2012/10/43009_sb7xx_rrg_pub_1.00.pdf [2] 7th Generation Intel ® Processor Family I/O for U/Y Platforms [...] Datasheet Volume 1 of 2, page 209 Intel's Document Number: 334658-006, https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/7th-and-8th-gen-core-family-mobile-u-y-processor-lines-i-o-datasheet-vol-1.pdf [3] Functions in arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c apparently were using it. [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936688 Fixes: 211e5db19d15 ("rtc: mc146818: Detect and handle broken RTCs") Fixes: ebb22a059436 ("rtc: mc146818: Dont test for bit 0-5 in Register D") Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jończyk Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Alessandro Zummo Cc: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210200131.153887-5-mat.jonczyk@o2.pl Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rtc: Check return value from mc146818_get_time()

2022-04-13T18:59:14Z

[ Upstream commit 0dd8d6cb9eddfe637bcd821bbfd40ebd5a0737b9 ] There are 4 users of mc146818_get_time() and none of them was checking the return value from this function. Change this. Print the appropriate warnings in callers of mc146818_get_time() instead of in the function mc146818_get_time() itself, in order not to add strings to rtc-mc146818-lib.c, which is kind of a library. The callers of alpha_rtc_read_time() and cmos_read_time() may use the contents of (struct rtc_time *) even when the functions return a failure code. Therefore, set the contents of (struct rtc_time *) to 0x00, which looks more sensible then 0xff and aligns with the (possibly stale?) comment in cmos_read_time: /* * If pm_trace abused the RTC for storage, set the timespec to 0, * which tells the caller that this RTC value is unusable. */ For consistency, do this in mc146818_get_time(). Note: hpet_rtc_interrupt() may call mc146818_get_time() many times a second. It is very unlikely, though, that the RTC suddenly stops working and mc146818_get_time() would consistently fail. Only compile-tested on alpha. Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jończyk Cc: Richard Henderson Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky Cc: Matt Turner Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Alessandro Zummo Cc: Alexandre Belloni Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org Cc: x86@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210200131.153887-4-mat.jonczyk@o2.pl Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin