user/sven/linux.git/fs/binfmt_script.c, branch v5.7.14

treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for more missed files

2019-05-21T08:50:45Z

Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which: - Have no license information of any form - Have MODULE_LICENCE("GPL*") inside which was used in the initial scan/conversion to ignore the file These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

exec: load_script: Do not exec truncated interpreter path

2019-02-19T00:49:36Z

Commit 8099b047ecc4 ("exec: load_script: don't blindly truncate shebang string") was trying to protect against a confused exec of a truncated interpreter path. However, it was overeager and also refused to truncate arguments as well, which broke userspace, and it was reverted. This attempts the protection again, but allows arguments to remain truncated. In an effort to improve readability, helper functions and comments have been added. Co-developed-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Samuel Dionne-Riel Cc: Richard Weinberger Cc: Graham Christensen Cc: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

Revert "exec: load_script: don't blindly truncate shebang string"

2019-02-14T23:02:18Z

This reverts commit 8099b047ecc431518b9bb6bdbba3549bbecdc343. It turns out that people do actually depend on the shebang string being truncated, and on the fact that an interpreter (like perl) will often just re-interpret it entirely to get the full argument list. Reported-by: Samuel Dionne-Riel Acked-by: Kees Cook Cc: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

exec: load_script: don't blindly truncate shebang string

2019-01-04T21:13:47Z

load_script() simply truncates bprm->buf and this is very wrong if the length of shebang string exceeds BINPRM_BUF_SIZE-2. This can silently truncate i_arg or (worse) we can execute the wrong binary if buf[2:126] happens to be the valid executable path. Change load_script() to return ENOEXEC if it can't find '\n' or zero in bprm->buf. Note that '\0' can come from either prepare_binprm()->memset() or from kernel_read(), we do not care. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181112160931.GA28463@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Kees Cook Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Ben Woodard Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

exec: load_script: kill the onstack interp[BINPRM_BUF_SIZE] array

2017-10-04T00:54:25Z

Patch series "exec: binfmt_misc: fix use-after-free, kill iname[BINPRM_BUF_SIZE]". It looks like this code was always wrong, then commit 948b701a607f ("binfmt_misc: add persistent opened binary handler for containers") added more problems. This patch (of 6): load_script() can simply use i_name instead, it points into bprm->buf[] and nobody can change this memory until we call prepare_binprm(). The only complication is that we need to also change the signature of bprm_change_interp() but this change looks good too. While at it, do whitespace/style cleanups. NOTE: the real motivation for this change is that people want to increase BINPRM_BUF_SIZE, we need to change load_misc_binary() too but this looks more complicated because afaics it is very buggy. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170918163446.GA26793@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Kees Cook Cc: Travis Gummels Cc: Ben Woodard Cc: Jim Foraker Cc: Cc: Al Viro Cc: James Bottomley Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

syscalls: implement execveat() system call

2014-12-13T20:42:51Z

This patchset adds execveat(2) for x86, and is derived from Meredydd Luff's patch from Sept 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/11/528). The primary aim of adding an execveat syscall is to allow an implementation of fexecve(3) that does not rely on the /proc filesystem, at least for executables (rather than scripts). The current glibc version of fexecve(3) is implemented via /proc, which causes problems in sandboxed or otherwise restricted environments. Given the desire for a /proc-free fexecve() implementation, HPA suggested (https://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/11/556) that an execveat(2) syscall would be an appropriate generalization. Also, having a new syscall means that it can take a flags argument without back-compatibility concerns. The current implementation just defines the AT_EMPTY_PATH and AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flags, but other flags could be added in future -- for example, flags for new namespaces (as suggested at https://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/11/474). Related history: - https://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/27/123 is an example of someone realizing that fexecve() is likely to fail in a chroot environment. - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514043 covered documenting the /proc requirement of fexecve(3) in its manpage, to "prevent other people from wasting their time". - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241609 described a problem where a process that did setuid() could not fexecve() because it no longer had access to /proc/self/fd; this has since been fixed. This patch (of 4): Add a new execveat(2) system call. execveat() is to execve() as openat() is to open(): it takes a file descriptor that refers to a directory, and resolves the filename relative to that. In addition, if the filename is empty and AT_EMPTY_PATH is specified, execveat() executes the file to which the file descriptor refers. This replicates the functionality of fexecve(), which is a system call in other UNIXen, but in Linux glibc it depends on opening "/proc/self/fd/" (and so relies on /proc being mounted). The filename fed to the executed program as argv[0] (or the name of the script fed to a script interpreter) will be of the form "/dev/fd/" (for an empty filename) or "/dev/fd//", effectively reflecting how the executable was found. This does however mean that execution of a script in a /proc-less environment won't work; also, script execution via an O_CLOEXEC file descriptor fails (as the file will not be accessible after exec). Based on patches by Meredydd Luff. Signed-off-by: David Drysdale Cc: Meredydd Luff Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Alexander Viro Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Rich Felker Cc: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Michael Kerrisk Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

exec: do not leave bprm->interp on stack

2012-12-21T01:40:19Z

If a series of scripts are executed, each triggering module loading via unprintable bytes in the script header, kernel stack contents can leak into the command line. Normally execution of binfmt_script and binfmt_misc happens recursively. However, when modules are enabled, and unprintable bytes exist in the bprm->buf, execution will restart after attempting to load matching binfmt modules. Unfortunately, the logic in binfmt_script and binfmt_misc does not expect to get restarted. They leave bprm->interp pointing to their local stack. This means on restart bprm->interp is left pointing into unused stack memory which can then be copied into the userspace argv areas. After additional study, it seems that both recursion and restart remains the desirable way to handle exec with scripts, misc, and modules. As such, we need to protect the changes to interp. This changes the logic to require allocation for any changes to the bprm->interp. To avoid adding a new kmalloc to every exec, the default value is left as-is. Only when passing through binfmt_script or binfmt_misc does an allocation take place. For a proof of concept, see DoTest.sh from: http://www.halfdog.net/Security/2012/LinuxKernelBinfmtScriptStackDataDisclosure/ Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Cc: halfdog Cc: P J P Cc: Alexander Viro Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

exec: use -ELOOP for max recursion depth

2012-12-18T01:15:23Z

To avoid an explosion of request_module calls on a chain of abusive scripts, fail maximum recursion with -ELOOP instead of -ENOEXEC. As soon as maximum recursion depth is hit, the error will fail all the way back up the chain, aborting immediately. This also has the side-effect of stopping the user's shell from attempting to reexecute the top-level file as a shell script. As seen in the dash source: if (cmd != path_bshell && errno == ENOEXEC) { *argv-- = cmd; *argv = cmd = path_bshell; goto repeat; } The above logic was designed for running scripts automatically that lacked the "#!" header, not to re-try failed recursion. On a legitimate -ENOEXEC, things continue to behave as the shell expects. Additionally, when tracking recursion, the binfmt handlers should not be involved. The recursion being tracked is the depth of calls through search_binary_handler(), so that function should be exclusively responsible for tracking the depth. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Cc: halfdog Cc: P J P Cc: Alexander Viro Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

get rid of pt_regs argument of ->load_binary()

2012-11-29T02:53:38Z

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

get rid of pt_regs argument of search_binary_handler()

2012-11-29T02:53:38Z

Signed-off-by: Al Viro