user/sven/linux.git/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c, branch v6.17.9

fscrypt: fix left shift underflow when inode->i_blkbits > PAGE_SHIFT

2025-11-13T20:37:45Z

commit 1e39da974ce621ed874c6d3aaf65ad14848c9f0d upstream. When simulating an nvme device on qemu with both logical_block_size and physical_block_size set to 8 KiB, an error trace appears during partition table reading at boot time. The issue is caused by inode->i_blkbits being larger than PAGE_SHIFT, which leads to a left shift of -1 and triggering a UBSAN warning. [ 2.697306] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.697309] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c:336:37 [ 2.697311] shift exponent -1 is negative [ 2.697315] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 274 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.18.0-rc2+ #34 PREEMPT(voluntary) [ 2.697317] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 2.697320] Call Trace: [ 2.697324] [ 2.697325] dump_stack_lvl+0x76/0xa0 [ 2.697340] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 2.697342] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1e3/0x390 [ 2.697351] bh_get_inode_and_lblk_num.cold+0x12/0x94 [ 2.697359] fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx_bh+0x44/0x90 [ 2.697365] submit_bh_wbc+0xb6/0x190 [ 2.697370] block_read_full_folio+0x194/0x270 [ 2.697371] ? __pfx_blkdev_get_block+0x10/0x10 [ 2.697375] ? __pfx_blkdev_read_folio+0x10/0x10 [ 2.697377] blkdev_read_folio+0x18/0x30 [ 2.697379] filemap_read_folio+0x40/0xe0 [ 2.697382] filemap_get_pages+0x5ef/0x7a0 [ 2.697385] ? mmap_region+0x63/0xd0 [ 2.697389] filemap_read+0x11d/0x520 [ 2.697392] blkdev_read_iter+0x7c/0x180 [ 2.697393] vfs_read+0x261/0x390 [ 2.697397] ksys_read+0x71/0xf0 [ 2.697398] __x64_sys_read+0x19/0x30 [ 2.697399] x64_sys_call+0x1e88/0x26a0 [ 2.697405] do_syscall_64+0x80/0x670 [ 2.697410] ? __x64_sys_newfstat+0x15/0x20 [ 2.697414] ? x64_sys_call+0x204a/0x26a0 [ 2.697415] ? do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x670 [ 2.697417] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x2e/0x2a0 [ 2.697420] ? irqentry_exit+0x43/0x50 [ 2.697421] ? exc_page_fault+0x90/0x1b0 [ 2.697422] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 2.697425] RIP: 0033:0x75054cba4a06 [ 2.697426] Code: 5d e8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 75 19 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 11 e8 26 ff ff ff 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <48> 8b 5d f8 c9 c3 0f 1f 40 00 f3 0f 1e fa 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 08 [ 2.697427] RSP: 002b:00007fff973723a0 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 [ 2.697430] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005ea9a2c02760 RCX: 000075054cba4a06 [ 2.697432] RDX: 0000000000002000 RSI: 000075054c190000 RDI: 000000000000001b [ 2.697433] RBP: 00007fff973723c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 2.697434] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 2.697434] R13: 00005ea9a2c027c0 R14: 00005ea9a2be5608 R15: 00005ea9a2be55f0 [ 2.697436] [ 2.697436] ---[ end trace ]--- This situation can happen for block devices because when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is enabled, the maximum logical_block_size is 64 KiB. set_init_blocksize() then sets the block device inode->i_blkbits to 13, which is within this limit. File I/O does not trigger this problem because for filesystems that do not support the FS_LBS feature, sb_set_blocksize() prevents sb->s_blocksize_bits from being larger than PAGE_SHIFT. During inode allocation, alloc_inode()->inode_init_always() assigns inode->i_blkbits from sb->s_blocksize_bits. Currently, only xfs_fs_type has the FS_LBS flag, and since xfs I/O paths do not reach submit_bh_wbc(), it does not hit the left-shift underflow issue. Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang Fixes: 47dd67532303 ("block/bdev: lift block size restrictions to 64k") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [EB: use folio_pos() and consolidate the two shifts by i_blkbits] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251105003642.42796-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fscrypt: Explicitly include

2025-06-20T21:30:23Z

Fix build warnings with W=1 that started appearing after commit a934a57a42f6 ("scripts/misc-check: check missing #include when W=1"). While at it, also sort the include lists alphabetically. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250614221301.100803-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: add support for hardware-wrapped keys

2025-04-09T02:32:11Z

Add support for hardware-wrapped keys to fscrypt. Such keys are protected from certain attacks, such as cold boot attacks. For more information, see the "Hardware-wrapped keys" section of Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst. To support hardware-wrapped keys in fscrypt, we allow the fscrypt master keys to be hardware-wrapped. File contents encryption is done by passing the wrapped key to the inline encryption hardware via blk-crypto. Other fscrypt operations such as filenames encryption continue to be done by the kernel, using the "software secret" which the hardware derives. For more information, see the documentation which this patch adds to Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst. Note that this feature doesn't require any filesystem-specific changes. However it does depend on inline encryption support, and thus currently it is only applicable to ext4 and f2fs. The version of this feature introduced by this patch is mostly equivalent to the version that has existed downstream in the Android Common Kernels since 2020. However, a couple fixes are included. First, the flags field in struct fscrypt_add_key_arg is now placed in the proper location. Second, key identifiers for HW-wrapped keys are now derived using a distinct HKDF context byte; this fixes a bug where a raw key could have the same identifier as a HW-wrapped key. Note that as a result of these fixes, the version of this feature introduced by this patch is not UAPI or on-disk format compatible with the version in the Android Common Kernels, though the divergence is limited to just those specific fixes. This version should be used going forwards. This patch has been heavily rewritten from the original version by Gaurav Kashyap and Barani Muthukumaran . Tested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski # sm8650 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250404225859.172344-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

blk-crypto: add basic hardware-wrapped key support

2025-02-10T16:54:19Z

To prevent keys from being compromised if an attacker acquires read access to kernel memory, some inline encryption hardware can accept keys which are wrapped by a per-boot hardware-internal key. This avoids needing to keep the raw keys in kernel memory, without limiting the number of keys that can be used. Such hardware also supports deriving a "software secret" for cryptographic tasks that can't be handled by inline encryption; this is needed for fscrypt to work properly. To support this hardware, allow struct blk_crypto_key to represent a hardware-wrapped key as an alternative to a raw key, and make drivers set flags in struct blk_crypto_profile to indicate which types of keys they support. Also add the ->derive_sw_secret() low-level operation, which drivers supporting wrapped keys must implement. For more information, see the detailed documentation which this patch adds to Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Tested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski # sm8650 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250204060041.409950-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

fscrypt: convert bh_get_inode_and_lblk_num to use a folio

2024-05-06T00:53:47Z

Patch series "Remove page_mapping()". There are only a few users left. Convert them all to either call folio_mapping() or just use folio->mapping directly. This patch (of 6): Remove uses of page->index, page_mapping() and b_page. Saves a call to compound_head(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240423225552.4113447-1-willy@infradead.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240423225552.4113447-2-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Sidhartha Kumar Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

fscrypt: rename fscrypt_info => fscrypt_inode_info

2023-10-09T03:44:26Z

We are going to track per-extent information, so it'll be necessary to distinguish between inode infos and extent infos. Rename fscrypt_info to fscrypt_inode_info, adjusting any lines that now exceed 80 characters. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik [ebiggers: rebased onto fscrypt tree, renamed fscrypt_get_info(), adjusted two comments, and fixed some lines over 80 characters] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005025757.33521-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: support crypto data unit size less than filesystem block size

2023-09-26T05:34:33Z

Until now, fscrypt has always used the filesystem block size as the granularity of file contents encryption. Two scenarios have come up where a sub-block granularity of contents encryption would be useful: 1. Inline crypto hardware that only supports a crypto data unit size that is less than the filesystem block size. 2. Support for direct I/O at a granularity less than the filesystem block size, for example at the block device's logical block size in order to match the traditional direct I/O alignment requirement. (1) first came up with older eMMC inline crypto hardware that only supports a crypto data unit size of 512 bytes. That specific case ultimately went away because all systems with that hardware continued using out of tree code and never actually upgraded to the upstream inline crypto framework. But, now it's coming back in a new way: some current UFS controllers only support a data unit size of 4096 bytes, and there is a proposal to increase the filesystem block size to 16K. (2) was discussed as a "nice to have" feature, though not essential, when support for direct I/O on encrypted files was being upstreamed. Still, the fact that this feature has come up several times does suggest it would be wise to have available. Therefore, this patch implements it by using one of the reserved bytes in fscrypt_policy_v2 to allow users to select a sub-block data unit size. Supported data unit sizes are powers of 2 between 512 and the filesystem block size, inclusively. Support is implemented for both the FS-layer and inline crypto cases. This patch focuses on the basic support for sub-block data units. Some things are out of scope for this patch but may be addressed later: - Supporting sub-block data units in combination with FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64, in most cases. Unfortunately this combination usually causes data unit indices to exceed 32 bits, and thus fscrypt_supported_policy() correctly disallows it. The users who potentially need this combination are using f2fs. To support it, f2fs would need to provide an option to slightly reduce its max file size. - Supporting sub-block data units in combination with FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32. This has the same problem described above, but also it will need special code to make DUN wraparound still happen on a FS block boundary. - Supporting use case (2) mentioned above. The encrypted direct I/O code will need to stop requiring and assuming FS block alignment. This won't be hard, but it belongs in a separate patch. - Supporting this feature on filesystems other than ext4 and f2fs. (Filesystems declare support for it via their fscrypt_operations.) On UBIFS, sub-block data units don't make sense because UBIFS encrypts variable-length blocks as a result of compression. CephFS could support it, but a bit more work would be needed to make the fscrypt_*_block_inplace functions play nicely with sub-block data units. I don't think there's a use case for this on CephFS anyway. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230925055451.59499-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: compute max_lblk_bits from s_maxbytes and block size

2023-09-26T05:34:30Z

For a given filesystem, the number of bits used by the maximum file logical block number is computable from the maximum file size and the block size. These values are always present in struct super_block. Therefore, compute it this way instead of using the value from fscrypt_operations::get_ino_and_lblk_bits. Since filesystems always have to set the super_block fields anyway, this avoids having to provide this information redundantly via fscrypt_operations. This change is in preparation for adding support for sub-block data units. For that, the value that is needed will become "the maximum file data unit index". A hardcoded value won't suffice for that; it will need to be computed anyway. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230925055451.59499-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

blk-crypto: add a blk_crypto_config_supported_natively helper

2022-11-21T18:39:05Z

Add a blk_crypto_config_supported_natively helper that wraps __blk_crypto_cfg_supported to retrieve the crypto_profile from the request queue. With this fscrypt can stop including blk-crypto-profile.h and rely on the public consumer interface in blk-crypto.h. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114042944.1009870-3-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

blk-crypto: don't use struct request_queue for public interfaces

2022-11-21T18:39:05Z

Switch all public blk-crypto interfaces to use struct block_device arguments to specify the device they operate on instead of th request_queue, which is a block layer implementation detail. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114042944.1009870-2-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe