user/sven/linux.git/fs/ecryptfs, branch v3.2.79

eCryptfs: Invalidate dcache entries when lower i_nlink is zero

2015-10-13T02:46:06Z

commit 5556e7e6d30e8e9b5ee51b0e5edd526ee80e5e36 upstream. Consider eCryptfs dcache entries to be stale when the corresponding lower inode's i_nlink count is zero. This solves a problem caused by the lower inode being directly modified, without going through the eCryptfs mount, leaving stale eCryptfs dentries cached and the eCryptfs inode's i_nlink count not being cleared. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks Reported-by: Richard Weinberger [bwh: Backported to 3.2: - Test d_revalidate pointer directly rather than a DCACHE_OP flag - Open-code d_inode() - Adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

eCryptfs: don't pass fs-specific ioctl commands through

2015-05-09T22:16:22Z

commit 6d65261a09adaa374c05de807f73a144d783669e upstream. eCryptfs can't be aware of what to expect when after passing an arbitrary ioctl command through to the lower filesystem. The ioctl command may trigger an action in the lower filesystem that is incompatible with eCryptfs. One specific example is when one attempts to use the Btrfs clone ioctl command when the source file is in the Btrfs filesystem that eCryptfs is mounted on top of and the destination fd is from a new file created in the eCryptfs mount. The ioctl syscall incorrectly returns success because the command is passed down to Btrfs which thinks that it was able to do the clone operation. However, the result is an empty eCryptfs file. This patch allows the trim, {g,s}etflags, and {g,s}etversion ioctl commands through and then copies up the inode metadata from the lower inode to the eCryptfs inode to catch any changes made to the lower inode's metadata. Those five ioctl commands are mostly common across all filesystems but the whitelist may need to be further pruned in the future. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93691 https://launchpad.net/bugs/1305335 Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks Cc: Rocko Cc: Colin Ian King [bwh: Backported to 3.2: - Adjust context - We don't have file_inode() so open-code the inode lookup] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

eCryptfs: Remove buggy and unnecessary write in file name decode routine

2015-02-20T00:49:28Z

commit 942080643bce061c3dd9d5718d3b745dcb39a8bc upstream. Dmitry Chernenkov used KASAN to discover that eCryptfs writes past the end of the allocated buffer during encrypted filename decoding. This fix corrects the issue by getting rid of the unnecessary 0 write when the current bit offset is 2. Signed-off-by: Michael Halcrow Reported-by: Dmitry Chernenkov Suggested-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

eCryptfs: Force RO mount when encrypted view is enabled

2015-02-20T00:49:22Z

commit 332b122d39c9cbff8b799007a825d94b2e7c12f2 upstream. The ecryptfs_encrypted_view mount option greatly changes the functionality of an eCryptfs mount. Instead of encrypting and decrypting lower files, it provides a unified view of the encrypted files in the lower filesystem. The presence of the ecryptfs_encrypted_view mount option is intended to force a read-only mount and modifying files is not supported when the feature is in use. See the following commit for more information: e77a56d [PATCH] eCryptfs: Encrypted passthrough This patch forces the mount to be read-only when the ecryptfs_encrypted_view mount option is specified by setting the MS_RDONLY flag on the superblock. Additionally, this patch removes some broken logic in ecryptfs_open() that attempted to prevent modifications of files when the encrypted view feature was in use. The check in ecryptfs_open() was not sufficient to prevent file modifications using system calls that do not operate on a file descriptor. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks Reported-by: Priya Bansal [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ecryptfs: avoid to access NULL pointer when write metadata in xattr

2014-12-14T16:23:47Z

commit 35425ea2492175fd39f6116481fe98b2b3ddd4ca upstream. Christopher Head 2014-06-28 05:26:20 UTC described: "I tried to reproduce this on 3.12.21. Instead, when I do "echo hello > foo" in an ecryptfs mount with ecryptfs_xattr specified, I get a kernel crash: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) IP: [] fsstack_copy_attr_all+0x2/0x61 PGD d7840067 PUD b2c3c067 PMD 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: nvidia(PO) CPU: 3 PID: 3566 Comm: bash Tainted: P O 3.12.21-gentoo-r1 #2 Hardware name: ASUSTek Computer Inc. G60JX/G60JX, BIOS 206 03/15/2010 task: ffff8801948944c0 ti: ffff8800bad70000 task.ti: ffff8800bad70000 RIP: 0010:[] [] fsstack_copy_attr_all+0x2/0x61 RSP: 0018:ffff8800bad71c10 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 00000000000181a4 RBX: ffff880198648480 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: ffff880172010450 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff880198490e40 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff880172010450 R11: ffffea0002c51e80 R12: 0000000000002000 R13: 000000000000001a R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff880198490e40 FS: 00007ff224caa700(0000) GS:ffff88019fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000bb07f000 CR4: 00000000000007e0 Stack: ffffffff811826e8 ffff8800a39d8000 0000000000000000 000000000000001a ffff8800a01d0000 ffff8800a39d8000 ffffffff81185fd5 ffffffff81082c2c 00000001a39d8000 53d0abbc98490e40 0000000000000037 ffff8800a39d8220 Call Trace: [] ? ecryptfs_setxattr+0x40/0x52 [] ? ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x1b3/0x223 [] ? should_resched+0x5/0x23 [] ? ecryptfs_initialize_file+0xaf/0xd4 [] ? ecryptfs_create+0xf4/0x142 [] ? vfs_create+0x48/0x71 [] ? do_last.isra.68+0x559/0x952 [] ? link_path_walk+0xbd/0x458 [] ? path_openat+0x224/0x472 [] ? do_filp_open+0x2b/0x6f [] ? __alloc_fd+0xd6/0xe7 [] ? do_sys_open+0x65/0xe9 [] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b RIP [] fsstack_copy_attr_all+0x2/0x61 RSP CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace df9dba5f1ddb8565 ]---" If we create a file when we mount with ecryptfs_xattr_metadata option, we will encounter a crash in this path: ->ecryptfs_create ->ecryptfs_initialize_file ->ecryptfs_write_metadata ->ecryptfs_write_metadata_to_xattr ->ecryptfs_setxattr ->fsstack_copy_attr_all It's because our dentry->d_inode used in fsstack_copy_attr_all is NULL, and it will be initialized when ecryptfs_initialize_file finish. So we should skip copying attr from lower inode when the value of ->d_inode is invalid. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ecryptfs: Fix memory leakage in keystore.c

2013-11-28T14:02:04Z

commit 3edc8376c06133e3386265a824869cad03a4efd4 upstream. In 'decrypt_pki_encrypted_session_key' function: Initializes 'payload' pointer and releases it on exit. Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

eCryptfs: check for eCryptfs cipher support at mount

2012-11-16T16:47:19Z

commit 5f5b331d5c21228a6519dcb793fc1629646c51a6 upstream. The issue occurs when eCryptfs is mounted with a cipher supported by the crypto subsystem but not by eCryptfs. The mount succeeds and an error does not occur until a write. This change checks for eCryptfs cipher support at mount time. Resolves Launchpad issue #338914, reported by Tyler Hicks in 03/2009. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/338914 Signed-off-by: Tim Sally Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

eCryptfs: Copy up POSIX ACL and read-only flags from lower mount

2012-11-16T16:47:18Z

commit 069ddcda37b2cf5bb4b6031a944c0e9359213262 upstream. When the eCryptfs mount options do not include '-o acl', but the lower filesystem's mount options do include 'acl', the MS_POSIXACL flag is not flipped on in the eCryptfs super block flags. This flag is what the VFS checks in do_last() when deciding if the current umask should be applied to a newly created inode's mode or not. When a default POSIX ACL mask is set on a directory, the current umask is incorrectly applied to new inodes created in the directory. This patch ignores the MS_POSIXACL flag passed into ecryptfs_mount() and sets the flag on the eCryptfs super block depending on the flag's presence on the lower super block. Additionally, it is incorrect to allow a writeable eCryptfs mount on top of a read-only lower mount. This missing check did not allow writes to the read-only lower mount because permissions checks are still performed on the lower filesystem's objects but it is best to simply not allow a rw mount on top of ro mount. However, a ro eCryptfs mount on top of a rw mount is valid and still allowed. https://launchpad.net/bugs/1009207 Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks Reported-by: Stefan Beller Cc: John Johansen Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

eCryptfs: Call lower ->flush() from ecryptfs_flush()

2012-10-17T02:49:54Z

commit 64e6651dcc10e9d2cc6230208a8e6c2cfd19ae18 upstream. Since eCryptfs only calls fput() on the lower file in ecryptfs_release(), eCryptfs should call the lower filesystem's ->flush() from ecryptfs_flush(). If the lower filesystem implements ->flush(), then eCryptfs should try to flush out any dirty pages prior to calling the lower ->flush(). If the lower filesystem does not implement ->flush(), then eCryptfs has no need to do anything in ecryptfs_flush() since dirty pages are now written out to the lower filesystem in ecryptfs_release(). Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

eCryptfs: Write out all dirty pages just before releasing the lower file

2012-10-17T02:49:53Z

commit 7149f2558d5b5b988726662fe58b1c388337805b upstream. Fixes a regression caused by: 821f749 eCryptfs: Revert to a writethrough cache model That patch reverted some code (specifically, 32001d6f) that was necessary to properly handle open() -> mmap() -> close() -> dirty pages -> munmap(), because the lower file could be closed before the dirty pages are written out. Rather than reapplying 32001d6f, this approach is a better way of ensuring that the lower file is still open in order to handle writing out the dirty pages. It is called from ecryptfs_release(), while we have a lock on the lower file pointer, just before the lower file gets the final fput() and we overwrite the pointer. https://launchpad.net/bugs/1047261 Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks Reported-by: Artemy Tregubenko Tested-by: Artemy Tregubenko Tested-by: Colin Ian King Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings