user/sven/linux.git/fs/exec.c, branch v5.4.177

vfs: check fd has read access in kernel_read_file_from_fd()

2021-10-27T07:54:27Z

commit 032146cda85566abcd1c4884d9d23e4e30a07e9a upstream. If we open a file without read access and then pass the fd to a syscall whose implementation calls kernel_read_file_from_fd(), we get a warning from __kernel_read(): if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ))) This currently affects both finit_module() and kexec_file_load(), but it could affect other syscalls in the future. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211007220110.600005-1-willy@infradead.org Fixes: b844f0ecbc56 ("vfs: define kernel_copy_file_from_fd()") Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Reported-by: Hao Sun Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Acked-by: Christian Brauner Cc: Al Viro Cc: Mimi Zohar Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

exec: Transform exec_update_mutex into a rw_semaphore

2021-01-09T12:44:55Z

[ Upstream commit f7cfd871ae0c5008d94b6f66834e7845caa93c15 ] Recently syzbot reported[0] that there is a deadlock amongst the users of exec_update_mutex. The problematic lock ordering found by lockdep was: perf_event_open (exec_update_mutex -> ovl_i_mutex) chown (ovl_i_mutex -> sb_writes) sendfile (sb_writes -> p->lock) by reading from a proc file and writing to overlayfs proc_pid_syscall (p->lock -> exec_update_mutex) While looking at possible solutions it occured to me that all of the users and possible users involved only wanted to state of the given process to remain the same. They are all readers. The only writer is exec. There is no reason for readers to block on each other. So fix this deadlock by transforming exec_update_mutex into a rw_semaphore named exec_update_lock that only exec takes for writing. Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov Cc: Al Viro Cc: Bernd Edlinger Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Christopher Yeoh Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Sargun Dhillon Cc: Christian Brauner Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Fixes: eea9673250db ("exec: Add exec_update_mutex to replace cred_guard_mutex") [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000063640c05ade8e3de@google.com Reported-by: syzbot+db9cdf3dd1f64252c6ef@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87ft4mbqen.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

mm: fix exec activate_mm vs TLB shootdown and lazy tlb switching race

2020-11-05T10:43:13Z

[ Upstream commit d53c3dfb23c45f7d4f910c3a3ca84bf0a99c6143 ] Reading and modifying current->mm and current->active_mm and switching mm should be done with irqs off, to prevent races seeing an intermediate state. This is similar to commit 38cf307c1f20 ("mm: fix kthread_use_mm() vs TLB invalidate"). At exec-time when the new mm is activated, the old one should usually be single-threaded and no longer used, unless something else is holding an mm_users reference (which may be possible). Absent other mm_users, there is also a race with preemption and lazy tlb switching. Consider the kernel_execve case where the current thread is using a lazy tlb active mm: call_usermodehelper() kernel_execve() old_mm = current->mm; active_mm = current->active_mm; *** preempt *** --------------------> schedule() prev->active_mm = NULL; mmdrop(prev active_mm); ... <-------------------- schedule() current->mm = mm; current->active_mm = mm; if (!old_mm) mmdrop(active_mm); If we switch back to the kernel thread from a different mm, there is a double free of the old active_mm, and a missing free of the new one. Closing this race only requires interrupts to be disabled while ->mm and ->active_mm are being switched, but the TLB problem requires also holding interrupts off over activate_mm. Unfortunately not all archs can do that yet, e.g., arm defers the switch if irqs are disabled and expects finish_arch_post_lock_switch() to be called to complete the flush; um takes a blocking lock in activate_mm(). So as a first step, disable interrupts across the mm/active_mm updates to close the lazy tlb preempt race, and provide an arch option to extend that to activate_mm which allows architectures doing IPI based TLB shootdowns to close the second race. This is a bit ugly, but in the interest of fixing the bug and backporting before all architectures are converted this is a compromise. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914045219.3736466-2-npiggin@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

exec: Add exec_update_mutex to replace cred_guard_mutex

2020-10-01T11:17:47Z

[ Upstream commit eea9673250db4e854e9998ef9da6d4584857f0ea ] The cred_guard_mutex is problematic as it is held over possibly indefinite waits for userspace. The possible indefinite waits for userspace that I have identified are: The cred_guard_mutex is held in PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT waiting for the tracer. The cred_guard_mutex is held over "put_user(0, tsk->clear_child_tid)" in exit_mm(). The cred_guard_mutex is held over "get_user(futex_offset, ...") in exit_robust_list. The cred_guard_mutex held over copy_strings. The functions get_user and put_user can trigger a page fault which can potentially wait indefinitely in the case of userfaultfd or if userspace implements part of the page fault path. In any of those cases the userspace process that the kernel is waiting for might make a different system call that winds up taking the cred_guard_mutex and result in deadlock. Holding a mutex over any of those possibly indefinite waits for userspace does not appear necessary. Add exec_update_mutex that will just cover updating the process during exec where the permissions and the objects pointed to by the task struct may be out of sync. The plan is to switch the users of cred_guard_mutex to exec_update_mutex one by one. This lets us move forward while still being careful and not introducing any regressions. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20160921152946.GA24210@dhcp22.suse.cz/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/AM6PR03MB5170B06F3A2B75EFB98D071AE4E60@AM6PR03MB5170.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20161102181806.GB1112@redhat.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20160923095031.GA14923@redhat.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20170213141452.GA30203@redhat.com/ Ref: 45c1a159b85b ("Add PTRACE_O_TRACEVFORKDONE and PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT facilities.") Ref: 456f17cd1a28 ("[PATCH] user-vm-unlock-2.5.31-A2") Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

exec: Move would_dump into flush_old_exec

2020-05-20T06:20:34Z

commit f87d1c9559164294040e58f5e3b74a162bf7c6e8 upstream. I goofed when I added mm->user_ns support to would_dump. I missed the fact that in the case of binfmt_loader, binfmt_em86, binfmt_misc, and binfmt_script bprm->file is reassigned. Which made the move of would_dump from setup_new_exec to __do_execve_file before exec_binprm incorrect as it can result in would_dump running on the script instead of the interpreter of the script. The net result is that the code stopped making unreadable interpreters undumpable. Which allows them to be ptraced and written to disk without special permissions. Oops. The move was necessary because the call in set_new_exec was after bprm->mm was no longer valid. To correct this mistake move the misplaced would_dump from __do_execve_file into flos_old_exec, before exec_mmap is called. I tested and confirmed that without this fix I can attach with gdb to a script with an unreadable interpreter, and with this fix I can not. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: f84df2a6f268 ("exec: Ensure mm->user_ns contains the execed files") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

signal: Extend exec_id to 64bits

2020-04-17T08:50:12Z

commit d1e7fd6462ca9fc76650fbe6ca800e35b24267da upstream. Replace the 32bit exec_id with a 64bit exec_id to make it impossible to wrap the exec_id counter. With care an attacker can cause exec_id wrap and send arbitrary signals to a newly exec'd parent. This bypasses the signal sending checks if the parent changes their credentials during exec. The severity of this problem can been seen that in my limited testing of a 32bit exec_id it can take as little as 19s to exec 65536 times. Which means that it can take as little as 14 days to wrap a 32bit exec_id. Adam Zabrocki has succeeded wrapping the self_exe_id in 7 days. Even my slower timing is in the uptime of a typical server. Which means self_exec_id is simply a speed bump today, and if exec gets noticably faster self_exec_id won't even be a speed bump. Extending self_exec_id to 64bits introduces a problem on 32bit architectures where reading self_exec_id is no longer atomic and can take two read instructions. Which means that is is possible to hit a window where the read value of exec_id does not match the written value. So with very lucky timing after this change this still remains expoiltable. I have updated the update of exec_id on exec to use WRITE_ONCE and the read of exec_id in do_notify_parent to use READ_ONCE to make it clear that there is no locking between these two locations. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-hardening/20200324215049.GA3710@pi3.com.pl Fixes: 2.3.23pre2 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

exit/exec: Seperate mm_release()

2019-11-29T09:10:10Z

commit 4610ba7ad877fafc0a25a30c6c82015304120426 upstream. mm_release() contains the futex exit handling. mm_release() is called from do_exit()->exit_mm() and from exec()->exec_mm(). In the exit_mm() case PF_EXITING and the futex state is updated. In the exec_mm() case these states are not touched. As the futex exit code needs further protections against exit races, this needs to be split into two functions. Preparatory only, no functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191106224556.240518241@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/membarrier: Fix p->mm->membarrier_state racy load

2019-09-25T15:42:30Z

The membarrier_state field is located within the mm_struct, which is not guaranteed to exist when used from runqueue-lock-free iteration on runqueues by the membarrier system call. Copy the membarrier_state from the mm_struct into the scheduler runqueue when the scheduler switches between mm. When registering membarrier for mm, after setting the registration bit in the mm membarrier state, issue a synchronize_rcu() to ensure the scheduler observes the change. In order to take care of the case where a runqueue keeps executing the target mm without swapping to other mm, iterate over each runqueue and issue an IPI to copy the membarrier_state from the mm_struct into each runqueue which have the same mm which state has just been modified. Move the mm membarrier_state field closer to pgd in mm_struct to use a cache line already touched by the scheduler switch_mm. The membarrier_execve() (now membarrier_exec_mmap) hook now needs to clear the runqueue's membarrier state in addition to clear the mm membarrier state, so move its implementation into the scheduler membarrier code so it can access the runqueue structure. Add memory barrier in membarrier_exec_mmap() prior to clearing the membarrier state, ensuring memory accesses executed prior to exec are not reordered with the stores clearing the membarrier state. As suggested by Linus, move all membarrier.c RCU read-side locks outside of the for each cpu loops. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Chris Metcalf Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Kirill Tkhai Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190919173705.2181-5-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

sched/fair: Don't free p->numa_faults with concurrent readers

2019-07-25T13:37:04Z

When going through execve(), zero out the NUMA fault statistics instead of freeing them. During execve, the task is reachable through procfs and the scheduler. A concurrent /proc/*/sched reader can read data from a freed ->numa_faults allocation (confirmed by KASAN) and write it back to userspace. I believe that it would also be possible for a use-after-free read to occur through a race between a NUMA fault and execve(): task_numa_fault() can lead to task_numa_compare(), which invokes task_weight() on the currently running task of a different CPU. Another way to fix this would be to make ->numa_faults RCU-managed or add extra locking, but it seems easier to wipe the NUMA fault statistics on execve. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Petr Mladek Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Will Deacon Fixes: 82727018b0d3 ("sched/numa: Call task_numa_free() from do_execve()") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190716152047.14424-1-jannh@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

Merge branch 'siginfo-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace

2019-07-09T04:48:15Z

Pull force_sig() argument change from Eric Biederman: "A source of error over the years has been that force_sig has taken a task parameter when it is only safe to use force_sig with the current task. The force_sig function is built for delivering synchronous signals such as SIGSEGV where the userspace application caused a synchronous fault (such as a page fault) and the kernel responded with a signal. Because the name force_sig does not make this clear, and because the force_sig takes a task parameter the function force_sig has been abused for sending other kinds of signals over the years. Slowly those have been fixed when the oopses have been tracked down. This set of changes fixes the remaining abusers of force_sig and carefully rips out the task parameter from force_sig and friends making this kind of error almost impossible in the future" * 'siginfo-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace: (27 commits) signal/x86: Move tsk inside of CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE in do_sigbus signal: Remove the signal number and task parameters from force_sig_info signal: Factor force_sig_info_to_task out of force_sig_info signal: Generate the siginfo in force_sig signal: Move the computation of force into send_signal and correct it. signal: Properly set TRACE_SIGNAL_LOSE_INFO in __send_signal signal: Remove the task parameter from force_sig_fault signal: Use force_sig_fault_to_task for the two calls that don't deliver to current signal: Explicitly call force_sig_fault on current signal/unicore32: Remove tsk parameter from __do_user_fault signal/arm: Remove tsk parameter from __do_user_fault signal/arm: Remove tsk parameter from ptrace_break signal/nds32: Remove tsk parameter from send_sigtrap signal/riscv: Remove tsk parameter from do_trap signal/sh: Remove tsk parameter from force_sig_info_fault signal/um: Remove task parameter from send_sigtrap signal/x86: Remove task parameter from send_sigtrap signal: Remove task parameter from force_sig_mceerr signal: Remove task parameter from force_sig signal: Remove task parameter from force_sigsegv ...