user/sven/linux.git/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c, branch v3.14.38

fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: remove empty /proc/device-tree when no openfirmware exists.

2014-01-24T00:37:01Z

Distribution kernels might want to build in support for /proc/device-tree for kernels that might end up running on hardware that doesn't support openfirmware. This results in an empty /proc/device-tree existing. Remove it if the OFW root node doesn't exist. This situation actually confuses grub2, resulting in install failures. grub2 sees the /proc/device-tree and picks the wrong install target cf. http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/grub/trunk/grub/annotate/4300/util/grub-install.in#L311 grub should be more robust, but still, leaving an empty proc dir seems pointless. Addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818378. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones Cc: Al Viro Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Josh Boyer Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

proc: set attributes of pde using accessor functions

2014-01-24T00:37:01Z

Use existing accessors proc_set_user() and proc_set_size() to set attributes. Just a cleanup. Signed-off-by: Rui Xiang Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

of: remove HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS

2013-10-10T01:04:08Z

HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS appears to always be needed except for sparc, but it is only used for /proc/device-teee and sparc does not enable /proc/device-tree. So this option is redundant. Remove the option and always enable it. This has the side effect of fixing /proc/device-tree on arches such as arm64 which failed to define this option. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Acked-by: Vineet Gupta Acked-by: Grant Likely Cc: Russell King Cc: James Hogan Cc: Michal Simek Cc: Jonas Bonn Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Chris Zankel Cc: Max Filippov

proc_devtree: Replace include linux/module.h with linux/export.h

2013-05-04T19:31:01Z

Since it uses only THIS_MODULE macro, include is the right to go here. Signed-off-by: Syam Sidhardhan Signed-off-by: Al Viro

proc: Make the PROC_I() and PDE() macros internal to procfs

2013-05-01T21:29:47Z

Make the PROC_I() and PDE() macros internal to procfs. This means making PDE_DATA() out of line. This could be made more optimal by storing PDE()->data into inode->i_private. Also provide a __PDE_DATA() that is inline and internal to procfs. Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Al Viro

procfs: new helper - PDE_DATA(inode)

2013-04-09T18:13:32Z

The only part of proc_dir_entry the code outside of fs/proc really cares about is PDE(inode)->data. Provide a helper for that; static inline for now, eventually will be moved to fs/proc, along with the knowledge of struct proc_dir_entry layout. Signed-off-by: Al Viro

fs/proc: clean up printks

2013-02-28T03:10:11Z

- use pr_foo() throughout - remove a couple of duplicated KERN_WARNINGs, via WARN(KERN_WARNING "...") - nuke a few warnings which I've never seen happen, ever. Cc: Joe Perches Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

procfs: use kbasename()

2012-12-18T01:15:17Z

[yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn: remove duplicated include] Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

of: Improve prom_update_property() function

2012-07-11T05:26:51Z

prom_update_property() currently fails if the property doesn't actually exist yet which isn't what we want. Change to add-or-update instead of update-only, then we can remove a lot duplicated lines. Suggested-by: Grant Likely Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng Acked-by: Rob Herring Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt

of/flattree: Drop an uninteresting message to pr_debug level

2011-03-02T20:45:18Z

This message looks like an error (which it isn't) when booting with a flattened device tree. Remove the message from normal kernel builds. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle Signed-off-by: Grant Likely