user/sven/linux.git/fs, branch v4.4.265

reiserfs: update reiserfs_xattrs_initialized() condition

2021-04-07T10:04:21Z

commit 5e46d1b78a03d52306f21f77a4e4a144b6d31486 upstream. syzbot is reporting NULL pointer dereference at reiserfs_security_init() [1], for commit ab17c4f02156c4f7 ("reiserfs: fixup xattr_root caching") is assuming that REISERFS_SB(s)->xattr_root != NULL in reiserfs_xattr_jcreate_nblocks() despite that commit made REISERFS_SB(sb)->priv_root != NULL && REISERFS_SB(s)->xattr_root == NULL case possible. I guess that commit 6cb4aff0a77cc0e6 ("reiserfs: fix oops while creating privroot with selinux enabled") wanted to check xattr_root != NULL before reiserfs_xattr_jcreate_nblocks(), for the changelog is talking about the xattr root. The issue is that while creating the privroot during mount reiserfs_security_init calls reiserfs_xattr_jcreate_nblocks which dereferences the xattr root. The xattr root doesn't exist, so we get an oops. Therefore, update reiserfs_xattrs_initialized() to check both the privroot and the xattr root. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=8abaedbdeb32c861dc5340544284167dd0e46cde # [1] Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Fixes: 6cb4aff0a77c ("reiserfs: fix oops while creating privroot with selinux enabled") Acked-by: Jeff Mahoney Acked-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: do not iput inode under running transaction in ext4_rename()

2021-04-07T10:04:21Z

[ Upstream commit 5dccdc5a1916d4266edd251f20bbbb113a5c495f ] In ext4_rename(), when RENAME_WHITEOUT failed to add new entry into directory, it ends up dropping new created whiteout inode under the running transaction. After commit <9b88f9fb0d2> ("ext4: Do not iput inode under running transaction"), we follow the assumptions that evict() does not get called from a transaction context but in ext4_rename() it breaks this suggestion. Although it's not a real problem, better to obey it, so this patch add inode to orphan list and stop transaction before final iput(). Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210303131703.330415-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext4: fix bh ref count on error paths

2021-04-07T10:04:20Z

[ Upstream commit c915fb80eaa6194fa9bd0a4487705cd5b0dda2f1 ] __ext4_journalled_writepage should drop bhs' ref count on error paths Signed-off-by: Zhaolong Zhang Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1614678151-70481-1-git-send-email-zhangzl2013@126.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

squashfs: fix xattr id and id lookup sanity checks

2021-03-30T12:45:00Z

commit 8b44ca2b634527151af07447a8090a5f3a043321 upstream. The checks for maximum metadata block size is missing SQUASHFS_BLOCK_OFFSET (the two byte length count). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2069685113.2081245.1614583677427@webmail.123-reg.co.uk Fixes: f37aa4c7366e23f ("squashfs: add more sanity checks in id lookup") Signed-off-by: Phillip Lougher Cc: Sean Nyekjaer Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

squashfs: fix inode lookup sanity checks

2021-03-30T12:44:59Z

commit c1b2028315c6b15e8d6725e0d5884b15887d3daa upstream. When mouting a squashfs image created without inode compression it fails with: "unable to read inode lookup table" It turns out that the BLOCK_OFFSET is missing when checking the SQUASHFS_METADATA_SIZE agaist the actual size. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210226092903.1473545-1-sean@geanix.com Fixes: eabac19e40c0 ("squashfs: add more sanity checks in inode lookup") Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer Acked-by: Phillip Lougher Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

nfs: we don't support removing system.nfs4_acl

2021-03-30T12:44:59Z

[ Upstream commit 4f8be1f53bf615102d103c0509ffa9596f65b718 ] The NFSv4 protocol doesn't have any notion of reomoving an attribute, so removexattr(path,"system.nfs4_acl") doesn't make sense. There's no documented return value. Arguably it could be EOPNOTSUPP but I'm a little worried an application might take that to mean that we don't support ACLs or xattrs. How about EINVAL? Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

NFS: Correct size calculation for create reply length

2021-03-30T12:44:59Z

[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ] CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'. Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte filehandles are in use. Add NFS3_post_op_fh_sz, and correct the size calculation for NFS3_createres_sz. Signed-off-by: Frank Sorenson Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

nfs: fix PNFS_FLEXFILE_LAYOUT Kconfig default

2021-03-30T12:44:59Z

[ Upstream commit a0590473c5e6c4ef17c3132ad08fbad170f72d55 ] This follows what was done in 8c2fabc6542d9d0f8b16bd1045c2eda59bdcde13. With the default being m, it's impossible to build the module into the kernel. Signed-off-by: Timo Rothenpieler Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext4: fix potential error in ext4_do_update_inode

2021-03-24T09:57:01Z

commit 7d8bd3c76da1d94b85e6c9b7007e20e980bfcfe6 upstream. If set_large_file = 1 and errors occur in ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(), the error code will be overridden, go to out_brelse to avoid this situation. Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312065051.36314-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com Cc: stable@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: find old entry again if failed to rename whiteout

2021-03-24T09:57:01Z

commit b7ff91fd030dc9d72ed91b1aab36e445a003af4f upstream. If we failed to add new entry on rename whiteout, we cannot reset the old->de entry directly, because the old->de could have moved from under us during make indexed dir. So find the old entry again before reset is needed, otherwise it may corrupt the filesystem as below. /dev/sda: Entry '00000001' in ??? (12) has deleted/unused inode 15. CLEARED. /dev/sda: Unattached inode 75 /dev/sda: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. Fixes: 6b4b8e6b4ad ("ext4: fix bug for rename with RENAME_WHITEOUT") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210303131703.330415-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman