user/sven/linux.git/fs, branch v4.9.235

btrfs: check the right error variable in btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log

2020-09-03T09:21:23Z

[ Upstream commit fb2fecbad50964b9f27a3b182e74e437b40753ef ] With my new locking code dbench is so much faster that I tripped over a transaction abort from ENOSPC. This turned out to be because btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log was checking for ret == -ENOSPC, but this function sets err on error, and returns err. So instead of properly marking the inode as needing a full commit, we were returning -ENOSPC and aborting in __btrfs_unlink_inode. Fix this by checking the proper variable so that we return the correct thing in the case of ENOSPC. The ENOENT needs to be checked, because btrfs_lookup_dir_item_index() can return -ENOENT if the dir item isn't in the tree log (which would happen if we hadn't fsync'ed this guy). We actually handle that case in __btrfs_unlink_inode, so it's an expected error to get back. Fixes: 4a500fd178c8 ("Btrfs: Metadata ENOSPC handling for tree log") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba [ add note and comment about ENOENT ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

writeback: Fix sync livelock due to b_dirty_time processing

2020-09-03T09:21:21Z

commit f9cae926f35e8230330f28c7b743ad088611a8de upstream. When we are processing writeback for sync(2), move_expired_inodes() didn't set any inode expiry value (older_than_this). This can result in writeback never completing if there's steady stream of inodes added to b_dirty_time list as writeback rechecks dirty lists after each writeback round whether there's more work to be done. Fix the problem by using sync(2) start time is inode expiry value when processing b_dirty_time list similarly as for ordinarily dirtied inodes. This requires some refactoring of older_than_this handling which simplifies the code noticeably as a bonus. Fixes: 0ae45f63d4ef ("vfs: add support for a lazytime mount option") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

writeback: Avoid skipping inode writeback

2020-09-03T09:21:21Z

commit 5afced3bf28100d81fb2fe7e98918632a08feaf5 upstream. Inode's i_io_list list head is used to attach inode to several different lists - wb->{b_dirty, b_dirty_time, b_io, b_more_io}. When flush worker prepares a list of inodes to writeback e.g. for sync(2), it moves inodes to b_io list. Thus it is critical for sync(2) data integrity guarantees that inode is not requeued to any other writeback list when inode is queued for processing by flush worker. That's the reason why writeback_single_inode() does not touch i_io_list (unless the inode is completely clean) and why __mark_inode_dirty() does not touch i_io_list if I_SYNC flag is set. However there are two flaws in the current logic: 1) When inode has only I_DIRTY_TIME set but it is already queued in b_io list due to sync(2), concurrent __mark_inode_dirty(inode, I_DIRTY_SYNC) can still move inode back to b_dirty list resulting in skipping writeback of inode time stamps during sync(2). 2) When inode is on b_dirty_time list and writeback_single_inode() races with __mark_inode_dirty() like: writeback_single_inode() __mark_inode_dirty(inode, I_DIRTY_PAGES) inode->i_state |= I_SYNC __writeback_single_inode() inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES; if (inode->i_state & I_SYNC) bail if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL)) - not true so nothing done We end up with I_DIRTY_PAGES inode on b_dirty_time list and thus standard background writeback will not writeback this inode leading to possible dirty throttling stalls etc. (thanks to Martijn Coenen for this analysis). Fix these problems by tracking whether inode is queued in b_io or b_more_io lists in a new I_SYNC_QUEUED flag. When this flag is set, we know flush worker has queued inode and we should not touch i_io_list. On the other hand we also know that once flush worker is done with the inode it will requeue the inode to appropriate dirty list. When I_SYNC_QUEUED is not set, __mark_inode_dirty() can (and must) move inode to appropriate dirty list. Reported-by: Martijn Coenen Reviewed-by: Martijn Coenen Tested-by: Martijn Coenen Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Fixes: 0ae45f63d4ef ("vfs: add support for a lazytime mount option") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

writeback: Protect inode->i_io_list with inode->i_lock

2020-09-03T09:21:21Z

commit b35250c0816c7cf7d0a8de92f5fafb6a7508a708 upstream. Currently, operations on inode->i_io_list are protected by wb->list_lock. In the following patches we'll need to maintain consistency between inode->i_state and inode->i_io_list so change the code so that inode->i_lock protects also all inode's i_io_list handling. Reviewed-by: Martijn Coenen Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # Prerequisite for "writeback: Avoid skipping inode writeback" Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix space cache memory leak after transaction abort

2020-09-03T09:21:20Z

commit bbc37d6e475eee8ffa2156ec813efc6bbb43c06d upstream. If a transaction aborts it can cause a memory leak of the pages array of a block group's io_ctl structure. The following steps explain how that can happen: 1) Transaction N is committing, currently in state TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED and it's about to start writing out dirty extent buffers; 2) Transaction N + 1 already started and another task, task A, just called btrfs_commit_transaction() on it; 3) Block group B was dirtied (extents allocated from it) by transaction N + 1, so when task A calls btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(), at the very beginning of the transaction commit, it starts writeback for the block group's space cache by calling btrfs_write_out_cache(), which allocates the pages array for the block group's io_ctl with a call to io_ctl_init(). Block group A is added to the io_list of transaction N + 1 by btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(); 4) While transaction N's commit is writing out the extent buffers, it gets an IO error and aborts transaction N, also setting the file system to RO mode; 5) Task A has already returned from btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(), is at btrfs_commit_transaction() and has set transaction N + 1 state to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START. Immediately after that it checks that the filesystem was turned to RO mode, due to transaction N's abort, and jumps to the "cleanup_transaction" label. After that we end up at btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction() which calls btrfs_cleanup_dirty_bgs(). That helper finds block group B in the transaction's io_list but it never releases the pages array of the block group's io_ctl, resulting in a memory leak. In fact at the point when we are at btrfs_cleanup_dirty_bgs(), the pages array points to pages that were already released by us at __btrfs_write_out_cache() through the call to io_ctl_drop_pages(). We end up freeing the pages array only after waiting for the ordered extent to complete through btrfs_wait_cache_io(), which calls io_ctl_free() to do that. But in the transaction abort case we don't wait for the space cache's ordered extent to complete through a call to btrfs_wait_cache_io(), so that's why we end up with a memory leak - we wait for the ordered extent to complete indirectly by shutting down the work queues and waiting for any jobs in them to complete before returning from close_ctree(). We can solve the leak simply by freeing the pages array right after releasing the pages (with the call to io_ctl_drop_pages()) at __btrfs_write_out_cache(), since we will never use it anymore after that and the pages array points to already released pages at that point, which is currently not a problem since no one will use it after that, but not a good practice anyway since it can easily lead to use-after-free issues. So fix this by freeing the pages array right after releasing the pages at __btrfs_write_out_cache(). This issue can often be reproduced with test case generic/475 from fstests and kmemleak can detect it and reports it with the following trace: unreferenced object 0xffff9bbf009fa600 (size 512): comm "fsstress", pid 38807, jiffies 4298504428 (age 22.028s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 a0 7c 4d 3d ed ff ff 40 a0 7c 4d 3d ed ff ff ..|M=...@.|M=... 80 a0 7c 4d 3d ed ff ff c0 a0 7c 4d 3d ed ff ff ..|M=.....|M=... backtrace: [<00000000f4b5cfe2>] __kmalloc+0x1a8/0x3e0 [<0000000028665e7f>] io_ctl_init+0xa7/0x120 [btrfs] [<00000000a1f95b2d>] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x86/0x4a0 [btrfs] [<00000000207ea1b0>] btrfs_write_out_cache+0x7f/0xf0 [btrfs] [<00000000af21f534>] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x27b/0x580 [btrfs] [<00000000c3c23d44>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa6f/0xe70 [btrfs] [<000000009588930c>] create_subvol+0x581/0x9a0 [btrfs] [<000000009ef2fd7f>] btrfs_mksubvol+0x3fb/0x4a0 [btrfs] [<00000000474e5187>] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x119/0x1a0 [btrfs] [<00000000708ee349>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs] [<00000000ea60106f>] btrfs_ioctl+0x12c/0x3130 [btrfs] [<000000005c923d6d>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [<0000000043ace2c9>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [<00000000904efbce>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fs: prevent BUG_ON in submit_bh_wbc()

2020-09-03T09:21:19Z

[ Upstream commit 377254b2cd2252c7c3151b113cbdf93a7736c2e9 ] If a device is hot-removed --- for example, when a physical device is unplugged from pcie slot or a nbd device's network is shutdown --- this can result in a BUG_ON() crash in submit_bh_wbc(). This is because the when the block device dies, the buffer heads will have their Buffer_Mapped flag get cleared, leading to the crash in submit_bh_wbc. We had attempted to work around this problem in commit a17712c8 ("ext4: check superblock mapped prior to committing"). Unfortunately, it's still possible to hit the BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh)) if the device dies between when the work-around check in ext4_commit_super() and when submit_bh_wbh() is finally called: Code path: ext4_commit_super judge if 'buffer_mapped(sbh)' is false, return <== commit a17712c8 lock_buffer(sbh) ... unlock_buffer(sbh) __sync_dirty_buffer(sbh,... lock_buffer(sbh) judge if 'buffer_mapped(sbh))' is false, return <== added by this patch submit_bh(...,sbh) submit_bh_wbc(...,sbh,...) [100722.966497] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:3095! <== BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh))' in submit_bh_wbc() [100722.966503] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [100722.966566] task: ffff8817e15a9e40 task.stack: ffffc90024744000 [100722.966574] RIP: 0010:submit_bh_wbc+0x180/0x190 [100722.966575] RSP: 0018:ffffc90024747a90 EFLAGS: 00010246 [100722.966576] RAX: 0000000000620005 RBX: ffff8818a80603a8 RCX: 0000000000000000 [100722.966576] RDX: ffff8818a80603a8 RSI: 0000000000020800 RDI: 0000000000000001 [100722.966577] RBP: ffffc90024747ac0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88207f94170d [100722.966578] R10: 00000000000437c8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000020800 [100722.966578] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 000000000bf9a438 R15: ffff88195f333000 [100722.966580] FS: 00007fa2eee27700(0000) GS:ffff88203d840000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [100722.966580] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [100722.966581] CR2: 0000000000f0b008 CR3: 000000201a622003 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [100722.966582] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [100722.966583] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [100722.966583] PKRU: 55555554 [100722.966583] Call Trace: [100722.966588] __sync_dirty_buffer+0x6e/0xd0 [100722.966614] ext4_commit_super+0x1d8/0x290 [ext4] [100722.966626] __ext4_std_error+0x78/0x100 [ext4] [100722.966635] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xca/0x120 [ext4] [100722.966646] ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x58/0xb0 [ext4] [100722.966655] ? ext4_dirty_inode+0x48/0x70 [ext4] [100722.966663] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x53/0x1e0 [ext4] [100722.966671] ? __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x6d/0xf0 [ext4] [100722.966679] ext4_dirty_inode+0x48/0x70 [ext4] [100722.966682] __mark_inode_dirty+0x17f/0x350 [100722.966686] generic_update_time+0x87/0xd0 [100722.966687] touch_atime+0xa9/0xd0 [100722.966690] generic_file_read_iter+0xa09/0xcd0 [100722.966694] ? page_cache_tree_insert+0xb0/0xb0 [100722.966704] ext4_file_read_iter+0x4a/0x100 [ext4] [100722.966707] ? __inode_security_revalidate+0x4f/0x60 [100722.966709] __vfs_read+0xec/0x160 [100722.966711] vfs_read+0x8c/0x130 [100722.966712] SyS_pread64+0x87/0xb0 [100722.966716] do_syscall_64+0x67/0x1b0 [100722.966719] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 To address this, add the check of 'buffer_mapped(bh)' to __sync_dirty_buffer(). This also has the benefit of fixing this for other file systems. With this addition, we can drop the workaround in ext4_commit_supper(). [ Commit description rewritten by tytso. ] Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1596211825-8750-1-git-send-email-xianting_tian@126.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

jbd2: abort journal if free a async write error metadata buffer

2020-09-03T09:21:19Z

[ Upstream commit c044f3d8360d2ecf831ba2cc9f08cf9fb2c699fb ] If we free a metadata buffer which has been failed to async write out in the background, the jbd2 checkpoint procedure will not detect this failure in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint(), so it may lead to filesystem inconsistency after cleanup journal tail. This patch abort the journal if free a buffer has write_io_error flag to prevent potential further inconsistency. Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200620025427.1756360-5-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

jbd2: make sure jh have b_transaction set in refile/unfile_buffer

2020-09-03T09:21:19Z

[ Upstream commit 24dc9864914eb5813173cfa53313fcd02e4aea7d ] Callers of __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() and __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer() assume that the b_transaction is set. In fact if it's not, we can end up with journal_head refcounting errors leading to crash much later that might be very hard to track down. Add asserts to make sure that is the case. We also make sure that b_next_transaction is NULL in __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() since the callers expect that as well and we should not get into that stage in this state anyway, leading to problems later on if we do. Tested with fstests. Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200617092549.6712-1-lczerner@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ceph: fix potential mdsc use-after-free crash

2020-09-03T09:21:18Z

[ Upstream commit fa9967734227b44acb1b6918033f9122dc7825b9 ] Make sure the delayed work stopped before releasing the resources. cancel_delayed_work_sync() will only guarantee that the work finishes executing if the work is already in the ->worklist. That means after the cancel_delayed_work_sync() returns, it will leave the work requeued if it was rearmed at the end. That can lead to a use after free once the work struct is freed. Fix it by flushing the delayed work instead of trying to cancel it, and ensure that the work doesn't rearm if the mdsc is stopping. URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46293 Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

do_epoll_ctl(): clean the failure exits up a bit

2020-08-26T08:29:06Z

commit 52c479697c9b73f628140dcdfcd39ea302d05482 upstream. Signed-off-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman