user/sven/linux.git/fs, branch v5.4.90

btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir

2021-01-12T19:16:23Z

commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. Tested-by: Massimo B. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

proc: fix lookup in /proc/net subdirectories after setns(2)

2021-01-12T19:16:10Z

[ Upstream commit c6c75deda81344c3a95d1d1f606d5cee109e5d54 ] Commit 1fde6f21d90f ("proc: fix /proc/net/* after setns(2)") only forced revalidation of regular files under /proc/net/ However, /proc/net/ is unusual in the sense of /proc/net/foo handlers take netns pointer from parent directory which is old netns. Steps to reproduce: (void)open("/proc/net/sctp/snmp", O_RDONLY); unshare(CLONE_NEWNET); int fd = open("/proc/net/sctp/snmp", O_RDONLY); read(fd, &c, 1); Read will read wrong data from original netns. Patch forces lookup on every directory under /proc/net . Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201205160916.GA109739@localhost.localdomain Fixes: 1da4d377f943 ("proc: revalidate misc dentries") Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan Reported-by: "Rantala, Tommi T. (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" Cc: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

proc: change ->nlink under proc_subdir_lock

2021-01-12T19:16:10Z

[ Upstream commit e06689bf57017ac022ccf0f2a5071f760821ce0f ] Currently gluing PDE into global /proc tree is done under lock, but changing ->nlink is not. Additionally struct proc_dir_entry::nlink is not atomic so updates can be lost. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190925202436.GA17388@avx2 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

exec: Transform exec_update_mutex into a rw_semaphore

2021-01-09T12:44:55Z

[ Upstream commit f7cfd871ae0c5008d94b6f66834e7845caa93c15 ] Recently syzbot reported[0] that there is a deadlock amongst the users of exec_update_mutex. The problematic lock ordering found by lockdep was: perf_event_open (exec_update_mutex -> ovl_i_mutex) chown (ovl_i_mutex -> sb_writes) sendfile (sb_writes -> p->lock) by reading from a proc file and writing to overlayfs proc_pid_syscall (p->lock -> exec_update_mutex) While looking at possible solutions it occured to me that all of the users and possible users involved only wanted to state of the given process to remain the same. They are all readers. The only writer is exec. There is no reason for readers to block on each other. So fix this deadlock by transforming exec_update_mutex into a rw_semaphore named exec_update_lock that only exec takes for writing. Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov Cc: Al Viro Cc: Bernd Edlinger Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Christopher Yeoh Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Sargun Dhillon Cc: Christian Brauner Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Fixes: eea9673250db ("exec: Add exec_update_mutex to replace cred_guard_mutex") [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000063640c05ade8e3de@google.com Reported-by: syzbot+db9cdf3dd1f64252c6ef@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87ft4mbqen.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fuse: fix bad inode

2021-01-09T12:44:54Z

[ Upstream commit 5d069dbe8aaf2a197142558b6fb2978189ba3454 ] Jan Kara's analysis of the syzbot report (edited): The reproducer opens a directory on FUSE filesystem, it then attaches dnotify mark to the open directory. After that a fuse_do_getattr() call finds that attributes returned by the server are inconsistent, and calls make_bad_inode() which, among other things does: inode->i_mode = S_IFREG; This then confuses dnotify which doesn't tear down its structures properly and eventually crashes. Avoid calling make_bad_inode() on a live inode: switch to a private flag on the fuse inode. Also add the test to ops which the bad_inode_ops would have caught. This bug goes back to the initial merge of fuse in 2.6.14... Reported-by: syzbot+f427adf9324b92652ccc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Tested-by: Jan Kara Cc: Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fs/namespace.c: WARN if mnt_count has become negative

2021-01-06T13:48:40Z

[ Upstream commit edf7ddbf1c5eb98b720b063b73e20e8a4a1ce673 ] Missing calls to mntget() (or equivalently, too many calls to mntput()) are hard to detect because mntput() delays freeing mounts using task_work_add(), then again using call_rcu(). As a result, mnt_count can often be decremented to -1 without getting a KASAN use-after-free report. Such cases are still bugs though, and they point to real use-after-frees being possible. For an example of this, see the bug fixed by commit 1b0b9cc8d379 ("vfs: fsmount: add missing mntget()"), discussed at https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20190605135401.GB30925@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u. This bug *should* have been trivial to find. But actually, it wasn't found until syzkaller happened to use fchdir() to manipulate the reference count just right for the bug to be noticeable. Address this by making mntput_no_expire() issue a WARN if mnt_count has become negative. Suggested-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

f2fs: avoid race condition for shrinker count

2021-01-06T13:48:40Z

[ Upstream commit a95ba66ac1457b76fe472c8e092ab1006271f16c ] Light reported sometimes shinker gets nat_cnt < dirty_nat_cnt resulting in wrong do_shinker work. Let's avoid to return insane overflowed value by adding single tracking value. Reported-by: Light Hsieh Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

NFSv4: Fix a pNFS layout related use-after-free race when freeing the inode

2021-01-06T13:48:40Z

[ Upstream commit b6d49ecd1081740b6e632366428b960461f8158b ] When returning the layout in nfs4_evict_inode(), we need to ensure that the layout is actually done being freed before we can proceed to free the inode itself. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

quota: Don't overflow quota file offsets

2021-01-06T13:48:39Z

[ Upstream commit 10f04d40a9fa29785206c619f80d8beedb778837 ] The on-disk quota format supports quota files with upto 2^32 blocks. Be careful when computing quota file offsets in the quota files from block numbers as they can overflow 32-bit types. Since quota files larger than 4GB would require ~26 millions of quota users, this is mostly a theoretical concern now but better be careful, fuzzers would find the problem sooner or later anyway... Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fcntl: Fix potential deadlock in send_sig{io, urg}()

2021-01-06T13:48:39Z

commit 8d1ddb5e79374fb277985a6b3faa2ed8631c5b4c upstream. Syzbot reports a potential deadlock found by the newly added recursive read deadlock detection in lockdep: [...] ======================================================== [...] WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected [...] 5.9.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Not tainted [...] -------------------------------------------------------- [...] syz-executor.1/10214 just changed the state of lock: [...] ffff88811f506338 (&f->f_owner.lock){.+..}-{2:2}, at: send_sigurg+0x1d/0x200 [...] but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past: [...] (&dev->event_lock){-...}-{2:2} [...] [...] [...] and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [...] [...] [...] other info that might help us debug this: [...] Chain exists of: [...] &dev->event_lock --> &new->fa_lock --> &f->f_owner.lock [...] [...] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [...] [...] CPU0 CPU1 [...] ---- ---- [...] lock(&f->f_owner.lock); [...] local_irq_disable(); [...] lock(&dev->event_lock); [...] lock(&new->fa_lock); [...] [...] lock(&dev->event_lock); [...] [...] *** DEADLOCK *** The corresponding deadlock case is as followed: CPU 0 CPU 1 CPU 2 read_lock(&fown->lock); spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, ...) write_lock_irq(&filp->f_owner.lock); // wait for the lock read_lock(&fown-lock); // have to wait until the writer release // due to the fairness spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock); // wait for the lock The lock dependency on CPU 1 happens if there exists a call sequence: input_inject_event(): spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock,...); input_handle_event(): input_pass_values(): input_to_handler(): handler->event(): // evdev_event() evdev_pass_values(): spin_lock(&client->buffer_lock); __pass_event(): kill_fasync(): kill_fasync_rcu(): read_lock(&fa->fa_lock); send_sigio(): read_lock(&fown->lock); To fix this, make the reader in send_sigurg() and send_sigio() use read_lock_irqsave() and read_lock_irqrestore(). Reported-by: syzbot+22e87cdf94021b984aa6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+c5e32344981ad9f33750@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman