user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/bpf.h, branch v5.10.230

bpf, sockmap: Fix sk->sk_forward_alloc warn_on in sk_stream_kill_queues

2024-07-18T11:05:43Z

commit d8616ee2affcff37c5d315310da557a694a3303d upstream. During TCP sockmap redirect pressure test, the following warning is triggered: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2145 at net/core/stream.c:205 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xbc/0xd0 CPU: 3 PID: 2145 Comm: iperf Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 5.10.0+ #9 Call Trace: inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110 inet_csk_listen_stop+0xbb/0x380 tcp_close+0x41b/0x480 inet_release+0x42/0x80 __sock_release+0x3d/0xa0 sock_close+0x11/0x20 __fput+0x9d/0x240 task_work_run+0x62/0x90 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x110/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The reason we observed is that: When the listener is closing, a connection may have completed the three-way handshake but not accepted, and the client has sent some packets. The child sks in accept queue release by inet_child_forget()->inet_csk_destroy_sock(), but psocks of child sks have not released. To fix, add sock_map_destroy to release psocks. Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki Acked-by: John Fastabend Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220524075311.649153-1-wangyufen@huawei.com [ Conflict in include/linux/bpf.h due to function declaration position and remove non-existed sk_psock_stop helper from sock_map_destroy. ] Signed-off-by: Wen Gu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Defer the free of inner map when necessary

2024-03-26T22:21:45Z

[ Upstream commit 876673364161da50eed6b472d746ef88242b2368 ] When updating or deleting an inner map in map array or map htab, the map may still be accessed by non-sleepable program or sleepable program. However bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() decreases the ref-counter of the inner map directly through bpf_map_put(), if the ref-counter is the last one (which is true for most cases), the inner map will be freed by ops->map_free() in a kworker. But for now, most .map_free() callbacks don't use synchronize_rcu() or its variants to wait for the elapse of a RCU grace period, so after the invocation of ops->map_free completes, the bpf program which is accessing the inner map may incur use-after-free problem. Fix the free of inner map by invoking bpf_map_free_deferred() after both one RCU grace period and one tasks trace RCU grace period if the inner map has been removed from the outer map before. The deferment is accomplished by using call_rcu() or call_rcu_tasks_trace() when releasing the last ref-counter of bpf map. The newly-added rcu_head field in bpf_map shares the same storage space with work field to reduce the size of bpf_map. Fixes: bba1dc0b55ac ("bpf: Remove redundant synchronize_rcu.") Fixes: 638e4b825d52 ("bpf: Allows per-cpu maps and map-in-map in sleepable programs") Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin (cherry picked from commit 62fca83303d608ad4fec3f7428c8685680bb01b0) Signed-off-by: Robert Kolchmeyer Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Add map and need_defer parameters to .map_fd_put_ptr()

2024-02-23T07:42:07Z

[ Upstream commit 20c20bd11a0702ce4dc9300c3da58acf551d9725 ] map is the pointer of outer map, and need_defer needs some explanation. need_defer tells the implementation to defer the reference release of the passed element and ensure that the element is still alive before the bpf program, which may manipulate it, exits. The following three cases will invoke map_fd_put_ptr() and different need_defer values will be passed to these callers: 1) release the reference of the old element in the map during map update or map deletion. The release must be deferred, otherwise the bpf program may incur use-after-free problem, so need_defer needs to be true. 2) release the reference of the to-be-added element in the error path of map update. The to-be-added element is not visible to any bpf program, so it is OK to pass false for need_defer parameter. 3) release the references of all elements in the map during map release. Any bpf program which has access to the map must have been exited and released, so need_defer=false will be OK. These two parameters will be used by the following patches to fix the potential use-after-free problem for map-in-map. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix tr dereferencing

2023-10-10T19:53:37Z

[ Upstream commit b724a6418f1f853bcb39c8923bf14a50c7bdbd07 ] Fix 'tr' dereferencing bug when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is turned off. When CONFIG_BPF_JIT is turned off, 'bpf_trampoline_get()' returns NULL, which is same as the cases when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is turned on. Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202309131936.5Nc8eUD0-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: f7b12b6fea00 ("bpf: verifier: refactor check_attach_btf_id()") Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230917153846.88732-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Add PROG_TEST_RUN support for sk_lookup programs

2022-08-03T10:00:52Z

commit 7c32e8f8bc33a5f4b113a630857e46634e3e143b upstream. Allow to pass sk_lookup programs to PROG_TEST_RUN. User space provides the full bpf_sk_lookup struct as context. Since the context includes a socket pointer that can't be exposed to user space we define that PROG_TEST_RUN returns the cookie of the selected socket or zero in place of the socket pointer. We don't support testing programs that select a reuseport socket, since this would mean running another (unrelated) BPF program from the sk_lookup test handler. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210303101816.36774-3-lmb@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Tianchen Ding Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/speculation: Add missing prototype for unpriv_ebpf_notify()

2022-06-09T08:21:04Z

[ Upstream commit 2147c438fde135d6c145a96e373d9348e7076f7f ] Fix the following warnings seen with "make W=1": kernel/sysctl.c:183:13: warning: no previous prototype for ‘unpriv_ebpf_notify’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 183 | void __weak unpriv_ebpf_notify(int new_state) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c:659:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘unpriv_ebpf_notify’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 659 | void unpriv_ebpf_notify(int new_state) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Fixes: 44a3918c8245 ("x86/speculation: Include unprivileged eBPF status in Spectre v2 mitigation reporting") Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5689d065f739602ececaee1e05e68b8644009608.1650930000.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/speculation: Include unprivileged eBPF status in Spectre v2 mitigation reporting

2022-03-11T11:11:49Z

commit 44a3918c8245ab10c6c9719dd12e7a8d291980d8 upstream. With unprivileged eBPF enabled, eIBRS (without retpoline) is vulnerable to Spectre v2 BHB-based attacks. When both are enabled, print a warning message and report it in the 'spectre_v2' sysfs vulnerabilities file. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner [fllinden@amazon.com: backported to 5.10] Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf, x86: Fix "no previous prototype" warning

2021-12-14T10:32:36Z

commit f45b2974cc0ae959a4c503a071e38a56bd64372f upstream. The arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher function does not have a prototype, and yields the following warning when W=1 is enabled for the kernel build. >> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2188:5: warning: no previous \ prototype for 'arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 2188 | int arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher(void *image, s64 *funcs, \ int num_funcs) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Remove the warning by adding a function declaration to include/linux/bpf.h. Fixes: 75ccbef6369e ("bpf: Introduce BPF dispatcher") Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211117125708.769168-1-bjorn@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Fix toctou on read-only map's constant scalar tracking

2021-12-01T08:18:58Z

commit 353050be4c19e102178ccc05988101887c25ae53 upstream. Commit a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars") is checking whether maps are read-only both from BPF program side and user space side, and then, given their content is constant, reading out their data via map->ops->map_direct_value_addr() which is then subsequently used as known scalar value for the register, that is, it is marked as __mark_reg_known() with the read value at verification time. Before a23740ec43ba, the register content was marked as an unknown scalar so the verifier could not make any assumptions about the map content. The current implementation however is prone to a TOCTOU race, meaning, the value read as known scalar for the register is not guaranteed to be exactly the same at a later point when the program is executed, and as such, the prior made assumptions of the verifier with regards to the program will be invalid which can cause issues such as OOB access, etc. While the BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG map flag is always fixed and required to be specified at map creation time, the map->frozen property is initially set to false for the map given the map value needs to be populated, e.g. for global data sections. Once complete, the loader "freezes" the map from user space such that no subsequent updates/deletes are possible anymore. For the rest of the lifetime of the map, this freeze one-time trigger cannot be undone anymore after a successful BPF_MAP_FREEZE cmd return. Meaning, any new BPF_* cmd calls which would update/delete map entries will be rejected with -EPERM since map_get_sys_perms() removes the FMODE_CAN_WRITE permission. This also means that pending update/delete map entries must still complete before this guarantee is given. This corner case is not an issue for loaders since they create and prepare such program private map in successive steps. However, a malicious user is able to trigger this TOCTOU race in two different ways: i) via userfaultfd, and ii) via batched updates. For i) userfaultfd is used to expand the competition interval, so that map_update_elem() can modify the contents of the map after map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load() were executed. This works, because userfaultfd halts the parallel thread which triggered a map_update_elem() at the time where we copy key/value from the user buffer and this already passed the FMODE_CAN_WRITE capability test given at that time the map was not "frozen". Then, the main thread performs the map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load(), and once that had completed successfully, the other thread is woken up to complete the pending map_update_elem() which then changes the map content. For ii) the idea of the batched update is similar, meaning, when there are a large number of updates to be processed, it can increase the competition interval between the two. It is therefore possible in practice to modify the contents of the map after executing map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load(). One way to fix both i) and ii) at the same time is to expand the use of the map's map->writecnt. The latter was introduced in fc9702273e2e ("bpf: Add mmap() support for BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY") and further refined in 1f6cb19be2e2 ("bpf: Prevent re-mmap()'ing BPF map as writable for initially r/o mapping") with the rationale to make a writable mmap()'ing of a map mutually exclusive with read-only freezing. The counter indicates writable mmap() mappings and then prevents/fails the freeze operation. Its semantics can be expanded beyond just mmap() by generally indicating ongoing write phases. This would essentially span any parallel regular and batched flavor of update/delete operation and then also have map_freeze() fail with -EBUSY. For the check_mem_access() in the verifier we expand upon the bpf_map_is_rdonly() check ensuring that all last pending writes have completed via bpf_map_write_active() test. Once the map->frozen is set and bpf_map_write_active() indicates a map->writecnt of 0 only then we are really guaranteed to use the map's data as known constants. For map->frozen being set and pending writes in process of still being completed we fall back to marking that register as unknown scalar so we don't end up making assumptions about it. With this, both TOCTOU reproducers from i) and ii) are fixed. Note that the map->writecnt has been converted into a atomic64 in the fix in order to avoid a double freeze_mutex mutex_{un,}lock() pair when updating map->writecnt in the various map update/delete BPF_* cmd flavors. Spanning the freeze_mutex over entire map update/delete operations in syscall side would not be possible due to then causing everything to be serialized. Similarly, something like synchronize_rcu() after setting map->frozen to wait for update/deletes to complete is not possible either since it would also have to span the user copy which can sleep. On the libbpf side, this won't break d66562fba1ce ("libbpf: Add BPF object skeleton support") as the anonymous mmap()-ed "map initialization image" is remapped as a BPF map-backed mmap()-ed memory where for .rodata it's non-writable. Fixes: a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars") Reported-by: w1tcher.bupt@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov [fix conflict to call bpf_map_write_active_dec() in err_put block. fix conflict to insert new functions after find_and_alloc_map().] Reference: CVE-2021-4001 Signed-off-by: Masami Ichikawa(CIP) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Fix potential race in tail call compatibility check

2021-11-02T18:48:21Z

commit 54713c85f536048e685258f880bf298a74c3620d upstream. Lorenzo noticed that the code testing for program type compatibility of tail call maps is potentially racy in that two threads could encounter a map with an unset type simultaneously and both return true even though they are inserting incompatible programs. The race window is quite small, but artificially enlarging it by adding a usleep_range() inside the check in bpf_prog_array_compatible() makes it trivial to trigger from userspace with a program that does, essentially: map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, 4, 4, 2, 0); pid = fork(); if (pid) { key = 0; value = xdp_fd; } else { key = 1; value = tc_fd; } err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &value, 0); While the race window is small, it has potentially serious ramifications in that triggering it would allow a BPF program to tail call to a program of a different type. So let's get rid of it by protecting the update with a spinlock. The commit in the Fixes tag is the last commit that touches the code in question. v2: - Use a spinlock instead of an atomic variable and cmpxchg() (Alexei) v3: - Put lock and the members it protects into an embedded 'owner' struct (Daniel) Fixes: 3324b584b6f6 ("ebpf: misc core cleanup") Reported-by: Lorenzo Bianconi Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026110019.363464-1-toke@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman