user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h, branch v4.9.243

bug.h: work around GCC PR82365 in BUG()

2019-07-10T07:55:44Z

[ Upstream commit 173a3efd3edb2ef6ef07471397c5f542a360e9c1 ] Looking at functions with large stack frames across all architectures led me discovering that BUG() suffers from the same problem as fortify_panic(), which I've added a workaround for already. In short, variables that go out of scope by calling a noreturn function or __builtin_unreachable() keep using stack space in functions afterwards. A workaround that was identified is to insert an empty assembler statement just before calling the function that doesn't return. I'm adding a macro "barrier_before_unreachable()" to document this, and insert calls to that in all instances of BUG() that currently suffer from this problem. The files that saw the largest change from this had these frame sizes before, and much less with my patch: fs/ext4/inode.c:82:1: warning: the frame size of 1672 bytes is larger than 800 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] fs/ext4/namei.c:434:1: warning: the frame size of 904 bytes is larger than 800 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] fs/ext4/super.c:2279:1: warning: the frame size of 1160 bytes is larger than 800 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] fs/ext4/xattr.c:146:1: warning: the frame size of 1168 bytes is larger than 800 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] fs/f2fs/inode.c:152:1: warning: the frame size of 1424 bytes is larger than 800 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1195:1: warning: the frame size of 1068 bytes is larger than 800 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:395:1: warning: the frame size of 1084 bytes is larger than 800 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c:298:1: warning: the frame size of 928 bytes is larger than 800 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c:418:1: warning: the frame size of 908 bytes is larger than 800 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c:718:1: warning: the frame size of 960 bytes is larger than 800 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c:1500:1: warning: the frame size of 1088 bytes is larger than 800 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] In case of ARC and CRIS, it turns out that the BUG() implementation actually does return (or at least the compiler thinks it does), resulting in lots of warnings about uninitialized variable use and leaving noreturn functions, such as: block/cfq-iosched.c: In function 'cfq_async_queue_prio': block/cfq-iosched.c:3804:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] include/linux/dmaengine.h: In function 'dma_maxpq': include/linux/dmaengine.h:1123:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] This makes them call __builtin_trap() instead, which should normally dump the stack and kill the current process, like some of the other architectures already do. I tried adding barrier_before_unreachable() to panic() and fortify_panic() as well, but that had very little effect, so I'm not submitting that patch. Vineet said: : For ARC, it is double win. : : 1. Fixes 3 -Wreturn-type warnings : : | ../net/core/ethtool.c:311:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function : [-Wreturn-type] : | ../kernel/sched/core.c:3246:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function : [-Wreturn-type] : | ../include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h:180:1: warning: control reaches end of : non-void function [-Wreturn-type] : : 2. bloat-o-meter reports code size improvements as gcc elides the : generated code for stack return. Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82365 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171219114112.939391-1-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Vineet Gupta [arch/arc] Tested-by: Vineet Gupta [arch/arc] Cc: Mikael Starvik Cc: Jesper Nilsson Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Fenghua Yu Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Christopher Li Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Will Deacon Cc: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" Cc: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin [removed cris chunks - gregkh] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

compiler.h: enable builtin overflow checkers and add fallback code

2019-01-31T07:12:35Z

commit f0907827a8a9152aedac2833ed1b674a7b2a44f2 upstream. This adds wrappers for the __builtin overflow checkers present in gcc 5.1+ as well as fallback implementations for earlier compilers. It's not that easy to implement the fully generic __builtin_X_overflow(T1 a, T2 b, T3 *d) in macros, so the fallback code assumes that T1, T2 and T3 are the same. We obviously don't want the wrappers to have different semantics depending on $GCC_VERSION, so we also insist on that even when using the builtins. There are a few problems with the 'a+b < a' idiom for checking for overflow: For signed types, it relies on undefined behaviour and is not actually complete (it doesn't check underflow; e.g. INT_MIN+INT_MIN == 0 isn't caught). Due to type promotion it is wrong for all types (signed and unsigned) narrower than int. Similarly, when a and b does not have the same type, there are subtle cases like u32 a; if (a + sizeof(foo) < a) return -EOVERFLOW; a += sizeof(foo); where the test is always false on 64 bit platforms. Add to that that it is not always possible to determine the types involved at a glance. The new overflow.h is somewhat bulky, but that's mostly a result of trying to be type-generic, complete (e.g. catching not only overflow but also signed underflow) and not relying on undefined behaviour. Linus is of course right [1] that for unsigned subtraction a-b, the right way to check for overflow (underflow) is "b > a" and not "__builtin_sub_overflow(a, b, &d)", but that's just one out of six cases covered here, and included mostly for completeness. So is it worth it? I think it is, if nothing else for the documentation value of seeing if (check_add_overflow(a, b, &d)) return -EGOAWAY; do_stuff_with(d); instead of the open-coded (and possibly wrong and/or incomplete and/or UBsan-tickling) if (a+b < a) return -EGOAWAY; do_stuff_with(a+b); While gcc does recognize the 'a+b < a' idiom for testing unsigned add overflow, it doesn't do nearly as good for unsigned multiplication (there's also no single well-established idiom). So using check_mul_overflow in kcalloc and friends may also make gcc generate slightly better code. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/2/658 Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

compiler-gcc.h: Add attribute((gnu_inline)) to all inline declarations

2018-07-22T12:27:35Z

commit d03db2bc26f0e4a6849ad649a09c9c73fccdc656 upstream. Functions marked extern inline do not emit an externally visible function when the gnu89 C standard is used. Some KBUILD Makefiles overwrite KBUILD_CFLAGS. This is an issue for GCC 5.1+ users as without an explicit C standard specified, the default is gnu11. Since c99, the semantics of extern inline have changed such that an externally visible function is always emitted. This can lead to multiple definition errors of extern inline functions at link time of compilation units whose build files have removed an explicit C standard compiler flag for users of GCC 5.1+ or Clang. Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann Suggested-by: H. Peter Anvin Suggested-by: Joe Perches Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers Acked-by: Juergen Gross Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: acme@redhat.com Cc: akataria@vmware.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com Cc: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org Cc: aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Cc: astrachan@google.com Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com Cc: brijesh.singh@amd.com Cc: caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org Cc: ghackmann@google.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: jan.kiszka@siemens.com Cc: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com Cc: keescook@google.com Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Cc: kstewart@linuxfoundation.org Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Cc: manojgupta@google.com Cc: mawilcox@microsoft.com Cc: michal.lkml@markovi.net Cc: mjg59@google.com Cc: mka@chromium.org Cc: pombredanne@nexb.com Cc: rientjes@google.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: thomas.lendacky@amd.com Cc: tstellar@redhat.com Cc: tweek@google.com Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Cc: yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180621162324.36656-2-ndesaulniers@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

compiler, clang: always inline when CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is disabled

2018-07-22T12:27:35Z

commit 9a04dbcfb33b4012d0ce8c0282f1e3ca694675b1 upstream. The motivation for commit abb2ea7dfd82 ("compiler, clang: suppress warning for unused static inline functions") was to suppress clang's warnings about unused static inline functions. For configs without CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING enabled, such as any non-x86 architecture, `inline' in the kernel implies that __attribute__((always_inline)) is used. Some code depends on that behavior, see https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/13/918: net/built-in.o: In function `__xchg_mb': arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:99: undefined reference to `__compiletime_assert_99' arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:99: undefined reference to `__compiletime_assert_99 The full fix would be to identify these breakages and annotate the functions with __always_inline instead of `inline'. But since we are late in the 4.12-rc cycle, simply carry forward the forced inlining behavior and work toward moving arm64, and other architectures, toward CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING behavior. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.10.1706261552200.1075@chino.kir.corp.google.com Signed-off-by: David Rientjes Reported-by: Sodagudi Prasad Tested-by: Sodagudi Prasad Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

complete e390f9a port for v4.9.106

2018-06-13T14:16:44Z

objtool ports introduced in v4.9.106 were not totally complete. Therefore they resulted in issues like: module: overflow in relocation type 10 val XXXXXXXXXXX ‘usbcore’ likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel module: overflow in relocation type 10 val XXXXXXXXXXX ‘scsi_mod’ likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel Missing part was the complete backport of commit e390f9a. Original notes by Josh Poimboeuf: The '__unreachable' and '__func_stack_frame_non_standard' sections are only used at compile time. They're discarded for vmlinux but they should also be discarded for modules. Since this is a recurring pattern, prefix the section names with ".discard.". It's a nice convention and vmlinux.lds.h already discards such sections. Also remove the 'a' (allocatable) flag from the __unreachable section since it doesn't make sense for a discarded section. Signed-off-by: Philip Müller Fixes: d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends") Link: https://gitlab.manjaro.org/packages/core/linux49/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

objtool: Enclose contents of unreachable() macro in a block

2018-06-05T08:28:58Z

commit 4e4636cf981b5b629fbfb78aa9f232e015f7d521 upstream. Guenter Roeck reported a boot failure in mips64. It was bisected to the following commit: d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends") The unreachable() macro was formerly only composed of a single statement. The above commit added a second statement, but neglected to enclose the statements in a block. Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck Reported-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Fixes: d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170228042116.glmwmwiohcix7o4a@treble Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends

2018-06-05T08:28:55Z

commit d1091c7fa3d52ebce4dd3f15d04155b3469b2f90 upstream. The BUG() macro's use of __builtin_unreachable() via the unreachable() macro tells gcc that the instruction is a dead end, and that it's safe to assume the current code path will not execute past the previous instruction. On x86, the BUG() macro is implemented with the 'ud2' instruction. When objtool's branch analysis sees that instruction, it knows the current code path has come to a dead end. Peter Zijlstra has been working on a patch to change the WARN macros to use 'ud2'. That patch will break objtool's assumption that 'ud2' is always a dead end. Generally it's best for objtool to avoid making those kinds of assumptions anyway. The more ignorant it is of kernel code internals, the better. So create a more generic way for objtool to detect dead ends by adding an annotation to the unreachable() macro. The annotation stores a pointer to the end of the unreachable code path in an '__unreachable' section. Objtool can read that section to find the dead ends. Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/41a6d33971462ebd944a1c60ad4bf5be86c17b77.1487712920.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/retpoline: Support retpoline builds with Clang

2018-03-18T10:18:52Z

commit 87358710c1fb4f1bf96bbe2349975ff9953fc9b2 upstream. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com Cc: bp@alien8.de Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: jmattson@google.com Cc: karahmed@amazon.de Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: rkrcmar@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519037457-7643-5-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

compiler-gcc.h: Introduce __optimize function attribute

2018-02-22T14:43:53Z

commit df5d45aa08f848b79caf395211b222790534ccc7 upstream. Create a new function attribute __optimize, which allows to specify an optimization level on a per-function basis. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

kasan: update kasan_global for gcc 7

2016-12-01T00:32:52Z

kasan_global struct is part of compiler/runtime ABI. gcc revision 241983 has added a new field to kasan_global struct. Update kernel definition of kasan_global struct to include the new field. Without this patch KASAN is broken with gcc 7. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479219743-28682-1-git-send-email-dvyukov@google.com Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov Acked-by: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Alexander Potapenko Cc: [4.0+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds