user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/cpu.h, branch v4.14.201

cpu/speculation: Uninline and export CPU mitigations helpers

2019-11-12T18:19:04Z

commit 731dc9df975a5da21237a18c3384f811a7a41cc6 upstream. A kernel module may need to check the value of the "mitigations=" kernel command line parameter as part of its setup when the module needs to perform software mitigations for a CPU flaw. Uninline and export the helper functions surrounding the cpu_mitigations enum to allow for their usage from a module. Lastly, privatize the enum and cpu_mitigations variable since the value of cpu_mitigations can be checked with the exported helper functions. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/bugs: Add ITLB_MULTIHIT bug infrastructure

2019-11-12T18:19:03Z

commit db4d30fbb71b47e4ecb11c4efa5d8aad4b03dfae upstream. Some processors may incur a machine check error possibly resulting in an unrecoverable CPU lockup when an instruction fetch encounters a TLB multi-hit in the instruction TLB. This can occur when the page size is changed along with either the physical address or cache type. The relevant erratum can be found here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205195 There are other processors affected for which the erratum does not fully disclose the impact. This issue affects both bare-metal x86 page tables and EPT. It can be mitigated by either eliminating the use of large pages or by using careful TLB invalidations when changing the page size in the page tables. Just like Spectre, Meltdown, L1TF and MDS, a new bit has been allocated in MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES (PSCHANGE_MC_NO) and will be set on CPUs which are mitigated against this issue. Signed-off-by: Vineela Tummalapalli Co-developed-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/speculation/taa: Add sysfs reporting for TSX Async Abort

2019-11-12T18:19:00Z

commit 6608b45ac5ecb56f9e171252229c39580cc85f0f upstream. Add the sysfs reporting file for TSX Async Abort. It exposes the vulnerability and the mitigation state similar to the existing files for the other hardware vulnerabilities. Sysfs file path is: /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Neelima Krishnan Reviewed-by: Mark Gross Reviewed-by: Tony Luck Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/power: Fix 'nosmt' vs hibernation triple fault during resume

2019-06-11T10:21:48Z

commit ec527c318036a65a083ef68d8ba95789d2212246 upstream. As explained in 0cc3cd21657b ("cpu/hotplug: Boot HT siblings at least once") we always, no matter what, have to bring up x86 HT siblings during boot at least once in order to avoid first MCE bringing the system to its knees. That means that whenever 'nosmt' is supplied on the kernel command-line, all the HT siblings are as a result sitting in mwait or cpudile after going through the online-offline cycle at least once. This causes a serious issue though when a kernel, which saw 'nosmt' on its commandline, is going to perform resume from hibernation: if the resume from the hibernated image is successful, cr3 is flipped in order to point to the address space of the kernel that is being resumed, which in turn means that all the HT siblings are all of a sudden mwaiting on address which is no longer valid. That results in triple fault shortly after cr3 is switched, and machine reboots. Fix this by always waking up all the SMT siblings before initiating the 'restore from hibernation' process; this guarantees that all the HT siblings will be properly carried over to the resumed kernel waiting in resume_play_dead(), and acted upon accordingly afterwards, based on the target kernel configuration. Symmetricaly, the resumed kernel has to push the SMT siblings to mwait again in case it has SMT disabled; this means it has to online all the siblings when resuming (so that they come out of hlt) and offline them again to let them reach mwait. Cc: 4.19+ # v4.19+ Debugged-by: Thomas Gleixner Fixes: 0cc3cd21657b ("cpu/hotplug: Boot HT siblings at least once") Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina Acked-by: Pavel Machek Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/speculation: Add 'mitigations=' cmdline option

2019-05-14T17:18:46Z

commit 98af8452945c55652de68536afdde3b520fec429 upstream Keeping track of the number of mitigations for all the CPU speculation bugs has become overwhelming for many users. It's getting more and more complicated to decide which mitigations are needed for a given architecture. Complicating matters is the fact that each arch tends to have its own custom way to mitigate the same vulnerability. Most users fall into a few basic categories: a) they want all mitigations off; b) they want all reasonable mitigations on, with SMT enabled even if it's vulnerable; or c) they want all reasonable mitigations on, with SMT disabled if vulnerable. Define a set of curated, arch-independent options, each of which is an aggregation of existing options: - mitigations=off: Disable all mitigations. - mitigations=auto: [default] Enable all the default mitigations, but leave SMT enabled, even if it's vulnerable. - mitigations=auto,nosmt: Enable all the default mitigations, disabling SMT if needed by a mitigation. Currently, these options are placeholders which don't actually do anything. They will be fleshed out in upcoming patches. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Jiri Kosina (on x86) Reviewed-by: Jiri Kosina Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Jiri Kosina Cc: Waiman Long Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Jon Masters Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Tyler Hicks Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Randy Dunlap Cc: Steven Price Cc: Phil Auld Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b07a8ef9b7c5055c3a4637c87d07c296d5016fe0.1555085500.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/speculation/mds: Add sysfs reporting for MDS

2019-05-14T17:18:44Z

commit 8a4b06d391b0a42a373808979b5028f5c84d9c6a upstream Add the sysfs reporting file for MDS. It exposes the vulnerability and mitigation state similar to the existing files for the other speculative hardware vulnerabilities. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Jon Masters Tested-by: Jon Masters Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: Fix "SMT disabled by BIOS" detection for KVM

2019-02-12T18:46:13Z

commit b284909abad48b07d3071a9fc9b5692b3e64914b upstream. With the following commit: 73d5e2b47264 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") ... the hotplug code attempted to detect when SMT was disabled by BIOS, in which case it reported SMT as permanently disabled. However, that code broke a virt hotplug scenario, where the guest is booted with only primary CPU threads, and a sibling is brought online later. The problem is that there doesn't seem to be a way to reliably distinguish between the HW "SMT disabled by BIOS" case and the virt "sibling not yet brought online" case. So the above-mentioned commit was a bit misguided, as it permanently disabled SMT for both cases, preventing future virt sibling hotplugs. Going back and reviewing the original problems which were attempted to be solved by that commit, when SMT was disabled in BIOS: 1) /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control showed "on" instead of "notsupported"; and 2) vmx_vm_init() was incorrectly showing the L1TF_MSG_SMT warning. I'd propose that we instead consider #1 above to not actually be a problem. Because, at least in the virt case, it's possible that SMT wasn't disabled by BIOS and a sibling thread could be brought online later. So it makes sense to just always default the smt control to "on" to allow for that possibility (assuming cpuid indicates that the CPU supports SMT). The real problem is #2, which has a simple fix: change vmx_vm_init() to query the actual current SMT state -- i.e., whether any siblings are currently online -- instead of looking at the SMT "control" sysfs value. So fix it by: a) reverting the original "fix" and its followup fix: 73d5e2b47264 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") bc2d8d262cba ("cpu/hotplug: Fix SMT supported evaluation") and b) changing vmx_vm_init() to query the actual current SMT state -- instead of the sysfs control value -- to determine whether the L1TF warning is needed. This also requires the 'sched_smt_present' variable to exported, instead of 'cpu_smt_control'. Fixes: 73d5e2b47264 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") Reported-by: Igor Mammedov Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Joe Mario Cc: Jiri Kosina Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e3a85d585da28cc333ecbc1e78ee9216e6da9396.1548794349.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: Fix SMT supported evaluation

2018-08-15T16:13:00Z

commit bc2d8d262cba5736332cbc866acb11b1c5748aa9 upstream Josh reported that the late SMT evaluation in cpu_smt_state_init() sets cpu_smt_control to CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED in case that 'nosmt' was supplied on the kernel command line as it cannot differentiate between SMT disabled by BIOS and SMT soft disable via 'nosmt'. That wreckages the state and makes the sysfs interface unusable. Rework this so that during bringup of the non boot CPUs the availability of SMT is determined in cpu_smt_allowed(). If a newly booted CPU is not a 'primary' thread then set the local cpu_smt_available marker and evaluate this explicitely right after the initial SMP bringup has finished. SMT evaulation on x86 is a trainwreck as the firmware has all the information _before_ booting the kernel, but there is no interface to query it. Fixes: 73d5e2b47264 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") Reported-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: Set CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED early

2018-08-15T16:12:56Z

commit fee0aede6f4739c87179eca76136f83210953b86 upstream The CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED state is set (if the processor does not support SMT) when the sysfs SMT control file is initialized. That was fine so far as this was only required to make the output of the control file correct and to prevent writes in that case. With the upcoming l1tf command line parameter, this needs to be set up before the L1TF mitigation selection and command line parsing happens. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Jiri Kosina Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180713142323.121795971@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: Expose SMT control init function

2018-08-15T16:12:56Z

commit 8e1b706b6e819bed215c0db16345568864660393 upstream The L1TF mitigation will gain a commend line parameter which allows to set a combination of hypervisor mitigation and SMT control. Expose cpu_smt_disable() so the command line parser can tweak SMT settings. [ tglx: Split out of larger patch and made it preserve an already existing force off state ] Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Jiri Kosina Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180713142323.039715135@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman