user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/fscrypt.h, branch v5.9.5

fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for ->i_crypt_info

2020-07-21T23:02:13Z

Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with smp_load_acquire(). Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with the more lightweight READ_ONCE(). However, for this to be safe, all the published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the pointer itself. This may not be the case if allocating the object also involves initializing a static or global variable, for example. fscrypt_info includes various sub-objects which are internal to and are allocated by other kernel subsystems such as keyrings and crypto. So by using READ_ONCE() for ->i_crypt_info, we're relying on internal implementation details of these other kernel subsystems. Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead. (Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here. This change is just fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.) Fixes: e37a784d8b6a ("fscrypt: use READ_ONCE() to access ->i_crypt_info") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: add inline encryption support

2020-07-08T17:29:30Z

Add support for inline encryption to fs/crypto/. With "inline encryption", the block layer handles the decryption/encryption as part of the bio, instead of the filesystem doing the crypto itself via Linux's crypto API. This model is needed in order to take advantage of the inline encryption hardware present on most modern mobile SoCs. To use inline encryption, the filesystem needs to be mounted with '-o inlinecrypt'. Blk-crypto will then be used instead of the traditional filesystem-layer crypto whenever possible to encrypt the contents of any encrypted files in that filesystem. Fscrypt still provides the key and IV to use, and the actual ciphertext on-disk is still the same; therefore it's testable using the existing fscrypt ciphertext verification tests. Note that since blk-crypto has a fallback to Linux's crypto API, and also supports all the encryption modes currently supported by fscrypt, this feature is usable and testable even without actual inline encryption hardware. Per-filesystem changes will be needed to set encryption contexts when submitting bios and to implement the 'inlinecrypt' mount option. This patch just adds the common code. Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200702015607.1215430-3-satyat@google.com Co-developed-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2

2020-05-19T03:21:48Z

v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2. Therefore, the "test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies. To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or "test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "test_dummy_encryption" (no argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting -- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2. To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting "$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a pointer to the dummy fscrypt_context rather than using mount flags. To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow test_dummy_encryption to be set or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.) Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4, there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored inline, but the increase in size of the fscrypt_context from 24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512233251.118314-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: remove unnecessary extern keywords

2020-05-12T23:37:17Z

Remove the unnecessary 'extern' keywords from function declarations. This makes it so that we don't have a mix of both styles, so it won't be ambiguous what to use in new fscrypt patches. This also makes the code shorter and matches the 'checkpatch --strict' expectation. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200511191358.53096-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: name all function parameters

2020-05-12T23:37:17Z

Name all the function parameters. This makes it so that we don't have a mix of both styles, so it won't be ambiguous what to use in new fscrypt patches. This also matches the checkpatch expectation. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200511191358.53096-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: fix all kerneldoc warnings

2020-05-12T23:37:17Z

Fix all kerneldoc warnings in fs/crypto/ and include/linux/fscrypt.h. Most of these were due to missing documentation for function parameters. Detected with: scripts/kernel-doc -v -none fs/crypto/*.{c,h} include/linux/fscrypt.h This cleanup makes it possible to check new patches for kerneldoc warnings without having to filter out all the existing ones. For consistency, also adjust some function "brief descriptions" to include the parentheses and to wrap at 80 characters. (The latter matches the checkpatch expectation.) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200511191358.53096-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: add FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE ioctl

2020-03-20T04:56:54Z

Add an ioctl FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE which retrieves the nonce from an encrypted file or directory. The nonce is the 16-byte random value stored in the inode's encryption xattr. It is normally used together with the master key to derive the inode's actual encryption key. The nonces are needed by automated tests that verify the correctness of the ciphertext on-disk. Except for the IV_INO_LBLK_64 case, there's no way to replicate a file's ciphertext without knowing that file's nonce. The nonces aren't secret, and the existing ciphertext verification tests in xfstests retrieve them from disk using debugfs or dump.f2fs. But in environments that lack these debugging tools, getting the nonces by manually parsing the filesystem structure would be very hard. To make this important type of testing much easier, let's just add an ioctl that retrieves the nonce. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200314205052.93294-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: improve format of no-key names

2020-01-22T22:50:03Z

When an encrypted directory is listed without the key, the filesystem must show "no-key names" that uniquely identify directory entries, are at most 255 (NAME_MAX) bytes long, and don't contain '/' or '\0'. Currently, for short names the no-key name is the base64 encoding of the ciphertext filename, while for long names it's the base64 encoding of the ciphertext filename's dirhash and second-to-last 16-byte block. This format has the following problems: - Since it doesn't always include the dirhash, it's incompatible with directories that will use a secret-keyed dirhash over the plaintext filenames. In this case, the dirhash won't be computable from the ciphertext name without the key, so it instead must be retrieved from the directory entry and always included in the no-key name. Casefolded encrypted directories will use this type of dirhash. - It's ambiguous: it's possible to craft two filenames that map to the same no-key name, since the method used to abbreviate long filenames doesn't use a proper cryptographic hash function. Solve both these problems by switching to a new no-key name format that is the base64 encoding of a variable-length structure that contains the dirhash, up to 149 bytes of the ciphertext filename, and (if any bytes remain) the SHA-256 of the remaining bytes of the ciphertext filename. This ensures that each no-key name contains everything needed to find the directory entry again, contains only legal characters, doesn't exceed NAME_MAX, is unambiguous unless there's a SHA-256 collision, and that we only take the performance hit of SHA-256 on very long filenames. Note: this change does *not* address the existing issue where users can modify the 'dirhash' part of a no-key name and the filesystem may still accept the name. Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg [EB: improved comments and commit message, fixed checking return value of base64_decode(), check for SHA-256 error, continue to set disk_name for short names to keep matching simpler, and many other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-7-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories

2020-01-22T22:49:55Z

When we allow indexed directories to use both encryption and casefolding, for the dirhash we can't just hash the ciphertext filenames that are stored on-disk (as is done currently) because the dirhash must be case insensitive, but the stored names are case-preserving. Nor can we hash the plaintext names with an unkeyed hash (or a hash keyed with a value stored on-disk like ext4's s_hash_seed), since that would leak information about the names that encryption is meant to protect. Instead, if we can accept a dirhash that's only computable when the fscrypt key is available, we can hash the plaintext names with a keyed hash using a secret key derived from the directory's fscrypt master key. We'll use SipHash-2-4 for this purpose. Prepare for this by deriving a SipHash key for each casefolded encrypted directory. Make sure to handle deriving the key not only when setting up the directory's fscrypt_info, but also in the case where the casefold flag is enabled after the fscrypt_info was already set up. (We could just always derive the key regardless of casefolding, but that would introduce unnecessary overhead for people not using casefolding.) Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, squashed with change that avoids unnecessarily deriving the key, and many other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefolding

2020-01-22T22:47:15Z

Casefolded encrypted directories will use a new dirhash method that requires a secret key. If the directory uses a v2 encryption policy, it's easy to derive this key from the master key using HKDF. However, v1 encryption policies don't provide a way to derive additional keys. Therefore, don't allow casefolding on directories that use a v1 policy. Specifically, make it so that trying to enable casefolding on a directory that has a v1 policy fails, trying to set a v1 policy on a casefolded directory fails, and trying to open a casefolded directory that has a v1 policy (if one somehow exists on-disk) fails. Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, and other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers