user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/libata.h, branch v3.16.46

libata: Align ata_device's id on a cacheline

2016-03-24T10:00:54Z

commit 4ee34ea3a12396f35b26d90a094c75db95080baa upstream. The id buffer in ata_device is a DMA target, but it isn't explicitly cacheline aligned. Due to this, adjacent fields can be overwritten with stale data from memory on non coherent architectures. As a result, the kernel is sometimes unable to communicate with an ATA device. Fix this by ensuring that the id buffer is cacheline aligned. This issue is similar to that fixed by Commit 84bda12af31f ("libata: align ap->sector_buf"). Signed-off-by: Harvey Hunt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques

libata: add ATA_HORKAGE_NOTRIM

2015-08-11T08:57:31Z

commit 71d126fd28de2d4d9b7b2088dbccd7ca62fad6e0 upstream. Some devices lose data on TRIM whether queued or not. This patch adds a horkage to disable TRIM. tj: Collapsed unnecessary if() nesting. Signed-off-by: Arne Fitzenreiter Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [ luis: backported to 3.16: - dropped changes to show_ata_dev_trim - adjusted context ] Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques

libata: Ignore spurious PHY event on LPM policy change

2015-05-28T08:59:58Z

commit 09c5b4803a80a5451d950d6a539d2eb311dc0fb1 upstream. When the LPM policy is set to ATA_LPM_MAX_POWER, the device might generate a spurious PHY event that cuases errors on the link. Ignore this event if it occured within 10s after the policy change. The timeout was chosen observing that on a Dell XPS13 9333 these spurious events can occur up to roughly 6s after the policy change. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/3352987.ugV1Ipy7Z5@xps13 Signed-off-by: Gabriele Mazzotta Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques

libata: Add helper to determine when PHY events should be ignored

2015-05-28T08:59:57Z

commit 8393b811f38acdf7fd8da2028708edad3e68ce1f upstream. This is a preparation commit that will allow to add other criteria according to which PHY events should be dropped. Signed-off-by: Gabriele Mazzotta Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques

libata: allow sata_sil24 to opt-out of tag ordered submission

2015-02-04T10:57:34Z

commit 72dd299d5039a336493993dcc63413cf31d0e662 upstream. Ronny reports: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87101 "Since commit 8a4aeec8d "libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered controllers" the access to the harddisk on the first SATA-port is failing on its first access. The access to the harddisk on the second port is working normal. When reverting the above commit, access to both harddisks is working fine again." Maintain tag ordered submission as the default, but allow sata_sil24 to continue with the old behavior. Cc: Tejun Heo Reported-by: Ronny Hegewald Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques

libata: introduce ata_host->n_tags to avoid oops on SAS controllers

2014-07-23T14:30:34Z

1871ee134b73 ("libata: support the ata host which implements a queue depth less than 32") directly used ata_port->scsi_host->can_queue from ata_qc_new() to determine the number of tags supported by the host; unfortunately, SAS controllers doing SATA don't initialize ->scsi_host leading to the following oops. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000058 IP: [] ata_qc_new_init+0x188/0x1b0 PGD 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: isci libsas scsi_transport_sas mgag200 drm_kms_helper ttm CPU: 1 PID: 518 Comm: udevd Not tainted 3.16.0-rc6+ #62 Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600CO/S2600CO, BIOS SE5C600.86B.02.02.0002.122320131210 12/23/2013 task: ffff880c1a00b280 ti: ffff88061a000000 task.ti: ffff88061a000000 RIP: 0010:[] [] ata_qc_new_init+0x188/0x1b0 RSP: 0018:ffff88061a003ae8 EFLAGS: 00010012 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff88000241ca80 RCX: 00000000000000fa RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 0000000000000020 RDI: ffff8806194aa298 RBP: ffff88061a003ae8 R08: ffff8806194a8000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff88000241ca80 R12: ffff88061ad58200 R13: ffff8806194aa298 R14: ffffffff814e67a0 R15: ffff8806194a8000 FS: 00007f3ad7fe3840(0000) GS:ffff880627620000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000058 CR3: 000000061a118000 CR4: 00000000001407e0 Stack: ffff88061a003b20 ffffffff814e96e1 ffff88000241ca80 ffff88061ad58200 ffff8800b6bf6000 ffff880c1c988000 ffff880619903850 ffff88061a003b68 ffffffffa0056ce1 ffff88061a003b48 0000000013d6e6f8 ffff88000241ca80 Call Trace: [] ata_sas_queuecmd+0xa1/0x430 [] sas_queuecommand+0x191/0x220 [libsas] [] scsi_dispatch_cmd+0x10e/0x300 [] scsi_request_fn+0x2f5/0x550 [] __blk_run_queue+0x33/0x40 [] queue_unplugged+0x2a/0x90 [] blk_flush_plug_list+0x1b4/0x210 [] blk_finish_plug+0x14/0x50 [] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x198/0x1f0 [] force_page_cache_readahead+0x31/0x50 [] page_cache_sync_readahead+0x3e/0x50 [] generic_file_read_iter+0x496/0x5a0 [] blkdev_read_iter+0x37/0x40 [] new_sync_read+0x7e/0xb0 [] vfs_read+0x94/0x170 [] SyS_read+0x46/0xb0 [] ? SyS_lseek+0x91/0xb0 [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Code: 00 00 00 88 50 29 83 7f 08 01 19 d2 83 e2 f0 83 ea 50 88 50 34 c6 81 1d 02 00 00 40 c6 81 17 02 00 00 00 5d c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 <89> 14 25 58 00 00 00 Fix it by introducing ata_host->n_tags which is initialized to ATA_MAX_QUEUE - 1 in ata_host_init() for SAS controllers and set to scsi_host_template->can_queue in ata_host_register() for !SAS ones. As SAS hosts are never registered, this will give them the same ATA_MAX_QUEUE - 1 as before. Note that we can't use scsi_host->can_queue directly for SAS hosts anyway as they can go higher than the libata maximum. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reported-by: Mike Qiu Reported-by: Jesse Brandeburg Reported-by: Peter Hurley Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra Tested-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy Fixes: 1871ee134b73 ("libata: support the ata host which implements a queue depth less than 32") Cc: Kevin Hao Cc: Dan Williams Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered controllers

2014-04-18T19:56:03Z

The AHCI spec allows implementations to issue commands in tag order rather than FIFO order: 5.3.2.12 P:SelectCmd HBA sets pSlotLoc = (pSlotLoc + 1) mod (CAP.NCS + 1) or HBA selects the command to issue that has had the PxCI bit set to '1' longer than any other command pending to be issued. The result is that commands posted sequentially (time-wise) may play out of sequence when issued by hardware. This behavior has likely been hidden by drives that arrange for commands to complete in issue order. However, it appears recent drives (two from different vendors that we have found so far) inflict out-of-order completions as a matter of course. So, we need to take care to maintain ordered submission, otherwise we risk triggering a drive to fall out of sequential-io automation and back to random-io processing, which incurs large latency and degrades throughput. This issue was found in simple benchmarks where QD=2 seq-write performance was 30-50% *greater* than QD=32 seq-write performance. Tagging for -stable and making the change globally since it has a low risk-to-reward ratio. Also, word is that recent versions of an unnamed OS also does it this way now. So, drives in the field are already experienced with this tag ordering scheme. Cc: Cc: Dave Jiang Cc: Ed Ciechanowski Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo

libata: remove unused ata_sas_port_async_resume() stub

2014-03-19T20:30:23Z

Commit bc6e7c4b0d1a "libata, libsas: kill pm_result and related cleanup" renamed ata_sas_port_async_resume() to ata_sas_port_resume(), but missed a CONFIG_PM=n stub conversion. Randy fixed that up in commit a5a6569959fc "libata.h: add stub for ata_sas_port_resume", but missed the deletion of the now unused ata_sas_port_async_resume() routine. Cc: Randy Dunlap Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo

libata.h: add stub for ata_sas_port_resume

2014-03-19T17:56:40Z

Fix build error when CONFIG_PM is not enabled by adding a stub function in . drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c: In function 'sas_resume_sata': drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:756:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'ata_sas_port_resume' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Reported-by: Jim Davis Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Dan Williams

libata, libsas: kill pm_result and related cleanup

2014-03-18T20:08:38Z

Tejun says: "At least for libata, worrying about suspend/resume failures don't make whole lot of sense. If suspend failed, just proceed with suspend. If the device can't be woken up afterwards, that's that. There isn't anything we could have done differently anyway. The same for resume, if spinup fails, the device is dud and the following commands will invoke EH actions and will eventually fail. Again, there really isn't any *choice* to make. Just making sure the errors are handled gracefully (ie. don't crash) and the following commands are handled correctly should be enough." The only libata user that actually cares about the result from a suspend operation is libsas. However, it only cares about whether queuing a new operation collides with an in-flight one. All libsas does with the error is retry, but we can just let libata wait for the previous operation before continuing. Other cleanups include: 1/ Unifying all ata port pm operations on an ata_port_pm_ prefix 2/ Marking all ata port pm helper routines as returning void, only ata_port_pm_ entry points need to fake a 0 return value. 3/ Killing ata_port_{suspend|resume}_common() in favor of calling ata_port_request_pm() directly 4/ Killing the wrappers that just do a to_ata_port() conversion 5/ Clearly marking the entry points that do async operations with an _async suffix. Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=138995409532286&w=2 Cc: Phillip Susi Cc: Alan Stern Suggested-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Todd Brandt Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo