user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/lockdep.h, branch v4.14.281

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

2017-11-02T10:10:55Z

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

locking/lockdep: Untangle xhlock history save/restore from task independence

2017-08-29T13:14:38Z

Where XHLOCK_{SOFT,HARD} are save/restore points in the xhlocks[] to ensure the temporal IRQ events don't interact with task state, the XHLOCK_PROC is a fundament different beast that just happens to share the interface. The purpose of XHLOCK_PROC is to annotate independent execution inside one task. For example workqueues, each work should appear to run in its own 'pristine' 'task'. Remove XHLOCK_PROC in favour of its own interface to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Byungchul Park Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: david@fromorbit.com Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170829085939.ggmb6xiohw67micb@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/lockdep: Fix workqueue crossrelease annotation

2017-08-25T09:06:33Z

The new completion/crossrelease annotations interact unfavourable with the extant flush_work()/flush_workqueue() annotations. The problem is that when a single work class does: wait_for_completion(&C) and complete(&C) in different executions, we'll build dependencies like: lock_map_acquire(W) complete_acquire(C) and lock_map_acquire(W) complete_release(C) which results in the dependency chain: W->C->W, which lockdep thinks spells deadlock, even though there is no deadlock potential since works are ran concurrently. One possibility would be to change the work 'lock' to recursive-read, but that would mean hitting a lockdep limitation on recursive locks. Also, unconditinoally switching to recursive-read here would fail to detect the actual deadlock on single-threaded workqueues, which do have a problem with this. For now, forcefully disregard these locks for crossrelease. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: byungchul.park@lge.com Cc: david@fromorbit.com Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net Cc: oleg@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/lockdep: Explicitly initialize wq_barrier::done::map

2017-08-17T10:12:33Z

With the new lockdep crossrelease feature, which checks completions usage, a false positive is reported in the workqueue code: > Worker A : acquired of wfc.work -> wait for cpu_hotplug_lock to be released > Task B : acquired of cpu_hotplug_lock -> wait for lock#3 to be released > Task C : acquired of lock#3 -> wait for completion of barr->done > (Task C is in lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked()) > Worker D : wait for wfc.work to be released -> will complete barr->done Such a dead lock can not happen because Task C's barr->done and Worker D's barr->done can not be the same instance. The reason of this false positive is we initialize all wq_barrier::done at insert_wq_barrier() via init_completion(), which makes them belong to the same lock class, therefore, impossible circles are reported. To fix this, explicitly initialize the lockdep map for wq_barrier::done in insert_wq_barrier(), so that the lock class key of wq_barrier::done is a subkey of the corresponding work_struct, as a result we won't build a dependency between a wq_barrier with a unrelated work, and we can differ wq barriers based on the related works, so the false positive above is avoided. Also define the empty lockdep_init_map_crosslock() for !CROSSRELEASE to make the code simple and away from unnecessary #ifdefs. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng Cc: Byungchul Park Cc: Lai Jiangshan Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170817094622.12915-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/lockdep: Handle non(or multi)-acquisition of a crosslock

2017-08-10T10:29:08Z

No acquisition might be in progress on commit of a crosslock. Completion operations enabling crossrelease are the case like: CONTEXT X CONTEXT Y --------- --------- trigger completion context complete AX commit AX wait_for_complete AX acquire AX wait where AX is a crosslock. When no acquisition is in progress, we should not perform commit because the lock does not exist, which might cause incorrect memory access. So we have to track the number of acquisitions of a crosslock to handle it. Moreover, in case that more than one acquisition of a crosslock are overlapped like: CONTEXT W CONTEXT X CONTEXT Y CONTEXT Z --------- --------- --------- --------- acquire AX (gen_id: 1) acquire A acquire AX (gen_id: 10) acquire B commit AX acquire C commit AX where A, B and C are typical locks and AX is a crosslock. Current crossrelease code performs commits in Y and Z with gen_id = 10. However, we can use gen_id = 1 to do it, since not only 'acquire AX in X' but 'acquire AX in W' also depends on each acquisition in Y and Z until their commits. So make it use gen_id = 1 instead of 10 on their commits, which adds an additional dependency 'AX -> A' in the example above. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: kirill@shutemov.name Cc: npiggin@gmail.com Cc: walken@google.com Cc: willy@infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1502089981-21272-8-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/lockdep: Detect and handle hist_lock ring buffer overwrite

2017-08-10T10:29:08Z

The ring buffer can be overwritten by hardirq/softirq/work contexts. That cases must be considered on rollback or commit. For example, |<------ hist_lock ring buffer size ----->| ppppppppppppiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii wrapped > iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.................... where 'p' represents an acquisition in process context, 'i' represents an acquisition in irq context. On irq exit, crossrelease tries to rollback idx to original position, but it should not because the entry already has been invalid by overwriting 'i'. Avoid rollback or commit for entries overwritten. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: kirill@shutemov.name Cc: npiggin@gmail.com Cc: walken@google.com Cc: willy@infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1502089981-21272-7-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/lockdep: Implement the 'crossrelease' feature

2017-08-10T10:29:07Z

Lockdep is a runtime locking correctness validator that detects and reports a deadlock or its possibility by checking dependencies between locks. It's useful since it does not report just an actual deadlock but also the possibility of a deadlock that has not actually happened yet. That enables problems to be fixed before they affect real systems. However, this facility is only applicable to typical locks, such as spinlocks and mutexes, which are normally released within the context in which they were acquired. However, synchronization primitives like page locks or completions, which are allowed to be released in any context, also create dependencies and can cause a deadlock. So lockdep should track these locks to do a better job. The 'crossrelease' implementation makes these primitives also be tracked. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: kirill@shutemov.name Cc: npiggin@gmail.com Cc: walken@google.com Cc: willy@infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1502089981-21272-6-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/lockdep: Rework FS_RECLAIM annotation

2017-08-10T10:29:03Z

A while ago someone, and I cannot find the email just now, asked if we could not implement the RECLAIM_FS inversion stuff with a 'fake' lock like we use for other things like workqueues etc. I think this should be possible which allows reducing the 'irq' states and will reduce the amount of __bfs() lookups we do. Removing the 1 IRQ state results in 4 less __bfs() walks per dependency, improving lockdep performance. And by moving this annotation out of the lockdep code it becomes easier for the mm people to extend. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Byungchul Park Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Nikolay Borisov Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: kirill@shutemov.name Cc: npiggin@gmail.com Cc: walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/lockdep: Add new check to lock_downgrade()

2017-03-16T08:57:07Z

Commit: f8319483f57f ("locking/lockdep: Provide a type check for lock_is_held") didn't fully cover rwsems as downgrade_write() was left out. Introduce lock_downgrade() and use it to add new checks. See-also: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148581164003149&w=2 Originally-written-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1486053497-9948-3-git-send-email-hooanon05g@gmail.com [ Rewrote the changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/lockdep: Provide a type check for lock_is_held

2016-11-30T03:32:25Z

Christoph requested lockdep_assert_held() variants that distinguish between held-for-read or held-for-write. Provide: int lock_is_held_type(struct lockdep_map *lock, int read) which takes the same argument as lock_acquire(.read) and matches it to the held_lock instance. Use of this function should be gated by the debug_locks variable. When that is 0 the return value of the lock_is_held_type() function is undefined. This is done to allow both negative and positive tests for holding locks. By default we provide (positive) lockdep_assert_held{,_exclusive,_read}() macros. Requested-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Tested-by: Jens Axboe Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner