user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/lockdep.h, branch v4.5.6

kernel/locking/lockdep.c: convert hash tables to hlists

2016-02-12T02:35:48Z

Mike said: : CONFIG_UBSAN_ALIGNMENT breaks x86-64 kernel with lockdep enabled, i. e : kernel with CONFIG_UBSAN_ALIGNMENT fails to load without even any error : message. : : The problem is that ubsan callbacks use spinlocks and might be called : before lockdep is initialized. Particularly this line in the : reserve_ebda_region function causes problem: : : lowmem = *(unsigned short *)__va(BIOS_LOWMEM_KILOBYTES); : : If i put lockdep_init() before reserve_ebda_region call in : x86_64_start_reservations kernel loads well. Fix this ordering issue permanently: change lockdep so that it uses hlists for the hash tables. Unlike a list_head, an hlist_head is in its initialized state when it is all-zeroes, so lockdep is ready for operation immediately upon boot - lockdep_init() need not have run. The patch will also save some memory. lockdep_init() and lockdep_initialized can be done away with now - a 4.6 patch has been prepared to do this. Reported-by: Mike Krinkin Suggested-by: Mike Krinkin Cc: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

treewide: Remove old email address

2015-11-23T08:44:58Z

There were still a number of references to my old Red Hat email address in the kernel source. Remove these while keeping the Red Hat copyright notices intact. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

Merge branch 'sched-hrtimers-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

2015-06-24T22:09:40Z

Pull scheduler updates from Thomas Gleixner: "This series of scheduler updates depends on sched/core and timers/core branches, which are already in your tree: - Scheduler balancing overhaul to plug a hard to trigger race which causes an oops in the balancer (Peter Zijlstra) - Lockdep updates which are related to the balancing updates (Peter Zijlstra)" * 'sched-hrtimers-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: sched,lockdep: Employ lock pinning lockdep: Implement lock pinning lockdep: Simplify lock_release() sched: Streamline the task migration locking a little sched: Move code around sched,dl: Fix sched class hopping CBS hole sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task() sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() sched: Use replace normalize_task() with __sched_setscheduler() sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list

locking/lockdep: Remove hard coded array size dependency

2015-06-19T07:48:03Z

An apparent oversight left a hardcoded '4' in place when LOCKSTAT_POINTS was introduced. The contention_point[] and contending_point[] arrays in the structs lock_class and lock_class_stats need to be the same size for the loops in lock_stats() to be correct. This patch allows LOCKSTAT_POINTS to be changed without affecting the correctness of the code. Signed-off-by: George Beshers Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

lockdep: Implement lock pinning

2015-06-18T22:25:27Z

Add a lockdep annotation that WARNs if you 'accidentially' unlock a lock. This is especially helpful for code with callbacks, where the upper layer assumes a lock remains taken but a lower layer thinks it maybe can drop and reacquire the lock. By unwittingly breaking up the lock, races can be introduced. Lock pinning is a lockdep annotation that helps with this, when you lockdep_pin_lock() a held lock, any unlock without a lockdep_unpin_lock() will produce a WARN. Think of this as a relative of lockdep_assert_held(), except you don't only assert its held now, but ensure it stays held until you release your assertion. RFC: a possible alternative API would be something like: int cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&foo); ... lockdep_unpin_lock(&foo, cookie); Where we pick a random number for the pin_count; this makes it impossible to sneak a lock break in without also passing the right cookie along. I've not done this because it ends up generating code for !LOCKDEP, esp. if you need to pass the cookie around for some reason. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124743.906731065@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner

rcu: Improve diagnostics for blocked critical sections in irq

2015-03-03T19:16:00Z

If an RCU read-side critical section occurs within an interrupt handler or a softirq handler, it cannot have been preempted. Therefore, there is a check in rcu_read_unlock_special() checking for this error. However, when this check triggers, it lacks diagnostic information. This commit therefore moves rcu_read_unlock()'s lockdep annotation to follow the call to __rcu_read_unlock() and changes rcu_read_unlock_special()'s WARN_ON_ONCE() to an lockdep_rcu_suspicious() in order to locate where the offending RCU read-side critical section began. In addition, the value of the ->rcu_read_unlock_special field is printed. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney

Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

2014-10-13T13:51:40Z

Pull core locking updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main updates in this cycle were: - mutex MCS refactoring finishing touches: improve comments, refactor and clean up code, reduce debug data structure footprint, etc. - qrwlock finishing touches: remove old code, self-test updates. - small rwsem optimization - various smaller fixes/cleanups" * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: locking/lockdep: Revert qrwlock recusive stuff locking/rwsem: Avoid double checking before try acquiring write lock locking/rwsem: Move EXPORT_SYMBOL() lines to follow function definition locking/rwlock, x86: Delete unused asm/rwlock.h and rwlock.S locking/rwlock, x86: Clean up asm/spinlock*.h to remove old rwlock code locking/semaphore: Resolve some shadow warnings locking/selftest: Support queued rwlock locking/lockdep: Restrict the use of recursive read_lock() with qrwlock locking/spinlocks: Always evaluate the second argument of spin_lock_nested() locking/Documentation: Update locking/mutex-design.txt disadvantages locking/Documentation: Move locking related docs into Documentation/locking/ locking/mutexes: Use MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER when appropriate locking/mutexes: Refactor optimistic spinning code locking/mcs: Remove obsolete comment locking/mutexes: Document quick lock release when unlocking locking/mutexes: Standardize arguments in lock/unlock slowpaths locking: Remove deprecated smp_mb__() barriers

Merge branch 'core-rcu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

2014-10-13T13:44:12Z

Pull RCU updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes in this cycle were: - changes related to No-CBs CPUs and NO_HZ_FULL - RCU-tasks implementation - torture-test updates - miscellaneous fixes - locktorture updates - RCU documentation updates" * 'core-rcu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (81 commits) workqueue: Use cond_resched_rcu_qs macro workqueue: Add quiescent state between work items locktorture: Cleanup header usage locktorture: Cannot hold read and write lock locktorture: Fix __acquire annotation for spinlock irq locktorture: Support rwlocks rcu: Eliminate deadlock between CPU hotplug and expedited grace periods locktorture: Document boot/module parameters rcutorture: Rename rcutorture_runnable parameter locktorture: Add test scenario for rwsem_lock locktorture: Add test scenario for mutex_lock locktorture: Make torture scripting account for new _runnable name locktorture: Introduce torture context locktorture: Support rwsems locktorture: Add infrastructure for torturing read locks torture: Address race in module cleanup locktorture: Make statistics generic locktorture: Teach about lock debugging locktorture: Support mutexes locktorture: Add documentation ...

locking/lockdep: Revert qrwlock recusive stuff

2014-10-03T04:09:30Z

Commit f0bab73cb539 ("locking/lockdep: Restrict the use of recursive read_lock() with qrwlock") changed lockdep to try and conform to the qrwlock semantics which differ from the traditional rwlock semantics. In particular qrwlock is fair outside of interrupt context, but in interrupt context readers will ignore all fairness. The problem modeling this is that read and write side have different lock state (interrupts) semantics but we only have a single representation of these. Therefore lockdep will get confused, thinking the lock can cause interrupt lock inversions. So revert it for now; the old rwlock semantics were already imperfectly modeled and the qrwlock extra won't fit either. If we want to properly fix this, I think we need to resurrect the work by Gautham did a few years ago that split the read and write state of locks: http://lwn.net/Articles/332801/ FWIW the locking selftest that would've failed (and was reported by Borislav earlier) is something like: RL(X1); /* IRQ-ON */ LOCK(A); UNLOCK(A); RU(X1); IRQ_ENTER(); RL(X1); /* IN-IRQ */ RU(X1); IRQ_EXIT(); At which point it would report that because A is an IRQ-unsafe lock we can suffer the following inversion: CPU0 CPU1 lock(A) lock(X1) lock(A) lock(X1) And this is 'wrong' because X1 can recurse (assuming the above lock are in fact read-lock) but lockdep doesn't know about this. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Waiman Long Cc: ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: bp@alien8.de Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140930132600.GA7444@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking: Add WARN_ON_ONCE lock assertion

2014-09-24T04:06:21Z

An interface may need to assert a lock invariant and not flood the system logs; add a lockdep helper macro equivalent to lockdep_assert_held() which only WARNs once. Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman