user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/memblock.h, branch v3.9

x86, ACPI, mm: Revert movablemem_map support

2013-03-02T17:34:39Z

Tim found: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:324 topology_sane.isra.2+0x6f/0x80() Hardware name: S2600CP sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node! [node: 1 != 0]. Ignoring dependency. smpboot: Booting Node 1, Processors #1 Modules linked in: Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.9.0-0-generic #1 Call Trace: set_cpu_sibling_map+0x279/0x449 start_secondary+0x11d/0x1e5 Don Morris reproduced on a HP z620 workstation, and bisected it to commit e8d195525809 ("acpi, memory-hotplug: parse SRAT before memblock is ready") It turns out movable_map has some problems, and it breaks several things 1. numa_init is called several times, NOT just for srat. so those nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed) memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo)) can not be just removed. Need to consider sequence is: numaq, srat, amd, dummy. and make fall back path working. 2. simply split acpi_numa_init to early_parse_srat. a. that early_parse_srat is NOT called for ia64, so you break ia64. b. for (i = 0; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++) set_apicid_to_node(i, NUMA_NO_NODE) still left in numa_init. So it will just clear result from early_parse_srat. it should be moved before that.... c. it breaks ACPI_TABLE_OVERIDE...as the acpi table scan is moved early before override from INITRD is settled. 3. that patch TITLE is total misleading, there is NO x86 in the title, but it changes critical x86 code. It caused x86 guys did not pay attention to find the problem early. Those patches really should be routed via tip/x86/mm. 4. after that commit, following range can not use movable ram: a. real_mode code.... well..funny, legacy Node0 [0,1M) could be hot-removed? b. initrd... it will be freed after booting, so it could be on movable... c. crashkernel for kdump...: looks like we can not put kdump kernel above 4G anymore. d. init_mem_mapping: can not put page table high anymore. e. initmem_init: vmemmap can not be high local node anymore. That is not good. If node is hotplugable, the mem related range like page table and vmemmap could be on the that node without problem and should be on that node. We have workaround patch that could fix some problems, but some can not be fixed. So just remove that offending commit and related ones including: f7210e6c4ac7 ("mm/memblock.c: use CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP to protect movablecore_map in memblock_overlaps_region().") 01a178a94e8e ("acpi, memory-hotplug: support getting hotplug info from SRAT") 27168d38fa20 ("acpi, memory-hotplug: extend movablemem_map ranges to the end of node") e8d195525809 ("acpi, memory-hotplug: parse SRAT before memblock is ready") fb06bc8e5f42 ("page_alloc: bootmem limit with movablecore_map") 42f47e27e761 ("page_alloc: make movablemem_map have higher priority") 6981ec31146c ("page_alloc: introduce zone_movable_limit[] to keep movable limit for nodes") 34b71f1e04fc ("page_alloc: add movable_memmap kernel parameter") 4d59a75125d5 ("x86: get pg_data_t's memory from other node") Later we should have patches that will make sure kernel put page table and vmemmap on local node ram instead of push them down to node0. Also need to find way to put other kernel used ram to local node ram. Reported-by: Tim Gardner Reported-by: Don Morris Bisected-by: Don Morris Tested-by: Don Morris Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Thomas Renninger Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Tang Chen Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/memblock.c: use CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP to protect movablecore_map in memblock_overlaps_region().

2013-02-24T01:50:14Z

The definition of struct movablecore_map is protected by CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP but its use in memblock_overlaps_region() is not. So add CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP to protect the use of movablecore_map in memblock_overlaps_region(). Signed-off-by: Tang Chen Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

page_alloc: bootmem limit with movablecore_map

2013-02-24T01:50:14Z

Ensure the bootmem will not allocate memory from areas that may be ZONE_MOVABLE. The map info is from movablecore_map boot option. Signed-off-by: Tang Chen Reviewed-by: Wen Congyang Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan Tested-by: Lin Feng Cc: Wu Jianguo Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

memblock: Add memblock_mem_size()

2013-01-30T03:32:57Z

Use it to get mem size under the limit_pfn. to replace local version in x86 reserved_initrd. -v2: remove not needed cast that is pointed out by HPA. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1359058816-7615-29-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin

x86, mm: Trim memory in memblock to be page aligned

2012-10-24T18:52:21Z

We will not map partial pages, so need to make sure memblock allocation will not allocate those bytes out. Also we will use for_each_mem_pfn_range() to loop to map memory range to keep them consistent. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQVZirvaBMFYRfXMmWEcHbKSicQEHz4VAwUv0xFCk51ZNw@mail.gmail.com Acked-by: Jacob Shin Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin Cc:

mm/memblock: cleanup early_node_map[] related comments

2012-10-09T07:22:47Z

Commit 0ee332c14518 ("memblock: Kill early_node_map[]") removed early_node_map[]. Clean up the comments to comply with that change. Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Gavin Shan Cc: Yinghai Lu Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

memblock: free allocated memblock_reserved_regions later

2012-07-11T23:04:50Z

memblock_free_reserved_regions() calls memblock_free(), but memblock_free() would double reserved.regions too, so we could free the old range for reserved.regions. Also tj said there is another bug which could be related to this. | I don't think we're saving any noticeable | amount by doing this "free - give it to page allocator - reserve | again" dancing. We should just allocate regions aligned to page | boundaries and free them later when memblock is no longer in use. in that case, when DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, will get panic: memblock_free: [0x0000102febc080-0x0000102febf080] memblock_free_reserved_regions+0x37/0x39 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88102febd948 IP: [] __next_free_mem_range+0x9b/0x155 PGD 4826063 PUD cf67a067 PMD cf7fa067 PTE 800000102febd160 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC CPU 0 Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.5.0-rc2-next-20120614-sasha #447 RIP: 0010:[] [] __next_free_mem_range+0x9b/0x155 See the discussion at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/13/469 So try to allocate with PAGE_SIZE alignment and free it later. Reported-by: Sasha Levin Acked-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator

2011-12-08T18:22:09Z

Now that all early memory information is in memblock when enabled, we can implement reverse free area iterator and use it to implement NUMA aware allocator which is then wrapped for simpler variants instead of the confusing and inefficient mending of information in separate NUMA aware allocator. Implement for_each_free_mem_range_reverse(), use it to reimplement memblock_find_in_range_node() which in turn is used by all allocators. The visible allocator interface is inconsistent and can probably use some cleanup too. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Yinghai Lu

memblock: Kill early_node_map[]

2011-12-08T18:22:09Z

Now all ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP archs select HAVE_MEBLOCK_NODE_MAP - there's no user of early_node_map[] left. Kill early_node_map[] and replace ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP with HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP. Also, relocate for_each_mem_pfn_range() and helper from mm.h to memblock.h as page_alloc.c would no longer host an alternative implementation. This change is ultimately one to one mapping and shouldn't cause any observable difference; however, after the recent changes, there are some functions which now would fit memblock.c better than page_alloc.c and dependency on HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP instead of HAVE_MEMBLOCK doesn't make much sense on some of them. Further cleanups for functions inside HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP in mm.h would be nice. -v2: Fix compile bug introduced by mis-spelling CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP to CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_HAVE_NODE_MAP in mmzone.h. Reported by Stephen Rothwell. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Yinghai Lu Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Ralf Baechle Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Chen Liqin Cc: Paul Mundt Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: "H. Peter Anvin"

memblock: Implement memblock_add_node()

2011-12-08T18:22:08Z

Implement memblock_add_node() which can add a new memblock memory region with specific node ID. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Yinghai Lu