user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/memblock.h, branch v5.15.16

memblock: fix memblock_phys_alloc() section mismatch error

2022-01-05T11:42:33Z

[ Upstream commit d7f55471db2719629f773c2d6b5742a69595bfd3 ] Fix modpost Section mismatch error in memblock_phys_alloc() [...] WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x1dcc): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_phys_alloc() to the function .init.text:memblock_phys_alloc_range() The function memblock_phys_alloc() references the function __init memblock_phys_alloc_range(). This is often because memblock_phys_alloc lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of memblock_phys_alloc_range is wrong. ERROR: modpost: Section mismatches detected. Set CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH_WARN_ONLY=y to allow them. [...] memblock_phys_alloc() is a one-line wrapper, make it __always_inline to avoid these section mismatches. Reported-by: k2ci Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu [rppt: slightly massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211217020754.2874872-1-liu.yun@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

memblock: introduce saner 'memblock_free_ptr()' interface

2021-09-14T20:23:22Z

The boot-time allocation interface for memblock is a mess, with 'memblock_alloc()' returning a virtual pointer, but then you are supposed to free it with 'memblock_free()' that takes a _physical_ address. Not only is that all kinds of strange and illogical, but it actually causes bugs, when people then use it like a normal allocation function, and it fails spectacularly on a NULL pointer: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210912140820.GD25450@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ or just random memory corruption if the debug checks don't catch it: https://lore.kernel.org/all/61ab2d0c-3313-aaab-514c-e15b7aa054a0@suse.cz/ I really don't want to apply patches that treat the symptoms, when the fundamental cause is this horribly confusing interface. I started out looking at just automating a sane replacement sequence, but because of this mix or virtual and physical addresses, and because people have used the "__pa()" macro that can take either a regular kernel pointer, or just the raw "unsigned long" address, it's all quite messy. So this just introduces a new saner interface for freeing a virtual address that was allocated using 'memblock_alloc()', and that was kept as a regular kernel pointer. And then it converts a couple of users that are obvious and easy to test, including the 'xbc_nodes' case in lib/bootconfig.c that caused problems. Reported-by: kernel test robot Fixes: 40caa127f3c7 ("init: bootconfig: Remove all bootconfig data when the init memory is removed") Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method private

2021-09-03T16:58:17Z

There are a lot of uses of memblock_find_in_range() along with memblock_reserve() from the times memblock allocation APIs did not exist. memblock_find_in_range() is the very core of memblock allocations, so any future changes to its internal behaviour would mandate updates of all the users outside memblock. Replace the calls to memblock_find_in_range() with an equivalent calls to memblock_phys_alloc() and memblock_phys_alloc_range() and make memblock_find_in_range() private method of memblock. This simplifies the callers, ensures that (unlikely) errors in memblock_reserve() are handled and improves maintainability of memblock_find_in_range(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210816122622.30279-1-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas [arm64] Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki [ACPI] Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) Acked-by: Nick Kossifidis [riscv] Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Acked-by: Rob Herring Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

memblock: make for_each_mem_range() traverse MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG regions

2021-07-24T00:43:28Z

Commit b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()") didn't take into account that when there is movable_node parameter in the kernel command line, for_each_mem_range() would skip ranges marked with MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG. The page table setup code in POWER uses for_each_mem_range() to create the linear mapping of the physical memory and since the regions marked as MEMORY_HOTPLUG are skipped, they never make it to the linear map. A later access to the memory in those ranges will fail: BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on write at 0xc000000400000000 Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000008a3c0 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 53 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Not tainted 5.13.0 #7 NIP: c00000000008a3c0 LR: c0000000003c1ed8 CTR: 0000000000000040 REGS: c000000008a57770 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (5.13.0) MSR: 8000000002009033 CR: 84222202 XER: 20040000 CFAR: c0000000003c1ed4 DAR: c000000400000000 DSISR: 42000000 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c0000000003c1ed8 c000000008a57a10 c0000000019da700 c000000400000000 GPR04: 0000000000000280 0000000000000180 0000000000000400 0000000000000200 GPR08: 0000000000000100 0000000000000080 0000000000000040 0000000000000300 GPR12: 0000000000000380 c000000001bc0000 c0000000001660c8 c000000006337e00 GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR20: 0000000040000000 0000000020000000 c000000001a81990 c000000008c30000 GPR24: c000000008c20000 c000000001a81998 000fffffffff0000 c000000001a819a0 GPR28: c000000001a81908 c00c000001000000 c000000008c40000 c000000008a64680 NIP clear_user_page+0x50/0x80 LR __handle_mm_fault+0xc88/0x1910 Call Trace: __handle_mm_fault+0xc44/0x1910 (unreliable) handle_mm_fault+0x130/0x2a0 __get_user_pages+0x248/0x610 __get_user_pages_remote+0x12c/0x3e0 get_arg_page+0x54/0xf0 copy_string_kernel+0x11c/0x210 kernel_execve+0x16c/0x220 call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x1b0/0x2f0 ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x70 Instruction dump: 79280fa4 79271764 79261f24 794ae8e2 7ca94214 7d683a14 7c893a14 7d893050 7d4903a6 60000000 60000000 60000000 <7c001fec> 7c091fec 7c081fec 7c051fec ---[ end trace 490b8c67e6075e09 ]--- Making for_each_mem_range() include MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG regions in the traversal fixes this issue. Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976100 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210712071132.20902-1-rppt@kernel.org Fixes: b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()") Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Tested-by: Greg Kurz Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: [5.10+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

memblock: update initialization of reserved pages

2021-07-01T03:47:29Z

The struct pages representing a reserved memory region are initialized using reserve_bootmem_range() function. This function is called for each reserved region just before the memory is freed from memblock to the buddy page allocator. The struct pages for MEMBLOCK_NOMAP regions are kept with the default values set by the memory map initialization which makes it necessary to have a special treatment for such pages in pfn_valid() and pfn_valid_within(). Split out initialization of the reserved pages to a function with a meaningful name and treat the MEMBLOCK_NOMAP regions the same way as the reserved regions and mark struct pages for the NOMAP regions as PageReserved. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210511100550.28178-3-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Marc Zyngier Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: replace CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES with CONFIG_NUMA

2021-06-29T17:53:55Z

After removal of DISCINTIGMEM the NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES and NUMA configuration options are equivalent. Drop CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES and use CONFIG_NUMA instead. Done with $ sed -i 's/CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES/CONFIG_NUMA/' \ $(git grep -wl CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES) $ sed -i 's/NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES/NUMA/' \ $(git grep -wl NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES) with manual tweaks afterwards. [rppt@linux.ibm.com: fix arm boot crash] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YMj9vHhHOiCVN4BF@linux.ibm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210608091316.3622-9-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Matt Turner Cc: Richard Henderson Cc: Vineet Gupta Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: memblock: fix section mismatch warning again

2021-03-25T16:22:55Z

Commit 34dc2efb39a2 ("memblock: fix section mismatch warning") marked memblock_bottom_up() and memblock_set_bottom_up() as __init, but they could be referenced from non-init functions like memblock_find_in_range_node() on architectures that enable CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK. For such builds kernel test robot reports: WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x74fea4): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_find_in_range_node() to the function .init.text:memblock_bottom_up() The function memblock_find_in_range_node() references the function __init memblock_bottom_up(). This is often because memblock_find_in_range_node lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of memblock_bottom_up is wrong. Replace __init annotations with __init_memblock annotations so that the appropriate section will be selected depending on CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202103160133.UzhgY0wt-lkp@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210316171347.14084-1-rppt@kernel.org Fixes: 34dc2efb39a2 ("memblock: fix section mismatch warning") Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann Reported-by: kernel test robot Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

memblock: fix section mismatch warning

2021-03-13T19:27:29Z

The inlining logic in clang-13 is rewritten to often not inline some functions that were inlined by all earlier compilers. In case of the memblock interfaces, this exposed a harmless bug of a missing __init annotation: WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x507c0a): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_bottom_up() to the variable .meminit.data:memblock The function memblock_bottom_up() references the variable __meminitdata memblock. This is often because memblock_bottom_up lacks a __meminitdata annotation or the annotation of memblock is wrong. Interestingly, these annotations were present originally, but got removed with the explanation that the __init annotation prevents the function from getting inlined. I checked this again and found that while this is the case with clang, gcc (version 7 through 10, did not test others) does inline the functions regardless. As the previous change was apparently intended to help the clang builds, reverting it to help the newer clang versions seems appropriate as well. gcc builds don't seem to care either way. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210225133808.2188581-1-arnd@kernel.org Fixes: 5bdba520c1b3 ("mm: memblock: drop __init from memblock functions to make it inline") Reference: 2cfb3665e864 ("include/linux/memblock.h: add __init to memblock_set_bottom_up()") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport Cc: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Faiyaz Mohammed Cc: Baoquan He Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: Aslan Bakirov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

Merge tag 'memblock-v5.12-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock

2021-02-22T21:01:23Z

Pull memblock update from Mike Rapoport: "Remove return value of memblock_free_all() memblock_free_all() returns the total count of freed pages and its callers used this value to update totalram_pages. This update is now anyway a part of memblock_free_all() and its callers no longer check the return value, so make memblock_free_all() void" * tag 'memblock-v5.12-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock: mm: memblock: remove return value of memblock_free_all()

memblock: fix kernel-doc markups

2021-01-21T21:06:00Z

Some identifiers have different names between their prototypes and the kernel-doc markup. Acked-by: Mike Rapoport Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f3c65f61367993a607f9daf9dc1a3bdab1f0a040.1610610937.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet