user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/mfd/da9063, branch v5.4.90

mfd: da9063: Remove now unused platform_data

2019-08-12T07:40:59Z

All preparational patches have been applied, we can now remove the include file for platform_data. Yiha! Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Signed-off-by: Lee Jones

Merge tag 'v5.2-rc4' into regulator-5.3

2019-06-18T18:12:47Z

Linux 5.2-rc4

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 152

2019-05-30T18:26:32Z

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Allison Randal Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

regulator: da9063: move definitions out of a header into the driver

2019-05-20T14:25:57Z

Those definitions are only used within the driver meanwhile, so put them there. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Acked-by: Steve Twiss Tested-by: Steve Twiss Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Signed-off-by: Mark Brown

mfd: da9063: Fix OTP control register names to match datasheets for DA9063/63L

2019-05-14T07:13:27Z

Mismatch between what is found in the Datasheets for DA9063 and DA9063L provided by Dialog Semiconductor, and the register names provided in the MFD registers file. The changes are for the OTP (one-time-programming) control registers. The two naming errors are OPT instead of OTP, and COUNT instead of CONT (i.e. control). Cc: Stable Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss Signed-off-by: Lee Jones

mfd: da9063: Convert headers to SPDX

2019-05-14T07:13:26Z

Covnert the headers of the source and include files to SPDX. And fix some typos in the descriptions ("interrupt" instead of "I2C"). Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Acked-by: Steve Twiss Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Signed-off-by: Lee Jones

mfd: da9063: Fix DT probing with constraints

2018-09-10T15:58:36Z

Commit 1c892e38ce59 ("regulator: da9063: Handle less LDOs on DA9063L") reordered the da9063_regulator_info[] array, but not the DA9063_ID_* regulator ids and not the da9063_matches[] array, because ids are used as indices in the array initializer. This mismatch between regulator id and da9063_regulator_info[] array index causes the driver probe to fail because constraints from DT are not applied to the correct regulator: da9063 0-0058: Device detected (chip-ID: 0x61, var-ID: 0x50) DA9063_BMEM: Bringing 900000uV into 3300000-3300000uV DA9063_LDO9: Bringing 3300000uV into 2500000-2500000uV DA9063_LDO1: Bringing 900000uV into 3300000-3300000uV DA9063_LDO1: failed to apply 3300000-3300000uV constraint(-22) This patch reorders the DA9063_ID_* as apparently intended, and with them the entries in the da90630_matches[] array. Fixes: 1c892e38ce59 ("regulator: da9063: Handle less LDOs on DA9063L") Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Signed-off-by: Lee Jones

mfd: da9063: Add DA9063L type

2018-07-04T06:16:39Z

Add type for DA9063L, which is a reduced variant of the DA9063 without RTC block and with less regulators. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Acked-by: Steve Twiss Signed-off-by: Lee Jones

mfd: da9063: Replace model with type

2018-07-04T06:16:25Z

The model number stored in the struct da9063 is the same for all variants of the da9063 since it is the chip ID, which is always the same. Replace that with a separate identifier instead, which allows us to discern the DA9063 variants by setting the type based on either DT match or otherwise. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut Acked-by: Mark Brown Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Signed-off-by: Lee Jones

mfd: da9063: Rename PMIC_DA9063 to PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063

2018-07-04T06:16:18Z

The PMIC_DA9063 is a complete misnomer, it denotes the value of the DA9063 chip ID register, so rename it as such. It is also the value of chip ID register of DA9063L though, so drop the enum as all the DA9063 "models" share the same chip ID and thus the distinction will have to be made using DT or otherwise. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut Acked-by: Mark Brown Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Acked-by: Steve Twiss Signed-off-by: Lee Jones