user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/mmzone.h, branch v4.12

mm: consider memblock reservations for deferred memory initialization sizing

2017-06-02T22:07:38Z

We have seen an early OOM killer invocation on ppc64 systems with crashkernel=4096M: kthreadd invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x16040c0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_NOTRACK), nodemask=7, order=0, oom_score_adj=0 kthreadd cpuset=/ mems_allowed=7 CPU: 0 PID: 2 Comm: kthreadd Not tainted 4.4.68-1.gd7fe927-default #1 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xb0/0xf0 (unreliable) dump_header+0xb0/0x258 out_of_memory+0x5f0/0x640 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xa8c/0xc80 kmem_getpages+0x84/0x1a0 fallback_alloc+0x2a4/0x320 kmem_cache_alloc_node+0xc0/0x2e0 copy_process.isra.25+0x260/0x1b30 _do_fork+0x94/0x470 kernel_thread+0x48/0x60 kthreadd+0x264/0x330 ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0xa4 Mem-Info: active_anon:0 inactive_anon:0 isolated_anon:0 active_file:0 inactive_file:0 isolated_file:0 unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 slab_reclaimable:5 slab_unreclaimable:73 mapped:0 shmem:0 pagetables:0 bounce:0 free:0 free_pcp:0 free_cma:0 Node 7 DMA free:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:52428800kB managed:110016kB mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:320kB slab_unreclaimable:4672kB kernel_stack:1152kB pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:0kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 Node 7 DMA: 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB 0*8192kB 0*16384kB = 0kB 0 total pagecache pages 0 pages in swap cache Swap cache stats: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0 Free swap = 0kB Total swap = 0kB 819200 pages RAM 0 pages HighMem/MovableOnly 817481 pages reserved 0 pages cma reserved 0 pages hwpoisoned the reason is that the managed memory is too low (only 110MB) while the rest of the the 50GB is still waiting for the deferred intialization to be done. update_defer_init estimates the initial memoty to initialize to 2GB at least but it doesn't consider any memory allocated in that range. In this particular case we've had Reserving 4096MB of memory at 128MB for crashkernel (System RAM: 51200MB) so the low 2GB is mostly depleted. Fix this by considering memblock allocations in the initial static initialization estimation. Move the max_initialise to reset_deferred_meminit and implement a simple memblock_reserved_memory helper which iterates all reserved blocks and sums the size of all that start below the given address. The cumulative size is than added on top of the initial estimation. This is still not ideal because reset_deferred_meminit doesn't consider holes and so reservation might be above the initial estimation whihch we ignore but let's make the logic simpler until we really need to handle more complicated cases. Fixes: 3a80a7fa7989 ("mm: meminit: initialise a subset of struct pages if CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is set") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170531104010.GI27783@dhcp22.suse.cz Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Mel Gorman Tested-by: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: [4.2+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, compaction: change migrate_async_suitable() to suitable_migration_source()

2017-05-09T00:15:10Z

Preparation for making the decisions more complex and depending on compact_control flags. No functional change. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170307131545.28577-6-vbabka@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: David Rientjes Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: vmscan: fix IO/refault regression in cache workingset transition

2017-05-03T22:52:11Z

Since commit 59dc76b0d4df ("mm: vmscan: reduce size of inactive file list") we noticed bigger IO spikes during changes in cache access patterns. The patch in question shrunk the inactive list size to leave more room for the current workingset in the presence of streaming IO. However, workingset transitions that previously happened on the inactive list are now pushed out of memory and incur more refaults to complete. This patch disables active list protection when refaults are being observed. This accelerates workingset transitions, and allows more of the new set to establish itself from memory, without eating into the ability to protect the established workingset during stable periods. The workloads that were measurably affected for us were hit pretty bad by it, with refault/majfault rates doubling and tripling during cache transitions, and the machines sustaining half-hour periods of 100% IO utilization, where they'd previously have sub-minute peaks at 60-90%. Stateful services that handle user data tend to be more conservative with kernel upgrades. As a result we hit most page cache issues with some delay, as was the case here. The severity seemed to warrant a stable tag. Fixes: 59dc76b0d4df ("mm: vmscan: reduce size of inactive file list") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170404220052.27593-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Vladimir Davydov Cc: [4.7+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: use is_migrate_highatomic() to simplify the code

2017-05-03T22:52:08Z

Introduce two helpers, is_migrate_highatomic() and is_migrate_highatomic_page(). Simplify the code, no functional changes. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use static inlines rather than macros, per mhocko] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/58B94F15.6060606@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Joonsoo Kim Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: delete NR_PAGES_SCANNED and pgdat_reclaimable()

2017-05-03T22:52:08Z

NR_PAGES_SCANNED counts number of pages scanned since the last page free event in the allocator. This was used primarily to measure the reclaimability of zones and nodes, and determine when reclaim should give up on them. In that role, it has been replaced in the preceding patches by a different mechanism. Being implemented as an efficient vmstat counter, it was automatically exported to userspace as well. It's however unlikely that anyone outside the kernel is using this counter in any meaningful way. Remove the counter and the unused pgdat_reclaimable(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170228214007.5621-8-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Hillf Danton Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Jia He Cc: Mel Gorman Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: fix 100% CPU kswapd busyloop on unreclaimable nodes

2017-05-03T22:52:07Z

Patch series "mm: kswapd spinning on unreclaimable nodes - fixes and cleanups". Jia reported a scenario in which the kswapd of a node indefinitely spins at 100% CPU usage. We have seen similar cases at Facebook. The kernel's current method of judging its ability to reclaim a node (or whether to back off and sleep) is based on the amount of scanned pages in proportion to the amount of reclaimable pages. In Jia's and our scenarios, there are no reclaimable pages in the node, however, and the condition for backing off is never met. Kswapd busyloops in an attempt to restore the watermarks while having nothing to work with. This series reworks the definition of an unreclaimable node based not on scanning but on whether kswapd is able to actually reclaim pages in MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES (16) consecutive runs. This is the same criteria the page allocator uses for giving up on direct reclaim and invoking the OOM killer. If it cannot free any pages, kswapd will go to sleep and leave further attempts to direct reclaim invocations, which will either make progress and re-enable kswapd, or invoke the OOM killer. Patch #1 fixes the immediate problem Jia reported, the remainder are smaller fixlets, cleanups, and overall phasing out of the old method. Patch #6 is the odd one out. It's a nice cleanup to get_scan_count(), and directly related to #5, but in itself not relevant to the series. If the whole series is too ambitious for 4.11, I would consider the first three patches fixes, the rest cleanups. This patch (of 9): Jia He reports a problem with kswapd spinning at 100% CPU when requesting more hugepages than memory available in the system: $ echo 4000 >/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages top - 13:42:59 up 3:37, 1 user, load average: 1.09, 1.03, 1.01 Tasks: 1 total, 1 running, 0 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 0.0 us, 12.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 85.5 id, 2.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem: 31371520 total, 30915136 used, 456384 free, 320 buffers KiB Swap: 6284224 total, 115712 used, 6168512 free. 48192 cached Mem PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 76 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 100.0 0.000 217:17.29 kswapd3 At that time, there are no reclaimable pages left in the node, but as kswapd fails to restore the high watermarks it refuses to go to sleep. Kswapd needs to back away from nodes that fail to balance. Up until commit 1d82de618ddd ("mm, vmscan: make kswapd reclaim in terms of nodes") kswapd had such a mechanism. It considered zones whose theoretically reclaimable pages it had reclaimed six times over as unreclaimable and backed away from them. This guard was erroneously removed as the patch changed the definition of a balanced node. However, simply restoring this code wouldn't help in the case reported here: there *are* no reclaimable pages that could be scanned until the threshold is met. Kswapd would stay awake anyway. Introduce a new and much simpler way of backing off. If kswapd runs through MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES (16) cycles without reclaiming a single page, make it back off from the node. This is the same number of shots direct reclaim takes before declaring OOM. Kswapd will go to sleep on that node until a direct reclaimer manages to reclaim some pages, thus proving the node reclaimable again. [hannes@cmpxchg.org: check kswapd failure against the cumulative nr_reclaimed count] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306162410.GB2090@cmpxchg.org [shakeelb@google.com: fix condition for throttle_direct_reclaim] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170314183228.20152-1-shakeelb@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170228214007.5621-2-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt Reported-by: Jia He Tested-by: Jia He Acked-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Hillf Danton Acked-by: Minchan Kim Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: vmscan: scan dirty pages even in laptop mode

2017-02-25T01:46:54Z

Patch series "mm: vmscan: fix kswapd writeback regression". We noticed a regression on multiple hadoop workloads when moving from 3.10 to 4.0 and 4.6, which involves kswapd getting tangled up in page writeout, causing direct reclaim herds that also don't make progress. I tracked it down to the thrash avoidance efforts after 3.10 that make the kernel better at keeping use-once cache and use-many cache sorted on the inactive and active list, with more aggressive protection of the active list as long as there is inactive cache. Unfortunately, our workload's use-once cache is mostly from streaming writes. Waiting for writes to avoid potential reloads in the future is not a good tradeoff. These patches do the following: 1. Wake the flushers when kswapd sees a lump of dirty pages. It's possible to be below the dirty background limit and still have cache velocity push them through the LRU. So start a-flushin'. 2. Let kswapd only write pages that have been rotated twice. This makes sure we really tried to get all the clean pages on the inactive list before resorting to horrible LRU-order writeback. 3. Move rotating dirty pages off the inactive list. Instead of churning or waiting on page writeback, we'll go after clean active cache. This might lead to thrashing, but in this state memory demand outstrips IO speed anyway, and reads are faster than writes. Mel backported the series to 4.10-rc5 with one minor conflict and ran a couple of tests on it. Mix of read/write random workload didn't show anything interesting. Write-only database didn't show much difference in performance but there were slight reductions in IO -- probably in the noise. simoop did show big differences although not as big as Mel expected. This is Chris Mason's workload that similate the VM activity of hadoop. Mel won't go through the full details but over the samples measured during an hour it reported 4.10.0-rc5 4.10.0-rc5 vanilla johannes-v1r1 Amean p50-Read 21346531.56 ( 0.00%) 21697513.24 ( -1.64%) Amean p95-Read 24700518.40 ( 0.00%) 25743268.98 ( -4.22%) Amean p99-Read 27959842.13 ( 0.00%) 28963271.11 ( -3.59%) Amean p50-Write 1138.04 ( 0.00%) 989.82 ( 13.02%) Amean p95-Write 1106643.48 ( 0.00%) 12104.00 ( 98.91%) Amean p99-Write 1569213.22 ( 0.00%) 36343.38 ( 97.68%) Amean p50-Allocation 85159.82 ( 0.00%) 79120.70 ( 7.09%) Amean p95-Allocation 204222.58 ( 0.00%) 129018.43 ( 36.82%) Amean p99-Allocation 278070.04 ( 0.00%) 183354.43 ( 34.06%) Amean final-p50-Read 21266432.00 ( 0.00%) 21921792.00 ( -3.08%) Amean final-p95-Read 24870912.00 ( 0.00%) 26116096.00 ( -5.01%) Amean final-p99-Read 28147712.00 ( 0.00%) 29523968.00 ( -4.89%) Amean final-p50-Write 1130.00 ( 0.00%) 977.00 ( 13.54%) Amean final-p95-Write 1033216.00 ( 0.00%) 2980.00 ( 99.71%) Amean final-p99-Write 1517568.00 ( 0.00%) 32672.00 ( 97.85%) Amean final-p50-Allocation 86656.00 ( 0.00%) 78464.00 ( 9.45%) Amean final-p95-Allocation 211712.00 ( 0.00%) 116608.00 ( 44.92%) Amean final-p99-Allocation 287232.00 ( 0.00%) 168704.00 ( 41.27%) The latencies are actually completely horrific in comparison to 4.4 (and 4.10-rc5 is worse than 4.9 according to historical data for reasons Mel hasn't analysed yet). Still, 95% of write latency (p95-write) is halved by the series and allocation latency is way down. Direct reclaim activity is one fifth of what it was according to vmstats. Kswapd activity is higher but this is not necessarily surprising. Kswapd efficiency is unchanged at 99% (99% of pages scanned were reclaimed) but direct reclaim efficiency went from 77% to 99% In the vanilla kernel, 627MB of data was written back from reclaim context. With the series, no data was written back. With or without the patch, pages are being immediately reclaimed after writeback completes. However, with the patch, only 1/8th of the pages are reclaimed like this. This patch (of 5): We have an elaborate dirty/writeback throttling mechanism inside the reclaim scanner, but for that to work the pages have to go through shrink_page_list() and get counted for what they are. Otherwise, we mess up the LRU order and don't match reclaim speed to writeback. Especially during deactivation, there is never a reason to skip dirty pages; nothing is even trying to write them out from there. Don't mess up the LRU order for nothing, shuffle these pages along. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170123181641.23938-2-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Minchan Kim Acked-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Hillf Danton Cc: Rik van Riel Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, vmscan: cleanup lru size claculations

2017-02-23T00:41:30Z

lruvec_lru_size returns the full size of the LRU list while we sometimes need a value reduced only to eligible zones (e.g. for lowmem requests). inactive_list_is_low is one such user. Later patches will add more of them. Add a new parameter to lruvec_lru_size and allow it filter out zones which are not eligible for the given context. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170117103702.28542-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Hillf Danton Acked-by: Minchan Kim Acked-by: Mel Gorman Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, page_alloc: fix check for NULL preferred_zone

2017-01-25T00:26:14Z

Patch series "fix premature OOM regression in 4.7+ due to cpuset races". This is v2 of my attempt to fix the recent report based on LTP cpuset stress test [1]. The intention is to go to stable 4.9 LTSS with this, as triggering repeated OOMs is not nice. That's why the patches try to be not too intrusive. Unfortunately why investigating I found that modifying the testcase to use per-VMA policies instead of per-task policies will bring the OOM's back, but that seems to be much older and harder to fix problem. I have posted a RFC [2] but I believe that fixing the recent regressions has a higher priority. Longer-term we might try to think how to fix the cpuset mess in a better and less error prone way. I was for example very surprised to learn, that cpuset updates change not only task->mems_allowed, but also nodemask of mempolicies. Until now I expected the parameter to alloc_pages_nodemask() to be stable. I wonder why do we then treat cpusets specially in get_page_from_freelist() and distinguish HARDWALL etc, when there's unconditional intersection between mempolicy and cpuset. I would expect the nodemask adjustment for saving overhead in g_p_f(), but that clearly doesn't happen in the current form. So we have both crazy complexity and overhead, AFAICS. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAFpQJXUq-JuEP=QPidy4p_=FN0rkH5Z-kfB4qBvsf6jMS87Edg@mail.gmail.com [2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/7c459f26-13a6-a817-e508-b65b903a8378@suse.cz This patch (of 4): Since commit c33d6c06f60f ("mm, page_alloc: avoid looking up the first zone in a zonelist twice") we have a wrong check for NULL preferred_zone, which can theoretically happen due to concurrent cpuset modification. We check the zoneref pointer which is never NULL and we should check the zone pointer. Also document this in first_zones_zonelist() comment per Michal Hocko. Fixes: c33d6c06f60f ("mm, page_alloc: avoid looking up the first zone in a zonelist twice") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170120103843.24587-2-vbabka@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Hillf Danton Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

linux: drop bitwise everywhere

2016-12-15T22:13:41Z

__bitwise__ used to mean "yes, please enable sparse checks unconditionally", but now that we dropped __CHECK_ENDIAN__ __bitwise is exactly the same. There aren't many users, replace it by __bitwise everywhere. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Acked-by: Stefan Schmidt Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Akced-by: Lee Duncan