user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/mutex.h, branch v5.10.207

locking/mutex: Fix non debug version of mutex_lock_io_nested()

2021-03-30T12:32:07Z

commit 291da9d4a9eb3a1cb0610b7f4480f5b52b1825e7 upstream. If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n then mutex_lock_io_nested() maps to mutex_lock() which is clearly wrong because mutex_lock() lacks the io_schedule_prepare()/finish() invocations. Map it to mutex_lock_io(). Fixes: f21860bac05b ("locking/mutex, sched/wait: Fix the mutex_lock_io_nested() define") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/878s6fshii.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

locking/seqlock, headers: Untangle the spaghetti monster

2020-08-06T14:13:13Z

By using lockdep_assert_*() from seqlock.h, the spaghetti monster attacked. Attack back by reducing seqlock.h dependencies from two key high level headers: - : -Remove - : -Remove - : +Add The price was to add it to sched.h ... Core header fallout, we add direct header dependencies instead of gaining them parasitically from higher level headers: - : +Add - : +Add - : +Add - : +Add - : +Add - : +Add Arch headers fallout: - PARISC: : +Add - SH: : +Add - SPARC: : +Add - SPARC: : +Add , -Remove - X86: : +Add -Remove There's also a bunch of parasitic header dependency fallout in .c files, not listed separately. [ mingo: Extended the changelog, split up & fixed the original patch. ] Co-developed-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200804133438.GK2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net

lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks

2020-03-21T15:00:24Z

Extend lockdep to validate lock wait-type context. The current wait-types are: LD_WAIT_FREE, /* wait free, rcu etc.. */ LD_WAIT_SPIN, /* spin loops, raw_spinlock_t etc.. */ LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_LOCK, spinlock_t etc.. */ LD_WAIT_SLEEP, /* sleeping locks, mutex_t etc.. */ Where lockdep validates that the current lock (the one being acquired) fits in the current wait-context (as generated by the held stack). This ensures that there is no attempt to acquire mutexes while holding spinlocks, to acquire spinlocks while holding raw_spinlocks and so on. In other words, its a more fancy might_sleep(). Obviously RCU made the entire ordeal more complex than a simple single value test because RCU can be acquired in (pretty much) any context and while it presents a context to nested locks it is not the same as it got acquired in. Therefore its necessary to split the wait_type into two values, one representing the acquire (outer) and one representing the nested context (inner). For most 'normal' locks these two are the same. [ To make static initialization easier we have the rule that: .outer == INV means .outer == .inner; because INV == 0. ] It further means that its required to find the minimal .inner of the held stack to compare against the outer of the new lock; because while 'normal' RCU presents a CONFIG type to nested locks, if it is taken while already holding a SPIN type it obviously doesn't relax the rules. Below is an example output generated by the trivial test code: raw_spin_lock(&foo); spin_lock(&bar); spin_unlock(&bar); raw_spin_unlock(&foo); [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] ----------------------------- swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: ffffc90000013f20 (&bar){....}-{3:3}, at: kernel_init+0xdb/0x187 other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by swapper/0/1: #0: ffffc90000013ee0 (&foo){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: kernel_init+0xd1/0x187 The way to read it is to look at the new -{n,m} part in the lock description; -{3:3} for the attempted lock, and try and match that up to the held locks, which in this case is the one: -{2,2}. This tells that the acquiring lock requires a more relaxed environment than presented by the lock stack. Currently only the normal locks and RCU are converted, the rest of the lockdep users defaults to .inner = INV which is ignored. More conversions can be done when desired. The check for spinlock_t nesting is not enabled by default. It's a separate config option for now as there are known problems which are currently addressed. The config option allows to identify these problems and to verify that the solutions found are indeed solving them. The config switch will be removed and the checks will permanently enabled once the vast majority of issues has been addressed. [ bigeasy: Move LD_WAIT_FREE,… out of CONFIG_LOCKDEP to avoid compile failure with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK + !CONFIG_LOCKDEP] [ tglx: Add the config option ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113242.427089655@linutronix.de

mutex: Fix up mutex_waiter usage

2019-08-08T07:09:25Z

The patch moving bits into mutex.c was a little too much; by also moving struct mutex_waiter a few less common CONFIGs would no longer build. Fixes: 5f35d5a66b3e ("locking/mutex: Make __mutex_owner static to mutex.c") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)

locking/mutex: Make __mutex_owner static to mutex.c

2019-08-06T10:49:16Z

__mutex_owner() should only be used by the mutex api's. So, to put this restiction let's move the __mutex_owner() function definition from linux/mutex.h to mutex.c file. There exist functions that uses __mutex_owner() like mutex_is_locked() and mutex_trylock_recursive(), So to keep legacy thing intact move them as well and export them. Move mutex_waiter structure also to keep it private to the file. Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: mingo@redhat.com Cc: will@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1564585504-3543-1-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org

docs: locking: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst

2019-07-15T11:53:27Z

Convert the locking documents to ReST and add them to the kernel development book where it belongs. Most of the stuff here is just to make Sphinx to properly parse the text file, as they're already in good shape, not requiring massive changes in order to be parsed. The conversion is actually: - add blank lines and identation in order to identify paragraphs; - fix tables markups; - add some lists markups; - mark literal blocks; - adjust title markups. At its new index.rst, let's add a :orphan: while this is not linked to the main index.rst file, in order to avoid build warnings. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Acked-by: Federico Vaga

locking/spinlocks: Clean up comment and #ifndef for {,queued_}spin_is_locked()

2018-05-15T06:11:15Z

Removes "#ifndef queued_spin_is_locked" from the generic code: this is unused and it's reasonable to conclude that it will continue to be unused. Also removes the comment about spin_is_locked() from mutex_is_locked(): the comment remains valid but not particularly useful. Suggested-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: Will Deacon Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: akiyks@gmail.com Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: dhowells@redhat.com Cc: j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: luc.maranget@inria.fr Cc: npiggin@gmail.com Cc: parri.andrea@gmail.com Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526338889-7003-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

Merge branch 'linus' into locking/core, to pick up fixes and dependencies

2018-03-10T09:19:28Z

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

mutex: Drop linkage.h from mutex.h

2018-02-25T14:00:46Z

does not use nor need , so drop that one header file from mutex.h. is currently #included in around 1250 C source files (oops, I didn't count other header files that #include it), making it the 27th most-used header file. Build tested on i386 and x86_64 * (allnoconfig, tiny.config, defconfig, allyesconfig, and allmodconfig) and x64_64 allmodconfig + SMP=disabled. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/582b3892-4e4c-06b2-a368-5c2d439de7fc@infradead.org

locking/mutex: Add comment to __mutex_owner() to deter usage

2018-02-21T07:56:40Z

Attempt to deter usage, this is not a public interface. It is entirely possible to implement a conformant mutex without having this owner field (in fact, we used to have that). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar