user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/perf, branch v4.19.7

arm64: perf: Reject stand-alone CHAIN events for PMUv3

2018-10-12T14:25:17Z

It doesn't make sense for a perf event to be configured as a CHAIN event in isolation, so extend the arm_pmu structure with a ->filter_match() function to allow the backend PMU implementation to reject CHAIN events early. Cc: Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm_pmu: Add support for 64bit event counters

2018-07-10T17:19:02Z

Each PMU has a set of 32bit event counters. But in some special cases, the events could be counted using counters which are effectively 64bit wide. e.g, Arm V8 PMUv3 has a 64 bit cycle counter which can count only the CPU cycles. Also, the PMU can chain the event counters to effectively count as a 64bit counter. Add support for tracking the events that uses 64bit counters. This only affects the periods set for each counter in the core driver. Cc: Will Deacon Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry Acked-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm_pmu: Change API to support 64bit counter values

2018-07-10T17:19:02Z

Convert the {read/write}_counter APIs to handle 64bit values to enable supporting chained event counters. The backends still use 32bit values and we pass them 32bit values only. So in effect there are no functional changes. Cc: Will Deacon Acked-by: Mark Rutland Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm_pmu: Clean up maximum period handling

2018-07-10T17:19:02Z

Each PMU defines their max_period of the counter as the maximum value that can be counted. Since all the PMU backends support 32bit counters by default, let us remove the redundant field. No functional changes. Cc: Will Deacon Acked-by: Mark Rutland Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm_pmu: simplify arm_pmu::handle_irq

2018-05-21T17:07:05Z

The arm_pmu::handle_irq() callback has the same prototype as a generic IRQ handler, taking the IRQ number and a void pointer argument which it must convert to an arm_pmu pointer. This means that all arm_pmu::handle_irq() take an IRQ number they never use, and all must explicitly cast the void pointer to an arm_pmu pointer. Instead, let's change arm_pmu::handle_irq to take an arm_pmu pointer, allowing these casts to be removed. The redundant IRQ number parameter is also removed. Suggested-by: Hoeun Ryu Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm_pmu: acpi: request IRQs up-front

2018-02-20T11:34:54Z

We can't request IRQs in atomic context, so for ACPI systems we'll have to request them up-front, and later associate them with CPUs. This patch reorganises the arm_pmu code to do so. As we no longer have the arm_pmu structure at probe time, a number of prototypes need to be adjusted, requiring changes to the common arm_pmu code and arm_pmu platform code. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm_pmu: note IRQs and PMUs per-cpu

2018-02-20T11:34:54Z

To support ACPI systems, we need to request IRQs before we know the associated PMU, and thus we need some percpu variable that the IRQ handler can find the PMU from. As we're going to request IRQs without the PMU, we can't rely on the arm_pmu::active_irqs mask, and similarly need to track requested IRQs with a percpu variable. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland [will: made armpmu_count_irq_users static] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm_pmu: add armpmu_alloc_atomic()

2018-02-20T11:34:54Z

In ACPI systems, we don't know the makeup of CPUs until we hotplug them on, and thus have to allocate the PMU datastructures at hotplug time. Thus, we must use GFP_ATOMIC allocations. Let's add an armpmu_alloc_atomic() that we can use in this case. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm_pmu: fold platform helpers into platform code

2018-02-20T11:34:53Z

The armpmu_{request,free}_irqs() helpers are only used by arm_pmu_platform.c, so let's fold them in and make them static. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm_pmu: kill arm_pmu_platdata

2018-02-20T11:34:53Z

Now that we have no platforms passing platform data to the arm_pmu code, we can get rid of the platdata and associated hooks, paving the way for rework of our IRQ handling. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Will Deacon