user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/sched/task.h, branch v6.1.99

locking: Introduce __cleanup() based infrastructure

2024-02-23T08:12:51Z

commit 54da6a0924311c7cf5015533991e44fb8eb12773 upstream. Use __attribute__((__cleanup__(func))) to build: - simple auto-release pointers using __free() - 'classes' with constructor and destructor semantics for scope-based resource management. - lock guards based on the above classes. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230612093537.614161713%40infradead.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

kernel/fork: beware of __put_task_struct() calling context

2023-09-23T09:11:00Z

[ Upstream commit d243b34459cea30cfe5f3a9b2feb44e7daff9938 ] Under PREEMPT_RT, __put_task_struct() indirectly acquires sleeping locks. Therefore, it can't be called from an non-preemptible context. One practical example is splat inside inactive_task_timer(), which is called in a interrupt context: CPU: 1 PID: 2848 Comm: life Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W --------- Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL388p Gen8, BIOS P70 07/15/2012 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d mark_lock_irq.cold+0x33/0xba mark_lock+0x1e7/0x400 mark_usage+0x11d/0x140 __lock_acquire+0x30d/0x930 lock_acquire.part.0+0x9c/0x210 rt_spin_lock+0x27/0xe0 refill_obj_stock+0x3d/0x3a0 kmem_cache_free+0x357/0x560 inactive_task_timer+0x1ad/0x340 __run_hrtimer+0x8a/0x1a0 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x91/0x130 hrtimer_interrupt+0x10f/0x220 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x7b/0xd0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x4f/0xd0 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 RIP: 0033:0x7fff196bf6f5 Instead of calling __put_task_struct() directly, we defer it using call_rcu(). A more natural approach would use a workqueue, but since in PREEMPT_RT, we can't allocate dynamic memory from atomic context, the code would become more complex because we would need to put the work_struct instance in the task_struct and initialize it when we allocate a new task_struct. The issue is reproducible with stress-ng: while true; do stress-ng --sched deadline --sched-period 1000000000 \ --sched-runtime 800000000 --sched-deadline \ 1000000000 --mmapfork 23 -t 20 done Reported-by: Hu Chunyu Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov Suggested-by: Valentin Schneider Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230614122323.37957-2-wander@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

mm: Move mm_cachep initialization to mm_init()

2023-08-08T18:03:49Z

commit af80602799681c78f14fbe20b6185a56020dedee upstream. In order to allow using mm_alloc() much earlier, move initializing mm_cachep into mm_init(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221025201057.751153381@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/mm: Use mm_alloc() in poking_init()

2023-08-08T18:03:49Z

commit 3f4c8211d982099be693be9aa7d6fc4607dff290 upstream. Instead of duplicating init_mm, allocate a fresh mm. The advantage is that mm_alloc() has much simpler dependencies. Additionally it makes more conceptual sense, init_mm has no (and must not have) user state to duplicate. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221025201057.816175235@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

kernel: exit: cleanup release_thread()

2022-09-12T04:55:07Z

Only x86 has own release_thread(), introduce a new weak release_thread() function to clean empty definitions in other ARCHs. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220819014406.32266-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang Acked-by: Guo Ren [csky] Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Acked-by: Brian Cain Acked-by: Michael Ellerman [powerpc] Acked-by: Stafford Horne [openrisc] Acked-by: Catalin Marinas [arm64] Acked-by: Huacai Chen [LoongArch] Cc: Alexander Gordeev Cc: Anton Ivanov Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Christophe Leroy Cc: Chris Zankel Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Dinh Nguyen Cc: Guo Ren [csky] Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Helge Deller Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky Cc: James Bottomley Cc: Johannes Berg Cc: Jonas Bonn Cc: Matt Turner Cc: Max Filippov Cc: Michal Simek Cc: Nicholas Piggin Cc: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Paul Walmsley Cc: Richard Henderson Cc: Richard Weinberger Cc: Rich Felker Cc: Stefan Kristiansson Cc: Sven Schnelle Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vasily Gorbik Cc: Vineet Gupta Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Xuerui Wang Cc: Yoshinori Sato Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

fix race between exit_itimers() and /proc/pid/timers

2022-07-11T16:52:59Z

As Chris explains, the comment above exit_itimers() is not correct, we can race with proc_timers_seq_ops. Change exit_itimers() to clear signal->posix_timers with ->siglock held. Cc: Reported-by: chris@accessvector.net Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

fork: Generalize PF_IO_WORKER handling

2022-05-07T14:01:59Z

Add fn and fn_arg members into struct kernel_clone_args and test for them in copy_thread (instead of testing for PF_KTHREAD | PF_IO_WORKER). This allows any task that wants to be a user space task that only runs in kernel mode to use this functionality. The code on x86 is an exception and still retains a PF_KTHREAD test because x86 unlikely everything else handles kthreads slightly differently than user space tasks that start with a function. The functions that created tasks that start with a function have been updated to set ".fn" and ".fn_arg" instead of ".stack" and ".stack_size". These functions are fork_idle(), create_io_thread(), kernel_thread(), and user_mode_thread(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220506141512.516114-4-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"

fork: Explicity test for idle tasks in copy_thread

2022-05-07T14:01:59Z

The architectures ia64 and parisc have special handling for the idle thread in copy_process. Add a flag named idle to kernel_clone_args and use it to explicity test if an idle process is being created. Fullfill the expectations of the rest of the copy_thread implemetations and pass a function pointer in .stack from fork_idle(). This makes what is happening in copy_thread better defined, and is useful to make idle threads less special. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220506141512.516114-3-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"

fork: Pass struct kernel_clone_args into copy_thread

2022-05-07T14:01:48Z

With io_uring we have started supporting tasks that are for most purposes user space tasks that exclusively run code in kernel mode. The kernel task that exec's init and tasks that exec user mode helpers are also user mode tasks that just run kernel code until they call kernel execve. Pass kernel_clone_args into copy_thread so these oddball tasks can be supported more cleanly and easily. v2: Fix spelling of kenrel_clone_args on h8300 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220506141512.516114-2-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"

kthread: Don't allocate kthread_struct for init and umh

2022-05-06T19:49:44Z

If kthread_is_per_cpu runs concurrently with free_kthread_struct the kthread_struct that was just freed may be read from. This bug was introduced by commit 40966e316f86 ("kthread: Ensure struct kthread is present for all kthreads"). When kthread_struct started to be allocated for all tasks that have PF_KTHREAD set. This in turn required the kthread_struct to be freed in kernel_execve and violated the assumption that kthread_struct will have the same lifetime as the task. Looking a bit deeper this only applies to callers of kernel_execve which is just the init process and the user mode helper processes. These processes really don't want to be kernel threads but are for historical reasons. Mostly that copy_thread does not know how to take a kernel mode function to the process with for processes without PF_KTHREAD or PF_IO_WORKER set. Solve this by not allocating kthread_struct for the init process and the user mode helper processes. This is done by adding a kthread member to struct kernel_clone_args. Setting kthread in fork_idle and kernel_thread. Adding user_mode_thread that works like kernel_thread except it does not set kthread. In fork only allocating the kthread_struct if .kthread is set. I have looked at kernel/kthread.c and since commit 40966e316f86 ("kthread: Ensure struct kthread is present for all kthreads") there have been no assumptions added that to_kthread or __to_kthread will not return NULL. There are a few callers of to_kthread or __to_kthread that assume a non-NULL struct kthread pointer will be returned. These functions are kthread_data(), kthread_parmme(), kthread_exit(), kthread(), kthread_park(), kthread_unpark(), kthread_stop(). All of those functions can reasonably expected to be called when it is know that a task is a kthread so that assumption seems reasonable. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 40966e316f86 ("kthread: Ensure struct kthread is present for all kthreads") Reported-by: Максим Кутявин Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220506141512.516114-1-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"