user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/sched, branch v4.19.281

exit: Add and use make_task_dead.

2023-02-06T06:49:45Z

commit 0e25498f8cd43c1b5aa327f373dd094e9a006da7 upstream. There are two big uses of do_exit. The first is it's design use to be the guts of the exit(2) system call. The second use is to terminate a task after something catastrophic has happened like a NULL pointer in kernel code. Add a function make_task_dead that is initialy exactly the same as do_exit to cover the cases where do_exit is called to handle catastrophic failure. In time this can probably be reduced to just a light wrapper around do_task_dead. For now keep it exactly the same so that there will be no behavioral differences introducing this new concept. Replace all of the uses of do_exit that use it for catastraphic task cleanup with make_task_dead to make it clear what the code is doing. As part of this rename rewind_stack_do_exit rewind_stack_and_make_dead. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

shm: extend forced shm destroy to support objects from several IPC nses

2021-12-08T07:50:11Z

commit 85b6d24646e4125c591639841169baa98a2da503 upstream. Currently, the exit_shm() function not designed to work properly when task->sysvshm.shm_clist holds shm objects from different IPC namespaces. This is a real pain when sysctl kernel.shm_rmid_forced = 1, because it leads to use-after-free (reproducer exists). This is an attempt to fix the problem by extending exit_shm mechanism to handle shm's destroy from several IPC ns'es. To achieve that we do several things: 1. add a namespace (non-refcounted) pointer to the struct shmid_kernel 2. during new shm object creation (newseg()/shmget syscall) we initialize this pointer by current task IPC ns 3. exit_shm() fully reworked such that it traverses over all shp's in task->sysvshm.shm_clist and gets IPC namespace not from current task as it was before but from shp's object itself, then call shm_destroy(shp, ns). Note: We need to be really careful here, because as it was said before (1), our pointer to IPC ns non-refcnt'ed. To be on the safe side we using special helper get_ipc_ns_not_zero() which allows to get IPC ns refcounter only if IPC ns not in the "state of destruction". Q/A Q: Why can we access shp->ns memory using non-refcounted pointer? A: Because shp object lifetime is always shorther than IPC namespace lifetime, so, if we get shp object from the task->sysvshm.shm_clist while holding task_lock(task) nobody can steal our namespace. Q: Does this patch change semantics of unshare/setns/clone syscalls? A: No. It's just fixes non-covered case when process may leave IPC namespace without getting task->sysvshm.shm_clist list cleaned up. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/67bb03e5-f79c-1815-e2bf-949c67047418@colorfullife.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211109151501.4921-1-manfred@colorfullife.com Fixes: ab602f79915 ("shm: make exit_shm work proportional to task activity") Co-developed-by: Manfred Spraul Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Greg KH Cc: Andrei Vagin Cc: Pavel Tikhomirov Cc: Vasily Averin Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

task_stack: Fix end_of_stack() for architectures with upwards-growing stack

2021-11-26T10:36:07Z

[ Upstream commit 9cc2fa4f4a92ccc6760d764e7341be46ee8aaaa1 ] The function end_of_stack() returns a pointer to the last entry of a stack. For architectures like parisc where the stack grows upwards return the pointer to the highest address in the stack. Without this change I faced a crash on parisc, because the stackleak functionality wrote STACKLEAK_POISON to the lowest address and thus overwrote the first 4 bytes of the task_struct which included the TIF_FLAGS. Signed-off-by: Helge Deller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

include/linux/sched/mm.h: use rcu_dereference in in_vfork()

2021-03-17T15:43:51Z

[ Upstream commit 149fc787353f65b7e72e05e7b75d34863266c3e2 ] Fix a sparse warning by using rcu_dereference(). Technically this is a bug and a sufficiently aggressive compiler could reload the `real_parent' pointer outside the protection of the rcu lock (and access freed memory), but I think it's pretty unlikely to happen. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210221194207.1351703-1-willy@infradead.org Fixes: b18dc5f291c0 ("mm, oom: skip vforked tasks from being selected") Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin Acked-by: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

exit/exec: Seperate mm_release()

2021-01-30T12:32:11Z

commit 4610ba7ad877fafc0a25a30c6c82015304120426 upstream mm_release() contains the futex exit handling. mm_release() is called from do_exit()->exit_mm() and from exec()->exec_mm(). In the exit_mm() case PF_EXITING and the futex state is updated. In the exec_mm() case these states are not touched. As the futex exit code needs further protections against exit races, this needs to be split into two functions. Preparatory only, no functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191106224556.240518241@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm, oom_adj: don't loop through tasks in __set_oom_adj when not necessary

2020-10-29T08:55:15Z

[ Upstream commit 67197a4f28d28d0b073ab0427b03cb2ee5382578 ] Currently __set_oom_adj loops through all processes in the system to keep oom_score_adj and oom_score_adj_min in sync between processes sharing their mm. This is done for any task with more that one mm_users, which includes processes with multiple threads (sharing mm and signals). However for such processes the loop is unnecessary because their signal structure is shared as well. Android updates oom_score_adj whenever a tasks changes its role (background/foreground/...) or binds to/unbinds from a service, making it more/less important. Such operation can happen frequently. We noticed that updates to oom_score_adj became more expensive and after further investigation found out that the patch mentioned in "Fixes" introduced a regression. Using Pixel 4 with a typical Android workload, write time to oom_score_adj increased from ~3.57us to ~362us. Moreover this regression linearly depends on the number of multi-threaded processes running on the system. Mark the mm with a new MMF_MULTIPROCESS flag bit when task is created with (CLONE_VM && !CLONE_THREAD && !CLONE_VFORK). Change __set_oom_adj to use MMF_MULTIPROCESS instead of mm_users to decide whether oom_score_adj update should be synchronized between multiple processes. To prevent races between clone() and __set_oom_adj(), when oom_score_adj of the process being cloned might be modified from userspace, we use oom_adj_mutex. Its scope is changed to global. The combination of (CLONE_VM && !CLONE_THREAD) is rarely used except for the case of vfork(). To prevent performance regressions of vfork(), we skip taking oom_adj_mutex and setting MMF_MULTIPROCESS when CLONE_VFORK is specified. Clearing the MMF_MULTIPROCESS flag (when the last process sharing the mm exits) is left out of this patch to keep it simple and because it is believed that this threading model is rare. Should there ever be a need for optimizing that case as well, it can be done by hooking into the exit path, likely following the mm_update_next_owner pattern. With the combination of (CLONE_VM && !CLONE_THREAD && !CLONE_VFORK) being quite rare, the regression is gone after the change is applied. [surenb@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200902012558.2335613-1-surenb@google.com Fixes: 44a70adec910 ("mm, oom_adj: make sure processes sharing mm have same view of oom_score_adj") Reported-by: Tim Murray Suggested-by: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Acked-by: Christian Brauner Acked-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Eugene Syromiatnikov Cc: Christian Kellner Cc: Adrian Reber Cc: Shakeel Butt Cc: Aleksa Sarai Cc: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Alexey Gladkov Cc: Michel Lespinasse Cc: Daniel Jordan Cc: Andrei Vagin Cc: Bernd Edlinger Cc: John Johansen Cc: Yafang Shao Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200824153036.3201505-1-surenb@google.com Debugged-by: Minchan Kim Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched/core: Fix illegal RCU from offline CPUs

2020-06-22T07:05:14Z

[ Upstream commit bf2c59fce4074e55d622089b34be3a6bc95484fb ] In the CPU-offline process, it calls mmdrop() after idle entry and the subsequent call to cpuhp_report_idle_dead(). Once execution passes the call to rcu_report_dead(), RCU is ignoring the CPU, which results in lockdep complaining when mmdrop() uses RCU from either memcg or debugobjects below. Fix it by cleaning up the active_mm state from BP instead. Every arch which has CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU should have already called idle_task_exit() from AP. The only exception is parisc because it switches them to &init_mm unconditionally (see smp_boot_one_cpu() and smp_cpu_init()), but the patch will still work there because it calls mmgrab(&init_mm) in smp_cpu_init() and then should call mmdrop(&init_mm) in finish_cpu(). WARNING: suspicious RCU usage ----------------------------- kernel/workqueue.c:710 RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held! other info that might help us debug this: RCU used illegally from offline CPU! Call Trace: dump_stack+0xf4/0x164 (unreliable) lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x140/0x164 get_work_pool+0x110/0x150 __queue_work+0x1bc/0xca0 queue_work_on+0x114/0x120 css_release+0x9c/0xc0 percpu_ref_put_many+0x204/0x230 free_pcp_prepare+0x264/0x570 free_unref_page+0x38/0xf0 __mmdrop+0x21c/0x2c0 idle_task_exit+0x170/0x1b0 pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self+0x38/0x2e0 cpu_die+0x48/0x64 arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x30/0x50 do_idle+0x2f4/0x470 cpu_startup_entry+0x38/0x40 start_secondary+0x7a8/0xa80 start_secondary_resume+0x10/0x14 Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Qian Cai Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Michael Ellerman (powerpc) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200401214033.8448-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: Avoid leaving stale IRQ work items during CPU offline

2019-12-31T15:36:22Z

commit 85572c2c4a45a541e880e087b5b17a48198b2416 upstream. The scheduler code calling cpufreq_update_util() may run during CPU offline on the target CPU after the IRQ work lists have been flushed for it, so the target CPU should be prevented from running code that may queue up an IRQ work item on it at that point. Unfortunately, that may not be the case if dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu is set for at least one cpufreq policy in the system, because that allows the CPU going offline to run the utilization update callback of the cpufreq governor on behalf of another (online) CPU in some cases. If that happens, the cpufreq governor callback may queue up an IRQ work on the CPU running it, which is going offline, and the IRQ work may not be flushed after that point. Moreover, that IRQ work cannot be flushed until the "offlining" CPU goes back online, so if any other CPU calls irq_work_sync() to wait for the completion of that IRQ work, it will have to wait until the "offlining" CPU is back online and that may not happen forever. In particular, a system-wide deadlock may occur during CPU online as a result of that. The failing scenario is as follows. CPU0 is the boot CPU, so it creates a cpufreq policy and becomes the "leader" of it (policy->cpu). It cannot go offline, because it is the boot CPU. Next, other CPUs join the cpufreq policy as they go online and they leave it when they go offline. The last CPU to go offline, say CPU3, may queue up an IRQ work while running the governor callback on behalf of CPU0 after leaving the cpufreq policy because of the dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu effect described above. Then, CPU0 is the only online CPU in the system and the stale IRQ work is still queued on CPU3. When, say, CPU1 goes back online, it will run irq_work_sync() to wait for that IRQ work to complete and so it will wait for CPU3 to go back online (which may never happen even in principle), but (worse yet) CPU0 is waiting for CPU1 at that point too and a system-wide deadlock occurs. To address this problem notice that CPUs which cannot run cpufreq utilization update code for themselves (for example, because they have left the cpufreq policies that they belonged to), should also be prevented from running that code on behalf of the other CPUs that belong to a cpufreq policy with dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu set and so in that case the cpufreq_update_util_data pointer of the CPU running the code must not be NULL as well as for the CPU which is the target of the cpufreq utilization update in progress. Accordingly, change cpufreq_this_cpu_can_update() into a regular function in kernel/sched/cpufreq.c (instead of a static inline in a header file) and make it check the cpufreq_update_util_data pointer of the local CPU if dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu is set for the target cpufreq policy. Also update the schedutil governor to do the cpufreq_this_cpu_can_update() check in the non-fast-switch case too to avoid the stale IRQ work issues. Fixes: 99d14d0e16fa ("cpufreq: Process remote callbacks from any CPU if the platform permits") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20191121093557.bycvdo4xyinbc5cb@vireshk-i7/ Reported-by: Anson Huang Tested-by: Anson Huang Cc: 4.14+ # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Tested-by: Peng Fan (i.MX8QXP-MEK) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fork: fix some -Wmissing-prototypes warnings

2019-12-05T08:21:04Z

[ Upstream commit fb5bf31722d0805a3f394f7d59f2e8cd07acccb7 ] We get a warning when building kernel with W=1: kernel/fork.c:167:13: warning: no previous prototype for `arch_release_thread_stack' [-Wmissing-prototypes] kernel/fork.c:779:13: warning: no previous prototype for `fork_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] Add the missing declaration in head file to fix this. Also, remove arch_release_thread_stack() completely because no arch seems to implement it since bb9d81264 (arch: remove tile port). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1542170087-23645-1-git-send-email-wang.yi59@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Yi Wang Acked-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Mike Rapoport Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched/membarrier: Call sync_core only before usermode for same mm

2019-10-11T16:21:21Z

[ Upstream commit 2840cf02fae627860156737e83326df354ee4ec6 ] When the prev and next task's mm change, switch_mm() provides the core serializing guarantees before returning to usermode. The only case where an explicit core serialization is needed is when the scheduler keeps the same mm for prev and next. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Chris Metcalf Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Kirill Tkhai Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190919173705.2181-4-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin