user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/suspend.h, branch v5.15.76

PM: s2idle: ACPI: Fix wakeup interrupts handling

2022-02-16T11:56:19Z

commit cb1f65c1e1424a4b5e4a86da8aa3b8fd8459c8ec upstream. After commit e3728b50cd9b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPE") wakeup interrupts occurring immediately after the one discarded by acpi_s2idle_wake() may be missed. Moreover, if the SCI triggers again immediately after the rearming in acpi_s2idle_wake(), that wakeup may be missed too. The problem is that pm_system_irq_wakeup() only calls pm_system_wakeup() when pm_wakeup_irq is 0, but that's not the case any more after the interrupt causing acpi_s2idle_wake() to run until pm_wakeup_irq is cleared by the pm_wakeup_clear() call in s2idle_loop(). However, there may be wakeup interrupts occurring in that time frame and if that happens, they will be missed. To address that issue first move the clearing of pm_wakeup_irq to the point at which it is known that the interrupt causing acpi_s2idle_wake() to tun will be discarded, before rearming the SCI for wakeup. Moreover, because that only reduces the size of the time window in which the issue may manifest itself, allow pm_system_irq_wakeup() to register two second wakeup interrupts in a row and, when discarding the first one, replace it with the second one. [Of course, this assumes that only one wakeup interrupt can be discarded in one go, but currently that is the case and I am not aware of any plans to change that.] Fixes: e3728b50cd9b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPE") Cc: 5.4+ # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

PM: hibernate: Remove register_nosave_region_late()

2022-02-16T11:56:15Z

[ Upstream commit 33569ef3c754a82010f266b7b938a66a3ccf90a4 ] It is an unused wrapper forcing kmalloc allocation for registering nosave regions. Also, rename __register_nosave_region() to register_nosave_region() now that there is no need for disambiguation. Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

PM: rewrite is_hibernate_resume_dev to not require an inode

2020-09-23T16:43:19Z

Just check the dev_t to help simplifying the code. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Pavel Machek Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

PM, libnvdimm: Add runtime firmware activation support

2020-07-29T01:28:32Z

Abstract platform specific mechanics for nvdimm firmware activation behind a handful of generic ops. At the bus level ->activate_state() indicates the unified state (idle, busy, armed) of all DIMMs on the bus, and ->capability() indicates the system state expectations for activate. At the DIMM level ->activate_state() indicates the per-DIMM state, ->activate_result() indicates the outcome of the last activation attempt, and ->arm() attempts to transition the DIMM from 'idle' to 'armed'. A new hibernate_quiet_exec() facility is added to support firmware activation in an OS defined system quiesce state. It leverages the fact that the hibernate-freeze state wants to assert that a memory hibernation snapshot can be taken. This is in contrast to a platform firmware defined quiesce state that may forcefully quiet the memory controller independent of whether an individual device-driver properly supports hibernate-freeze. The libnvdimm sysfs interface is extended to support detection of a firmware activate capability. The mechanism supports enumeration and triggering of firmware activate, optionally in the hibernate_quiet_exec() context. [rafael: hibernate_quiet_exec() proposal] [vishal: fix up sparse warning, grammar in Documentation/] Cc: Pavel Machek Cc: Ira Weiny Cc: Len Brown Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Dave Jiang Cc: Vishal Verma Reported-by: kernel test robot Co-developed-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Signed-off-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma

PM: hibernate: Restrict writes to the resume device

2020-05-27T15:55:59Z

Hibernation via snapshot device requires write permission to the swap block device, the one that more often (but not necessarily) is used to store the hibernation image. With this patch, such permissions are granted iff: 1) snapshot device config option is enabled 2) swap partition is used as resume device In other circumstances the swap device is not writable from userspace. In order to achieve this, every write attempt to a swap device is checked against the device configured as part of the uswsusp API [0] using a pointer to the inode struct in memory. If the swap device being written was not configured for resuming, the write request is denied. NOTE: this implementation works only for swap block devices, where the inode configured by swapon (which sets S_SWAPFILE) is the same used by SNAPSHOT_SET_SWAP_AREA. In case of swap file, SNAPSHOT_SET_SWAP_AREA indeed receives the inode of the block device containing the filesystem where the swap file is located (+ offset in it) which is never passed to swapon and then has not set S_SWAPFILE. As result, the swap file itself (as a file) has never an option to be written from userspace. Instead it remains writable if accessed directly from the containing block device, which is always writeable from root. [0] Documentation/power/userland-swsusp.rst v2: - rename is_hibernate_snapshot_dev() to is_hibernate_resume_dev() - fix description so to correctly refer to the resume device Signed-off-by: Domenico Andreoli Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

PM: remove s390 specific callbacks

2020-03-23T12:41:55Z

ARCH_SAVE_PAGE_KEYS has been introduced in order to be able to save and restore s390 specific storage keys into a hibernation image. With hibernation support removed from s390 there is no point in keeping the callbacks. Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger Acked-by: Peter Oberparleiter Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik

ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPE

2020-02-11T09:11:02Z

It is theoretically possible for the ACPI EC GPE to be set after the s2idle_ops->wake() called from s2idle_loop() has returned and before the subsequent pm_wakeup_pending() check is carried out. If that happens, the resulting wakeup event will cause the system to resume even though it may be a spurious one. To avoid that race, first make the ->wake() callback in struct platform_s2idle_ops return a bool value indicating whether or not to let the system resume and rearrange s2idle_loop() to use that value instad of the direct pm_wakeup_pending() call if ->wake() is present. Next, rework acpi_s2idle_wake() to process EC events and check pm_wakeup_pending() before re-arming the SCI for system wakeup to prevent it from triggering prematurely and add comments to that function to explain the rationale for the new code flow. Fixes: 56b991849009 ("PM: sleep: Simplify suspend-to-idle control flow") Cc: 5.4+ # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

PM: suspend: Add sysfs attribute to control the "sync on suspend" behavior

2020-01-16T20:47:03Z

The sysfs attribute `/sys/power/sync_on_suspend` controls, whether or not filesystems are synced by the kernel before system suspend. Congruously, the behaviour of build-time switch CONFIG_SUSPEND_SKIP_SYNC is slightly changed: It now defines the run-tim default for the new sysfs attribute `/sys/power/sync_on_suspend`. The run-time attribute is added because the existing corresponding build-time Kconfig flag for (`CONFIG_SUSPEND_SKIP_SYNC`) is not flexible enough. E.g. Linux distributions that provide pre-compiled kernels usually want to stick with the default (sync filesystems before suspend) but under special conditions this needs to be changed. One example for such a special condition is user-space handling of suspending block devices (e.g. using `cryptsetup luksSuspend` or `dmsetup suspend`) before system suspend. The Kernel trying to sync filesystems after the underlying block device already got suspended obviously leads to dead-locks. Be aware that you have to take care of the filesystem sync yourself before suspending the system in those scenarios. Signed-off-by: Jonas Meurer Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI: PM: s2idle: Execute LPS0 _DSM functions with suspended devices

2019-08-08T09:26:01Z

According to Section 3.5 of the "Intel Low Power S0 Idle" document [1], Function 5 of the LPS0 _DSM is expected to be invoked when the system configuration matches the criteria for entering the target low-power state of the platform. In particular, this means that all devices should be suspended and in low-power states already when that function is invoked. This is not the case currently, however, because Function 5 of the LPS0 _DSM is invoked by it before the "noirq" phase of device suspend, which means that some devices may not have been put into low-power states yet at that point. That is a consequence of the previous design of the suspend-to-idle flow that allowed the "noirq" phase of device suspend and the "noirq" phase of device resume to be carried out for multiple times while "suspended" (if any spurious wakeup events were detected) and the point of the LPS0 _DSM Function 5 invocation was chosen so as to call it (and LPS0 _DSM Function 6 analogously) once per suspend-resume cycle (regardless of how many times the "noirq" phases of device suspend and resume were carried out while "suspended"). Now that the suspend-to-idle flow has been redesigned to carry out the "noirq" phases of device suspend and resume once in each cycle, the code can be reordered to follow the specification that it is based on more closely. For this purpose, add ->prepare_late and ->restore_early platform callbacks for suspend-to-idle, to be executed, respectively, after the "noirq" phase of suspending devices and before the "noirq" phase of resuming them and make ACPI use them for the invocation of LPS0 _DSM functions as appropriate. While at it, move the LPS0 entry requirements check to be made before invoking Functions 3 and 5 of the LPS0 _DSM (also once per cycle) as follows from the specification [1]. Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_ACPI_Low_Power_S0_Idle.pdf # [1] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Tested-by: Kai-Heng Feng

ACPI: PM: Set up EC GPE for system wakeup from drivers that need it

2019-07-30T10:26:21Z

The EC GPE needs to be set up for system wakeup only if there is a driver depending on it, either intel-hid or intel-vbtn, bound to a button device that is expected to wake up the system from sleep (such as the power button on some Dell systems, like the XPS13 9360). It doesn't need to be set up for waking up the system from sleep in any other cases and whether or not it is expected to wake up the system from sleep doesn't depend on whether or not the LPS0 device is present in the ACPI namespace. For this reason, rearrange the ACPI suspend-to-idle code to make the drivers depending on the EC GPE wakeup take care of setting it up and decouple that from the LPS0 device handling. While at it, make intel-hid and intel-vbtn prepare for system wakeup only if they are allowed to wake up the system from sleep by user space (via sysfs). [Note that acpi_ec_mark_gpe_for_wake() and acpi_ec_set_gpe_wake_mask() are there to prevent the EC GPE from being disabled by the acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes() call in acpi_s2idle_prepare(), so on systems with either intel-hid or intel-vbtn this change doesn't affect any interactions with the hardware or platform firmware.] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko