user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/vmstat.h, branch v4.12

mm: vmstat: replace __count_zone_vm_events with a zone id equivalent

2016-07-28T23:07:41Z

This is partially a preparation patch for more vmstat work but it also has the slight advantage that __count_zid_vm_events is cheaper to calculate than __count_zone_vm_events(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-32-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Hillf Danton Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Rik van Riel Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, workingset: make working set detection node-aware

2016-07-28T23:07:41Z

Working set and refault detection is still zone-based, fix it. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-16-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Hillf Danton Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Rik van Riel Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, vmscan: move LRU lists to node

2016-07-28T23:07:41Z

This moves the LRU lists from the zone to the node and related data such as counters, tracing, congestion tracking and writeback tracking. Unfortunately, due to reclaim and compaction retry logic, it is necessary to account for the number of LRU pages on both zone and node logic. Most reclaim logic is based on the node counters but the retry logic uses the zone counters which do not distinguish inactive and active sizes. It would be possible to leave the LRU counters on a per-zone basis but it's a heavier calculation across multiple cache lines that is much more frequent than the retry checks. Other than the LRU counters, this is mostly a mechanical patch but note that it introduces a number of anomalies. For example, the scans are per-zone but using per-node counters. We also mark a node as congested when a zone is congested. This causes weird problems that are fixed later but is easier to review. In the event that there is excessive overhead on 32-bit systems due to the nodes being on LRU then there are two potential solutions 1. Long-term isolation of highmem pages when reclaim is lowmem When pages are skipped, they are immediately added back onto the LRU list. If lowmem reclaim persisted for long periods of time, the same highmem pages get continually scanned. The idea would be that lowmem keeps those pages on a separate list until a reclaim for highmem pages arrives that splices the highmem pages back onto the LRU. It potentially could be implemented similar to the UNEVICTABLE list. That would reduce the skip rate with the potential corner case is that highmem pages have to be scanned and reclaimed to free lowmem slab pages. 2. Linear scan lowmem pages if the initial LRU shrink fails This will break LRU ordering but may be preferable and faster during memory pressure than skipping LRU pages. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-4-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Hillf Danton Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Rik van Riel Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, vmstat: add infrastructure for per-node vmstats

2016-07-28T23:07:41Z

Patchset: "Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v9" This series moves LRUs from the zones to the node. While this is a current rebase, the test results were based on mmotm as of June 23rd. Conceptually, this series is simple but there are a lot of details. Some of the broad motivations for this are; 1. The residency of a page partially depends on what zone the page was allocated from. This is partially combatted by the fair zone allocation policy but that is a partial solution that introduces overhead in the page allocator paths. 2. Currently, reclaim on node 0 behaves slightly different to node 1. For example, direct reclaim scans in zonelist order and reclaims even if the zone is over the high watermark regardless of the age of pages in that LRU. Kswapd on the other hand starts reclaim on the highest unbalanced zone. A difference in distribution of file/anon pages due to when they were allocated results can result in a difference in again. While the fair zone allocation policy mitigates some of the problems here, the page reclaim results on a multi-zone node will always be different to a single-zone node. it was scheduled on as a result. 3. kswapd and the page allocator scan zones in the opposite order to avoid interfering with each other but it's sensitive to timing. This mitigates the page allocator using pages that were allocated very recently in the ideal case but it's sensitive to timing. When kswapd is allocating from lower zones then it's great but during the rebalancing of the highest zone, the page allocator and kswapd interfere with each other. It's worse if the highest zone is small and difficult to balance. 4. slab shrinkers are node-based which makes it harder to identify the exact relationship between slab reclaim and LRU reclaim. The reason we have zone-based reclaim is that we used to have large highmem zones in common configurations and it was necessary to quickly find ZONE_NORMAL pages for reclaim. Today, this is much less of a concern as machines with lots of memory will (or should) use 64-bit kernels. Combinations of 32-bit hardware and 64-bit hardware are rare. Machines that do use highmem should have relatively low highmem:lowmem ratios than we worried about in the past. Conceptually, moving to node LRUs should be easier to understand. The page allocator plays fewer tricks to game reclaim and reclaim behaves similarly on all nodes. The series has been tested on a 16 core UMA machine and a 2-socket 48 core NUMA machine. The UMA results are presented in most cases as the NUMA machine behaved similarly. pagealloc --------- This is a microbenchmark that shows the benefit of removing the fair zone allocation policy. It was tested uip to order-4 but only orders 0 and 1 are shown as the other orders were comparable. 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9 Min total-odr0-1 490.00 ( 0.00%) 457.00 ( 6.73%) Min total-odr0-2 347.00 ( 0.00%) 329.00 ( 5.19%) Min total-odr0-4 288.00 ( 0.00%) 273.00 ( 5.21%) Min total-odr0-8 251.00 ( 0.00%) 239.00 ( 4.78%) Min total-odr0-16 234.00 ( 0.00%) 222.00 ( 5.13%) Min total-odr0-32 223.00 ( 0.00%) 211.00 ( 5.38%) Min total-odr0-64 217.00 ( 0.00%) 208.00 ( 4.15%) Min total-odr0-128 214.00 ( 0.00%) 204.00 ( 4.67%) Min total-odr0-256 250.00 ( 0.00%) 230.00 ( 8.00%) Min total-odr0-512 271.00 ( 0.00%) 269.00 ( 0.74%) Min total-odr0-1024 291.00 ( 0.00%) 282.00 ( 3.09%) Min total-odr0-2048 303.00 ( 0.00%) 296.00 ( 2.31%) Min total-odr0-4096 311.00 ( 0.00%) 309.00 ( 0.64%) Min total-odr0-8192 316.00 ( 0.00%) 314.00 ( 0.63%) Min total-odr0-16384 317.00 ( 0.00%) 315.00 ( 0.63%) Min total-odr1-1 742.00 ( 0.00%) 712.00 ( 4.04%) Min total-odr1-2 562.00 ( 0.00%) 530.00 ( 5.69%) Min total-odr1-4 457.00 ( 0.00%) 433.00 ( 5.25%) Min total-odr1-8 411.00 ( 0.00%) 381.00 ( 7.30%) Min total-odr1-16 381.00 ( 0.00%) 356.00 ( 6.56%) Min total-odr1-32 372.00 ( 0.00%) 346.00 ( 6.99%) Min total-odr1-64 372.00 ( 0.00%) 343.00 ( 7.80%) Min total-odr1-128 375.00 ( 0.00%) 351.00 ( 6.40%) Min total-odr1-256 379.00 ( 0.00%) 351.00 ( 7.39%) Min total-odr1-512 385.00 ( 0.00%) 355.00 ( 7.79%) Min total-odr1-1024 386.00 ( 0.00%) 358.00 ( 7.25%) Min total-odr1-2048 390.00 ( 0.00%) 362.00 ( 7.18%) Min total-odr1-4096 390.00 ( 0.00%) 362.00 ( 7.18%) Min total-odr1-8192 388.00 ( 0.00%) 363.00 ( 6.44%) This shows a steady improvement throughout. The primary benefit is from reduced system CPU usage which is obvious from the overall times; 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623nodelru-v8 User 189.19 191.80 System 2604.45 2533.56 Elapsed 2855.30 2786.39 The vmstats also showed that the fair zone allocation policy was definitely removed as can be seen here; 4.7.0-rc3 4.7.0-rc3 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v8 DMA32 allocs 28794729769 0 Normal allocs 48432501431 77227309877 Movable allocs 0 0 tiobench on ext4 ---------------- tiobench is a benchmark that artifically benefits if old pages remain resident while new pages get reclaimed. The fair zone allocation policy mitigates this problem so pages age fairly. While the benchmark has problems, it is important that tiobench performance remains constant as it implies that page aging problems that the fair zone allocation policy fixes are not re-introduced. 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9 Min PotentialReadSpeed 89.65 ( 0.00%) 90.21 ( 0.62%) Min SeqRead-MB/sec-1 82.68 ( 0.00%) 82.01 ( -0.81%) Min SeqRead-MB/sec-2 72.76 ( 0.00%) 72.07 ( -0.95%) Min SeqRead-MB/sec-4 75.13 ( 0.00%) 74.92 ( -0.28%) Min SeqRead-MB/sec-8 64.91 ( 0.00%) 65.19 ( 0.43%) Min SeqRead-MB/sec-16 62.24 ( 0.00%) 62.22 ( -0.03%) Min RandRead-MB/sec-1 0.88 ( 0.00%) 0.88 ( 0.00%) Min RandRead-MB/sec-2 0.95 ( 0.00%) 0.92 ( -3.16%) Min RandRead-MB/sec-4 1.43 ( 0.00%) 1.34 ( -6.29%) Min RandRead-MB/sec-8 1.61 ( 0.00%) 1.60 ( -0.62%) Min RandRead-MB/sec-16 1.80 ( 0.00%) 1.90 ( 5.56%) Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-1 76.41 ( 0.00%) 76.85 ( 0.58%) Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-2 74.11 ( 0.00%) 73.54 ( -0.77%) Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-4 80.05 ( 0.00%) 80.13 ( 0.10%) Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-8 72.88 ( 0.00%) 73.20 ( 0.44%) Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-16 75.91 ( 0.00%) 76.44 ( 0.70%) Min RandWrite-MB/sec-1 1.18 ( 0.00%) 1.14 ( -3.39%) Min RandWrite-MB/sec-2 1.02 ( 0.00%) 1.03 ( 0.98%) Min RandWrite-MB/sec-4 1.05 ( 0.00%) 0.98 ( -6.67%) Min RandWrite-MB/sec-8 0.89 ( 0.00%) 0.92 ( 3.37%) Min RandWrite-MB/sec-16 0.92 ( 0.00%) 0.93 ( 1.09%) 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 approx-v9 User 645.72 525.90 System 403.85 331.75 Elapsed 6795.36 6783.67 This shows that the series has little or not impact on tiobench which is desirable and a reduction in system CPU usage. It indicates that the fair zone allocation policy was removed in a manner that didn't reintroduce one class of page aging bug. There were only minor differences in overall reclaim activity 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623nodelru-v8 Minor Faults 645838 647465 Major Faults 573 640 Swap Ins 0 0 Swap Outs 0 0 DMA allocs 0 0 DMA32 allocs 46041453 44190646 Normal allocs 78053072 79887245 Movable allocs 0 0 Allocation stalls 24 67 Stall zone DMA 0 0 Stall zone DMA32 0 0 Stall zone Normal 0 2 Stall zone HighMem 0 0 Stall zone Movable 0 65 Direct pages scanned 10969 30609 Kswapd pages scanned 93375144 93492094 Kswapd pages reclaimed 93372243 93489370 Direct pages reclaimed 10969 30609 Kswapd efficiency 99% 99% Kswapd velocity 13741.015 13781.934 Direct efficiency 100% 100% Direct velocity 1.614 4.512 Percentage direct scans 0% 0% kswapd activity was roughly comparable. There were differences in direct reclaim activity but negligible in the context of the overall workload (velocity of 4 pages per second with the patches applied, 1.6 pages per second in the baseline kernel). pgbench read-only large configuration on ext4 --------------------------------------------- pgbench is a database benchmark that can be sensitive to page reclaim decisions. This also checks if removing the fair zone allocation policy is safe pgbench Transactions 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v8 Hmean 1 188.26 ( 0.00%) 189.78 ( 0.81%) Hmean 5 330.66 ( 0.00%) 328.69 ( -0.59%) Hmean 12 370.32 ( 0.00%) 380.72 ( 2.81%) Hmean 21 368.89 ( 0.00%) 369.00 ( 0.03%) Hmean 30 382.14 ( 0.00%) 360.89 ( -5.56%) Hmean 32 428.87 ( 0.00%) 432.96 ( 0.95%) Negligible differences again. As with tiobench, overall reclaim activity was comparable. bonnie++ on ext4 ---------------- No interesting performance difference, negligible differences on reclaim stats. paralleldd on ext4 ------------------ This workload uses varying numbers of dd instances to read large amounts of data from disk. 4.7.0-rc3 4.7.0-rc3 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9 Amean Elapsd-1 186.04 ( 0.00%) 189.41 ( -1.82%) Amean Elapsd-3 192.27 ( 0.00%) 191.38 ( 0.46%) Amean Elapsd-5 185.21 ( 0.00%) 182.75 ( 1.33%) Amean Elapsd-7 183.71 ( 0.00%) 182.11 ( 0.87%) Amean Elapsd-12 180.96 ( 0.00%) 181.58 ( -0.35%) Amean Elapsd-16 181.36 ( 0.00%) 183.72 ( -1.30%) 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9 User 1548.01 1552.44 System 8609.71 8515.08 Elapsed 3587.10 3594.54 There is little or no change in performance but some drop in system CPU usage. 4.7.0-rc3 4.7.0-rc3 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9 Minor Faults 362662 367360 Major Faults 1204 1143 Swap Ins 22 0 Swap Outs 2855 1029 DMA allocs 0 0 DMA32 allocs 31409797 28837521 Normal allocs 46611853 49231282 Movable allocs 0 0 Direct pages scanned 0 0 Kswapd pages scanned 40845270 40869088 Kswapd pages reclaimed 40830976 40855294 Direct pages reclaimed 0 0 Kswapd efficiency 99% 99% Kswapd velocity 11386.711 11369.769 Direct efficiency 100% 100% Direct velocity 0.000 0.000 Percentage direct scans 0% 0% Page writes by reclaim 2855 1029 Page writes file 0 0 Page writes anon 2855 1029 Page reclaim immediate 771 1628 Sector Reads 293312636 293536360 Sector Writes 18213568 18186480 Page rescued immediate 0 0 Slabs scanned 128257 132747 Direct inode steals 181 56 Kswapd inode steals 59 1131 It basically shows that kswapd was active at roughly the same rate in both kernels. There was also comparable slab scanning activity and direct reclaim was avoided in both cases. There appears to be a large difference in numbers of inodes reclaimed but the workload has few active inodes and is likely a timing artifact. stutter ------- stutter simulates a simple workload. One part uses a lot of anonymous memory, a second measures mmap latency and a third copies a large file. The primary metric is checking for mmap latency. stutter 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v8 Min mmap 16.6283 ( 0.00%) 13.4258 ( 19.26%) 1st-qrtle mmap 54.7570 ( 0.00%) 34.9121 ( 36.24%) 2nd-qrtle mmap 57.3163 ( 0.00%) 46.1147 ( 19.54%) 3rd-qrtle mmap 58.9976 ( 0.00%) 47.1882 ( 20.02%) Max-90% mmap 59.7433 ( 0.00%) 47.4453 ( 20.58%) Max-93% mmap 60.1298 ( 0.00%) 47.6037 ( 20.83%) Max-95% mmap 73.4112 ( 0.00%) 82.8719 (-12.89%) Max-99% mmap 92.8542 ( 0.00%) 88.8870 ( 4.27%) Max mmap 1440.6569 ( 0.00%) 121.4201 ( 91.57%) Mean mmap 59.3493 ( 0.00%) 42.2991 ( 28.73%) Best99%Mean mmap 57.2121 ( 0.00%) 41.8207 ( 26.90%) Best95%Mean mmap 55.9113 ( 0.00%) 39.9620 ( 28.53%) Best90%Mean mmap 55.6199 ( 0.00%) 39.3124 ( 29.32%) Best50%Mean mmap 53.2183 ( 0.00%) 33.1307 ( 37.75%) Best10%Mean mmap 45.9842 ( 0.00%) 20.4040 ( 55.63%) Best5%Mean mmap 43.2256 ( 0.00%) 17.9654 ( 58.44%) Best1%Mean mmap 32.9388 ( 0.00%) 16.6875 ( 49.34%) This shows a number of improvements with the worst-case outlier greatly improved. Some of the vmstats are interesting 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623nodelru-v8 Swap Ins 163 502 Swap Outs 0 0 DMA allocs 0 0 DMA32 allocs 618719206 1381662383 Normal allocs 891235743 564138421 Movable allocs 0 0 Allocation stalls 2603 1 Direct pages scanned 216787 2 Kswapd pages scanned 50719775 41778378 Kswapd pages reclaimed 41541765 41777639 Direct pages reclaimed 209159 0 Kswapd efficiency 81% 99% Kswapd velocity 16859.554 14329.059 Direct efficiency 96% 0% Direct velocity 72.061 0.001 Percentage direct scans 0% 0% Page writes by reclaim 6215049 0 Page writes file 6215049 0 Page writes anon 0 0 Page reclaim immediate 70673 90 Sector Reads 81940800 81680456 Sector Writes 100158984 98816036 Page rescued immediate 0 0 Slabs scanned 1366954 22683 While this is not guaranteed in all cases, this particular test showed a large reduction in direct reclaim activity. It's also worth noting that no page writes were issued from reclaim context. This series is not without its hazards. There are at least three areas that I'm concerned with even though I could not reproduce any problems in that area. 1. Reclaim/compaction is going to be affected because the amount of reclaim is no longer targetted at a specific zone. Compaction works on a per-zone basis so there is no guarantee that reclaiming a few THP's worth page pages will have a positive impact on compaction success rates. 2. The Slab/LRU reclaim ratio is affected because the frequency the shrinkers are called is now different. This may or may not be a problem but if it is, it'll be because shrinkers are not called enough and some balancing is required. 3. The anon/file reclaim ratio may be affected. Pages about to be dirtied are distributed between zones and the fair zone allocation policy used to do something very similar for anon. The distribution is now different but not necessarily in any way that matters but it's still worth bearing in mind. VM statistic counters for reclaim decisions are zone-based. If the kernel is to reclaim on a per-node basis then we need to track per-node statistics but there is no infrastructure for that. The most notable change is that the old node_page_state is renamed to sum_zone_node_page_state. The new node_page_state takes a pglist_data and uses per-node stats but none exist yet. There is some renaming such as vm_stat to vm_zone_stat and the addition of vm_node_stat and the renaming of mod_state to mod_zone_state. Otherwise, this is mostly a mechanical patch with no functional change. There is a lot of similarity between the node and zone helpers which is unfortunate but there was no obvious way of reusing the code and maintaining type safety. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-2-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Hillf Danton Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Minchan Kim Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, page_alloc: inline zone_statistics

2016-05-20T02:12:14Z

zone_statistics has one call-site but it's a public function. Make it static and inline. The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is; 4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2 statbranch-v1r20 statinline-v1r20 Min alloc-odr0-1 419.00 ( 0.00%) 412.00 ( 1.67%) Min alloc-odr0-2 305.00 ( 0.00%) 301.00 ( 1.31%) Min alloc-odr0-4 250.00 ( 0.00%) 247.00 ( 1.20%) Min alloc-odr0-8 219.00 ( 0.00%) 215.00 ( 1.83%) Min alloc-odr0-16 203.00 ( 0.00%) 199.00 ( 1.97%) Min alloc-odr0-32 195.00 ( 0.00%) 191.00 ( 2.05%) Min alloc-odr0-64 191.00 ( 0.00%) 187.00 ( 2.09%) Min alloc-odr0-128 189.00 ( 0.00%) 185.00 ( 2.12%) Min alloc-odr0-256 198.00 ( 0.00%) 193.00 ( 2.53%) Min alloc-odr0-512 210.00 ( 0.00%) 207.00 ( 1.43%) Min alloc-odr0-1024 216.00 ( 0.00%) 213.00 ( 1.39%) Min alloc-odr0-2048 221.00 ( 0.00%) 220.00 ( 0.45%) Min alloc-odr0-4096 227.00 ( 0.00%) 226.00 ( 0.44%) Min alloc-odr0-8192 232.00 ( 0.00%) 229.00 ( 1.29%) Min alloc-odr0-16384 232.00 ( 0.00%) 229.00 ( 1.29%) Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh to force vmstat update

2016-05-20T02:12:14Z

Provide /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh to force an immediate update of per-cpu into global vmstats: useful to avoid a sleep(2) or whatever before checking counts when testing. Originally added to work around a bug which left counts stranded indefinitely on a cpu going idle (an inaccuracy magnified when small below-batch numbers represent "huge" amounts of memory), but I believe that bug is now fixed: nonetheless, this is still a useful knob. Its schedule_on_each_cpu() is probably too expensive just to fold into reading /proc/meminfo itself: give this mode 0600 to prevent abuse. Allow a write or a read to do the same: nothing to read, but "grep -h Shmem /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh /proc/meminfo" is convenient. Oh, and since global_page_state() itself is careful to disguise any underflow as 0, hack in an "Invalid argument" and pr_warn() if a counter is negative after the refresh - this helped to fix a misaccounting of NR_ISOLATED_FILE in my migration code. But on recent kernels, I find that NR_ALLOC_BATCH and NR_PAGES_SCANNED often go negative some of the time. I have not yet worked out why, but have no evidence that it's actually harmful. Punt for the moment by just ignoring the anomaly on those. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla Cc: Yang Shi Cc: Ning Qu Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

vmstat: make vmstat_updater deferrable again and shut down on idle

2016-01-15T00:00:49Z

Currently the vmstat updater is not deferrable as a result of commit ba4877b9ca51 ("vmstat: do not use deferrable delayed work for vmstat_update"). This in turn can cause multiple interruptions of the applications because the vmstat updater may run at Make vmstate_update deferrable again and provide a function that folds the differentials when the processor is going to idle mode thus addressing the issue of the above commit in a clean way. Note that the shepherd thread will continue scanning the differentials from another processor and will reenable the vmstat workers if it detects any changes. Fixes: ba4877b9ca51 ("vmstat: do not use deferrable delayed work for vmstat_update") Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Tetsuo Handa Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/vmstat: fix overflow in mod_zone_page_state()

2015-12-30T01:45:49Z

mod_zone_page_state() takes a "delta" integer argument. delta contains the number of pages that should be added or subtracted from a struct zone's vm_stat field. If a zone is larger than 8TB this will cause overflows. E.g. for a zone with a size slightly larger than 8TB the line mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ALLOC_BATCH, zone->managed_pages); in mm/page_alloc.c:free_area_init_core() will result in a negative result for the NR_ALLOC_BATCH entry within the zone's vm_stat, since 8TB contain 0x8xxxxxxx pages which will be sign extended to a negative value. Fix this by changing the delta argument to long type. This could fix an early boot problem seen on s390, where we have a 9TB system with only one node. ZONE_DMA contains 2GB and ZONE_NORMAL the rest. The system is trying to allocate a GFP_DMA page but ZONE_DMA is completely empty, so it tries to reclaim pages in an endless loop. This was seen on a heavily patched 3.10 kernel. One possible explaination seem to be the overflows caused by mod_zone_page_state(). Unfortunately I did not have the chance to verify that this patch actually fixes the problem, since I don't have access to the system right now. However the overflow problem does exist anyway. Given the description that a system with slightly less than 8TB does work, this seems to be a candidate for the observed problem. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Cc: Christoph Lameter Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: remove refresh_cpu_vm_stats() definition for !SMP kernel

2015-11-06T03:34:48Z

refresh_cpu_vm_stats(int cpu) is no longer referenced by !SMP kernel since Linux 3.12. Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/vmstat.c: uninline node_page_state()

2015-11-06T03:34:48Z

With x86_64 (config http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/config-akpm2.txt) and old gcc (4.4.4), drivers/base/node.c:node_read_meminfo() is using 2344 bytes of stack. Uninlining node_page_state() reduces this to 440 bytes. The stack consumption issue is fixed by newer gcc (4.8.4) however with that compiler this patch reduces the node.o text size from 7314 bytes to 4578. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds