user/sven/linux.git/include/linux/workqueue.h, branch v6.1.149

workqueue: Provide one lock class key per work_on_cpu() callsite

2023-11-28T17:06:55Z

[ Upstream commit 265f3ed077036f053981f5eea0b5b43e7c5b39ff ] All callers of work_on_cpu() share the same lock class key for all the functions queued. As a result the workqueue related locking scenario for a function A may be spuriously accounted as an inversion against the locking scenario of function B such as in the following model: long A(void *arg) { mutex_lock(&mutex); mutex_unlock(&mutex); } long B(void *arg) { } void launchA(void) { work_on_cpu(0, A, NULL); } void launchB(void) { mutex_lock(&mutex); work_on_cpu(1, B, NULL); mutex_unlock(&mutex); } launchA and launchB running concurrently have no chance to deadlock. However the above can be reported by lockdep as a possible locking inversion because the works containing A() and B() are treated as belonging to the same locking class. The following shows an existing example of such a spurious lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:1/9 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff9bc72f30 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 but task is already holding lock: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x83/0x4e0 work_on_cpu+0x97/0xc0 rcu_nocb_cpu_offload+0x62/0xb0 rcu_nocb_toggle+0xd0/0x1d0 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 -> #1 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0xc80 rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload+0x38/0xb0 rcu_nocb_toggle+0x144/0x1d0 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500 lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0 percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200 _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 __cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20 work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20 process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500 worker_thread+0x173/0x330 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> rcu_state.barrier_mutex --> (work_completion)(&wfc.work) Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); lock(rcu_state.barrier_mutex); lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/0:1/9: #0: ffff900481068b38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x212/0x500 #1: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn Call Trace: rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of episode dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80 check_noncircular+0x132/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500 lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0 ? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200 ? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 __cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20 work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20 process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500 worker_thread+0x173/0x330 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

workqueue: clean up WORK_* constant types, clarify masking

2023-07-23T11:49:19Z

commit afa4bb778e48d79e4a642ed41e3b4e0de7489a6c upstream. Dave Airlie reports that gcc-13.1.1 has started complaining about some of the workqueue code in 32-bit arm builds: kernel/workqueue.c: In function ‘get_work_pwq’: kernel/workqueue.c:713:24: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast] 713 | return (void *)(data & WORK_STRUCT_WQ_DATA_MASK); | ^ [ ... a couple of other cases ... ] and while it's not immediately clear exactly why gcc started complaining about it now, I suspect it's some C23-induced enum type handlign fixup in gcc-13 is the cause. Whatever the reason for starting to complain, the code and data types are indeed disgusting enough that the complaint is warranted. The wq code ends up creating various "helper constants" (like that WORK_STRUCT_WQ_DATA_MASK) using an enum type, which is all kinds of confused. The mask needs to be 'unsigned long', not some unspecified enum type. To make matters worse, the actual "mask and cast to a pointer" is repeated a couple of times, and the cast isn't even always done to the right pointer, but - as the error case above - to a 'void *' with then the compiler finishing the job. That's now how we roll in the kernel. So create the masks using the proper types rather than some ambiguous enumeration, and use a nice helper that actually does the type conversion in one well-defined place. Incidentally, this magically makes clang generate better code. That, admittedly, is really just a sign of clang having been seriously confused before, and cleaning up the typing unconfuses the compiler too. Reported-by: Dave Airlie Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAPM=9twNnV4zMCvrPkw3H-ajZOH-01JVh_kDrxdPYQErz8ZTdA@mail.gmail.com/ Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Merge tag 'amd-drm-next-5.20-2022-07-05' of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/agd5f/linux into drm-next

2022-07-12T01:07:32Z

amd-drm-next-5.20-2022-07-05: amdgpu: - Various spelling and grammer fixes - Various eDP fixes - Various DMCUB fixes - VCN fixes - GMC 11 fixes - RAS fixes - TMZ support for GC 10.3.7 - GPUVM TLB flush fixes - SMU 13.0.x updates - DCN 3.2 Support - DCN 3.2.1 Support - MES updates - GFX11 modifiers support - USB-C fixes - MMHUB 3.0.1 support - SDMA 6.0 doorbell fixes - Initial devcoredump support - Enable high priority gfx queue on asics which support it - Enable GPU reset for SMU 13.0.4 - OLED display fixes - MPO fixes - DC frame size fixes - ASPM support for PCIE 7.4/7.6 - GPU reset support for SMU 13.0.0 - GFX11 updates - VCN JPEG fix - BACO support for SMU 13.0.7 - VCN instance handling fix - GFX8 GPUVM TLB flush fix - GPU reset rework - VCN 4.0.2 support - GTT size fixes - DP link training fixes - LSDMA 6.0.1 support - Various backlight fixes - Color encoding fixes - Backlight config cleanup - VCN 4.x unified queue cleanup amdkfd: - MMU notifier fixes - Updates for GC 10.3.6 and 10.3.7 - P2P DMA support using dma-buf - Add available memory IOCTL - SDMA 6.0.1 fix - MES fixes - HMM profiler support radeon: - License fix - Backlight config cleanup UAPI: - Add available memory IOCTL to amdkfd Proposed userspace: https://www.mail-archive.com/amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org/msg75743.html - HMM profiler support for amdkfd Proposed userspace: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/2022-June/080805.html Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie From: Alex Deucher Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220705212633.6037-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com

workqueue: Switch to new kerneldoc syntax for named variable macro argument

2022-06-12T00:16:42Z

The syntax without dots is available since commit 43756e347f21 ("scripts/kernel-doc: Add support for named variable macro arguments"). The same HTML output is produced with and without this patch. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer Acked-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo

Revert "workqueue: remove unused cancel_work()"

2022-06-10T19:24:38Z

This reverts commit 6417250d3f894e66a68ba1cd93676143f2376a6f. amdpgu need this function in order to prematurly stop pending reset works when another reset work already in progress. Acked-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan Reviewed-by: Christian König Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher

workqueue: Wrap flush_workqueue() using a macro

2022-06-07T17:07:14Z

Since flush operation synchronously waits for completion, flushing system-wide WQs (e.g. system_wq) might introduce possibility of deadlock due to unexpected locking dependency. Tejun Heo commented at [1] that it makes no sense at all to call flush_workqueue() on the shared WQs as the caller has no idea what it's gonna end up waiting for. Although there is flush_scheduled_work() which flushes system_wq WQ with "Think twice before calling this function! It's very easy to get into trouble if you don't take great care." warning message, syzbot found a circular locking dependency caused by flushing system_wq WQ [2]. Therefore, let's change the direction to that developers had better use their local WQs if flush_scheduled_work()/flush_workqueue(system_*_wq) is inevitable. Steps for converting system-wide WQs into local WQs are explained at [3], and a conversion to stop flushing system-wide WQs is in progress. Now we want some mechanism for preventing developers who are not aware of this conversion from again start flushing system-wide WQs. Since I found that WARN_ON() is complete but awkward approach for teaching developers about this problem, let's use __compiletime_warning() for incomplete but handy approach. For completeness, we will also insert WARN_ON() into __flush_workqueue() after all in-tree users stopped calling flush_scheduled_work(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YgnQGZWT%2Fn3VAITX@slm.duckdns.org/ [1] Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=bde0f89deacca7c765b8 [2] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/49925af7-78a8-a3dd-bce6-cfc02e1a9236@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp [3] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo

workqueue: Introduce show_one_worker_pool and show_one_workqueue.

2021-10-20T16:19:03Z

Currently show_workqueue_state shows the state of all workqueues and of all worker pools. In certain cases we may need to dump state of only a specific workqueue or worker pool. For example in destroy_workqueue we only need to show state of the workqueue which is getting destroyed. So rename show_workqueue_state to show_all_workqueues(to signify it dumps state of all busy workqueues) and divide it into more granular functions (show_one_workqueue and show_one_worker_pool), that would show states of individual workqueues and worker pools and can be used in cases such as the one mentioned above. Also, as mentioned earlier, make destroy_workqueue dump data pertaining to only the workqueue that is being destroyed and make user(s) of earlier interface(show_workqueue_state), use new interface (show_all_workqueues). Signed-off-by: Imran Khan Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo

workqueue: annotate alloc_workqueue() as printf

2021-09-13T17:53:27Z

This also enables checking of allows alloc_ordered_workqueue(). Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo

workqueue: Remove unused WORK_NO_COLOR

2021-08-17T17:49:10Z

WORK_NO_COLOR has no user now, just remove it. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo

workqueue: Rename "delayed" (delayed by active management) to "inactive"

2021-08-17T17:49:09Z

There are two kinds of "delayed" work items in workqueue subsystem. One is for timer-delayed work items which are visible to workqueue users. The other kind is for work items delayed by active management which can not be directly visible to workqueue users. We mixed the word "delayed" for both kinds and caused somewhat ambiguity. This patch renames the later one (delayed by active management) to "inactive", because it is used for workqueue active management and most of its related symbols are named with "active" or "activate". All "delayed" and "DELAYED" are carefully checked and renamed one by one to avoid accidentally changing the name of the other kind for timer-delayed. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo