user/sven/linux.git/include/linux, branch v4.19.50

x86/power: Fix 'nosmt' vs hibernation triple fault during resume

2019-06-11T10:20:52Z

commit ec527c318036a65a083ef68d8ba95789d2212246 upstream. As explained in 0cc3cd21657b ("cpu/hotplug: Boot HT siblings at least once") we always, no matter what, have to bring up x86 HT siblings during boot at least once in order to avoid first MCE bringing the system to its knees. That means that whenever 'nosmt' is supplied on the kernel command-line, all the HT siblings are as a result sitting in mwait or cpudile after going through the online-offline cycle at least once. This causes a serious issue though when a kernel, which saw 'nosmt' on its commandline, is going to perform resume from hibernation: if the resume from the hibernated image is successful, cr3 is flipped in order to point to the address space of the kernel that is being resumed, which in turn means that all the HT siblings are all of a sudden mwaiting on address which is no longer valid. That results in triple fault shortly after cr3 is switched, and machine reboots. Fix this by always waking up all the SMT siblings before initiating the 'restore from hibernation' process; this guarantees that all the HT siblings will be properly carried over to the resumed kernel waiting in resume_play_dead(), and acted upon accordingly afterwards, based on the target kernel configuration. Symmetricaly, the resumed kernel has to push the SMT siblings to mwait again in case it has SMT disabled; this means it has to online all the siblings when resuming (so that they come out of hlt) and offline them again to let them reach mwait. Cc: 4.19+ # v4.19+ Debugged-by: Thomas Gleixner Fixes: 0cc3cd21657b ("cpu/hotplug: Boot HT siblings at least once") Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina Acked-by: Pavel Machek Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

pstore: Convert buf_lock to semaphore

2019-06-11T10:20:52Z

commit ea84b580b95521644429cc6748b6c2bf27c8b0f3 upstream. Instead of running with interrupts disabled, use a semaphore. This should make it easier for backends that may need to sleep (e.g. EFI) when performing a write: |BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/sched/completion.c:99 |in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 2236, name: sig-xstate-bum |Preemption disabled at: |[] pstore_dump+0x72/0x330 |CPU: 26 PID: 2236 Comm: sig-xstate-bum Tainted: G D 4.20.0-rc3 #45 |Call Trace: | dump_stack+0x4f/0x6a | ___might_sleep.cold.91+0xd3/0xe4 | __might_sleep+0x50/0x90 | wait_for_completion+0x32/0x130 | virt_efi_query_variable_info+0x14e/0x160 | efi_query_variable_store+0x51/0x1a0 | efivar_entry_set_safe+0xa3/0x1b0 | efi_pstore_write+0x109/0x140 | pstore_dump+0x11c/0x330 | kmsg_dump+0xa4/0xd0 | oops_exit+0x22/0x30 ... Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Fixes: 21b3ddd39fee ("efi: Don't use spinlocks for efi vars") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rcu: locking and unlocking need to always be at least barriers

2019-06-11T10:20:50Z

commit 66be4e66a7f422128748e3c3ef6ee72b20a6197b upstream. Herbert Xu pointed out that commit bb73c52bad36 ("rcu: Don't disable preemption for Tiny and Tree RCU readers") was incorrect in making the preempt_disable/enable() be conditional on CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT. If CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT isn't enabled, the preemption enable/disable is a no-op, but still is a compiler barrier. And RCU locking still _needs_ that compiler barrier. It is simply fundamentally not true that RCU locking would be a complete no-op: we still need to guarantee (for example) that things that can trap and cause preemption cannot migrate into the RCU locked region. The way we do that is by making it a barrier. See for example commit 386afc91144b ("spinlocks and preemption points need to be at least compiler barriers") from back in 2013 that had similar issues with spinlocks that become no-ops on UP: they must still constrain the compiler from moving other operations into the critical region. Now, it is true that a lot of RCU operations already use READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() (which in practice likely would never be re-ordered wrt anything remotely interesting), but it is also true that that is not globally the case, and that it's not even necessarily always possible (ie bitfields etc). Reported-by: Herbert Xu Fixes: bb73c52bad36 ("rcu: Don't disable preemption for Tiny and Tree RCU readers") Cc: stable@kernel.org Cc: Boqun Feng Cc: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

of: overlay: validate overlay properties #address-cells and #size-cells

2019-06-09T07:17:24Z

commit 6f75118800acf77f8ad6afec61ca1b2349ade371 upstream. If overlay properties #address-cells or #size-cells are already in the live devicetree for any given node, then the values in the overlay must match the values in the live tree. If the properties are already in the live tree then there is no need to create a changeset entry to add them since they must have the same value. This reduces the memory used by the changeset and eliminates a possible memory leak. Tested-by: Alan Tull Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

include/linux/module.h: copy init/exit attrs to init/cleanup_module

2019-06-09T07:17:23Z

commit a6e60d84989fa0e91db7f236eda40453b0e44afa upstream. The upcoming GCC 9 release extends the -Wmissing-attributes warnings (enabled by -Wall) to C and aliases: it warns when particular function attributes are missing in the aliases but not in their target. In particular, it triggers for all the init/cleanup_module aliases in the kernel (defined by the module_init/exit macros), ending up being very noisy. These aliases point to the __init/__exit functions of a module, which are defined as __cold (among other attributes). However, the aliases themselves do not have the __cold attribute. Since the compiler behaves differently when compiling a __cold function as well as when compiling paths leading to calls to __cold functions, the warning is trying to point out the possibly-forgotten attribute in the alias. In order to keep the warning enabled, we decided to silence this case. Ideally, we would mark the aliases directly as __init/__exit. However, there are currently around 132 modules in the kernel which are missing __init/__exit in their init/cleanup functions (either because they are missing, or for other reasons, e.g. the functions being called from somewhere else); and a section mismatch is a hard error. A conservative alternative was to mark the aliases as __cold only. However, since we would like to eventually enforce __init/__exit to be always marked, we chose to use the new __copy function attribute (introduced by GCC 9 as well to deal with this). With it, we copy the attributes used by the target functions into the aliases. This way, functions that were not marked as __init/__exit won't have their aliases marked either, and therefore there won't be a section mismatch. Note that the warning would go away marking either the extern declaration, the definition, or both. However, we only mark the definition of the alias, since we do not want callers (which only see the declaration) to be compiled as if the function was __cold (and therefore the paths leading to those calls would be assumed to be unlikely). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190123173707.GA16603@gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190206175627.GA20399@gmail.com/ Suggested-by: Martin Sebor Acked-by: Jessica Yu Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Compiler Attributes: add support for __copy (gcc >= 9)

2019-06-09T07:17:23Z

commit c0d9782f5b6d7157635ae2fd782a4b27d55a6013 upstream. From the GCC manual: copy copy(function) The copy attribute applies the set of attributes with which function has been declared to the declaration of the function to which the attribute is applied. The attribute is designed for libraries that define aliases or function resolvers that are expected to specify the same set of attributes as their targets. The copy attribute can be used with functions, variables, or types. However, the kind of symbol to which the attribute is applied (either function or variable) must match the kind of symbol to which the argument refers. The copy attribute copies only syntactic and semantic attributes but not attributes that affect a symbol’s linkage or visibility such as alias, visibility, or weak. The deprecated attribute is also not copied. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html The upcoming GCC 9 release extends the -Wmissing-attributes warnings (enabled by -Wall) to C and aliases: it warns when particular function attributes are missing in the aliases but not in their target, e.g.: void __cold f(void) {} void __alias("f") g(void); diagnoses: warning: 'g' specifies less restrictive attribute than its target 'f': 'cold' [-Wmissing-attributes] Using __copy(f) we can copy the __cold attribute from f to g: void __cold f(void) {} void __copy(f) __alias("f") g(void); This attribute is most useful to deal with situations where an alias is declared but we don't know the exact attributes the target has. For instance, in the kernel, the widely used module_init/exit macros define the init/cleanup_module aliases, but those cannot be marked always as __init/__exit since some modules do not have their functions marked as such. Suggested-by: Martin Sebor Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

memcg: make it work on sparse non-0-node systems

2019-06-09T07:17:19Z

commit 3e8589963773a5c23e2f1fe4bcad0e9a90b7f471 upstream. We have a single node system with node 0 disabled: Scanning NUMA topology in Northbridge 24 Number of physical nodes 2 Skipping disabled node 0 Node 1 MemBase 0000000000000000 Limit 00000000fbff0000 NODE_DATA(1) allocated [mem 0xfbfda000-0xfbfeffff] This causes crashes in memcg when system boots: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 #PF error: [normal kernel read fault] ... RIP: 0010:list_lru_add+0x94/0x170 ... Call Trace: d_lru_add+0x44/0x50 dput.part.34+0xfc/0x110 __fput+0x108/0x230 task_work_run+0x9f/0xc0 exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf5/0x100 It is reproducible as far as 4.12. I did not try older kernels. You have to have a new enough systemd, e.g. 241 (the reason is unknown -- was not investigated). Cannot be reproduced with systemd 234. The system crashes because the size of lru array is never updated in memcg_update_all_list_lrus and the reads are past the zero-sized array, causing dereferences of random memory. The root cause are list_lru_memcg_aware checks in the list_lru code. The test in list_lru_memcg_aware is broken: it assumes node 0 is always present, but it is not true on some systems as can be seen above. So fix this by avoiding checks on node 0. Remember the memcg-awareness by a bool flag in struct list_lru. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190522091940.3615-1-jslaby@suse.cz Fixes: 60d3fd32a7a9 ("list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists") Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby Acked-by: Michal Hocko Suggested-by: Vladimir Davydov Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Raghavendra K T Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

include/linux/bitops.h: sanitize rotate primitives

2019-06-09T07:17:11Z

commit ef4d6f6b275c498f8e5626c99dbeefdc5027f843 upstream. The ror32 implementation (word >> shift) | (word << (32 - shift) has undefined behaviour if shift is outside the [1, 31] range. Similarly for the 64 bit variants. Most callers pass a compile-time constant (naturally in that range), but there's an UBSAN report that these may actually be called with a shift count of 0. Instead of special-casing that, we can make them DTRT for all values of shift while also avoiding UB. For some reason, this was already partly done for rol32 (which was well-defined for [0, 31]). gcc 8 recognizes these patterns as rotates, so for example __u32 rol32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift) { return (word << (shift & 31)) | (word >> ((-shift) & 31)); } compiles to 0000000000000020 : 20: 89 f8 mov %edi,%eax 22: 89 f1 mov %esi,%ecx 24: d3 c0 rol %cl,%eax 26: c3 retq Older compilers unfortunately do not do as well, but this only affects the small minority of users that don't pass constants. Due to integer promotions, ro[lr]8 were already well-defined for shifts in [0, 8], and ro[lr]16 were mostly well-defined for shifts in [0, 16] (only mostly - u16 gets promoted to _signed_ int, so if bit 15 is set, word << 16 is undefined). For consistency, update those as well. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190410211906.2190-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes Reported-by: Ido Schimmel Tested-by: Ido Schimmel Reviewed-by: Will Deacon Cc: Vadim Pasternak Cc: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Jacek Anaszewski Cc: Pavel Machek Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

jump_label: move 'asm goto' support test to Kconfig

2019-06-04T06:02:34Z

commit e9666d10a5677a494260d60d1fa0b73cc7646eb3 upstream. Currently, CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL just means "I _want_ to use jump label". The jump label is controlled by HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, which is defined like this: #if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL) # define HAVE_JUMP_LABEL #endif We can improve this by testing 'asm goto' support in Kconfig, then make JUMP_LABEL depend on CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO. Ugly #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL will go away, and CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL will match to the real kernel capability. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Acked-by: Michael Ellerman (powerpc) Tested-by: Sedat Dilek [nc: Fix trivial conflicts in 4.19 arch/xtensa/kernel/jump_label.c doesn't exist yet Ensured CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO and HAVE_JUMP_LABEL were sufficiently eliminated] Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

compiler.h: give up __compiletime_assert_fallback()

2019-06-04T06:02:34Z

commit 81b45683487a51b0f4d3b29d37f20d6d078544e4 upstream. __compiletime_assert_fallback() is supposed to stop building earlier by using the negative-array-size method in case the compiler does not support "error" attribute, but has never worked like that. You can simply try: BUILD_BUG_ON(1); GCC immediately terminates the build, but Clang does not report anything because Clang does not support the "error" attribute now. It will later fail at link time, but __compiletime_assert_fallback() is not working at least. The root cause is commit 1d6a0d19c855 ("bug.h: prevent double evaluation of `condition' in BUILD_BUG_ON"). Prior to that commit, BUILD_BUG_ON() was checked by the negative-array-size method *and* the link-time trick. Since that commit, the negative-array-size is not effective because '__cond' is no longer constant. As the comment in says, GCC (and Clang as well) only emits the error for obvious cases. When '__cond' is a variable, ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2 * __cond])) ... is not obvious for the compiler to know the array size is negative. Reverting that commit would break BUILD_BUG() because negative-size-array is evaluated before the code is optimized out. Let's give up __compiletime_assert_fallback(). This commit does not change the current behavior since it just rips off the useless code. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

user/sven/linux.git/include/linux, branch v4.19.50

x86/power: Fix 'nosmt' vs hibernation triple fault during resume

pstore: Convert buf_lock to semaphore

rcu: locking and unlocking need to always be at least barriers

of: overlay: validate overlay properties #address-cells and #size-cells

include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to init/cleanup_module

Compiler Attributes: add support for __copy (gcc >= 9)

memcg: make it work on sparse non-0-node systems

include/linux/bitops.h: sanitize rotate primitives

jump_label: move 'asm goto' support test to Kconfig

compiler.h: give up __compiletime_assert_fallback()

include/linux/module.h: copy init/exit attrs to init/cleanup_module