user/sven/linux.git/include/linux, branch v5.6.10

qed: Fix use after free in qed_chain_free

2020-05-02T06:51:05Z

commit 8063f761cd7c17fc1d0018728936e0c33a25388a upstream. The qed_chain data structure was modified in commit 1a4a69751f4d ("qed: Chain support for external PBL") to support receiving an external pbl (due to iWARP FW requirements). The pages pointed to by the pbl are allocated in qed_chain_alloc and their virtual address are stored in an virtual addresses array to enable accessing and freeing the data. The physical addresses however weren't stored and were accessed directly from the external-pbl during free. Destroy-qp flow, leads to freeing the external pbl before the chain is freed, when the chain is freed it tries accessing the already freed external pbl, leading to a use-after-free. Therefore we need to store the physical addresses in additional to the virtual addresses in a new data structure. Fixes: 1a4a69751f4d ("qed: Chain support for external PBL") Signed-off-by: Michal Kalderon Signed-off-by: Yuval Bason Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add support for VPENDBASER's Dirty+Valid signaling

2020-05-02T06:51:03Z

[ Upstream commit 96806229ca033f85310bc5c203410189f8a1d2ee ] When a vPE is made resident, the GIC starts parsing the virtual pending table to deliver pending interrupts. This takes place asynchronously, and can at times take a long while. Long enough that the vcpu enters the guest and hits WFI before any interrupt has been signaled yet. The vcpu then exits, blocks, and now gets a doorbell. Rince, repeat. In order to avoid the above, a (optional on GICv4, mandatory on v4.1) feature allows the GIC to feedback to the hypervisor whether it is done parsing the VPT by clearing the GICR_VPENDBASER.Dirty bit. The hypervisor can then wait until the GIC is ready before actually running the vPE. Plug the detection code as well as polling on vPE schedule. While at it, tidy-up the kernel message that displays the GICv4 optional features. Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

PCI: Add Zhaoxin Vendor ID

2020-05-02T06:50:50Z

commit 3375590623e4a132b19a8740512f4deb95728933 upstream. Add Zhaoxin Vendor ID to pci_ids.h Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327091148.5190-2-RaymondPang-oc@zhaoxin.com Signed-off-by: Raymond Pang Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

svcrdma: Fix leak of svc_rdma_recv_ctxt objects

2020-05-02T06:50:49Z

commit 23cf1ee1f1869966b75518c59b5cbda4c6c92450 upstream. Utilize the xpo_release_rqst transport method to ensure that each rqstp's svc_rdma_recv_ctxt object is released even when the server cannot return a Reply for that rqstp. Without this fix, each RPC whose Reply cannot be sent leaks one svc_rdma_recv_ctxt. This is a 2.5KB structure, a 4KB DMA-mapped Receive buffer, and any pages that might be part of the Reply message. The leak is infrequent unless the network fabric is unreliable or Kerberos is in use, as GSS sequence window overruns, which result in connection loss, are more common on fast transports. Fixes: 3a88092ee319 ("svcrdma: Preserve Receive buffer until svc_rdma_sendto") Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

printk: queue wake_up_klogd irq_work only if per-CPU areas are ready

2020-05-02T06:50:39Z

commit ab6f762f0f53162d41497708b33c9a3236d3609e upstream. printk_deferred(), similarly to printk_safe/printk_nmi, does not immediately attempt to print a new message on the consoles, avoiding calls into non-reentrant kernel paths, e.g. scheduler or timekeeping, which potentially can deadlock the system. Those printk() flavors, instead, rely on per-CPU flush irq_work to print messages from safer contexts. For same reasons (recursive scheduler or timekeeping calls) printk() uses per-CPU irq_work in order to wake up user space syslog/kmsg readers. However, only printk_safe/printk_nmi do make sure that per-CPU areas have been initialised and that it's safe to modify per-CPU irq_work. This means that, for instance, should printk_deferred() be invoked "too early", that is before per-CPU areas are initialised, printk_deferred() will perform illegal per-CPU access. Lech Perczak [0] reports that after commit 1b710b1b10ef ("char/random: silence a lockdep splat with printk()") user-space syslog/kmsg readers are not able to read new kernel messages. The reason is printk_deferred() being called too early (as was pointed out by Petr and John). Fix printk_deferred() and do not queue per-CPU irq_work before per-CPU areas are initialized. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aa0732c6-5c4e-8a8b-a1c1-75ebe3dca05b@camlintechnologies.com/ Reported-by: Lech Perczak Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky Tested-by: Jann Horn Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Theodore Ts'o Cc: John Ogness Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

KVM: Check validity of resolved slot when searching memslots

2020-04-29T14:34:48Z

commit b6467ab142b708dd076f6186ca274f14af379c72 upstream. Check that the resolved slot (somewhat confusingly named 'start') is a valid/allocated slot before doing the final comparison to see if the specified gfn resides in the associated slot. The resolved slot can be invalid if the binary search loop terminated because the search index was incremented beyond the number of used slots. This bug has existed since the binary search algorithm was introduced, but went unnoticed because KVM statically allocated memory for the max number of slots, i.e. the access would only be truly out-of-bounds if all possible slots were allocated and the specified gfn was less than the base of the lowest memslot. Commit 36947254e5f98 ("KVM: Dynamically size memslot array based on number of used slots") eliminated the "all possible slots allocated" condition and made the bug embarrasingly easy to hit. Fixes: 9c1a5d38780e6 ("kvm: optimize GFN to memslot lookup with large slots amount") Reported-by: syzbot+d889b59b2bb87d4047a2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Message-Id: <20200408064059.8957-2-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

vmalloc: fix remap_vmalloc_range() bounds checks

2020-04-29T14:34:45Z

commit bdebd6a2831b6fab69eb85cee74a8ba77f1a1cc2 upstream. remap_vmalloc_range() has had various issues with the bounds checks it promises to perform ("This function checks that addr is a valid vmalloc'ed area, and that it is big enough to cover the vma") over time, e.g.: - not detecting pgoff< Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Martin KaFai Lau Cc: Song Liu Cc: Yonghong Song Cc: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: John Fastabend Cc: KP Singh Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200415222312.236431-1-jannh@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

iio: core: remove extra semi-colon from devm_iio_device_register() macro

2020-04-29T14:34:43Z

commit a07479147be03d2450376ebaff9ea1a0682f25d6 upstream. This change removes the semi-colon from the devm_iio_device_register() macro which seems to have been added by accident. Fixes: 63b19547cc3d9 ("iio: Use macro magic to avoid manual assign of driver_module") Signed-off-by: Lars Engebretsen Cc: Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

KEYS: Don't write out to userspace while holding key semaphore

2020-04-23T08:38:26Z

commit d3ec10aa95819bff18a0d936b18884c7816d0914 upstream. A lockdep circular locking dependency report was seen when running a keyutils test: [12537.027242] ====================================================== [12537.059309] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [12537.088148] 4.18.0-147.7.1.el8_1.x86_64+debug #1 Tainted: G OE --------- - - [12537.125253] ------------------------------------------------------ [12537.153189] keyctl/25598 is trying to acquire lock: [12537.175087] 000000007c39f96c (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12537.208365] [12537.208365] but task is already holding lock: [12537.234507] 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12537.270476] [12537.270476] which lock already depends on the new lock. [12537.270476] [12537.307209] [12537.307209] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [12537.340754] [12537.340754] -> #3 (&type->lock_class){++++}: [12537.367434] down_write+0x4d/0x110 [12537.385202] __key_link_begin+0x87/0x280 [12537.405232] request_key_and_link+0x483/0xf70 [12537.427221] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.444839] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.468445] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.496731] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.519418] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.546263] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.573551] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.601045] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.617906] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.636225] [12537.636225] -> #2 (root_key_user.cons_lock){+.+.}: [12537.664525] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.683734] request_key_and_link+0x35a/0xf70 [12537.705640] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.723304] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.746773] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.775607] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.798322] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.823369] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.847262] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.873477] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.890281] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.908649] [12537.908649] -> #1 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}: [12537.935225] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.954450] cifs_call_async+0x102/0x7f0 [cifs] [12537.977250] smb2_async_readv+0x6c3/0xc90 [cifs] [12538.000659] cifs_readpages+0x120a/0x1e50 [cifs] [12538.023920] read_pages+0xf5/0x560 [12538.041583] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x41d/0x4b0 [12538.067047] ondemand_readahead+0x44c/0xc10 [12538.092069] filemap_fault+0xec1/0x1830 [12538.111637] __do_fault+0x82/0x260 [12538.129216] do_fault+0x419/0xfb0 [12538.146390] __handle_mm_fault+0x862/0xdf0 [12538.167408] handle_mm_fault+0x154/0x550 [12538.187401] __do_page_fault+0x42f/0xa60 [12538.207395] do_page_fault+0x38/0x5e0 [12538.225777] page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [12538.243010] [12538.243010] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: [12538.267875] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12538.286848] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12538.306006] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12538.327936] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12538.352154] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12538.370558] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12538.391470] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12538.410511] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf [12538.435535] [12538.435535] other info that might help us debug this: [12538.435535] [12538.472829] Chain exists of: [12538.472829] &mm->mmap_sem --> root_key_user.cons_lock --> &type->lock_class [12538.472829] [12538.524820] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [12538.524820] [12538.551431] CPU0 CPU1 [12538.572654] ---- ---- [12538.595865] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.613737] lock(root_key_user.cons_lock); [12538.644234] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.672410] lock(&mm->mmap_sem); [12538.687758] [12538.687758] *** DEADLOCK *** [12538.687758] [12538.714455] 1 lock held by keyctl/25598: [12538.732097] #0: 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12538.770573] [12538.770573] stack backtrace: [12538.790136] CPU: 2 PID: 25598 Comm: keyctl Kdump: loaded Tainted: G [12538.844855] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 12/27/2015 [12538.881963] Call Trace: [12538.892897] dump_stack+0x9a/0xf0 [12538.907908] print_circular_bug.isra.25.cold.50+0x1bc/0x279 [12538.932891] ? save_trace+0xd6/0x250 [12538.948979] check_prev_add.constprop.32+0xc36/0x14f0 [12538.971643] ? keyring_compare_object+0x104/0x190 [12538.992738] ? check_usage+0x550/0x550 [12539.009845] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [12539.025484] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1e0 [12539.043555] __lock_acquire+0x1f12/0x38d0 [12539.061551] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x10/0x10 [12539.080554] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12539.100330] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.119079] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12539.135869] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.153234] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12539.172787] ? keyring_read+0x110/0x110 [12539.190059] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12539.211526] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12539.227561] ? keyring_gc_check_iterator+0xc0/0xc0 [12539.249076] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12539.266660] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12539.283091] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf One way to prevent this deadlock scenario from happening is to not allow writing to userspace while holding the key semaphore. Instead, an internal buffer is allocated for getting the keys out from the read method first before copying them out to userspace without holding the lock. That requires taking out the __user modifier from all the relevant read methods as well as additional changes to not use any userspace write helpers. That is, 1) The put_user() call is replaced by a direct copy. 2) The copy_to_user() call is replaced by memcpy(). 3) All the fault handling code is removed. Compiling on a x86-64 system, the size of the rxrpc_read() function is reduced from 3795 bytes to 2384 bytes with this patch. Fixes: ^1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

platform/chrome: cros_ec: Query EC protocol version if EC transitions between RO/RW

2020-04-23T08:38:22Z

[ Upstream commit 42cd0ab476e2daffc23982c37822a78f9a53cdd5 ] RO and RW of EC may have different EC protocol version. If EC transitions between RO and RW, but AP does not reboot (this is true for fingerprint microcontroller / cros_fp, but not true for main ec / cros_ec), the AP still uses the protocol version queried before transition, which can cause problems. In the case of fingerprint microcontroller, this causes AP to send the wrong version of EC_CMD_GET_NEXT_EVENT to RO in the interrupt handler, which in turn prevents RO to clear the interrupt line to AP, in an infinite loop. Once an EC_HOST_EVENT_INTERFACE_READY is received, we know that there might have been a transition between RO and RW, so re-query the protocol. Signed-off-by: Yicheng Li Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin