user/sven/linux.git/include/uapi, branch v5.15.57

uapi/linux/stddef.h: Add include guards

2022-07-12T14:35:03Z

[ Upstream commit 55037ed7bdc62151a726f5685f88afa6a82959b1 ] Add include guard wrapper define to uapi/linux/stddef.h to prevent macro redefinition errors when stddef.h is included more than once. This was not needed before since the only contents already used a redefinition test. Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220329171252.57279-1-tadeusz.struk@linaro.org Fixes: 50d7bd38c3aa ("stddef: Introduce struct_group() helper macro") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

stddef: Introduce DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper

2022-07-12T14:35:03Z

[ Upstream commit 3080ea5553cc909b000d1f1d964a9041962f2c5b ] There are many places where kernel code wants to have several different typed trailing flexible arrays. This would normally be done with multiple flexible arrays in a union, but since GCC and Clang don't (on the surface) allow this, there have been many open-coded workarounds, usually involving neighboring 0-element arrays at the end of a structure. For example, instead of something like this: struct thing { ... union { struct type1 foo[]; struct type2 bar[]; }; }; code works around the compiler with: struct thing { ... struct type1 foo[0]; struct type2 bar[]; }; Another case is when a flexible array is wanted as the single member within a struct (which itself is usually in a union). For example, this would be worked around as: union many { ... struct { struct type3 baz[0]; }; }; These kinds of work-arounds cause problems with size checks against such zero-element arrays (for example when building with -Warray-bounds and -Wzero-length-bounds, and with the coming FORTIFY_SOURCE improvements), so they must all be converted to "real" flexible arrays, avoiding warnings like this: fs/hpfs/anode.c: In function 'hpfs_add_sector_to_btree': fs/hpfs/anode.c:209:27: warning: array subscript 0 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'struct bplus_internal_node[0]' [-Wzero-length-bounds] 209 | anode->btree.u.internal[0].down = cpu_to_le32(a); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ In file included from fs/hpfs/hpfs_fn.h:26, from fs/hpfs/anode.c:10: fs/hpfs/hpfs.h:412:32: note: while referencing 'internal' 412 | struct bplus_internal_node internal[0]; /* (internal) 2-word entries giving | ^~~~~~~~ drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c: In function 'es58x_fd_tx_can_msg': drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c:360:35: warning: array subscript 65535 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'u8[0]' {aka 'unsigned char[]'} [-Wzero-length-bounds] 360 | tx_can_msg = (typeof(tx_can_msg))&es58x_fd_urb_cmd->raw_msg[msg_len]; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_core.h:22, from drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c:17: drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.h:231:6: note: while referencing 'raw_msg' 231 | u8 raw_msg[0]; | ^~~~~~~ However, it _is_ entirely possible to have one or more flexible arrays in a struct or union: it just has to be in another struct. And since it cannot be alone in a struct, such a struct must have at least 1 other named member -- but that member can be zero sized. Wrap all this nonsense into the new DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() in support of having flexible arrays in unions (or alone in a struct). As with struct_group(), since this is needed in UAPI headers as well, implement the core there, with a non-UAPI wrapper. Additionally update kernel-doc to understand its existence. https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/137 Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

media: omap3isp: Use struct_group() for memcpy() region

2022-07-12T14:34:57Z

[ Upstream commit d4568fc8525897e683983806f813be1ae9eedaed ] In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid intentionally writing across neighboring fields. Wrap the target region in struct_group(). This additionally fixes a theoretical misalignment of the copy (since the size of "buf" changes between 64-bit and 32-bit, but this is likely never built for 64-bit). FWIW, I think this code is totally broken on 64-bit (which appears to not be a "real" build configuration): it would either always fail (with an uninitialized data->buf_size) or would cause corruption in userspace due to the copy_to_user() in the call path against an uninitialized data->buf value: omap3isp_stat_request_statistics_time32(...) struct omap3isp_stat_data data64; ... omap3isp_stat_request_statistics(stat, &data64); int omap3isp_stat_request_statistics(struct ispstat *stat, struct omap3isp_stat_data *data) ... buf = isp_stat_buf_get(stat, data); static struct ispstat_buffer *isp_stat_buf_get(struct ispstat *stat, struct omap3isp_stat_data *data) ... if (buf->buf_size > data->buf_size) { ... return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); } ... rval = copy_to_user(data->buf, buf->virt_addr, buf->buf_size); Regardless, additionally initialize data64 to be zero-filled to avoid undefined behavior. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211215220505.GB21862@embeddedor Cc: Arnd Bergmann Fixes: 378e3f81cb56 ("media: omap3isp: support 64-bit version of omap3isp_stat_data") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

stddef: Introduce struct_group() helper macro

2022-07-12T14:34:57Z

[ Upstream commit 50d7bd38c3aafc4749e05e8d7fcb616979143602 ] Kernel code has a regular need to describe groups of members within a structure usually when they need to be copied or initialized separately from the rest of the surrounding structure. The generally accepted design pattern in C is to use a named sub-struct: struct foo { int one; struct { int two; int three, four; } thing; int five; }; This would allow for traditional references and sizing: memcpy(&dst.thing, &src.thing, sizeof(dst.thing)); However, doing this would mean that referencing struct members enclosed by such named structs would always require including the sub-struct name in identifiers: do_something(dst.thing.three); This has tended to be quite inflexible, especially when such groupings need to be added to established code which causes huge naming churn. Three workarounds exist in the kernel for this problem, and each have other negative properties. To avoid the naming churn, there is a design pattern of adding macro aliases for the named struct: #define f_three thing.three This ends up polluting the global namespace, and makes it difficult to search for identifiers. Another common work-around in kernel code avoids the pollution by avoiding the named struct entirely, instead identifying the group's boundaries using either a pair of empty anonymous structs of a pair of zero-element arrays: struct foo { int one; struct { } start; int two; int three, four; struct { } finish; int five; }; struct foo { int one; int start[0]; int two; int three, four; int finish[0]; int five; }; This allows code to avoid needing to use a sub-struct named for member references within the surrounding structure, but loses the benefits of being able to actually use such a struct, making it rather fragile. Using these requires open-coded calculation of sizes and offsets. The efforts made to avoid common mistakes include lots of comments, or adding various BUILD_BUG_ON()s. Such code is left with no way for the compiler to reason about the boundaries (e.g. the "start" object looks like it's 0 bytes in length), making bounds checking depend on open-coded calculations: if (length > offsetof(struct foo, finish) - offsetof(struct foo, start)) return -EINVAL; memcpy(&dst.start, &src.start, offsetof(struct foo, finish) - offsetof(struct foo, start)); However, the vast majority of places in the kernel that operate on groups of members do so without any identification of the grouping, relying either on comments or implicit knowledge of the struct contents, which is even harder for the compiler to reason about, and results in even more fragile manual sizing, usually depending on member locations outside of the region (e.g. to copy "two" and "three", use the start of "four" to find the size): BUILD_BUG_ON((offsetof(struct foo, four) < offsetof(struct foo, two)) || (offsetof(struct foo, four) < offsetof(struct foo, three)); if (length > offsetof(struct foo, four) - offsetof(struct foo, two)) return -EINVAL; memcpy(&dst.two, &src.two, length); In order to have a regular programmatic way to describe a struct region that can be used for references and sizing, can be examined for bounds checking, avoids forcing the use of intermediate identifiers, and avoids polluting the global namespace, introduce the struct_group() macro. This macro wraps the member declarations to create an anonymous union of an anonymous struct (no intermediate name) and a named struct (for references and sizing): struct foo { int one; struct_group(thing, int two; int three, four; ); int five; }; if (length > sizeof(src.thing)) return -EINVAL; memcpy(&dst.thing, &src.thing, length); do_something(dst.three); There are some rare cases where the resulting struct_group() needs attributes added, so struct_group_attr() is also introduced to allow for specifying struct attributes (e.g. __align(x) or __packed). Additionally, there are places where such declarations would like to have the struct be tagged, so struct_group_tagged() is added. Given there is a need for a handful of UAPI uses too, the underlying __struct_group() macro has been defined in UAPI so it can be used there too. To avoid confusing scripts/kernel-doc, hide the macro from its struct parsing. Co-developed-by: Keith Packard Signed-off-by: Keith Packard Acked-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210728023217.GC35706@embeddedor Enhanced-by: Rasmus Villemoes Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/41183a98-bdb9-4ad6-7eab-5a7292a6df84@rasmusvillemoes.dk Enhanced-by: Dan Williams Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1d9a2e6df2a9a35b2cdd50a9a68cac5991e7e5f0.camel@intel.com Enhanced-by: Daniel Vetter Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YQKa76A6XuFqgM03@phenom.ffwll.local Acked-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

netfilter: nft_payload: support for inner header matching / mangling

2022-07-12T14:34:55Z

[ Upstream commit c46b38dc8743535e686b911d253a844f0bd50ead ] Allow to match and mangle on inner headers / payload data after the transport header. There is a new field in the pktinfo structure that stores the inner header offset which is calculated only when requested. Only TCP and UDP supported at this stage. Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/fourcc: fix integer type usage in uapi header

2022-07-07T15:53:34Z

[ Upstream commit 20b8264394b33adb1640a485a62a84bc1388b6a3 ] Kernel uapi headers are supposed to use __[us]{8,16,32,64} types defined by as opposed to 'uint32_t' and similar. See [1] for the relevant discussion about this topic. In this particular case, the usage of 'uint64_t' escaped headers_check as these macros are not being called here. However, the following program triggers a compilation error: #include int main() { unsigned long x = AMD_FMT_MOD_CLEAR(RB); return 0; } gcc error: drm.c:5:27: error: ‘uint64_t’ undeclared (first use in this function) 5 | unsigned long x = AMD_FMT_MOD_CLEAR(RB); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This patch changes AMD_FMT_MOD_{SET,CLEAR} macros to use the correct integer types, which fixes the above issue. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/5/18 Fixes: 8ba16d599374 ("drm/fourcc: Add AMD DRM modifiers.") Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas Reviewed-by: Simon Ser Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

landlock: Fix landlock_add_rule(2) documentation

2022-06-09T08:23:23Z

commit a13e248ff90e81e9322406c0e618cf2168702f4e upstream. It is not mandatory to pass a file descriptor obtained with the O_PATH flag. Also, replace rule's accesses with ruleset's accesses. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506160820.524344-2-mic@digikod.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

landlock: Add clang-format exceptions

2022-06-09T08:23:22Z

commit 6cc2df8e3a3967e7c13a424f87f6efb1d4a62d80 upstream. In preparation to a following commit, add clang-format on and clang-format off stanzas around constant definitions. This enables to keep aligned values, which is much more readable than packed definitions. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506160513.523257-2-mic@digikod.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

signal: Deliver SIGTRAP on perf event asynchronously if blocked

2022-06-09T08:22:48Z

[ Upstream commit 78ed93d72ded679e3caf0758357209887bda885f ] With SIGTRAP on perf events, we have encountered termination of processes due to user space attempting to block delivery of SIGTRAP. Consider this case: ... sigset_t s; sigemptyset(&s); sigaddset(&s, SIGTRAP | ); sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &s, ...); ... When the perf event triggers, while SIGTRAP is blocked, force_sig_perf() will force the signal, but revert back to the default handler, thus terminating the task. This makes sense for error conditions, but not so much for explicitly requested monitoring. However, the expectation is still that signals generated by perf events are synchronous, which will no longer be the case if the signal is blocked and delivered later. To give user space the ability to clearly distinguish synchronous from asynchronous signals, introduce siginfo_t::si_perf_flags and TRAP_PERF_FLAG_ASYNC (opted for flags in case more binary information is required in future). The resolution to the problem is then to (a) no longer force the signal (avoiding the terminations), but (b) tell user space via si_perf_flags if the signal was synchronous or not, so that such signals can be handled differently (e.g. let user space decide to ignore or consider the data imprecise). The alternative of making the kernel ignore SIGTRAP on perf events if the signal is blocked may work for some usecases, but likely causes issues in others that then have to revert back to interception of sigprocmask() (which we want to avoid). [ A concrete example: when using breakpoint perf events to track data-flow, in a region of code where signals are blocked, data-flow can no longer be tracked accurately. When a relevant asynchronous signal is received after unblocking the signal, the data-flow tracking logic needs to know its state is imprecise. ] Fixes: 97ba62b27867 ("perf: Add support for SIGTRAP on perf events") Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Marco Elver Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220404111204.935357-1-elver@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

dma-buf: fix use of DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_{A,B} in userspace

2022-05-25T07:57:28Z

commit 7c3e9fcad9c7d8bb5d69a576044fb16b1d2e8a01 upstream. The typedefs u32 and u64 are not available in userspace. Thus user get an error he try to use DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A or DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B: $ gcc -Wall -c -MMD -c -o ioctls_list.o ioctls_list.c In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/asm/ioctl.h:1, from /usr/include/linux/ioctl.h:5, from /usr/include/asm-generic/ioctls.h:5, from ioctls_list.c:11: ioctls_list.c:463:29: error: ‘u32’ undeclared here (not in a function) 463 | { "DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A", DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A, -1, -1 }, // linux/dma-buf.h | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ioctls_list.c:464:29: error: ‘u64’ undeclared here (not in a function) 464 | { "DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B", DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B, -1, -1 }, // linux/dma-buf.h | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The issue was initially reported here[1]. [1]: https://github.com/jerome-pouiller/ioctl/pull/14 Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller Reviewed-by: Christian König Fixes: a5bff92eaac4 ("dma-buf: Fix SET_NAME ioctl uapi") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220517072708.245265-1-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Christian König Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman