user/sven/linux.git/include, branch v6.1.112

netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: walk over current view on netlink dump

2024-09-30T14:23:54Z

commit 29b359cf6d95fd60730533f7f10464e95bd17c73 upstream. The generation mask can be updated while netlink dump is in progress. The pipapo set backend walk iterator cannot rely on it to infer what view of the datastructure is to be used. Add notation to specify if user wants to read/update the set. Based on patch from Florian Westphal. Fixes: 2b84e215f874 ("netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: .walk does not deal with generations") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

net/mlx5: Correct TASR typo into TSAR

2024-09-18T17:23:05Z

[ Upstream commit e575d3a6dd22123888defb622b1742aa2d45b942 ] TSAR is the correct spelling (Transmit Scheduling ARbiter). Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240613210036.1125203-2-tariqt@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Stable-dep-of: 861cd9b9cb62 ("net/mlx5: Verify support for scheduling element and TSAR type") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net/mlx5: Add missing masks and QoS bit masks for scheduling elements

2024-09-18T17:23:05Z

[ Upstream commit 452ef7f86036392005940de54228d42ca0044192 ] Add the missing masks for supported element types and Transmit Scheduling Arbiter (TSAR) types in scheduling elements. Also, add the corresponding bit masks for these types in the QoS capabilities of a NIC scheduler. Fixes: 214baf22870c ("net/mlx5e: Support HTB offload") Signed-off-by: Carolina Jubran Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net: tighten bad gso csum offset check in virtio_net_hdr

2024-09-18T17:23:04Z

commit 6513eb3d3191574b58859ef2d6dc26c0277c6f81 upstream. The referenced commit drops bad input, but has false positives. Tighten the check to avoid these. The check detects illegal checksum offload requests, which produce csum_start/csum_off beyond end of packet after segmentation. But it is based on two incorrect assumptions: 1. virtio_net_hdr_to_skb with VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCP[46] implies GSO. True in callers that inject into the tx path, such as tap. But false in callers that inject into rx, like virtio-net. Here, the flags indicate GRO, and CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY or CHECKSUM_NONE without VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM is normal. 2. TSO requires checksum offload, i.e., ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. False, as tcp[46]_gso_segment will fix up csum_start and offset for all other ip_summed by calling __tcp_v4_send_check. Because of 2, we can limit the scope of the fix to virtio_net_hdr that do try to set these fields, with a bogus value. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240909094527.GA3048202@port70.net/ Fixes: 89add40066f9 ("net: drop bad gso csum_start and offset in virtio_net_hdr") Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn Acked-by: Jason Wang Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240910213553.839926-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: add feature flag for expire-only

2024-09-12T09:10:30Z

commit 5cadfbd5a11e5495cac217534c5f788168b1afd7 upstream. Add an init flag idicating whether the FUSE_EXPIRE_ONLY flag of FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_ENTRY is effective. This is needed for backports of this feature, otherwise the server could just check the protocol version. Fixes: 4f8d37020e1f ("fuse: add "expire only" mode to FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_ENTRY") Cc: # v6.2 Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/amdgpu: handle gfx12 in amdgpu_display_verify_sizes

2024-09-12T09:10:28Z

[ Upstream commit 8dd1426e2c80e32ac1995007330c8f95ffa28ebb ] It verified GFX9-11 swizzle modes on GFX12, which has undefined behavior. Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák Acked-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amd: Add gfx12 swizzle mode defs

2024-09-12T09:10:28Z

[ Upstream commit 7ceb94e87bffff7c12b61eb29749e1d8ac976896 ] Add GFX12 swizzle mode definitions for use with DCN401 Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fuse: add request extension

2024-09-12T09:10:27Z

[ Upstream commit 15d937d7ca8c55d2b0ce9116e20c780fdd0b67cc ] Will need to add supplementary groups to create messages, so add the general concept of a request extension. A request extension is appended to the end of the main request. It has a header indicating the size and type of the extension. The create security context (fuse_secctx_*) is similar to the generic request extension, so include that as well in a backward compatible manner. Add the total extension length to the request header. The offset of the extension block within the request can be calculated by: inh->len - inh->total_extlen * 8 Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Stable-dep-of: 3002240d1649 ("fuse: fix memory leak in fuse_create_open") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fuse: allow non-extending parallel direct writes on the same file

2024-09-12T09:10:27Z

[ Upstream commit 153524053bbb0d27bb2e0be36d1b46862e9ce74c ] In general, as of now, in FUSE, direct writes on the same file are serialized over inode lock i.e we hold inode lock for the full duration of the write request. I could not find in fuse code and git history a comment which clearly explains why this exclusive lock is taken for direct writes. Following might be the reasons for acquiring an exclusive lock but not be limited to 1) Our guess is some USER space fuse implementations might be relying on this lock for serialization. 2) The lock protects against file read/write size races. 3) Ruling out any issues arising from partial write failures. This patch relaxes the exclusive lock for direct non-extending writes only. File size extending writes might not need the lock either, but we are not entirely sure if there is a risk to introduce any kind of regression. Furthermore, benchmarking with fio does not show a difference between patch versions that take on file size extension a) an exclusive lock and b) a shared lock. A possible example of an issue with i_size extending writes are write error cases. Some writes might succeed and others might fail for file system internal reasons - for example ENOSPACE. With parallel file size extending writes it _might_ be difficult to revert the action of the failing write, especially to restore the right i_size. With these changes, we allow non-extending parallel direct writes on the same file with the help of a flag called FOPEN_PARALLEL_DIRECT_WRITES. If this flag is set on the file (flag is passed from libfuse to fuse kernel as part of file open/create), we do not take exclusive lock anymore, but instead use a shared lock that allows non-extending writes to run in parallel. FUSE implementations which rely on this inode lock for serialization can continue to do so and serialized direct writes are still the default. Implementations that do not do write serialization need to be updated and need to set the FOPEN_PARALLEL_DIRECT_WRITES flag in their file open/create reply. On patch review there were concerns that network file systems (or vfs multiple mounts of the same file system) might have issues with parallel writes. We believe this is not the case, as this is just a local lock, which network file systems could not rely on anyway. I.e. this lock is just for local consistency. Signed-off-by: Dharmendra Singh Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Stable-dep-of: 3002240d1649 ("fuse: fix memory leak in fuse_create_open") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fuse: add "expire only" mode to FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_ENTRY

2024-09-12T09:10:27Z

[ Upstream commit 4f8d37020e1fd0bf6ee9381ba918135ef3712efd ] Add a flag to entry expiration that lets the filesystem expire a dentry without kicking it out from the cache immediately. This makes a difference for overmounted dentries, where plain invalidation would detach all submounts before dropping the dentry from the cache. If only expiry is set on the dentry, then any overmounts are left alone and until ->d_revalidate() is called. Note: ->d_revalidate() is not called for the case of following a submount, so invalidation will only be triggered for the non-overmounted case. The dentry could also be mounted in a different mount instance, in which case any submounts will still be detached. Suggested-by: Jakob Blomer Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Stable-dep-of: 3002240d1649 ("fuse: fix memory leak in fuse_create_open") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin