user/sven/linux.git/kernel/bpf/syscall.c, branch v4.9.184

bpf: map_get_next_key to return first key on NULL

2018-05-09T07:50:19Z

commit 8fe45924387be6b5c1be59a7eb330790c61d5d10 upstream. When iterating through a map, we need to find a key that does not exist in the map so map_get_next_key will give us the first key of the map. This often requires a lot of guessing in production systems. This patch makes map_get_next_key return the first key when the key pointer in the parameter is NULL. Signed-off-by: Teng Qin Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng Cc: Lorenzo Colitti Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: skip unnecessary capability check

2018-03-28T16:39:26Z

commit 0fa4fe85f4724fff89b09741c437cbee9cf8b008 upstream. The current check statement in BPF syscall will do a capability check for CAP_SYS_ADMIN before checking sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled. This code path will trigger unnecessary security hooks on capability checking and cause false alarms on unprivileged process trying to get CAP_SYS_ADMIN access. This can be resolved by simply switch the order of the statement and CAP_SYS_ADMIN is not required anyway if unprivileged bpf syscall is allowed. Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng Acked-by: Lorenzo Colitti Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: move fixup_bpf_calls() function

2018-01-17T08:38:55Z

commit e245c5c6a5656e4d61aa7bb08e9694fd6e5b2b9d upstream. no functional change. move fixup_bpf_calls() to verifier.c it's being refactored in the next patch Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Cc: Jiri Slaby [backported to 4.9 - gregkh] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: don't trigger OOM killer under pressure with map alloc

2017-07-05T12:40:21Z

[ Upstream commit d407bd25a204bd66b7346dde24bd3d37ef0e0b05 ] This patch adds two helpers, bpf_map_area_alloc() and bpf_map_area_free(), that are to be used for map allocations. Using kmalloc() for very large allocations can cause excessive work within the page allocator, so i) fall back earlier to vmalloc() when the attempt is considered costly anyway, and even more importantly ii) don't trigger OOM killer with any of the allocators. Since this is based on a user space request, for example, when creating maps with element pre-allocation, we really want such requests to fail instead of killing other user space processes. Also, don't spam the kernel log with warnings should any of the allocations fail under pressure. Given that, we can make backend selection in bpf_map_area_alloc() generic, and convert all maps over to use this API for spots with potentially large allocation requests. Note, replacing the one kmalloc_array() is fine as overflow checks happen earlier in htab_map_alloc(), since it must also protect the multiplication for vmalloc() should kmalloc_array() fail. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: fix map not being uncharged during map creation failure

2016-11-07T18:22:26Z

In map_create(), we first find and create the map, then once that suceeded, we charge it to the user's RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, and then fetch a new anon fd through anon_inode_getfd(). The problem is, once the latter fails f.e. due to RLIMIT_NOFILE limit, then we only destruct the map via map->ops->map_free(), but without uncharging the previously locked memory first. That means that the user_struct allocation is leaked as well as the accounted RLIMIT_MEMLOCK memory not released. Make the label names in the fix consistent with bpf_prog_load(). Fixes: aaac3ba95e4c ("bpf: charge user for creation of BPF maps and programs") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: add bpf_prog_add api for bulk prog refcnt

2016-07-20T04:46:31Z

A subsystem may need to store many copies of a bpf program, each deserving its own reference. Rather than requiring the caller to loop one by one (with possible mid-loop failure), add a bulk bpf_prog_add api. Signed-off-by: Brenden Blanco Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

cgroup: bpf: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_ARRAY

2016-07-01T20:30:38Z

Add a BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_ARRAY and its bpf_map_ops's implementations. To update an element, the caller is expected to obtain a cgroup2 backed fd by open(cgroup2_dir) and then update the array with that fd. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Tejun Heo Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: refactor bpf_prog_get and type check into helper

2016-07-01T20:00:47Z

Since bpf_prog_get() and program type check is used in a couple of places, refactor this into a small helper function that we can make use of. Since the non RO prog->aux part is not used in performance critical paths and a program destruction via RCU is rather very unlikley when doing the put, we shouldn't have an issue just doing the bpf_prog_get() + prog->type != type check, but actually not taking the ref at all (due to being in fdget() / fdput() section of the bpf fd) is even cleaner and makes the diff smaller as well, so just go for that. Callsites are changed to make use of the new helper where possible. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: generally move prog destruction to RCU deferral

2016-07-01T20:00:47Z

Jann Horn reported following analysis that could potentially result in a very hard to trigger (if not impossible) UAF race, to quote his event timeline: - Set up a process with threads T1, T2 and T3 - Let T1 set up a socket filter F1 that invokes another filter F2 through a BPF map [tail call] - Let T1 trigger the socket filter via a unix domain socket write, don't wait for completion - Let T2 call PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF with F2, don't wait for completion - Now T2 should be behind bpf_prog_get(), but before bpf_prog_put() - Let T3 close the file descriptor for F2, dropping the reference count of F2 to 2 - At this point, T1 should have looked up F2 from the map, but not finished executing it - Let T3 remove F2 from the BPF map, dropping the reference count of F2 to 1 - Now T2 should call bpf_prog_put() (wrong BPF program type), dropping the reference count of F2 to 0 and scheduling bpf_prog_free_deferred() via schedule_work() - At this point, the BPF program could be freed - BPF execution is still running in a freed BPF program While at PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF time it's only guaranteed that the perf event fd we're doing the syscall on doesn't disappear from underneath us for whole syscall time, it may not be the case for the bpf fd used as an argument only after we did the put. It needs to be a valid fd pointing to a BPF program at the time of the call to make the bpf_prog_get() and while T2 gets preempted, F2 must have dropped reference to 1 on the other CPU. The fput() from the close() in T3 should also add additionally delay to the reference drop via exit_task_work() when bpf_prog_release() gets called as well as scheduling bpf_prog_free_deferred(). That said, it makes nevertheless sense to move the BPF prog destruction generally after RCU grace period to guarantee that such scenario above, but also others as recently fixed in ceb56070359b ("bpf, perf: delay release of BPF prog after grace period") with regards to tail calls won't happen. Integrating bpf_prog_free_deferred() directly into the RCU callback is not allowed since the invocation might happen from either softirq or process context, so we're not permitted to block. Reviewing all bpf_prog_put() invocations from eBPF side (note, cBPF -> eBPF progs don't use this for their destruction) with call_rcu() look good to me. Since we don't know whether at the time of attaching the program, we're already part of a tail call map, we need to use RCU variant. However, due to this, there won't be severely more stress on the RCU callback queue: situations with above bpf_prog_get() and bpf_prog_put() combo in practice normally won't lead to releases, but even if they would, enough effort/ cycles have to be put into loading a BPF program into the kernel already. Reported-by: Jann Horn Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf, maps: extend map_fd_get_ptr arguments

2016-06-16T06:42:57Z

This patch extends map_fd_get_ptr() callback that is used by fd array maps, so that struct file pointer from the related map can be passed in. It's safe to remove map_update_elem() callback for the two maps since this is only allowed from syscall side, but not from eBPF programs for these two map types. Like in per-cpu map case, bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem() needs to be called directly here due to the extra argument. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller