user/sven/linux.git/kernel/bpf, branch v4.14.186

bpf: Explicitly memset some bpf info structures declared on the stack

2020-04-02T14:34:37Z

commit 5c6f25887963f15492b604dd25cb149c501bbabf upstream. Trying to initialize a structure with "= {};" will not always clean out all padding locations in a structure. So be explicit and call memset to initialize everything for a number of bpf information structures that are then copied from userspace, sometimes from smaller memory locations than the size of the structure. Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200320162258.GA794295@kroah.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Explicitly memset the bpf_attr structure

2020-04-02T14:34:37Z

commit 8096f229421f7b22433775e928d506f0342e5907 upstream. For the bpf syscall, we are relying on the compiler to properly zero out the bpf_attr union that we copy userspace data into. Unfortunately that doesn't always work properly, padding and other oddities might not be correctly zeroed, and in some tests odd things have been found when the stack is pre-initialized to other values. Fix this by explicitly memsetting the structure to 0 before using it. Reported-by: Maciej Żenczykowski Reported-by: John Stultz Reported-by: Alexander Potapenko Reported-by: Alistair Delva Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/1235490 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200320094813.GA421650@kroah.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Fix passing modified ctx to ld/abs/ind instruction

2020-01-12T11:12:02Z

commit 6d4f151acf9a4f6fab09b615f246c717ddedcf0c upstream. Anatoly has been fuzzing with kBdysch harness and reported a KASAN slab oob in one of the outcomes: [...] [ 77.359642] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_skb_load_helper_8_no_cache+0x71/0x130 [ 77.360463] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880679bac68 by task bpf/406 [ 77.361119] [ 77.361289] CPU: 2 PID: 406 Comm: bpf Not tainted 5.5.0-rc2-xfstests-00157-g2187f215eba #1 [ 77.362134] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 77.362984] Call Trace: [ 77.363249] dump_stack+0x97/0xe0 [ 77.363603] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1d/0x220 [ 77.364251] ? bpf_skb_load_helper_8_no_cache+0x71/0x130 [ 77.365030] ? bpf_skb_load_helper_8_no_cache+0x71/0x130 [ 77.365860] __kasan_report.cold+0x37/0x7b [ 77.366365] ? bpf_skb_load_helper_8_no_cache+0x71/0x130 [ 77.366940] kasan_report+0xe/0x20 [ 77.367295] bpf_skb_load_helper_8_no_cache+0x71/0x130 [ 77.367821] ? bpf_skb_load_helper_8+0xf0/0xf0 [ 77.368278] ? mark_lock+0xa3/0x9b0 [ 77.368641] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 77.369096] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [ 77.369460] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x110 [ 77.369876] ? bpf_skb_load_helper_8+0xf0/0xf0 [ 77.370330] ___bpf_prog_run+0x16c0/0x28f0 [ 77.370755] __bpf_prog_run32+0x83/0xc0 [ 77.371153] ? __bpf_prog_run64+0xc0/0xc0 [ 77.371568] ? match_held_lock+0x1b/0x230 [ 77.371984] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0xa1/0xb0 [ 77.372416] ? rcu_is_watching+0x34/0x50 [ 77.372826] sk_filter_trim_cap+0x17c/0x4d0 [ 77.373259] ? sock_kzfree_s+0x40/0x40 [ 77.373648] ? __get_filter+0x150/0x150 [ 77.374059] ? skb_copy_datagram_from_iter+0x80/0x280 [ 77.374581] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa5/0x140 [ 77.375025] unix_dgram_sendmsg+0x33a/0xa70 [ 77.375459] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ 77.375893] ? unix_peer_get+0xa0/0xa0 [ 77.376287] ? __fget_light+0xa4/0xf0 [ 77.376670] __sys_sendto+0x265/0x280 [ 77.377056] ? __ia32_sys_getpeername+0x50/0x50 [ 77.377523] ? lock_downgrade+0x350/0x350 [ 77.377940] ? __sys_setsockopt+0x2a6/0x2c0 [ 77.378374] ? sock_read_iter+0x240/0x240 [ 77.378789] ? __sys_socketpair+0x22a/0x300 [ 77.379221] ? __ia32_sys_socket+0x50/0x50 [ 77.379649] ? mark_held_locks+0x1d/0x90 [ 77.380059] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 77.380536] __x64_sys_sendto+0x74/0x90 [ 77.380938] do_syscall_64+0x68/0x2a0 [ 77.381324] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 77.381878] RIP: 0033:0x44c070 [...] After further debugging, turns out while in case of other helper functions we disallow passing modified ctx, the special case of ld/abs/ind instruction which has similar semantics (except r6 being the ctx argument) is missing such check. Modified ctx is impossible here as bpf_skb_load_helper_8_no_cache() and others are expecting skb fields in original position, hence, add check_ctx_reg() to reject any modified ctx. Issue was first introduced back in f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking"). Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Reported-by: Anatoly Trosinenko Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200106215157.3553-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: reject passing modified ctx to helper functions

2020-01-12T11:12:02Z

commit 58990d1ff3f7896ee341030e9a7c2e4002570683 upstream. As commit 28e33f9d78ee ("bpf: disallow arithmetic operations on context pointer") already describes, f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") removed the specific white-listed cases we had previously where we would allow for pointer arithmetic in order to further generalize it, and allow e.g. context access via modified registers. While the dereferencing of modified context pointers had been forbidden through 28e33f9d78ee, syzkaller did recently manage to trigger several KASAN splats for slab out of bounds access and use after frees by simply passing a modified context pointer to a helper function which would then do the bad access since verifier allowed it in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(). Rejecting arithmetic on ctx pointer in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() generally could break existing programs as there's a valid use case in tracing in combination with passing the ctx to helpers as bpf_probe_read(), where the register then becomes unknown at verification time due to adding a non-constant offset to it. An access sequence may look like the following: offset = args->filename; /* field __data_loc filename */ bpf_probe_read(&dst, len, (char *)args + offset); // args is ctx There are two options: i) we could special case the ctx and as soon as we add a constant or bounded offset to it (hence ctx type wouldn't change) we could turn the ctx into an unknown scalar, or ii) we generalize the sanity test for ctx member access into a small helper and assert it on the ctx register that was passed as a function argument. Fwiw, latter is more obvious and less complex at the same time, and one case that may potentially be legitimate in future for ctx member access at least would be for ctx to carry a const offset. Therefore, fix follows approach from ii) and adds test cases to BPF kselftests. Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Reported-by: syzbot+3d0b2441dbb71751615e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+c8504affd4fdd0c1b626@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+e5190cb881d8660fb1a3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+efae31b384d5badbd620@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Edward Cree Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: drop refcount if bpf_map_new_fd() fails in map_create()

2019-12-05T14:38:00Z

[ Upstream commit 352d20d611414715353ee65fc206ee57ab1a6984 ] In bpf/syscall.c, map_create() first set map->usercnt to 1, a file descriptor is supposed to return to userspace. When bpf_map_new_fd() fails, drop the refcount. Fixes: bd5f5f4ecb78 ("bpf: Add BPF_MAP_GET_FD_BY_ID") Signed-off-by: Peng Sun Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: decrease usercnt if bpf_map_new_fd() fails in bpf_map_get_fd_by_id()

2019-12-05T14:37:58Z

[ Upstream commit 781e62823cb81b972dc8652c1827205cda2ac9ac ] In bpf/syscall.c, bpf_map_get_fd_by_id() use bpf_map_inc_not_zero() to increase the refcount, both map->refcnt and map->usercnt. Then, if bpf_map_new_fd() fails, should handle map->usercnt too. Fixes: bd5f5f4ecb78 ("bpf: Add BPF_MAP_GET_FD_BY_ID") Signed-off-by: Peng Sun Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: devmap: fix wrong interface selection in notifier_call

2019-12-01T08:13:47Z

[ Upstream commit f592f804831f1cf9d1f9966f58c80f150e6829b5 ] The dev_map_notification() removes interface in devmap if unregistering interface's ifindex is same. But only checking ifindex is not enough because other netns can have same ifindex. so that wrong interface selection could occurred. Hence netdev pointer comparison code is added. v2: compare netdev pointer instead of using net_eq() (Daniel Borkmann) v1: Initial patch Fixes: 2ddf71e23cc2 ("net: add notifier hooks for devmap bpf map") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo Acked-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: fix use after free in prog symbol exposure

2019-10-07T16:55:15Z

commit c751798aa224fadc5124b49eeb38fb468c0fa039 upstream. syzkaller managed to trigger the warning in bpf_jit_free() which checks via bpf_prog_kallsyms_verify_off() for potentially unlinked JITed BPF progs in kallsyms, and subsequently trips over GPF when walking kallsyms entries: [...] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device batadv0 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device batadv0 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9869 at kernel/bpf/core.c:810 bpf_jit_free+0x1e8/0x2a0 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 0 PID: 9869 Comm: kworker/0:7 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #1 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: events bpf_prog_free_deferred Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x113/0x167 lib/dump_stack.c:113 panic+0x212/0x40b kernel/panic.c:214 __warn.cold.8+0x1b/0x38 kernel/panic.c:571 report_bug+0x1a4/0x200 lib/bug.c:186 fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:178 [inline] do_error_trap+0x11b/0x200 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:271 do_invalid_op+0x36/0x40 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:290 invalid_op+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:973 RIP: 0010:bpf_jit_free+0x1e8/0x2a0 Code: 02 4c 89 e2 83 e2 07 38 d0 7f 08 84 c0 0f 85 86 00 00 00 48 ba 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 0f b6 43 02 49 39 d6 0f 84 5f fe ff ff <0f> 0b e9 58 fe ff ff 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 e2 48 c1 RSP: 0018:ffff888092f67cd8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000007 RBX: ffffc90001947000 RCX: ffffffff816e9d88 RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff88808769f7f0 RBP: ffff888092f67d00 R08: fffffbfff1394059 R09: fffffbfff1394058 R10: fffffbfff1394058 R11: ffffffff89ca02c7 R12: ffffc90001947002 R13: ffffc90001947020 R14: ffffffff881eca80 R15: ffff88808769f7e8 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffbfff400d000 #PF error: [normal kernel read fault] PGD 21ffee067 P4D 21ffee067 PUD 21ffed067 PMD 9f942067 PTE 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 9869 Comm: kworker/0:7 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #1 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: events bpf_prog_free_deferred RIP: 0010:bpf_get_prog_addr_region kernel/bpf/core.c:495 [inline] RIP: 0010:bpf_tree_comp kernel/bpf/core.c:558 [inline] RIP: 0010:__lt_find include/linux/rbtree_latch.h:115 [inline] RIP: 0010:latch_tree_find include/linux/rbtree_latch.h:208 [inline] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_kallsyms_find+0x107/0x2e0 kernel/bpf/core.c:632 Code: 00 f0 ff ff 44 38 c8 7f 08 84 c0 0f 85 fa 00 00 00 41 f6 45 02 01 75 02 0f 0b 48 39 da 0f 82 92 00 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 30 84 c0 74 08 3c 03 0f 8e 45 01 00 00 8b 03 48 c1 e0 [...] Upon further debugging, it turns out that whenever we trigger this issue, the kallsyms removal in bpf_prog_ksym_node_del() was /skipped/ but yet bpf_jit_free() reported that the entry is /in use/. Problem is that symbol exposure via bpf_prog_kallsyms_add() but also perf_event_bpf_event() were done /after/ bpf_prog_new_fd(). Once the fd is exposed to the public, a parallel close request came in right before we attempted to do the bpf_prog_kallsyms_add(). Given at this time the prog reference count is one, we start to rip everything underneath us via bpf_prog_release() -> bpf_prog_put(). The memory is eventually released via deferred free, so we're seeing that bpf_jit_free() has a kallsym entry because we added it from bpf_prog_load() but /after/ bpf_prog_put() from the remote CPU. Therefore, move both notifications /before/ we install the fd. The issue was never seen between bpf_prog_alloc_id() and bpf_prog_new_fd() because upon bpf_prog_get_fd_by_id() we'll take another reference to the BPF prog, so we're still holding the original reference from the bpf_prog_load(). Fixes: 6ee52e2a3fe4 ("perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT") Fixes: 74451e66d516 ("bpf: make jited programs visible in traces") Reported-by: syzbot+bd3bba6ff3fcea7a6ec6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Zubin Mithra Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: fix bpf_jit_limit knob for PAGE_SIZE >= 64K

2019-08-25T08:50:23Z

[ Upstream commit fdadd04931c2d7cd294dc5b2b342863f94be53a3 ] Michael and Sandipan report: Commit ede95a63b5 introduced a bpf_jit_limit tuneable to limit BPF JIT allocations. At compile time it defaults to PAGE_SIZE * 40000, and is adjusted again at init time if MODULES_VADDR is defined. For ppc64 kernels, MODULES_VADDR isn't defined, so we're stuck with the compile-time default at boot-time, which is 0x9c400000 when using 64K page size. This overflows the signed 32-bit bpf_jit_limit value: root@ubuntu:/tmp# cat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_limit -1673527296 and can cause various unexpected failures throughout the network stack. In one case `strace dhclient eth0` reported: setsockopt(5, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_FILTER, {len=11, filter=0x105dd27f8}, 16) = -1 ENOTSUPP (Unknown error 524) and similar failures can be seen with tools like tcpdump. This doesn't always reproduce however, and I'm not sure why. The more consistent failure I've seen is an Ubuntu 18.04 KVM guest booted on a POWER9 host would time out on systemd/netplan configuring a virtio-net NIC with no noticeable errors in the logs. Given this and also given that in near future some architectures like arm64 will have a custom area for BPF JIT image allocations we should get rid of the BPF_JIT_LIMIT_DEFAULT fallback / default entirely. For 4.21, we have an overridable bpf_jit_alloc_exec(), bpf_jit_free_exec() so therefore add another overridable bpf_jit_alloc_exec_limit() helper function which returns the possible size of the memory area for deriving the default heuristic in bpf_jit_charge_init(). Like bpf_jit_alloc_exec() and bpf_jit_free_exec(), the new bpf_jit_alloc_exec_limit() assumes that module_alloc() is the default JIT memory provider, and therefore in case archs implement their custom module_alloc() we use MODULES_{END,_VADDR} for limits and otherwise for vmalloc_exec() cases like on ppc64 we use VMALLOC_{END,_START}. Additionally, for archs supporting large page sizes, we should change the sysctl to be handled as long to not run into sysctl restrictions in future. Fixes: ede95a63b5e8 ("bpf: add bpf_jit_limit knob to restrict unpriv allocations") Reported-by: Sandipan Das Reported-by: Michael Roth Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Tested-by: Michael Roth Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: add bpf_jit_limit knob to restrict unpriv allocations

2019-08-25T08:50:03Z

commit ede95a63b5e84ddeea6b0c473b36ab8bfd8c6ce3 upstream. Rick reported that the BPF JIT could potentially fill the entire module space with BPF programs from unprivileged users which would prevent later attempts to load normal kernel modules or privileged BPF programs, for example. If JIT was enabled but unsuccessful to generate the image, then before commit 290af86629b2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config") we would always fall back to the BPF interpreter. Nowadays in the case where the CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON could be set, then the load will abort with a failure since the BPF interpreter was compiled out. Add a global limit and enforce it for unprivileged users such that in case of BPF interpreter compiled out we fail once the limit has been reached or we fall back to BPF interpreter earlier w/o using module mem if latter was compiled in. In a next step, fair share among unprivileged users can be resolved in particular for the case where we would fail hard once limit is reached. Fixes: 290af86629b2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config") Fixes: 0a14842f5a3c ("net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64") Co-Developed-by: Rick Edgecombe Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Eric Dumazet Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Kees Cook Cc: LKML Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman