user/sven/linux.git/kernel/bpf, branch v4.9.335

bpf: fix overflow in prog accounting

2022-08-25T09:09:24Z

commit 5ccb071e97fbd9ffe623a0d3977cc6d013bee93c upstream. Commit aaac3ba95e4c ("bpf: charge user for creation of BPF maps and programs") made a wrong assumption of charging against prog->pages. Unlike map->pages, prog->pages are still subject to change when we need to expand the program through bpf_prog_realloc(). This can for example happen during verification stage when we need to expand and rewrite parts of the program. Should the required space cross a page boundary, then prog->pages is not the same anymore as its original value that we used to bpf_prog_charge_memlock() on. Thus, we'll hit a wrap-around during bpf_prog_uncharge_memlock() when prog is freed eventually. I noticed this that despite having unlimited memlock, programs suddenly refused to load with EPERM error due to insufficient memlock. There are two ways to fix this issue. One would be to add a cached variable to struct bpf_prog that takes a snapshot of prog->pages at the time of charging. The other approach is to also account for resizes. I chose to go with the latter for a couple of reasons: i) We want accounting rather to be more accurate instead of further fooling limits, ii) adding yet another page counter on struct bpf_prog would also be a waste just for this purpose. We also do want to charge as early as possible to avoid going into the verifier just to find out later on that we crossed limits. The only place that needs to be fixed is bpf_prog_realloc(), since only here we expand the program, so we try to account for the needed delta and should we fail, call-sites check for outcome anyway. On cBPF to eBPF migrations, we don't grab a reference to the user as they are charged differently. With that in place, my test case worked fine. Fixes: aaac3ba95e4c ("bpf: charge user for creation of BPF maps and programs") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller [Quentin: backport to 4.9: Adjust context in bpf.h ] Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Make sure mac_header was set before using it

2022-07-29T15:05:46Z

commit 0326195f523a549e0a9d7fd44c70b26fd7265090 upstream. Classic BPF has a way to load bytes starting from the mac header. Some skbs do not have a mac header, and skb_mac_header() in this case is returning a pointer that 65535 bytes after skb->head. Existing range check in bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper() was properly kicking and no illegal access was happening. New sanity check in skb_mac_header() is firing, so we need to avoid it. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 28990 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 skb_mac_header include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 28990 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper+0x1b1/0x1c0 kernel/bpf/core.c:74 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 28990 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc4-syzkaller-00865-g4874fb9484be #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/29/2022 RIP: 0010:skb_mac_header include/linux/skbuff.h:2785 [inline] RIP: 0010:bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper+0x1b1/0x1c0 kernel/bpf/core.c:74 Code: ff ff 45 31 f6 e9 5a ff ff ff e8 aa 27 40 00 e9 3b ff ff ff e8 90 27 40 00 e9 df fe ff ff e8 86 27 40 00 eb 9e e8 2f 2c f3 ff <0f> 0b eb b1 e8 96 27 40 00 e9 79 fe ff ff 90 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000309f668 EFLAGS: 00010216 RAX: 0000000000000118 RBX: ffffffffffeff00c RCX: ffffc9000e417000 RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff81873f21 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: ffff8880842878c0 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 000000000000ffff R10: 000000000000ffff R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000004 R13: ffff88803ac56c00 R14: 000000000000ffff R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 00007f5c88a16700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fdaa9f6c058 CR3: 000000003a82c000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ____bpf_skb_load_helper_32 net/core/filter.c:276 [inline] bpf_skb_load_helper_32+0x191/0x220 net/core/filter.c:264 Fixes: f9aefd6b2aa3 ("net: warn if mac header was not set") Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220707123900.945305-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Add kconfig knob for disabling unpriv bpf by default

2022-02-16T11:43:54Z

commit 08389d888287c3823f80b0216766b71e17f0aba5 upstream. Add a kconfig knob which allows for unprivileged bpf to be disabled by default. If set, the knob sets /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled to value of 2. This still allows a transition of 2 -> {0,1} through an admin. Similarly, this also still keeps 1 -> {1} behavior intact, so that once set to permanently disabled, it cannot be undone aside from a reboot. We've also added extra2 with max of 2 for the procfs handler, so that an admin still has a chance to toggle between 0 <-> 2. Either way, as an additional alternative, applications can make use of CAP_BPF that we added a while ago. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/74ec548079189e4e4dffaeb42b8987bb3c852eee.1620765074.git.daniel@iogearbox.net [fllinden@amazon.com: backported to 4.9] Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Prevent increasing bpf_jit_limit above max

2021-11-26T10:48:20Z

[ Upstream commit fadb7ff1a6c2c565af56b4aacdd086b067eed440 ] Restrict bpf_jit_limit to the maximum supported by the arch's JIT. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211014142554.53120-4-lmb@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix integer overflow in prealloc_elems_and_freelist()

2021-10-17T08:05:39Z

[ Upstream commit 30e29a9a2bc6a4888335a6ede968b75cd329657a ] In prealloc_elems_and_freelist(), the multiplication to calculate the size passed to bpf_map_area_alloc() could lead to an integer overflow. As a result, out-of-bounds write could occur in pcpu_freelist_populate() as reported by KASAN: [...] [ 16.968613] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100 [ 16.969408] Write of size 8 at addr ffff888104fc6ea0 by task crash/78 [ 16.970038] [ 16.970195] CPU: 0 PID: 78 Comm: crash Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2+ #1 [ 16.970878] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 [ 16.972026] Call Trace: [ 16.972306] dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 [ 16.972687] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x21/0x140 [ 16.973297] ? pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100 [ 16.973777] ? pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100 [ 16.974257] kasan_report.cold+0x7f/0x11b [ 16.974681] ? pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100 [ 16.975190] pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100 [ 16.975669] stack_map_alloc+0x209/0x2a0 [ 16.976106] __sys_bpf+0xd83/0x2ce0 [...] The possibility of this overflow was originally discussed in [0], but was overlooked. Fix the integer overflow by changing elem_size to u64 from u32. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/728b238e-a481-eb50-98e9-b0f430ab01e7@gmail.com/ Fixes: 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation") Signed-off-by: Tatsuhiko Yasumatsu Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210930135545.173698-1-th.yasumatsu@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Check for integer overflow when using roundup_pow_of_two()

2021-02-23T12:59:16Z

[ Upstream commit 6183f4d3a0a2ad230511987c6c362ca43ec0055f ] On 32-bit architecture, roundup_pow_of_two() can return 0 when the argument has upper most bit set due to resulting 1UL << 32. Add a check for this case. Fixes: d5a3b1f69186 ("bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE") Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127063653.3576-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix buggy rsh min/max bounds tracking

2021-01-30T12:27:15Z

[ no upstream commit ] Fix incorrect bounds tracking for RSH opcode. Commit f23cc643f9ba ("bpf: fix range arithmetic for bpf map access") had a wrong assumption about min/max bounds. The new dst_reg->min_value needs to be derived by right shifting the max_val bounds, not min_val, and likewise new dst_reg->max_value needs to be derived by right shifting the min_val bounds, not max_val. Later stable kernels than 4.9 are not affected since bounds tracking was overall reworked and they already track this similarly as in the fix. Fixes: f23cc643f9ba ("bpf: fix range arithmetic for bpf map access") Reported-by: Ryota Shiga (Flatt Security) Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Reviewed-by: John Fastabend Cc: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Remove recursion prevention from rcu free callback

2020-10-01T18:40:08Z

[ Upstream commit 8a37963c7ac9ecb7f86f8ebda020e3f8d6d7b8a0 ] If an element is freed via RCU then recursion into BPF instrumentation functions is not a concern. The element is already detached from the map and the RCU callback does not hold any locks on which a kprobe, perf event or tracepoint attached BPF program could deadlock. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200224145643.259118710@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Explicitly memset the bpf_attr structure

2020-04-02T15:20:40Z

commit 8096f229421f7b22433775e928d506f0342e5907 upstream. For the bpf syscall, we are relying on the compiler to properly zero out the bpf_attr union that we copy userspace data into. Unfortunately that doesn't always work properly, padding and other oddities might not be correctly zeroed, and in some tests odd things have been found when the stack is pre-initialized to other values. Fix this by explicitly memsetting the structure to 0 before using it. Reported-by: Maciej Żenczykowski Reported-by: John Stultz Reported-by: Alexander Potapenko Reported-by: Alistair Delva Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/1235490 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200320094813.GA421650@kroah.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: fix bpf_jit_limit knob for PAGE_SIZE >= 64K

2019-08-25T08:51:50Z

[ Upstream commit fdadd04931c2d7cd294dc5b2b342863f94be53a3 ] Michael and Sandipan report: Commit ede95a63b5 introduced a bpf_jit_limit tuneable to limit BPF JIT allocations. At compile time it defaults to PAGE_SIZE * 40000, and is adjusted again at init time if MODULES_VADDR is defined. For ppc64 kernels, MODULES_VADDR isn't defined, so we're stuck with the compile-time default at boot-time, which is 0x9c400000 when using 64K page size. This overflows the signed 32-bit bpf_jit_limit value: root@ubuntu:/tmp# cat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_limit -1673527296 and can cause various unexpected failures throughout the network stack. In one case `strace dhclient eth0` reported: setsockopt(5, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_FILTER, {len=11, filter=0x105dd27f8}, 16) = -1 ENOTSUPP (Unknown error 524) and similar failures can be seen with tools like tcpdump. This doesn't always reproduce however, and I'm not sure why. The more consistent failure I've seen is an Ubuntu 18.04 KVM guest booted on a POWER9 host would time out on systemd/netplan configuring a virtio-net NIC with no noticeable errors in the logs. Given this and also given that in near future some architectures like arm64 will have a custom area for BPF JIT image allocations we should get rid of the BPF_JIT_LIMIT_DEFAULT fallback / default entirely. For 4.21, we have an overridable bpf_jit_alloc_exec(), bpf_jit_free_exec() so therefore add another overridable bpf_jit_alloc_exec_limit() helper function which returns the possible size of the memory area for deriving the default heuristic in bpf_jit_charge_init(). Like bpf_jit_alloc_exec() and bpf_jit_free_exec(), the new bpf_jit_alloc_exec_limit() assumes that module_alloc() is the default JIT memory provider, and therefore in case archs implement their custom module_alloc() we use MODULES_{END,_VADDR} for limits and otherwise for vmalloc_exec() cases like on ppc64 we use VMALLOC_{END,_START}. Additionally, for archs supporting large page sizes, we should change the sysctl to be handled as long to not run into sysctl restrictions in future. Fixes: ede95a63b5e8 ("bpf: add bpf_jit_limit knob to restrict unpriv allocations") Reported-by: Sandipan Das Reported-by: Michael Roth Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Tested-by: Michael Roth Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin