user/sven/linux.git/kernel/bpf, branch v6.1.124

bpf: fix potential error return

2025-01-09T12:30:04Z

[ Upstream commit c4441ca86afe4814039ee1b32c39d833c1a16bbc ] The bpf_remove_insns() function returns WARN_ON_ONCE(error), where error is a result of bpf_adj_branches(), and thus should be always 0 However, if for any reason it is not 0, then it will be converted to boolean by WARN_ON_ONCE and returned to user space as 1, not an actual error value. Fix this by returning the original err after the WARN check. Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210114245.836164-1-aspsk@isovalent.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Check validity of link->type in bpf_link_show_fdinfo()

2025-01-02T09:30:53Z

commit 8421d4c8762bd022cb491f2f0f7019ef51b4f0a7 upstream. If a newly-added link type doesn't invoke BPF_LINK_TYPE(), accessing bpf_link_type_strs[link->type] may result in an out-of-bounds access. To spot such missed invocations early in the future, checking the validity of link->type in bpf_link_show_fdinfo() and emitting a warning when such invocations are missed. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241024013558.1135167-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com [ shung-hsi.yu: break up existing seq_printf() call since commit 68b04864ca42 ("bpf: Create links for BPF struct_ops maps.") is not present ] Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: sync_linked_regs() must preserve subreg_def

2024-12-19T17:08:57Z

commit e9bd9c498cb0f5843996dbe5cbce7a1836a83c70 upstream. Range propagation must not affect subreg_def marks, otherwise the following example is rewritten by verifier incorrectly when BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag is set: 0: call bpf_ktime_get_ns call bpf_ktime_get_ns 1: r0 &= 0x7fffffff after verifier r0 &= 0x7fffffff 2: w1 = w0 rewrites w1 = w0 3: if w0 < 10 goto +0 --------------> r11 = 0x2f5674a6 (r) 4: r1 >>= 32 r11 <<= 32 (r) 5: r0 = r1 r1 |= r11 (r) 6: exit; if w0 < 0xa goto pc+0 r1 >>= 32 r0 = r1 exit (or zero extension of w1 at (2) is missing for architectures that require zero extension for upper register half). The following happens w/o this patch: - r0 is marked as not a subreg at (0); - w1 is marked as subreg at (2); - w1 subreg_def is overridden at (3) by copy_register_state(); - w1 is read at (5) but mark_insn_zext() does not mark (2) for zero extension, because w1 subreg_def is not set; - because of BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag verifier inserts random value for hi32 bits of (2) (marked (r)); - this random value is read at (5). Fixes: 75748837b7e5 ("bpf: Propagate scalar ranges through register assignments.") Reported-by: Lonial Con Signed-off-by: Lonial Con Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/7e2aa30a62d740db182c170fdd8f81c596df280d.camel@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240924210844.1758441-1-eddyz87@gmail.com [ shung-hsi.yu: sync_linked_regs() was called find_equal_scalars() before commit 4bf79f9be434 ("bpf: Track equal scalars history on per-instruction level"), and modification is done because there is only a single call to copy_register_state() before commit 98d7ca374ba4 ("bpf: Track delta between "linked" registers."). ] Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Fix helper writes to read-only maps

2024-12-14T18:54:53Z

commit 32556ce93bc45c730829083cb60f95a2728ea48b upstream. Lonial found an issue that despite user- and BPF-side frozen BPF map (like in case of .rodata), it was still possible to write into it from a BPF program side through specific helpers having ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} as arguments. In check_func_arg() when the argument is as mentioned, the meta->raw_mode is never set. Later, check_helper_mem_access(), under the case of PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE as register base type, it assumes BPF_READ for the subsequent call to check_map_access_type() and given the BPF map is read-only it succeeds. The helpers really need to be annotated as ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} | MEM_UNINIT when results are written into them as opposed to read out of them. The latter indicates that it's okay to pass a pointer to uninitialized memory as the memory is written to anyway. However, ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} is a special case of ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM just with additional alignment requirement. So it is better to just get rid of the ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} special cases altogether and reuse the fixed size memory types. For this, add MEM_ALIGNED to additionally ensure alignment given these helpers write directly into the args via * = val. The .arg*_size has been initialized reflecting the actual sizeof(*). MEM_ALIGNED can only be used in combination with MEM_FIXED_SIZE annotated argument types, since in !MEM_FIXED_SIZE cases the verifier does not know the buffer size a priori and therefore cannot blindly write * = val. Fixes: 57c3bb725a3d ("bpf: Introduce ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} arg types") Reported-by: Lonial Con Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-3-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov [ Resolve merge conflict in include/linux/bpf.h and merge conflict in kernel/bpf/verifier.c.] Signed-off-by: Bin Lan Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: fix OOB devmap writes when deleting elements

2024-12-14T18:54:35Z

commit ab244dd7cf4c291f82faacdc50b45cc0f55b674d upstream. Jordy reported issue against XSKMAP which also applies to DEVMAP - the index used for accessing map entry, due to being a signed integer, causes the OOB writes. Fix is simple as changing the type from int to u32, however, when compared to XSKMAP case, one more thing needs to be addressed. When map is released from system via dev_map_free(), we iterate through all of the entries and an iterator variable is also an int, which implies OOB accesses. Again, change it to be u32. Example splat below: [ 160.724676] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc8fc2c001000 [ 160.731662] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 160.736876] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 160.742095] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 160.744678] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 160.749106] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 520 Comm: kworker/u145:12 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1+ #487 [ 160.757050] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019 [ 160.767642] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 160.773308] RIP: 0010:dev_map_free+0x77/0x170 [ 160.777735] Code: 00 e8 fd 91 ed ff e8 b8 73 ed ff 41 83 7d 18 19 74 6e 41 8b 45 24 49 8b bd f8 00 00 00 31 db 85 c0 74 48 48 63 c3 48 8d 04 c7 <48> 8b 28 48 85 ed 74 30 48 8b 7d 18 48 85 ff 74 05 e8 b3 52 fa ff [ 160.796777] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000ee1fe38 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 160.802086] RAX: ffffc8fc2c001000 RBX: 0000000080000000 RCX: 0000000000000024 [ 160.809331] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000024 RDI: ffffc9002c001000 [ 160.816576] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000023 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 160.823823] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000000000ee6b2 R12: dead000000000122 [ 160.831066] R13: ffff88810c928e00 R14: ffff8881002df405 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 160.838310] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8897e0c40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 160.846528] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 160.852357] CR2: ffffc8fc2c001000 CR3: 0000000005c32006 CR4: 00000000007726f0 [ 160.859604] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 160.866847] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 160.874092] PKRU: 55555554 [ 160.876847] Call Trace: [ 160.879338] [ 160.881477] ? __die+0x20/0x60 [ 160.884586] ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x450 [ 160.888746] ? search_extable+0x22/0x30 [ 160.892647] ? search_bpf_extables+0x5f/0x80 [ 160.896988] ? exc_page_fault+0xa9/0x140 [ 160.900973] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 [ 160.905232] ? dev_map_free+0x77/0x170 [ 160.909043] ? dev_map_free+0x58/0x170 [ 160.912857] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x51/0x90 [ 160.917196] process_one_work+0x142/0x370 [ 160.921272] worker_thread+0x29e/0x3b0 [ 160.925082] ? rescuer_thread+0x4b0/0x4b0 [ 160.929157] kthread+0xd4/0x110 [ 160.932355] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [ 160.936079] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 [ 160.943396] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [ 160.950803] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 160.958482] Fixes: 546ac1ffb70d ("bpf: add devmap, a map for storing net device references") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Jordy Zomer Suggested-by: Jordy Zomer Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241122121030.716788-3-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Fix exact match conditions in trie_get_next_key()

2024-12-14T18:54:31Z

[ Upstream commit 27abc7b3fa2e09bbe41e2924d328121546865eda ] trie_get_next_key() uses node->prefixlen == key->prefixlen to identify an exact match, However, it is incorrect because when the target key doesn't fully match the found node (e.g., node->prefixlen != matchlen), these two nodes may also have the same prefixlen. It will return expected result when the passed key exist in the trie. However when a recently-deleted key or nonexistent key is passed to trie_get_next_key(), it may skip keys and return incorrect result. Fix it by using node->prefixlen == matchlen to identify exact matches. When the condition is true after the search, it also implies node->prefixlen equals key->prefixlen, otherwise, the search would return NULL instead. Fixes: b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map") Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241206110622.1161752-6-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Handle in-place update for full LPM trie correctly

2024-12-14T18:54:31Z

[ Upstream commit 532d6b36b2bfac5514426a97a4df8d103d700d43 ] When a LPM trie is full, in-place updates of existing elements incorrectly return -ENOSPC. Fix this by deferring the check of trie->n_entries. For new insertions, n_entries must not exceed max_entries. However, in-place updates are allowed even when the trie is full. Fixes: b95a5c4db09b ("bpf: add a longest prefix match trie map implementation") Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241206110622.1161752-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Remove unnecessary kfree(im_node) in lpm_trie_update_elem

2024-12-14T18:54:31Z

[ Upstream commit 3d5611b4d7efbefb85a74fcdbc35c603847cc022 ] There is no need to call kfree(im_node) when updating element fails, because im_node must be NULL. Remove the unnecessary kfree() for im_node. Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241206110622.1161752-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Stable-dep-of: 532d6b36b2bf ("bpf: Handle in-place update for full LPM trie correctly") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Handle BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST for LPM trie

2024-12-14T18:54:31Z

[ Upstream commit eae6a075e9537dd69891cf77ca5a88fa8a28b4a1 ] Add the currently missing handling for the BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST flags. These flags can be specified by users and are relevant since LPM trie supports exact matches during update. Fixes: b95a5c4db09b ("bpf: add a longest prefix match trie map implementation") Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241206110622.1161752-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: use kvzmalloc to allocate BPF verifier environment

2024-11-17T14:07:20Z

[ Upstream commit 434247637c66e1be2bc71a9987d4c3f0d8672387 ] The kzmalloc call in bpf_check can fail when memory is very fragmented, which in turn can lead to an OOM kill. Use kvzmalloc to fall back to vmalloc when memory is too fragmented to allocate an order 3 sized bpf verifier environment. Admittedly this is not a very common case, and only happens on systems where memory has already been squeezed close to the limit, but this does not seem like much of a hot path, and it's a simple enough fix. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008170735.16766766@imladris.surriel.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin