user/sven/linux.git/kernel/cpu.c, branch v4.14.83

Revert "x86/speculation: Enable cross-hyperthread spectre v2 STIBP mitigation"

2018-11-23T07:19:27Z

This reverts commit 8a13906ae519b3ed95cd0fb73f1098b46362f6c4 which is commit 53c613fe6349994f023245519265999eed75957f upstream. It's not ready for the stable trees as there are major slowdowns involved with this patch. Reported-by: Jiri Kosina Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: "WoodhouseDavid" Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Tim Chen Cc: "SchauflerCasey" Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/speculation: Enable cross-hyperthread spectre v2 STIBP mitigation

2018-11-13T19:14:47Z

commit 53c613fe6349994f023245519265999eed75957f upstream. STIBP is a feature provided by certain Intel ucodes / CPUs. This feature (once enabled) prevents cross-hyperthread control of decisions made by indirect branch predictors. Enable this feature if - the CPU is vulnerable to spectre v2 - the CPU supports SMT and has SMT siblings online - spectre_v2 mitigation autoselection is enabled (default) After some previous discussion, this leaves STIBP on all the time, as wrmsr on crossing kernel boundary is a no-no. This could perhaps later be a bit more optimized (like disabling it in NOHZ, experiment with disabling it in idle, etc) if needed. Note that the synchronization of the mask manipulation via newly added spec_ctrl_mutex is currently not strictly needed, as the only updater is already being serialized by cpu_add_remove_lock, but let's make this a little bit more future-proof. Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: "WoodhouseDavid" Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Tim Chen Cc: "SchauflerCasey" Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YFH.7.76.1809251438240.15880@cbobk.fhfr.pm Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: Prevent state corruption on error rollback

2018-09-19T20:43:36Z

commit 69fa6eb7d6a64801ea261025cce9723d9442d773 upstream. When a teardown callback fails, the CPU hotplug code brings the CPU back to the previous state. The previous state becomes the new target state. The rollback happens in undo_cpu_down() which increments the state unconditionally even if the state is already the same as the target. As a consequence the next CPU hotplug operation will start at the wrong state. This is easily to observe when __cpu_disable() fails. Prevent the unconditional undo by checking the state vs. target before incrementing state and fix up the consequently wrong conditional in the unplug code which handles the failure of the final CPU take down on the control CPU side. Fixes: 4dddfb5faa61 ("smp/hotplug: Rewrite AP state machine core") Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Tested-by: Sudeep Holla Tested-by: Neeraj Upadhyay Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: jiangshanlai@gmail.com Cc: dzickus@redhat.com Cc: brendan.jackman@arm.com Cc: malat@debian.org Cc: sramana@codeaurora.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1809051419580.1416@nanos.tec.linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman ----

cpu/hotplug: Adjust misplaced smb() in cpuhp_thread_fun()

2018-09-19T20:43:36Z

commit f8b7530aa0a1def79c93101216b5b17cf408a70a upstream. The smp_mb() in cpuhp_thread_fun() is misplaced. It needs to be after the load of st->should_run to prevent reordering of the later load/stores w.r.t. the load of st->should_run. Fixes: 4dddfb5faa61 ("smp/hotplug: Rewrite AP state machine core") Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: jiangshanlai@gmail.com Cc: dzickus@redhat.com Cc: brendan.jackman@arm.com Cc: malat@debian.org Cc: mojha@codeaurora.org Cc: sramana@codeaurora.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1536126727-11629-1-git-send-email-neeraju@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: Non-SMP machines do not make use of booted_once

2018-08-15T16:13:01Z

commit 269777aa530f3438ec1781586cdac0b5fe47b061 upstream. Commit 0cc3cd21657b ("cpu/hotplug: Boot HT siblings at least once") breaks non-SMP builds. [ I suspect the 'bool' fields should just be made to be bitfields and be exposed regardless of configuration, but that's a separate cleanup that I'll leave to the owners of this file for later. - Linus ] Fixes: 0cc3cd21657b ("cpu/hotplug: Boot HT siblings at least once") Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tony Luck Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: Fix SMT supported evaluation

2018-08-15T16:13:00Z

commit bc2d8d262cba5736332cbc866acb11b1c5748aa9 upstream Josh reported that the late SMT evaluation in cpu_smt_state_init() sets cpu_smt_control to CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED in case that 'nosmt' was supplied on the kernel command line as it cannot differentiate between SMT disabled by BIOS and SMT soft disable via 'nosmt'. That wreckages the state and makes the sysfs interface unusable. Rework this so that during bringup of the non boot CPUs the availability of SMT is determined in cpu_smt_allowed(). If a newly booted CPU is not a 'primary' thread then set the local cpu_smt_available marker and evaluate this explicitely right after the initial SMP bringup has finished. SMT evaulation on x86 is a trainwreck as the firmware has all the information _before_ booting the kernel, but there is no interface to query it. Fixes: 73d5e2b47264 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") Reported-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS

2018-08-15T16:12:57Z

commit 73d5e2b472640b1fcdb61ae8be389912ef211bda upstream If SMT is disabled in BIOS, the CPU code doesn't properly detect it. The /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control file shows 'on', and the 'l1tf' vulnerabilities file shows SMT as vulnerable. Fix it by forcing 'cpu_smt_control' to CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED in such a case. Unfortunately the detection can only be done after bringing all the CPUs online, so we have to overwrite any previous writes to the variable. Reported-by: Joe Mario Tested-by: Jiri Kosina Fixes: f048c399e0f7 ("x86/topology: Provide topology_smt_supported()") Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: Set CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED early

2018-08-15T16:12:56Z

commit fee0aede6f4739c87179eca76136f83210953b86 upstream The CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED state is set (if the processor does not support SMT) when the sysfs SMT control file is initialized. That was fine so far as this was only required to make the output of the control file correct and to prevent writes in that case. With the upcoming l1tf command line parameter, this needs to be set up before the L1TF mitigation selection and command line parsing happens. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Jiri Kosina Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180713142323.121795971@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: Expose SMT control init function

2018-08-15T16:12:56Z

commit 8e1b706b6e819bed215c0db16345568864660393 upstream The L1TF mitigation will gain a commend line parameter which allows to set a combination of hypervisor mitigation and SMT control. Expose cpu_smt_disable() so the command line parser can tweak SMT settings. [ tglx: Split out of larger patch and made it preserve an already existing force off state ] Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Jiri Kosina Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180713142323.039715135@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: Online siblings when SMT control is turned on

2018-08-15T16:12:55Z

commit 215af5499d9e2b55f111d2431ea20218115f29b3 upstream Writing 'off' to /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control offlines all SMT siblings. Writing 'on' merily enables the abilify to online them, but does not online them automatically. Make 'on' more useful by onlining all offline siblings. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman